NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Ophthalmic International, Inc. (OI) was incorporated in March 1997 in the state of Nevada. The Company had been a wholly owned subsidiary of Coronado Industries, Inc until January 26, 2007 when the Company and its subsidiaries were purchased from Coronado Industries, Inc. for cash and other consideration.
Tari, Inc. (Tari) was incorporated on May 2, 2001 under the laws of the State of Nevada. It is located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company fiscal year end is March 31.
In September, 2009 Tari consummated an Agreement of Share Exchange and Plan of Reorganization (The Agreement) with OI. Pursuant to the Agreement Tari agreed to issue an aggregate of 33,050,000 shares of its restricted common stock to all of the shareholders of OI in exchange for all the issued and outstanding common stock shares of OI.
The exchange of shares has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in the form of a recapitalization with OI as the “accounting acquirer.” Prior to the acquisition, Tari changed its name to SunRidge International, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “SunRidge” or the “Company”). Following the acquisition, OI became the wholly owned subsidiary of SunRidge. SunRidge has adopted a fiscal year end of June 30. Operations after the acquisition have been based in Fountain Hills, Arizona, where the Company manufactures and markets a patented Vacuum Fixation Device and patented suction rings to major medical supply companies and health care providers throughout the world. As a recapitalization, the accompanying financial statements represent the activity of OI.
GOING CONCERN
The Company’s financial statements are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not made an operating profit since 1996. Further, the Company has a working capital deficit of $(791,696) and a negative net worth of $(789,164) as of December 31, 2010, which causes a doubt about the ability of the Company to remain a going concern. As such, the Company’s auditors have expressed a going concern opinion on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects of the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of December 31, 2010 and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the six and three months ended December 31, 2010. Although management believes that the disclosures in these consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission.
The result of operations for the six and three months ended, December 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending June 30, 2011. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the more detailed consolidated financial statements, and the related footnotes thereto, filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010.
SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All material intercompany transactions, accounts and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include, but are not limited to, collectability of accounts receivable, recovery of inventory, depreciable lives, realization of net operating losses, and valuation of stock-based transactions.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents are considered to be all highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three (3) months or less.
INVENTORIES
Inventories consist primarily of materials and parts and are stated at the lower of cost, as determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, or market.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company follows the allowance method of recognizing uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance method recognizes bad debt expense as a percentage of accounts receivable based on a review of the individual accounts outstanding and the Company’s prior history of uncollectible accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the Company has not established an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. The Company does not record interest income on delinquent receivable balances until it is received. Accounts receivable are generally unsecured.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to operations as incurred. Betterments or renewals are capitalized when incurred. Depreciation is provided using accelerated methods over the following useful lives:
Office furniture & Equipment
|
5 – 7 Years
|
Machinery
|
5 – 7 Years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
5 Years
|
LONG LIVED ASSETS
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are provided on an asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing loss to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The effect of the recapitalization is included in all periods presented.
Assumed conversion of convertible promissory notes for approximately 150,000 shares at December 31, 2010 has been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share as its effect would be anti-dilutive (decreases the loss per share). In addition, as the Company has a net loss available to common stockholders for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the diluted EPS calculation has been excluded from the financial statements. As of December 31, 2010 there were no dilutive securities outstanding.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying values of our financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities approximated their respective fair values at each balance sheet date due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
There have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the six months ended December 31, 2010, that are of significance, or potential significance, to us, except as discussed below.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on revenue recognition for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and addresses how to separate deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The Company has adopted the guidance which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, our price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on our standard products when title passes to the customer upon shipment. The standard products do not have customer acceptance criteria. The Company has standard rights of return that are accounted for as a warranty provision, although it is deemed immaterial at this time. The Company does not have any price protection agreements or other post shipment obligations. For custom equipment where customer acceptance is part of the sales agreement, revenue will be recognized when the customer has accepted the product. In cases where custom equipment does not have customer acceptance as part of the sales agreement, revenue will be recognized upon shipment, as long as the system meets the specifications as agreed upon with the customer.
SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 – DEBT AND DEBT CONVERSION
For the 2nd quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued $32,600 of promissory notes. These promissory notes were for a duration of three months with an interest rate of 10% for the term and a default rate of 12%.
The Company offered the promissory note holders the opportunity to convert their principal and accrued interest into restricted common stock of the Company at various times during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
Conversions took place between October through December 2010, at the closing bid stock prices between $.08 and $.145 per share, and converted $21,303 of principal and interest.
NOTE 4 – EQUITY
Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2010, our authorized preferred stock is 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with par value of $0.001 per share. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to divide the preferred stock shares into series and to fix the voting powers, designation, preference, and relative participating, option or other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of the shares of any series so established. The Company has issued no preferred stock shares as of December 31, 2010.
Common Stock
In September 2009, Tari, Inc. completed a 5-for-1 forward stock split which brought the shares outstanding of Tari, Inc. from 3,890,000 to 19,450,000. The 5-for-1 forward split has been accounted for retroactively for all periods presented.
The President of Tari, Inc. then contributed 12,500,000 shares of common stock to the Company as part of the exchange of shares with OI, leaving 6,950,000 shares outstanding prior to the merger.
