Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against Satcon Technology Corporation

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) (http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/satcon/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of purchasers of Satcon Technology Corp. (“Satcon”) (NASDAQ:SATC) common stock during the period between March 4, 2010 and July 5, 2011 (the “Class Period”).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff’s counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at [e-mail]. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/satcon/. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges Satcon and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Satcon is a leading provider of utility-grade power conversion solutions for the renewable energy markets in the United States and internationally.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business practices and financial results. Specifically, defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose the following adverse facts: (a) that the Company was experiencing a decrease in sales of its inverter systems; (b) that the Company’s European market was performing below internal expectations due to changes in government incentives for solar energy; (c) that the Company failed to properly account for its inventory; and (d) as a result of the foregoing, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company and its prospects.

On February 22, 2011, Satcon announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and year end of 2010. With regard to the Company’s outlook for the first quarter of 2011, defendants stated that they expected “ revenues to be in the range of $65 to $70 million with our gross margin between 25% to 27%.” In reaction to the announcement, the price of Satcon stock fell $1.29 per share, or 27%, to close at $3.54 per share, on heavy trading volume. On April 7, 2011, Satcon announced its preliminary financial results for the first quarter of 2011. For the quarter, the Company revised its guidance and stated that revenue would be between $61 million and $63 million and gross margins would be within a range of 23% to 25%. In reaction to this announcement, the price of Satcon stock fell $0.23 per share, or 7%, to close at $3.29 per share.

On April 27, 2011, Satcon announced its financial results for the first quarter of 2011, the period ended March 31, 2011, and its guidance for the second quarter. With regard to the guidance, defendants stated that they expected “revenue to be in the range of $50 to $60 million.” Then on July 5, 2011, the Company announced preliminary financial results for the second quarter of 2011. For the quarter, the Company expected revenue to be between $45 million and $47 million due to “changes in government incentives in the company’s higher margin markets in Europe as well as delays on a few projects that have been pushed into the third quarter.” Moreover, the Company announced that its gross margin estimate would be “between 7% and 11%, below the company’s previously announced guidance of 17% to 20%” due to the “lower revenue range, and the effects of the slowdown in the European market. Lastly, the Company announced that it was reducing its workforce by 15%. In reaction to these announcements, the price of Satcon stock fell $0.59 per share, or 23%, to close at $1.95 per share, on heavy trading volume.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of Satcon common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Robbins Geller, a 180-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San Francisco, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and Atlanta, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. The Robbins Geller Web site (http://www.rgrdlaw.com) has more information about the firm.