Neuberger BM RE (NYSE:NRL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2019 to Jul 2024
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Income Fund Inc. (NYSE: NRL) announced that
the federal district court for the District of Maryland issued a
Declaratory Judgment Order in the case Neuberger Berman Real Estate
Income Fund Inc. v. Lola Brown Trust No. 1B et al., 04-cv-03056
(AMD).
Judge Andre M. Davis held that NRL’s adoption
of successive rights agreements “with the
purpose and effect of defeating the tender offer at issue in this case,
does not violate federal or state law or plaintiff’s
charter,” thus upholding NRL’s
“poison pill”
defense. The court also upheld NRL’s
interpretation of the scope of any exemption for Lola Brown Trust No. 1B
(the “Trust”) under
the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (the “MCSAA”),
ruling that the Trust could vote the NRL shares it held at the time NRL
opted into the MCSAA, but that the Trust “may
vote any shares it acquired after [NRL’s]
opt-in on September 23, 2004, or it hereafter acquires, only with the
approval of two-thirds of disinterested shareholders of (NRL), as
provided in that statute.” Finally, the court
held that “Lola Brown Trust No. 1B is not an
investment company and is not a constituent entity of an investment
company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended, and is not prohibited by section 12(d) thereof from owning more
than 3% of the outstanding voting shares of a registered investment
company.”
The Declaratory Judgment Order did not address all pending claims in the
litigation. The court stated that it would issue an opinion shortly.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this release that look forward in time involve risks
and uncertainties and are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such risks and
uncertainties include, without limitation, the adverse effect from a
decline in the securities markets or a decline in the Fund’s
performance, a general downturn in the economy, competition from other
funds, changes in government policy or regulation, inability of the Fund’s
investment advisor to attract or retain key employees, inability of the
Fund’s investment advisor to implement its
investment strategy, inability of the Fund to manage unforeseen costs
and other effects related to legal proceedings or investigations of
governmental and self-regulatory organizations.