In September, 2009, Tari consummated an Agreement of Share Exchange and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”) with OI. Pursuant to the Agreement, Tari agreed to issue an aggregate of 33,050,000 shares of its restricted common stock to all of the shareholders of OI in exchange for all the issued and outstanding common stock of OI.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010 the following equity transactions took place:
The Company issued 611,269 shares of common stock totaling $66,500 to various consultants and vendors for services performed.
The Company also issued 190,736 of shares of common stock totaling $21,303 to various note holders for payment of principal and interest.
The Company received $87,650 for the issuance of 1,995,409 shares of common stock.
NOTE 5 – LOSS ON STOCK ISSUANCES
The Company’s promissory note holders were given an incentive to convert the promissory notes to common stock by issuing the stock at a discount from the closing bid trade price. Also, certain consultants were paid in common stock at a discount from the closing bid trade price. As such, the Company recorded a loss on stock issuances of $171,234 on 2,797,414 shares of stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2010.
SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, G. Richard Smith, the Company's President and a Director, loaned the Company an additional $26,100 and was repaid $37,128. This debt bears an interest rate of 10% for the term and 12% default per annum thereafter and is currently due on demand. At December 31, 2010, G. Richard Smith was owed $184,577 by the Company.
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company entered into a non-cancelable lease agreement for office space in Fountain Hills, Arizona commencing December 1, 2004, through December 15, 2009. Monthly rental payments were $4,520. After the lease expired, the Company extended the lease to December 31, 2010, at a monthly rate of $4,520. There is no immediate plan to sign a new rental agreement. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had been delinquent in its rent payments. In order to make up past due payments, the Company issued a promissory note dated January 27, 2010 to convert $70,309 in rent and related late and legal fees into a note to pay $17,627 in four quarterly payments for a total principal amount of $70,309, including interest at 12% per annum after July 1, 2010.
The balance of the note as of December 31, 2010 was: $31,554, including accrued interest.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had amended their lease agreement. The new agreement extends the term of the lease to January 1, 2011 through January 1, 2013. There is no January 2011 lease payment. The base rent for February 2011 through January 2012 will be $4,500 per month, with $3,000 going towards the current rent and $1,500 applied to the note balance. The base rent for February 2012 through January 2013 shall be $4,500 per month, with $3,500 going towards current rent and $1,000 applied to the note balance.
Indemnification
The Company has agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences that may arise as a result of the officer or director serving in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. However, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal and has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.
Contingent Liability
The Company had a consulting agreement with Francesco Aspes whereby a clause stated that the Company would reimburse Mr. Aspes for documented expenses, up to a maximum of 80,000 euros (or $109,000 USD currently). There is a claim by Mr. Aspes for the maximum amount, however, the Company believes that it is more than reasonably possible that the reimbursement claim is unenforceable. As such, there is no accrued expense related to the potential reimbursement, as no underlying documentation in support of this claim has been received.
SUNRIDGE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Litigation
On December 16, 2009, our patent attorneys, Meschkow & Gresham, P.L.C., filed a lawsuit (CV 2009-037698) in the Superior Court for Maricopa County, Arizona against the Company and Mr. Richard Smith for breach of contract in the failure to pay for legal services in the amount of $12,063 plus costs and legal fees. Our answer to the complaint admitted that legal services had been provided but claimed no knowledge of the value of those services. This case was transferred to arbitration and an award was rendered in the amount of $8,064 against G. Richard Smith, our President and Director, his wife, Karen Smith and the Ophthalmic International, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, plus court costs of $453 and attorney fees of $1,500. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, this arbitration award proceeded to judgment against the parties.
During our fiscal fourth quarter 2010, Charles E. Brokup filed a lawsuit (CV 2010-054295) in Superior Court for Maricopa County, Arizona against Ophthalmic International, Inc. and Mr. G. Richard Smith for breach of promise to pay $10,000 principal on a promissory note and $1,000 per month in interest. Our answer to the complaint admitted that the principal amount of $10,000 was owed but denies that more than legal interest is owed after the first month expressly stated interest of $1,000.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Francesco Aspes, our former European marketing consultant, filed a lawsuit (CV 2010-028530) in the Superior Court for Maricopa County, Arizona against the Company for failure to pay him $180,000 of employee wages earned previously plus 80,000 Euros of expenses incurred as an employee of the Company. Our answer to this complaint disputes the 80,000 Euros of expense because the complaint contained no accounting of these expenses. As to the matter of $180,000 of employees wages, our answer alleges this employee obtained our agreement to pay this sum through duress and bad faith and this employee ceased working on our behalf previously.
The plaintiff in this case has filed a Motion For Summary Judgment to which we have responded that there are facts still to be determined at trial. No decision has been made yet by the Court on this motion.
NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Between January 1, 2011 and February 22, 2011, the Company issued the following restricted common stock: (i) 85,000 shares for $4,250 of services; (ii) 351,307 shares in conversion of $23,952 of debt and accrued interest; (iii) 288,904 shares for $11,100 cash. These sales were made without public solicitation. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid on these sales of securities.