Beacon Hill Share Discussion Threads

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 19:02

To Vote NO with:


5) MOTLEY FOOL SHARE TRADING

Phone [phone] or email [e-mail] to register your vote in accordance with MFST terms and conditions.

“7.5 If you ask, we will arrange for you to:

• vote by proxy (by telling us how you want the votes to be exercised by the nominee).

• We will only use any rights we have to vote for you when you tell us to do so.”

Link:

hxxps://share-dealing.foolsharedealing.co.uk/Sharedealing/Public/DynamicContent/TMF/TMFShareDealing_TermsandConds.pdf



6) KILLIK & CO

hxxp://www.killik.com/services-and-products/shareowner-services/

• Follow the link

• Sign-up for “shareowner services” at the bottom of the page and follow instructions on how to vote.

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 19:00

To Vote NO with:-


3) INTERACTIVE BROKERS

hxxps://www.interactivebrokers.co.uk/en/main.php#

• Log into Account Management

• Go to Message Center

• Create a New Ticket

• Select category Account Services and sub-category Corporate Actions

• Then place (your share ticker) in title and a brief message explaining that as a shareholder that you'd like to place your votes for the GM/AGM.

• List the resolution and votes.

It’s worth noting that Interactive Brokers doesn't have to vote small holdings and may refuse to register the vote. Some pressure can be brought by claiming that you will consider transferring shares to a broker that can assist in the execution of you basic right as a shareholder. Demand to know why it isn't automated and what the minimum holding is to be sure to have your vote registered. Create enough of a stink and they vote.



4) INTERACTIVE INVESTOR

[...]

• Log into your trading account

• Click in secure messaging

• On the left hand side there is a message facility which tells you of corporate action - in fact you can filter all corporate notifications.

• Send a secure email with the resolution numbers and your vote for or against and Interactive Investor does this for you.

You can telephone on 0845 200 3637 between the hours of 7.45 am and 9.00 pm, Monday to Friday.

Update with regards to Interactive Investor - message from by secure mail:

• We would require you to provide us with your voting instruction by return secure message, or by calling the number below, for any AGM/GM or other meeting, called by a company in which you hold stock in your nominee account.

• We require a minimum of 1 week’s notice of any AGM/GM date in order to guarantee your instruction, and any request given after this period will be done on a best endeavours basis. As an execution-only broker, we do not issue notification or voting forms.

• Should you have any other enquiries then you can continue to write to us by secure message. Our response time is usually 1 working day however, we would appreciate the opportunity to answer your enquiry immediately. You may therefore wish to call us Monday to Friday, from 07:45 am until 9:00 pm on 0845 200 3637.

Further tip on the secure messaging option:

“ Login to your Trading Account and select:

• Secure Message

• Send Secure Message. select ‘Corporation Action’ in What is your enquiry about?

(message) Company name. Meeting event (i.e. AGM/GM). Date of meeting.

Resolutions & Votes (identify a resolution by its number only e.g. 4. Against)

Recommend to copy* message before sending.

Important IF a message was sent in the correct manner a message window will open to confirm it was ‘sent successfully’.

IF NOT the message was not sent. Perhaps the message was simply ‘timed out. Suggest to re-try and to paste it.

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 18:58

sstudd - I am going to copy all the details for all the Brokers courtesy AndytheMKDon on LSE.

All - If you haven't yet registered your vote and don't know how to, please check the following posts for your Broker and it details how you go about it.

To vote NO with:-

1) HARGREAVES LANSDOWN.

• Log into the Hargreaves Lansdown website hxxp://www.hl.co.uk

• On the right hand side on the home page is ‘my accounts’.

• From here you are able to send secure messages.

Send a secure message stating your holding and how you would like to vote on each of the resolutions.

At the end of the secure message and before sending ask for clarification that your vote has been received and cast.

Hargreaves Lansdown 0117 900 9000

HL do seem to provide an efficient service, even advising when the collated votes have been sent off to the company. However, they seem to charge for the voting service so you should check with them what charges may be applied.



2) THE SHARE CENTRE

• You can vote on-line via www.share.com.

