Quarterly Report (10-q)

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

Or

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 001-15795

 

RENTECH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Colorado		84-0957421
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1000 Potomac Street NW, 5th Floor

Washington, DC 20007

(Address of principal executive offices)

[phone]

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ☐     No   ☒

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2017 was 23,211,780.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Form 10-Q

Table of Contents

 

Part I — Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited):	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	46
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	47
Part II — Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	48
Item 6.	Exhibits	48
Signatures		49

 

 

2

---

 

PART I. FINANCI AL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash		$	19,048			$	28,319
Accounts receivable, including unbilled revenue			6,759				12,490
Inventories			24,075				28,131
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,505				3,744
Other receivables			3,223				4,495
Total current assets			56,610				77,179
Property, plant and equipment, net			105,258				117,565
Construction in progress			1,597				905
Other assets
Equity investment			25,085				53,335
Goodwill			15,451				28,576
Intangible assets			26,297				31,227
Deposits and other assets			1,963				3,930
Total other assets			68,796				117,068
Total assets		$	232,261			$	312,717
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		$	11,468			$	12,389
Accrued payroll and benefits			3,692				4,529
Accrued liabilities			12,319				16,836
Deferred revenue			2,240				1,730
Current portion of long term debt			15,879				11,237
Accrued interest			455				301
Other			1,394				1,628
Liabilities of discontinued operations			—				150
Total current liabilities			47,447				48,800
Long-term liabilities
Debt			96,525				103,733
Earn-out consideration			113				234
Asset retirement obligation			252				245
Deferred income taxes			7,566				7,826
Other			1,485				1,761
Total long-term liabilities			105,941				113,799
Total liabilities			153,388				162,599
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock: $10 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; 90 series A convertible preferred shares    authorized and issued; no shares outstanding and $0 liquidation preference			—				—
Series C participating cumulative preferred stock: $10 par value; 500 shares authorized; no shares    issued and outstanding			—				—
Common stock: $.01 par value; 45,000 shares authorized; 23,212 and 23,200 shares issued and outstanding    at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively			232				232
Additional paid-in capital			534,132				533,575
Accumulated deficit			(434,031	)			(362,696	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(24,007	)			(23,533	)
Total Rentech stockholders' equity			76,326				147,578
Noncontrolling interests			2,547				2,540
Total equity			78,873				150,118
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	232,261			$	312,717

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

3

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(Unaudited)
Revenues
Product sales		$	11,039			$	16,336			$	27,274			$	39,652
Service revenues			13,699				15,457				29,685				32,078
Total revenues			24,738				31,793				56,959				71,730
Cost of sales
Product			12,881				20,655				32,081				47,158
Service			12,534				12,817				26,300				26,120
Total cost of sales			25,415				33,472				58,381				73,278
Gross loss			(677	)			(1,679	)			(1,422	)			(1,548	)
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative expense			6,146				7,742				14,830				16,856
Depreciation and amortization			453				775				1,077				1,783
Asset impairment			—				—				7,759				—
Goodwill impairment			—				—				13,125				—
Other expense, net			348				1,651				361				1,664
Total operating expenses			6,947				10,168				37,152				20,303
Operating loss			(7,624	)			(11,847	)			(38,574	)			(21,851	)
Other expense, net
Interest expense			(2,520	)			(2,511	)			(4,917	)			(6,083	)
Loss on debt repayment			—				(3,295	)			—				(3,295	)
Other income (expense)			207				367				(1,137	)			513
Total other expenses, net			(2,313	)			(5,439	)			(6,054	)			(8,865	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in    loss of investee			(9,937	)			(17,286	)			(44,628	)			(30,716	)
Income tax benefit			(26	)			(9,705	)			(1,250	)			(12,107	)
Loss from continuing operations before equity in loss of    investee			(9,911	)			(7,581	)			(43,378	)			(18,609	)
Equity in loss of investee			27,212				1,360				28,130				1,360
Loss from continuing operations			(37,123	)			(8,941	)			(71,508	)			(19,969	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax			—				305,100				96				310,674
Net income (loss)			(37,123	)			296,159				(71,412	)			290,705
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			66				(157	)			77				(3,563	)
Loss on redemption of preferred stock			—				(11,049	)			—				(11,049	)
Preferred stock dividends			—				—				—				(1,320	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	(37,057	)		$	284,953			$	(71,335	)		$	274,773
Net income (loss) per common share allocated to Rentech common    shareholders:
Basic:
Continuing operations		$	(1.60	)		$	(0.87	)		$	(3.08	)		$	(1.41	)
Discontinued operations		$	0.00			$	12.89			$	0.00			$	12.99
Net income (loss)		$	(1.60	)		$	12.05			$	(3.07	)		$	11.61
Diluted:
Continuing operations		$	(1.60	)		$	(0.87	)		$	(3.08	)		$	(1.41	)
Discontinued operations		$	0.00			$	12.89			$	0.00			$	12.99
Net income (loss)		$	(1.60	)		$	12.05			$	(3.07	)		$	11.61
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per common    share:
Basic			23,211				23,067				23,206				23,051
Diluted			23,211				23,067				23,206				23,051

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(Unaudited)
Net income (loss)		$	(37,123	)		$	296,159			$	(71,412	)		$	290,705
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation			(407	)			(230	)			(474	)			7,254
Other comprehensive income (loss)			(407	)			(230	)			(474	)			7,254
Comprehensive income (loss)			(37,530	)			295,929				(71,886	)			297,959
Less: net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			66				(157	)			77				(3,563	)
Less: other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests			—				—				—				—
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Rentech		$	(37,464	)		$	295,772			$	(71,809	)		$	294,396

