Indymac Bancorp (NYSE:IMB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2019 to Jun 2024
Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (“Coughlin
Stoia”) (http://www.csgrr.com/cases/indymac/)
today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf
of purchasers of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (“IndyMac”)
(NYSE:IMB) common stock during the period between August 16, 2007 and
May 12, 2008 (the “Class Period”).
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later
than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any
questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please
contact plaintiff’s counsel, Darren Robbins of
Coughlin Stoia at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@csgrr.com.
If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint
as filed or join this class action online at http://www.csgrr.com/cases/indymac/.
Any member of the purported class may move the Court to serve as lead
plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing
and remain an absent class member.
The complaint charges IndyMac and certain of its officers and directors
with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. IndyMac is the
holding company for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., a hybrid thrift/mortgage bank.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued
materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s
business and financial results. Specifically, defendants downplayed and
concealed IndyMac’s growing exposure to
non-performing assets, particularly loans in its pay-option
adjustable-rate mortgage (“Option ARM”)
and homebuilder construction portfolios, and made numerous positive
representations regarding the Company’s
capital position to alleviate investors’
fears concerning the Company’s capital
erosion. As a result of defendants’ false
statements, IndyMac stock traded at artificially inflated prices during
the Class Period, reaching a Class Period high of $24.55 per share in
October 2007.
Then on May 12, 2008, IndyMac announced its first quarter 2008 financial
results, including a net loss of $184.2 million, or ($2.27) per share,
compared with net earnings of $52.4 million, or $0.70 per share, in the
first quarter of 2007. On this news, IndyMac’s
stock dropped to close at $2.32 per share – a
two-day decline of $1.11 per share, or 32%, and a decline of 91% from
$24.55 per share on October 2, 2007.
According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the
defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class
Period, were as follows: (a) the Company was not adequately reserving
for its losses on mortgage-related assets in violation of generally
accepted accounting principles; (b) the Company had far greater exposure
to anticipated losses and defaults concerning its book of business
related to its homebuilder and Option ARM portfolios than it had
previously disclosed; (c) the Company’s
capital base was not adequate enough to withstand the significant
deterioration in the credit and real estate markets and could jeopardize
the Company’s status as “well
capitalized;” (d) IndyMac had not adequately
reserved for Option ARMs; and (e) given the Company’s
exposure to the increased volatility in the credit and real estate
markets, the Company had no reasonable basis to make projections about
its earnings.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of
IndyMac common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”).
The plaintiff is represented by Coughlin Stoia, which has expertise in
prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions
involving financial fraud.
Coughlin Stoia, a 190-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San
Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C.,
Philadelphia and Atlanta, is active in major litigations pending in
federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a
leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors,
consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations.
The Coughlin Stoia Web site (http://www.csgrr.com)
has more information about the firm.