• Below your account summary you will see: “click here to see details of forthcoming company meetings”.

• A list of all active meetings will be displayed – click on the on the right hand side to view the meeting details and resolutions

• Record your vote and click on the confirm button to finish. The deadline for each meeting is shown; this is usually 4 working days before the meeting.

The Share Centre usually updates shareholder meetings every Friday and makes all meetings available for on-line voting wherever possible. Check if (your share) is already updated so that you are able to vote straight away.

Your votes are recorded on the total number of shares held across all accounts (ISA, normal trading account etc.) under the same customer number - it makes no difference what type of account they are held in.

If the meeting details are not available on-line or you are unable to vote on-line, please e-mail [e-mail] with your clear instructions or call on 0845 6185180.

Voting is “A simple exercise” according to our correspondent.

[sstudd] 11/12/2014 18:35

Hi, I've registered my 100k shares but can you tell which website address for voting no please.

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 17:41

All - If you buy shares, don't forget to use them to vote NO and keep hold of YOUR company. If the yes vote wins, your shares that are currently probably standing at a loss of 98%, will be then be totally worthless, The reason for the placing is to allow Darwin to sell their holding and take the price down from the new price of 0.0010p on 18th December back down to today's price of 0.0001p, What will your holding be worth then if you let this happen?

The BOD are definitely panicking, hence today's farce. Why are they so keen to get the vote through if the company is worthless by the end of December? It isn't as though the money they are raising is going to last more than a few weeks, so why prolong the agony? There is only one reason and that is that they are going to give your company away to their mates in the hope that they will get to keep their jobs with the new owners. Don't let them get away with. Vote No and make sure you get confirmation that your vote has been registered.

We have everything to play for before the 17th. If we secure the no vote, the BOD will be gone and we can then sell the assets at a price that suits us, not the IIs who currently think they are going to be given it on 17th December. They want what we own, make them pay for it!!!

[librag] 11/12/2014 14:41

Bottom line, risk £4K for break even @ a 10 bagger. Double up and break even at 0.04p. At the moment it costs 0.02 to 0.03p per share. Is this risk worth the gamble of breaking even? It's up to you.

[librag] 11/12/2014 14:37

Bloody hell, what happened there? Sorry!

The columns are out of sync but from left to right, it's number of shares in Millions, resulting average cost per share in pence allowing for your original loss and additional cost in £.

There's no advice intended here. This is just what I'm thinking and doing to get out of this mess. It's a risk, of course.
Q. Would I be buying at this level for a gamble on the future?
A. Yes.

If your answer to the above is No, then walk away from the table.

[librag] 11/12/2014 14:33

Highly geared; good name!

Sorry for the delay.
shares (M) cost per share (p) £
5 0.37 1000
10 0.2 2000
15 0.14 3000
20 0.11 4000
25 0.09 5000
30 0.08 6000
40 0.065 8000
50 0.056 10000
90 0.04 18000

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 13:24

Message from Redbike on LSE

Cutoff time and date -Please read!!
Today 12:59
I contacted BHR today on two issues from that RNS

Issue one, why the shareholder holdings hasn't been updated.
the answer is as the shares have not hit the market yet don't have to until that time.
So the mystery savior that's going to put in 56k for a possibly going to admin company will not be revealed
until that time, but take time to read the second issue.

Issue two, cut off data and time for vote closing (I bet you can guess whats coming)
The latest time and date for the receipt of Forms of Proxy from shareholders is 10.00 a.m. on 15 December 2014.

The shares make it to the market at 08:00 AM that very morning, and the cutoff is 10:00 AM
Please circulate to the other boards, that backs up this mornings that coincidence isn't even considered.
As rightly noted in 24 hours the BOD managed to get this organized due to the no vote and intend to take whats yours if you don't vote, placings are too expensive yet managed one in twenty four hours.
I will put money that the votes are all YES votes too.

Please use your votes, even if you have one share your vote could be that crucial vote that send these people
on their way in the hope that they never hold a position of responsibility in a company.
Why would someone invest 56K in a company that's going to go bust below a placing price?
You decide that, I have my own honest opinions based on the data, a no vote would ensure that they would not hold that position again, so you can help them with a YES as the mystery investor has done or help yourselves with a NO that they wont be able to do this to anyone again.