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

5

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

																		Accumulated				Total
										Additional								Other				Rentech								Total
		Common Stock								Paid-in				Accumulated				Comprehensive				Stockholders'				Noncontrolling				Stockholders'
		Shares				Amount				Capital				Deficit				Income (Loss)				Equity   (Deficit)				Interests				Equity (Deficit)
		(Unaudited)
Balance, December 31, 2015			23,033			$	230			$	543,724			$	(531,971	)		$	(27,204	)		$	(15,221	)		$	(65,199	)		$	(80,420	)
Sale of investment in RNP			—				—				—				—				—				—				67,638				67,638
Common stock issued for services			125				2				(2	)			—				—				—				—				—
Loss on redemption of preferred stock			—				—				(11,049	)			—				—				(11,049	)			—				(11,049	)
Dividends - preferred stock			—				—				(1,320	)			—				—				(1,320	)			—				(1,320	)
Distributions to noncontrolling    interests			—				—				—				—				—				—				(3,345	)			(3,345	)
Equity-based compensation expense			—				—				1,303				—				—				1,303				—				1,303
Restricted stock units			31				—				(27	)			—				—				(27	)			—				(27	)
Net income			—				—				—				287,142				—				287,142				3,563				290,705
Other comprehensive income			—				—				—				—				7,254				7,254				—				7,254
Other			—				—				164				—				(283	)			(119	)			(2	)			(121	)
Balance, June 30, 2016			23,189			$	232			$	532,793			$	(244,829	)		$	(20,233	)		$	267,963			$	2,655			$	270,618
Balance, December 31, 2016			23,200			$	232			$	533,575			$	(362,696	)		$	(23,533	)		$	147,578			$	2,540			$	150,118
Common stock issued for services			6				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Equity-based compensation expense			—				—				644				—				—				644				—				644
Restricted stock units			6				—				(2	)			—				—				(2	)			—				(2	)
Net loss			—				—				—				(71,335	)			—				(71,335	)			(77	)			(71,412	)
Other comprehensive loss			—				—				—				—				(474	)			(474	)			—				(474	)
Other			—				—				(85	)			—				—				(85	)			84				(1	)
Balance, June 30, 2017			23,212			$	232			$	534,132			$	(434,031	)		$	(24,007	)		$	76,326			$	2,547			$	78,873

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

6

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

 

		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016
		(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)		$	(71,412	)		$	290,705
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Income from discontinued operations			(96	)			(310,674	)
Non-cash equity in loss of investee			28,106				1,329
Depreciation and amortization			6,996				11,296
Asset impairment			7,759				—
Goodwill impairment			13,125				—
Non-cash effect of tax benefit			(54	)			(12,107	)
Utilization of spare parts			395				963
Write-down of inventory			3,302				10,298
Loss on disposal of fixed assets			361				1,664
Loss on debt repayment			—				3,295
Change in deferred taxes			(259	)			32,021
Non-cash interest expense			410				314
Equity-based compensation			644				1,153
Other			(316	)			(381	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			5,760				(5,295	)
Other receivables			1,426				682
Inventories			318				(14,639	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			2,220				687
Accounts payable			(1,154	)			(3,126	)
Deferred revenue			505				629
Accrued interest			148				(44	)
Accrued liabilities, accrued payroll and other			(5,002	)			3,834
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations			(6,818	)			12,604
Cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations			—				(23,672	)
Net cash used in operating activities			(6,818	)			(11,068	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures			(4,444	)			(7,716	)
Proceeds from disposal of assets			5,219				2,442
Distributions received from equity investment			—				1,941
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations			775				(3,333	)
Cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations			—				17,797
Net cash provided by investing activities			775				14,464
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from debt and credit facilities			7,754				23,815
Payments and retirement of debt			(11,087	)			(14,227	)
Redemption of preferred stock			—				(10,000	)
Dividends to preferred stockholders			—				(1,500	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests			—				(3,345	)
Other			(2	)			(11	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(3,335	)			(5,268	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash			107				344
Decrease in cash			(9,271	)			(1,528	)
Cash, beginning of period - continuing operations			28,319				33,119
Cash, beginning of period - discontinued operations			—				15,823
Cash, end of period			19,048				47,414
Cash from discontinued operations, end of period			—				—
Cash from continuing operations, end of period		$	19,048			$	47,414

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)

(Continued from previous page)

Excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows were the effects of certain non-cash investing and financing activities as follows:  

 

		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016
		(Unaudited)
Purchase of property, plant, equipment and construction in progress in accounts payable and    accrued liabilities		$	383			$	6,002
Receipt of CVR common units			—				202,145
Derecognition of net liabilities of RNP			—				(197,469	)
Transfer of CVR common units to repurchase preferred stock			—				(97,083	)
Transfer of CVR common units to repay debt			—				(45,036	)
Derecognition of net assets of Pasadena Facility			—				8,894
Distribution receivable			144				—
Issuance of additional shares to noncontrolling interests			84				—
Increase in QS Construction Facility obligation			65				59

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

8

---

 

RENTECH, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Rentech, Inc. (“Rentech”) and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in compliance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Neither authority requires all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2017, and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rentech, its wholly owned subsidiaries and all subsidiaries in which Rentech directly or indirectly owns a controlling financial interest. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or any other reporting period. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 7, 2017 (the “Annual Report”).

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Liquidity & Going Concern

We have a history of operating losses and an accumulated deficit of $434.0 million as of June 30, 2017. We believe we have sufficient liquidity from cash on hand, expected working capital and other expected sources to fund operations and corporate activities through calendar year 2017, but we may have costs associated with maintaining the wood pellet production facility located in Wawa, Ontario (the “Wawa Facility”) in an idle state, pursuing strategic alternatives with respect to Rentech, Inc. and its operating businesses and other events that could arise that could increase our liquidity needs in 2017. We may need additional liquidity to fund corporate activities in 2018. As a result of the above, there exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date of the issuance of our financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Management’s plans to address these concerns are discussed below. 

We are attempting to address our liquidity needs through a combination of cost reductions within our businesses and pursuing strategic alternatives. In February 2017, we announced the idling of the Wawa Facility to conserve liquidity as we explore strategic alternatives for the facility. We also announced our plan to address potential liquidity needs by considering strategic alternatives for the Company as a whole that may include, but are not limited to, a sale of us, a merger or other business combination, a sale of all or a material portion of our assets, restructuring or a recapitalization. The Company’s pursuit of an option in its review of strategic alternatives may lead to or result in future goodwill or asset impairments in its financial statements. We have retained Wells Fargo Securities, LLC to assist in the strategic alternatives review process.  

