Blinkx Share Discussion Threads

[kendonagasaki] 13/6/2016 23:06

Most encouraging fo67.Most encouraging indeed. Perhaps we can sustain the momentum and gain the traction to stay a step ahead of the rest of the pack?1st Quarter nearly over and i dare to say it's going to be a belter...hopefully!!?

[fo67] 13/6/2016 21:51

Pixalate Top Seller Rankings in Programmatic Advertising for May due out soon?

[kendonagasaki] 13/6/2016 21:01

I hope you have recovered and are well?Tomorrow is another day and I know you will always be forever the optimist?Chin, chin old chap! chin, chin!

[kendonagasaki] 13/6/2016 20:08

If you want to pray........Pray the RSPCA never catches up with JonC??He's going down for life!!

[leluot3] 13/6/2016 18:05

Just as the gimp boasts of another BLUE day!!!

Blinkx remains on a wing and a prayer - though probably just a prayer now!

[jonc] 13/6/2016 16:36

Shocking sub 20p close.

Chart looks awful and set for further major drops.
Sell now IMO.

[cromw3ll] 13/6/2016 16:02

Blnx earnings in dollars?

[football] 13/6/2016 13:51

Should read

Microsoft buying Blinked in for £26?

[kendonagasaki] 13/6/2016 13:49

Consolidation!Microsoft buying linked in for 26 billion?

[kendonagasaki] 12/6/2016 23:31

Sikh is safe everyone!Thank goodness Gehe showed him the 'back door'!Lord have mercy!

[kendonagasaki] 12/6/2016 23:29

Sikh so glad your safe!When I heard about that shooting my heart went out to you!You've got some moves eh?You dark horse you.

[sikhthetech] 12/6/2016 19:59

UK Holding & UK2 were incorporated on 8th & 20th March 2012, respectively...

However, Blinkx bought several companies prior to those incorporation dates... so were they buying using Blinkx UK Limited....

Why the change to create 2 new subsidaries for handling cash and buying...

PVMG was bought Nov 2011, 6 months before the 2 subsidaries were incorporated.... BM was CEO of PVMG company...
Did he advise on to create UK Holding & UK2???


In 2013, blinx reported a huge increase in revenues... so after the new companies were incorporated...coincidence????


Now blinkx have sold assets to RhythmOne LLC - another subsidary...but US based... it's not easy getting accurate info regarding Private US Companies, had problems when trying to find out about LeadImpact LLC...

RhythmOne founded 2004???



The UK sub

[kendonagasaki] 11/6/2016 21:57

fo67, have just read through the links you've posted.Very positive.Perhaps even Sikhthetech may be taking another contrarian punt!He will have to empty his piggy bank this time or he may surely miss the boat?

[begorrah88] 11/6/2016 05:47

Good summary luafc

[fo67] 10/6/2016 23:17

retweeted by SC.

[geheimnis2] 10/6/2016 20:13

Wow nice blue day!

Betcha mr pooey pants is out for a cheeky nandos to celebrate!

[brando69] 10/6/2016 15:22

i believe he said no flowers: just asked for donations to the Retirement Home for Old Gimps

[leluot3] 10/6/2016 15:20

Thanks Brando I must have missed that

Anyone sending flowers?

[luafc] 10/6/2016 15:01

It depends on what you mean by profit, neo26.

blnx likes to discuss losses as adjusted EBITDA profits. Basically a raft of cost is excluded to transform losses. A trustworthy company may do this to unearth underlying trends. blnx on the other hand dispenses with the under in underlying trends to come up with its version of trends and is opaque - IMHO.

There is some interesting debate above between 1gw and sikhthetech that raises questions in relation to the layers of corporate structures.

Historically the company did achieve real profits until dubious practices were cited by the infamous Ben Edelman investment blogger (and never successfully rebutted). The share price then began a heady descent from well over £2 to less than one tenth of that today, a level that isn't even half its launch cost of nine years ago.

Management has been well rewarded for questionable practices and shareholder destruction. They appear to know their and the company's limitations - minimal "true" management shareholder purchases have occurred. Virtually every acquisition made has undergone a material impairment charge. So what odds the company ever making a real profit again? Not impossible, but somewhat lower than 50% in my view.