[humbugg] 11/12/2014 13:23

what a disgusting bunch of crooks. this fundraise needs reporting to the FCA. vote them out now

[highly geared] 11/12/2014 13:18

Libra G; I have 120,000 shares that cost me c. £18k 3 years back (now worth about £5).

How many will I need to subscribe for and at what cost to have a realistic chance of break even... assuming all sorts of things go right?

[librag] 11/12/2014 13:01

This has all the hallmarks of a similar experience I had with a company (ICS) a few years ago. Management tried everything to get rid of PIs including an attempted forced purchase. 97% of votes are needed for that and they failed. I got a 25x bagger a couple of years later.

It's obvious that the moneymen want this company and therefore it's in our interests to maintain a stake. We need 3B shares to equate to 3% of the expected future shares total, which interestingly is almost exactly our 80% share of the original 4B currently.

This will be a game of maintaining a controlling interest to prevent a future enforced share purchase from PIs.

We must all ensure that we keep our shares and add if we can afford it. I just about can and I'll be doing just that. Currently 16M )0.016%) and rising.

Vote yes.

[puphead] 11/12/2014 11:47

they said it is expensive and time consuming to do RI, clearly not any more. look at the number of shares issued (500m) exactly what Shareholders Action Group managed to secure so far.

[katie1234] 11/12/2014 11:02

Vote NO and take action
Today 09:57
BHR did say that it was expensive to do a PI issue, here they have managed it in less than 24 hours.

On 10 December 2014, the Company was notified that a new investor had subscribed for 560,550,000 new ordinary shares of 0.01 pence each in the capital of Beacon Hill (the "Subscription Shares") at a price of 0.01 pence per Subscription Share, to raise £56,055 (approximately US$88,000) before expenses (the "Subscription").

Lets consider at the moment, were being told the company is facing admin if we don't get a YES vote, but incredibly when the NO vote means they will be ousted.
The Board have time in-between non declaration of value of assets requested and preparing for the worst case such as that illusive threat of admin, manage to find time to do all this work, lets face it 56K is not about extending the life of the company or that investment could have waited as we need 15m+, its all about taking your company from you and guaranteed that those shares will be YES votes.

First RNS i have seen like this if its a shares issue RNS, selling a YES vote is just wrong. If any resolution is not passed, such fundraising will not complete and the Company will most likely not have adequate working capital past the end of 2014. The independent directors of the Company (being Justin Farr-Jones, Rowan Karstel and Murray d'Almeida) do not believe that any such funding will be available on a timely basis or at all. If any such alternative sources of potential funding are not available, it is highly likely that the Company will be forced into administration.

Register your vote today for tomorrow you wont have one, even if its ten shares vote with a NO and lets try to regulate companies such as BHR for the good of people invested within them. Many small votes make the big vote and if you think or even know that something isn't right here, please use your votes to stop the company taking it away from you, don't be a victim here in BHR you can genuinely change the outcome of this company. Today BHR is your company, tomorrow it wont be so vote.

PS that 56K is for "used for general working capital purposes" lets consider that as salaries, xmas party, champagne and cuban cigars...as we don't produce coal, allegedly have no assets this seems a strange move
for a company with no value at a time where there are bigger fish to fry than 56k, lets try 15m+. If the company was worthless why would a NO vote scare the people trying to take it. ;-)

[lightfield] 11/12/2014 08:51

o/T AFR on the rise.

Got to be one hell of a bounce coming there from 35p levels. Oil up and dow futures up.

AFR is well well oversold from £1.70 levels.

[htrocka2] 11/12/2014 08:51

Related topic...

[oliversanvil] 11/12/2014 08:18

No not with the trainset and use of Sena line!

[philo124] 11/12/2014 07:56

Going bust then?

[oliversanvil] 10/12/2014 21:29

Train sub leasing win win scenario! Get those trains back! . This is the BODS Insurance. The package deal is at the moment split .Why lease the trains in the first place,Upgrade wash plant first then lease the trains. This is where they got there priorities wrong