We expect our New England Wood Pellet, LLC (“NEWP”) and Fulghum Fibres, Inc. (“Fulghum”) businesses to generate positive cash flow and be self-sufficient from a liquidity perspective in 2017; however, there can be no assurance that either business will perform in line with our expectations. We expect the wood pellet production facility located in Atikokan, Ontario (the “Atikokan Facility”) to generate cash flow in the range of break-even to slightly positive under the revised operating plan to produce 45,000 metric tons of wood pellets per year. We expect that NEWP will need to renew its $6 million revolving credit facility in August 2017 to address seasonal working capital needs, but there can be no assurance the revolving credit facility will be renewed on acceptable terms. NEWP received a waiver from TD Bank for a failure to meet its financial covenants for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017. We expect that NEWP will need similar waivers during the next two calendar quarters. In the event we are unable to obtain the waivers from NEWP’s lender, the lender could exercise remedies against NEWP under the loan documents, including accelerating the debt so that it becomes due on demand. A default of the NEWP indebtedness would trigger a cross default of other indebtedness of the Company. On May 5, 2017, Fulghum consummated the sale of the two chip mills resulting in net proceeds of $5.1 million that was paid by Fulghum to Rentech mostly in satisfaction of intercompany balances. The Company was required to offer the net proceeds of the sale as a prepayment of its debt under the GSO Credit Agreement, as defined in Note 5 — Fair Value . In June 2017, the Company paid down the GSO Credit Agreement by $5.1 million.  

9

---

 

In August 2017,  Fulghum was notified by a customer of the exercise of its purchase option for six of Fulghum’s chip mills. The parties are in discussions to enter into new operating agreements for Fulghum to continue to operate the mills on terms similar to operating agreements at other Fulghum mills when Fulghum transfer s the asset ownership to the customer . When the sale of the mills is consummated, the Company expects to receive a one-time cash payment of approximately $5.0 million. The sales proceeds will be used to pay off any underlying debt on the purchased mills wi th any remaining proceeds being offered to GSO Capital Partners LP as a prepayment of the GSO Credit Agreement.

Our subsidiaries can distribute cash to us, although restrictions in our debt agreements may restrict such distributions. Under the GSO Credit Agreement we are required to maintain at least $5 million of cash on hand, including cash available for distribution from our subsidiaries. Under the NEWP credit facility, NEWP must receive the lender’s prior approval before making any cash distributions to Rentech, and the lender may not provide such approval. NEWP is also required to comply with financial performance covenants in its debt agreements. These covenants include maintaining: (i) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.4 to 1.0 on a trailing four quarter basis, (ii) a senior debt coverage ratio of less than 3.0 to 1.0 on a trailing four quarter basis and (iii) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.2 to 1.0 calculated at the end of each calendar year. As of June 30, 2017, NEWP required a waiver from its lender as it was not in compliance with the minimum debt service coverage ratio due to lower sales volumes and additional costs relating to scaling back production at the facilities. We expect NEWP to require similar waivers over the next two quarters, which their inability to obtain such waivers could trigger a cross default of other indebtedness of the Company. Fulghum is required to comply with the financial performance covenants in its debt agreements. These covenants include maintaining (i) a minimum cash flow coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0, measured on a consolidated basis for Fulghum and its domestic subsidiaries and collectively for selected projects and (ii) a minimum tangible net worth of no less than $11.28 million plus 50% of the net income of Fulghum from and after December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2017, Fulghum was in compliance with its financial covenants. In the event that Fulghum does not comply with these covenants, the debt agreements do not permit it to make cash distributions to Rentech. In the event that NEWP or Fulghum is not permitted to make cash distributions to Rentech, these restrictions would limit Rentech’s ability to access and use cash from its operating subsidiaries to fund its corporate activities and operations. A failure to comply with the debt agreements described above also could constitute an event of default, which would give rise to the right of the applicable lenders to seek remedies against NEWP or Fulghum, as applicable.

There is no assurance that the strategic review process will result in a transaction, that we will achieve the cost savings we expect, that an event resulting in the acceleration of our indebtedness or otherwise requiring additional liquidity will not occur or that we will not require an additional source of funds. If we require additional capital and are unable to obtain it, there would be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

 

 

Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance that replaces the current lower of cost or market method of measurement for inventory with a lower of cost and net realizable value measurement. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance on how to assess whether contingent call (put) options that accelerate the payment on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures. 

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance on stock-based compensation, which modifies certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income taxes, classification of awards, and classification on the statements of cash flows. This guidance will require recognizing excess tax benefits and deficiencies (that result from an increase or decrease in the value of an award from grant date to the vesting date or exercise date) on share-based compensation arrangements in the tax provision, instead of in equity as under the current guidance. In addition, these amounts will be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows, instead of as a financing activity. The Company does not have any material unrecorded excess tax benefits. In addition, cash paid for shares withheld to satisfy employee taxes will be classified as a financing activity, instead of as an operating activity. Cash paid for employee taxes was $2,300 and $26,700 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company adopted the new guidance in the first quarter of 2017 as follows:

•

Regarding excess tax benefits and deficiencies, the guidance required prospective adoption for the statement of income and allowed for either prospective or retrospective adoption for the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to prospectively adopt the effect to the statement of cash flows.

10

---

 

•

Cash paid for shares withheld to satisfy employee taxes of $26,700 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was classified as a use in financing activities in the Consolidated Sta tements of Cash Flows. The guidance required retrospective adoption; accordingly, a $26,700 use was reclassified from an operating activity to a financing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance that eliminates the requirement to determine implied goodwill in measuring an impairment loss, making this guidance preferable to the former guidance, which required a two-step goodwill impairment test. Upon adoption, a goodwill impairment will be measured as the excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value over fair value, limited to the amount of goodwill. This guidance is effective for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. As early adoption of the guidance is permitted, the Company has elected to implement the guidance in this report. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

Accounting Pronouncements Issued

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued guidance that will significantly enhance comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date making the guidance effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In addition, the FASB will continue to permit entities to early adopt the guidance for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. The Company currently expects to adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. The Company’s evaluation of the guidance is ongoing and not complete. The FASB has issued and may issue in the future, interpretative guidance, which may cause our evaluation to change. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this guidance and the potential impact, if any, on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures. To date, the Company has not identified any material differences in its existing revenue recognition methods that would require modification under the new guidance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an update to its guidance on lease accounting. This update revises accounting for operating leases by a lessee, among other changes, and requires a lessee to recognize a liability to make lease payments and an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term in the balance sheet. The distinction between finance and operating leases has not significantly changed and the update does not significantly change the effect of finance and operating leases on the statement of operations. The new guidance is effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. At adoption, this update will be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.  

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this guidance and the potential impact, if any, on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosure.

In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory to be recognized when the transfer occurs instead of when the asset is sold to an outside party. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The guidance is required to be adopted retrospectively by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the adoption period. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this guidance and the potential impact, if any, on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosure.

In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. This guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the provisions of this guidance and the potential impact, if any, on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosure.  

 

 

Note 3 — Investment in CVR

The Company owns approximately 7.2 million common units of CVR Partners, L.P. (“CVR”) (“CVR Common Units”). The 7.2 million CVR Common Units were valued at $60.1 million, based on CVR’s closing price of $8.36 per Common Unit as of March 31, 2016. The 7.2 million CVR Common Units had a market value of $25.1 million, based on CVR’s closing price of $3.49 per Common Unit as of June 30, 2017. The investment in CVR is shown on the consolidated balance sheets under equity investment.  

11

---

 

The investment in CVR is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company utilizes the equity method to account for investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financi al policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when an investor possesses 3% to 5% or more ownership of a limited partnership. The Company’s ownership in CVR represents approximately 6% of the total CVR Common Units outstanding, which is based on total CVR Common Units outstanding at June 30, 2017 of 113,282,973.

In applying the equity method, the Company recorded the investment at fair value and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying amount of the investment by its proportionate share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income of the investee. The Company records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment. The investment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment charge would only be recognized in earnings for a decline in value that is determined to be other than temporary.

As of June 30, 2017, the carrying value, before impairment charges, and fair value of the Company’s investment in CVR Common Units were $51.8 million and $25.1 million, respectively. Historically, there have been differentials between the carrying values and fair values. Given these differentials, the Company had been closely monitoring the performance of CVR to determine whether the investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company considered a variety of factors in its impairment analysis, including the historical volatility in the price of CVR units, the seasonality of the fertilizer industry in which CVR operates and recent public statements made by CVR’s management regarding CVR’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and their future expectations. The Company concluded that the decline in value of the CVR Common Units is other than temporary from an accounting perspective and therefore an impairment to the investment is required as of June 30, 2017. Therefore, as of June 30, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment to the investment of $26.7 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded its proportionate share of loss from its investment in CVR of $ 0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively. In addition, as of the date of the Company’s investment in CVR, basis differences between the book value of equity on CVR’s balance sheet and the amount recorded on the Company’s books was ascribed to an asset and amortized over its useful life, which resulted in an additional expense of $ 0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. The total of the impairment, the proportionate share of loss and the basis difference amortization is shown on the consolidated statement of operations under equity in loss of investee. As of June 30, 2017, the carrying value, after impairment charges, agreed with the fair value amount of $25.1 million.

 

 

Note 4 — Discontinued Operations

The Company has classified its consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented in this report to reflect Rentech Nitrogen Partners, L.P. (“RNP”), excluding certain corporate expenses that the Company expects to continue on an on-going basis, which were previously allocated to RNP, and the Energy Technologies segment as discontinued operations.  

 

On March 14, 2016, RNP completed the sale of Rentech Nitrogen Pasadena Holdings, LLC to Interoceanic Corporation. The estimated loss on sale of $0.8 million was recorded in discontinued operations. On March 18, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the property that housed its product demonstration unit in Colorado. The preliminary loss recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $1.2 million, of which $0.3 million was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2016. On April 1, 2016, RNP completed the previously announced transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 9, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”) under which RNP and Rentech Nitrogen GP, LLC (the “General Partner”) merged with affiliates of CVR Partners, L.P. (“CVR”), and RNP ceased to be a publicly traded company and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR (the “Merger”). The Company’s share of book gain on sale of RNP was $358.6 million, which is recorded in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

In the consolidated statements of cash flows, the cash flows of discontinued operations are separately classified or aggregated under operating and investing activities.

All discussions and amounts in the consolidated financial statements and related notes for all periods presented relate to continuing operations only, unless otherwise noted.

At December 31, 2016, the only item relating to discontinued operations on the balance sheet was a current liability for the Energy Technologies segment of $0.1 million, which was written off during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and is recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of tax on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

12

---

 

The following tables summarize the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
		RNP				Energy Technologies				Total
		(in thousands)
Revenues		$	—			$	—			$	—
Cost of sales			—				—				—
Gross profit			—				—				—
Operating income, excluding gain on sale			—				346				346
Gain (loss) on sale			358,324				(172	)			358,152
Other income, net			290				8				298
Income before income taxes			358,614				182				358,796
Income tax expense			53,627				69				53,696
Net income			304,987				113				305,100
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			116				—				116
Net income attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	304,871			$	113			$	304,984
Net income attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	304,871			$	113			$	304,984
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			116				—				116
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		$	304,987			$	113			$	305,100

 

		For the Six Months Ended June   30, 2016
		RNP				Energy Technologies				Total
		(in thousands)
Revenues		$	54,347			$	—			$	54,347
Cost of sales			34,696				—				34,696
Gross profit			19,651				—				19,651
Operating income, excluding gain on sale			15,056				883				15,939
Gain (loss) on sale			357,510				(546	)			356,964
Other expenses, net			(5,259	)			(42	)			(5,301	)
Income before income taxes			367,307				295				367,602
Income tax expense			56,818				110				56,928
Net income			310,489				185				310,674
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			3,338				—				3,338
Net income attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	307,151			$	185			$	307,336
Net income attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	307,151			$	185			$	307,336
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			3,338				—				3,338
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		$	310,489			$	185			$	310,674

 

 

Note 5 — Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants and is classified in one of the following three categories:

•

Level 1 — Consists of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date.

•

Level 2 — Consists of inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.

•

Level 3 — Consists of unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities whose fair value is estimated based on internally developed models or methodologies using inputs that are generally less readily observable and supported by little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best available information and subject to cost-benefit constraints.

Fair values of cash, receivables, deposits, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities were assumed to approximate carrying value since they are short term and can be settled on demand.

13

---

 

The following table presents the financial instruments that were accounted for at fair value by level as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 

		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
		(in thousands)
Liabilities
Earn-out consideration - June 30, 2017		$	—			$	—			$	113
Earn-out consideration - December 31, 2016			—				—				234

 

The following table presents the fair value and carrying value of the Company’s borrowings as of June 30, 2017.

 

		Fair Value												Carrying
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Value
		(in thousands)
Liabilities
Fulghum debt		$	—			$	38,072			$	—			$	39,111
NEWP debt			—				13,923				—				14,233
GSO Credit Agreement			—				47,176				—				45,451

 

The following table presents the fair value and carrying value of the Company’s borrowings as of December 31, 2016.

 

		Fair Value												Carrying
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Value
		(in thousands)
Liabilities
Fulghum debt		$	—			$	38,424			$	—			$	37,473
NEWP debt			—				14,042				—				13,973
GSO Credit Agreement			—				52,250				—				50,024

 

Earn-out Consideration

At June 30, 2017, the earn-out consideration was $0.1 million which related to the Atikokan Facility. This consideration is deemed to be a Level 3 financial instrument because the measurement is based on unobservable inputs. The fair value of earn-out consideration was determined based on the Company’s analysis of various scenarios involving the achievement of certain levels of EBITDA, as defined in the asset purchase agreement related to the Atikokan Facility, over a ten-year period. The scenarios, which included a weighted probability factor, involved assumptions relating to product profitability and production levels. The earn-out consideration will be measured at each reporting date with changes in its fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Assuming the minimum required EBITDA level is achieved, an increase or decrease of $1.0 million in EBITDA would result in an increase or decrease in earn-out consideration of $0.1 million. The Company provided a loan to the sellers of the Atikokan Facility of $0.7 million, which will be repayable from any earn-out consideration. The collectability of the loan is tied to the amount of earn-out consideration the sellers receive from the Company. The Company adjusts the balances of the loan and the earn-out consideration at the same time so that they are equal.

A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of the earn-out consideration during the six months ended June 30, 2017 is as follows:

 

		Atikokan
		(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016		$	234
Less: Unrealized gain			(125	)
Add: Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation			4
Balance at June 30, 2017		$	113

 

14

---

 

A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of the earn-out consideration during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows:

 

		Atikokan
		(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015		$	871
Less: Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation			62
Balance at June 30, 2016		$	933

 

Debt Valuation

The Fulghum debt and NEWP debt are deemed to be Level 2 financial instruments because the measurements are based on observable market data. The Company’s valuation reflects discounted expected future cash flows, which incorporate yield curves for instruments with similar characteristics, such as credit ratings, weighted average lives and maturity dates.

The credit agreement we have entered into with certain funds managed by or affiliated with GSO Capital Partners LP (the “GSO Credit Agreement”) is deemed to be a Level 2 financial instrument because the measurement is based on observable market data. The Company concluded that the carrying value, before the discount, of the GSO Credit Agreement approximated the fair value of such loan as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 based on its floating interest rate and the Company’s assessment that the fixed-rate margins are still at market.

The levels within the fair value hierarchy at which the Company’s financial instruments have been evaluated have not changed for any of the Company’s financial instruments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

 

Note 6 — Derivative Instruments

Accounting guidance establishes accounting and reporting requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. This guidance requires recognition of all derivative instruments, not subject to the normal purchase and sale exception, as assets or liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and measurement of those instruments at fair value. The accounting treatment of changes in fair value is dependent upon whether or not a derivative instrument is designated as a hedge and if so, the type of hedge. The Company currently does not designate any of its derivatives as hedges for financial accounting purposes. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as hedges are included in earnings in other income (expense) and reported under cash flows from operating activities.

Interest Rate and Currency Swaps

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, NEWP, entered into three interest rate swaps in notional amounts that cover the borrowings under its two industrial revenue bonds and a real estate mortgage loan.

Under the interest rate swaps, NEWP pays interest at a fixed rate of 5.29% on the outstanding balance of one of the industrial revenue bonds, 5.05% on the outstanding balance of the other industrial revenue bond and 7.95% on the outstanding balance of the real estate mortgage loan. NEWP receives interest at the variable interest rates specified in the various swap agreements. The interest rate swap on the real estate mortgage loan was terminated in July 2016.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Fulghum, has entered into an interest rate swap in a notional amount that covers the borrowings under one of its long-term loans. Under the interest rate swap, Fulghum pays interest at a fixed rate of 6.83% on the outstanding balance of the loan. Fulghum receives interest at the variable interest rate specified in the swap agreement.  

Through the interest rate swaps, the Company is essentially fixing the variable interest rate to be paid on these borrowings.

The interest rate swaps are accounted for as derivatives for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps are deemed to be Level 2 financial instruments because the measurements are based on observable market data. The Company used a standard swap contract valuation method to value its interest rate derivatives, and the inputs it uses for present value discounting included forward one-month LIBOR rates, risk-free interest rates and an estimate of credit risk. The fair value of the interest rate swaps at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the unrealized loss of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Any adjustments to the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded in other income (expense) on the consolidated statements of operations.

15

---

 

Net gain (loss) on interest rate swaps:

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Realized loss		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Unrealized gain (loss)			27				30				80				(6	)
Total net gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		$	27			$	30			$	80			$	(6	)

 

Fulghum’s subsidiary in Chile uses foreign currency economic hedges to offset the earnings impact that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have on certain monetary liabilities (in this case, four loans) denominated in nonfunctional currencies. The changes in fair value of economic hedges used to offset the monetary liabilities are recognized into earnings in the line item other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, Fulghum uses foreign currency economic hedges to minimize the variability in cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The total notional values of derivatives related to our foreign currency economic hedges were $11.1 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The currency swaps are accounted for as derivatives for accounting purposes. The currency swaps are deemed to be Level 2 financial instruments because the measurements are based on observable market data. The fair value of the currency derivatives is the difference between the contract values and the exchange rates at the end of the period. The fair value of the currency swaps at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the unrealized loss.

Net gain (loss) on currency swaps:

 

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Realized loss		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Unrealized gain (loss)			(89	)			4				119				352
Total net gain (loss) on currency swaps		$	(89	)		$	4			$	119			$	352

 

The interest rate swaps are recorded in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Interest rate swaps recorded in current liabilities:
Gross amounts recognized		$	(248	)		$	(328	)
Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheets			—				—
Net amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets		$	(248	)		$	(328	)

 

The currency swaps are recorded in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Currency swaps recorded in current liabilities:
Gross amounts recognized		$	(746	)		$	(865	)
Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheets			—				—
Net amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets		$	(746	)		$	(865	)

 

The following table presents the financial instruments that were accounted for at fair value by level as of June 30, 2017:

 

		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
		(in thousands)
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps			—			$	248				—
Currency swaps			—				746				—

 

16

---

 

The following table presents the financial instruments that were accounted for at fair value by level as of December 31, 2016:

 

		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
		(in thousands)
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps			—			$	328				—
Currency swaps			—				865				—

 

 

Note 7 — Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Finished goods		$	18,587			$	22,047
Raw materials			5,488				6,084
Total inventory		$	24,075			$	28,131

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company wrote down the value of its log inventory by $0.9 million to estimated net realizable value within its Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company wrote down the value of its wood pellet inventory by $5.2 million to net realizable value within its Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company wrote down the value of its log and wood pellet inventory by $3.3 million to estimated net realizable value within its Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company wrote down the value of its wood pellet inventory by $10.3 million to estimated net realizable value within its Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. The write-downs were reflected in cost of goods sold for the applicable periods.

 

 

Note 8 — Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Land and land improvements		$	4,512			$	4,508
Buildings and building improvements			12,998				13,059
Machinery and equipment			110,943				120,578
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment			469				445
Computer equipment and computer software			3,162				3,105
Vehicles			8,183				8,529
Leasehold improvements			2,031				2,575
			142,298				152,799
Less: Accumulated depreciation			(37,040	)			(35,234	)
Total property, plant and equipment, net		$	105,258			$	117,565

 

Construction in progress consisted of the following:

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,004			$	746
NEWP			558				130
Other			35				29
Total construction in progress		$	1,597			$	905

 

The construction in progress balance includes no capitalized interest costs at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

17

---

 

Fulghum Fibres

On April 8, 2016, Fulghum completed the sale of one of its mills in the United States to one of its customers, and the customer took over operations of the mill. Since the carrying value was written down in 2015, an immaterial amount of loss was recognized upon the sale in 2016.

In February 2017, Fulghum was notified by a customer of its intent to exercise its purchase option on two of Fulghum’s mills. Since the purchase price under the option was lower than the carrying values of the two mills, during the first quarter of 2017, the Company wrote down the carrying values of the two mills by $2.6 million. In addition, the processing agreements for the two mills totaling $3.9 million were written off as well as the spare parts inventory of $1.3 million. The total asset impairment charge recorded during the first quarter of 2017 was $7.8 million. In May 2017, the mills were sold resulting in net proceeds of $5.1 million. Since the carrying value was previously written down in 2017, the amount of loss on sale recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.3 million.  

Atikokan and Wawa

In February 2017, the Company announced that it has reduced annualized production at its Atikokan Facility to levels sufficient only to fulfill the delivery requirements under the ten-year take-or-pay contract (the “OPG Contract”) with Ontario Power Generation (“OPG”). The Atikokan Facility will no longer ship wood pellets to the Port of Quebec to help fulfill delivery requirements under the ten-year take-or-pay contract (the “Drax Contract”) with Drax Power Limited (“Drax”). The Company will continue to explore alternatives for selling additional wood pellets that could be produced from the Atikokan Facility to increase its utilization.

In February 2017, the Company also announced that its Board decided to idle the Wawa Facility, which experienced equipment and operating challenges subsequent to the replacement of problematic conveyors in the fourth quarter of 2016. The Board’s decision to idle the Wawa Facility was based in part on the Company’s review of the work by a third-party engineering firm to identify necessary capital improvements. While the Company believes that the issues it had been experiencing at the facility can be resolved with additional capital investments, it has concluded that it is not economical to pursue those investments or to continue to operate the facility at this time.

As a result of this decision, the Wawa Facility operations team completed a safe and orderly idling of the facility in early 2017. While the facility is idled, a small workforce remains in place to maintain the facility so that it can resume operations with minimal cost if there is interest from a third party to invest in or purchase the facility. The remainder of the workforce has been placed on a temporary layoff while options for the facility are explored.

Corporate

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company wrote off computer software of $1.0 million, previously recorded in construction in progress, and leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment totaling $0.4 million.

 

 

Note 9 - Goodwill

A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of goodwill is as follows:

 

		Fulghum				NEWP				Total
		(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2016		$	18,253			$	10,323			$	28,576
Impairment			(13,125	)			—				(13,125	)
Balance at June 30, 2017		$	5,128			$	10,323			$	15,451

In February 2017, Fulghum was notified by a customer of its intent to exercise its purchase option on two of Fulghum’s mills. Fulghum expects the loss of these mills to negatively impact operating income and cash flow in the second half of 2017 and going forward. The customer’s decision was considered a triggering event to perform a goodwill impairment test for Fulghum U.S. as of March 31, 2017. The analysis of goodwill indicated an impairment to goodwill of $13.1 million, which was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

In February 2017, the Company announced its plan to address potential liquidity needs by considering strategic alternatives for the Company as a whole that may include, but are not limited to, a sale of us, a merger or other business combination, a sale of all or a material portion of our assets, restructuring or a recapitalization. The Company’s pursuit of an option in its review of strategic alternatives may lead to or result in future goodwill or asset impairments in its financial statements.

18

---

 

The estimate of fair value requires significant judgment. We based our fair value estimates on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain, including but not limited to estimates of futu re growth rates, future production levels, product pricing, raw material and operating costs, and other assumptions about the overall economic and market conditions for our business units. There can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions made f or purposes of our goodwill testing as of the time of testing will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding business plans, market conditions or anticipated growth rates or other changes in prior assumptions or estimates are not correct or if our market capitalization declines, we may be required to record goodwill and/or intangible asset impairment charges in future periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing or earlier, if an indicator of an i mpairment is present before our next annual evaluation.

 

 

Note 10 — Debt

As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants, except for NEWP as discussed below. Total debt consisted of the following:

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
QS Construction Facility		$	13,609			$	13,500
Fulghum debt			38,467				36,756
GSO Credit Agreement			47,176				52,250
NEWP debt			14,223				13,944
Total debt		$	113,475			$	116,450
Less: Debt issuance costs			(1,051	)			(1,357	)
Less: Unamortized net discount			(20	)			(123	)
Less: Current portion			(15,762	)			(11,082	)
Less: Current portion unamortized net premium			(148	)			(186	)
Plus: Current portion debt issuance costs			31				31
Long-term debt		$	96,525			$	103,733

 

In May 2017, NEWP amended its $6 million revolving credit facility to extend the maturity date from May 31, 2017 to August 29, 2017. In June 2017, the Company paid down the GSO Credit Agreement by $5.1 million with the net proceeds from the sale of two of Fulghum’s mills. As of June 30, 2017, NEWP required a waiver from its lender as it was not in compliance with the minimum debt service coverage ratio due to lower sales volumes and additional costs relating to scaling back production at the facilities. We expect NEWP to require similar waivers over the next two quarters. In the event we are unable to obtain the waivers from NEWP’s lender, the lender could exercise remedies against NEWP under the loan documents, including accelerating the debt so that it becomes due on demand. A default of the NEWP indebtedness would trigger a cross default of other indebtedness of the Company, which would most likely have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual Obligations

Wood Pellets

On May 1, 2013, Rentech’s subsidiary that owns the Wawa Facility (the “Wawa Company”) entered into the Drax Contract with Drax. Under the Drax Contract, the Wawa Company is required to sell to Drax the first 400,000 metric tons of wood pellets per year produced from the Wawa Facility. In the event that it does not deliver wood pellets as required under the Drax Contract, the Wawa Company is required to pay Drax an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, between the contract price for the wood pellets and the price of any wood pellets Drax purchases in replacement. Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the Wawa Company’s obligation in an amount not to exceed CAD$20 million until May 1, 2018, and thereafter through the term of the Drax Contract for an amount not to exceed CAD$11 million.

The Drax Contract was amended in order to adjust required delivery schedules and annual delivery amounts to reflect the delays the Wawa Company was experiencing in production at the Wawa Facility prior to our decision to idle the facility. The amendments resulted in certain contract adjustments, including cash payments to Drax, credits on deliveries in early 2016, and adding 36,000 metric tons of contracted deliveries in each of 2018 and 2019 at pricing levels contracted for 2015, which would be lower than the pricing levels for 2018-19 in the original contract. In particular, in August 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to the Drax Contract pursuant to which the Wawa Company canceled all 2015 wood pellet deliveries and agreed to a total penalty, which encompassed all amendments relating to 2015 shipments to date, of $2.6 million associated with costs for Drax to purchase

19

---

 

replacement pellets and to cancel shipping commitments. In 2015, the Company accrued the $2.6 millio n penalty in operating expenses. The penalty was paid in the form of credits on the first several deliveries to Drax in early 2016.

The Wawa Company delivered approximately 134,000 metric tons to Drax in 2016. The Wawa Facility did not incur penalties in 2016 for the shortfall in delivered pellets from originally contracted volumes because the spot market prices for wood pellets were less than the contracted price with Drax.  

Prior to our decision to idle the facility, the Wawa Company agreed to deliver approximately 336,000 metric tons to Drax in 2017. In January 2017 we shipped 48,000 metric tons of pellets to Drax. In March 2017, Drax and the Wawa Company agreed to cancel the next two shipments of 2017 without any penalties, leaving the Wawa Company with an obligation to deliver approximately 193,000 metric tons to Drax later in the year. In April 2017, the Wawa Company shipped approximately 12,000 metric tons of pellets to Drax pursuant to an amendment to the Drax Contract; this shipment does not affect our delivery obligations for 2017. The Wawa Company is currently negotiating with Drax to cancel the remaining shipments in 2017. At this time we cannot make a determination if any penalties will be associated with future changes to the Drax Contract. Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the payment obligations of the Wawa Company under the terms of the Drax Contract up to a maximum amount of CAD$20 million.

Rentech’s subsidiary that owns the Atikokan Facility (the “Atikokan Company”) entered into the OPG Contract with OPG under which such subsidiary is required to deliver 45,000 metric tons of wood pellets annually through December 31, 2023. OPG has the option to increase required delivery of wood pellets from the Atikokan Facility to up to 90,000 metric tons annually. Under the OPG Contract, Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the Atikokan Company’s obligations in an amount not to exceed CAD$1.0 million.

 

The Wawa Company has contracted with Canadian National Railway Company through December 31, 2023 for all rail transportation of wood pellets from the Atikokan Facility and the Wawa Facility to the Port of Quebec (the “Canadian National Contract”). Under the Canadian National Contract, the Wawa Company committed to transport a minimum of 3,600 rail carloads annually for the duration of the long-term contract. Delivery shortfalls would result in a penalty of CAD$1,000 per rail car under the terms of the Canadian National Contract. Due to issues discovered at the Wawa Facility, the Wawa Company did not fully meet its 2015 commitment under the Canadian National Contract. In addition, the Wawa Company incurred additional carload shortfall penalties for 2016 under the Canadian National Contract as a result of the continued delays in ramping up the Wawa Facility and the revised 2016 deliveries scheduled to Drax. During 2015 and 2016, the Wawa Company incurred and either paid or accrued penalties of $3.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. In addition, we may incur additional carload shortfall penalties for 2017 under the Canadian National Contract as a result of idling the Wawa Facility and the revised 2017 deliveries scheduled to Drax. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded one-half of the estimated liability of shortfall penalties for 2017, which resulted in an expense of $1.4 million. The Company is looking at various alternatives related to the Wawa Facility and may need to record additional liabilities for the Canadian National Contract. As facts and circumstances change, the Company will review its estimated liability and adjust the liability, if needed. Under the Canadian National Contract, Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the Wawa Company’s obligations in an amount not to exceed CAD$1.5 million. We are currently in litigation with Canadian National regarding the payment of penalties related to the Canadian National Contract.

In November 2013, the Wawa Company entered into a lease agreement through April 30, 2024 (the “TrinityRail Lease”) with TrinityRail Canada, Inc. (“Trinity”) under which it committed to lease the required rail cars (258 rail cars per full calendar year) needed to satisfy its delivery requirements under the Drax Contract. The TrinityRail Lease was terminated on March 31, 2017. Due to the lease termination, the Company recorded an estimated remaining liability of $1.3 million that represents the Company’s liability for the remainder of the term of the TrinityRail Lease reduced by an estimate for sublease rental of the rail cars. As facts and circumstances change, the Company will review its estimated liability and adjust the liability, if needed. Under the TrinityRail Lease, Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the Wawa Company’s obligations in an amount not to exceed USD$1.9 million (the “Trinity PCG”). We are currently in litigation with Trinity regarding lease payments related to the TrinityRail Lease.    

Litigation

The Company is party to litigation from time to time in the normal course of business. The Company accrues liabilities related to litigation only when it concludes that it is probable that it will incur costs related to such litigation, and can reasonably estimate the amount of such costs. In cases where the Company determines that it is not probable, but reasonably possible that it has a material obligation, it discloses such obligations and the possible loss or range of loss, if such estimate can be made. The outcome of the Company’s current litigation matters is not estimable or probable. The Company maintains insurance to cover certain actions and believes that resolution of its current litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

20

---

 

Litigation Relating to the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities

In June of 2015, RDR Industrial Contractors, Inc. (“RDR”) recorded liens against both the Atikokan Facility and Wawa Facility. RDR performed work at both of the facilities as a subcontractor to Agrirecycle, Inc. (“Agrirecycle”) and asserted that Agrirecycle had failed to pay RDR according to the terms of its subcontract. In September of 2015, EAD Control Systems, Inc. (“EAD Controls”) similarly filed liens against both pellet facilities alleging Agrirecycle’s failure to pay EAD Controls for work performed at both facilities as a subcontractor to Agrirecycle. In October of 2015, Agrirecycle filed liens against both facilities asserting that (i) it had not been paid for services performed as subcontractor for EAD Engineering, Inc. (“EAD Engineering”) and (ii) it had not been paid for work performed under direct contracts with certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company (the “RTK Parties”).  

In December of 2015 and January of 2016, the RTK Parties filed statements of defense denying the allegations set forth by RDR, EAD Controls and Agrirecycle and seeking over $40.2 million in the aggregate by way of counterclaims and cross-claims against EAD Engineering, EAD Controls, Agrirecycle and RDR for damages incurred due to defective engineering, design, equipment supply and construction at our pellet facilities, including the cost to remedy and replace defective work as well as penalties, schedule delays and lost profits.

In late August of 2016, EAD Engineering filed crossclaims against the RTK Parties, within Agrirecycle’s lien actions for amounts allegedly owing by the RTK Parties to EAD Engineering. Specifically, EAD Engineering alleges that it is owed unpaid contract amounts and amounts for extra work completed at both pellet facilities for the RTK Parties. EAD Engineering did not register any liens against the facilities for the amounts it now claims are allegedly owed.

In July 2017, the RTK Parties finalized a settlement agreement with RDR, whereby all of RDR’s claims against the RTK Parties were released, RDR agreed to discharge its lien against the Wawa Facility, and all claims by RDR against Agrirecycle were assigned to the RTK Parties.  

The remaining amounts claimed by EAD Controls, EAD Engineering and Agrirecycle in the separate causes of action in Ontario Superior Court naming the RTK Parties and the Company as defendants is approximately $6.5 million. This includes claims for amounts allegedly due under contracts with the RTK Parties and claims by subcontractors against our direct contractors.

The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself against the allegations made by EAD Engineering, EAD Controls and Agrirecycle and vigorously pursue recovery from EAD Engineering, EAD Controls and Agrirecycle. Given that this litigation is in the pleadings stage and discovery has yet to begin, the Company is unable to estimate at this time the likelihood or the amount of any judgments which may be rendered either in favor of or against it or the RTK Parties.

On February 20, 2017 Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”) filed claims against Rentech, Inc. and RTK WP in Superior Court in the Province of Quebec, District of Montreal for CAD$2,391,858 (which was subsequently amended to CAD $3,635,661) plus costs relating to penalties for volume shortfalls under the Canadian National Contract, freight services and demurrage charges in calendar year 2016. Further, CN has requested that for CAD$1,500,000 of the aforementioned amount, Rentech, Inc. be ordered to compensate CN pursuant to the terms of the Rentech, Inc. parent company guaranty. Both the Company and RTK WP are reviewing these claims, and intends to defend against them vigorously.

On May 22, 2017 Trinity filed claims against Rentech, Inc. in District Court of Dallas County, Texas for monetary relief of over USD$1,000,000 plus costs under the Trinity PCG for unpaid invoices by the Wawa Company under the TrinityRail Lease. The Company is reviewing these claims, and intends to defend against them vigorously.

In addition to the actions described above, the Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions relating to construction liens and other claims by vendors hired to perform work for the Wawa Company. If these claims are resolved adverse to the Wawa Company, this is anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to execute its strategic alternatives process.

Other Litigation

On February 22, 2017, Juan Las Heras, a purported shareholder of the Company, filed a federal securities class action complaint on behalf of other shareholders of Rentech similarly situated to Mr. Heras, against Rentech, Inc., Jeffrey R. Spain, and Keith Forman in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the “Heras Lawsuit”). On February 23, 2017, Cheng Jiangchen , a purported shareholder of the Company, filed a federal securities class action complaint on behalf of other shareholders of Rentech, Inc. similarly situated to Mr. Jiangchen, against Rentech, Inc. and Keith Forman in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the “Jiangchen Lawsuit”). On March 7, 2017, Carlos Raul Cuadra, a purported shareholder of Rentech, filed a federal securities class action complaint on behalf of other shareholders of Rentech similarly situated to Mr. Cuadra, against Rentech, Inc.,

21

---

 

Jeffrey R. Spain, and Keith Forman in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the “Cuadra Lawsuit” ). The Heras and Cuadra Lawsuits were voluntarily dismissed on May 10, 2017, and May 11, 2017, respectively. In the Jiangchen Lawsuit, the Court appointed Ichiro Ikuno as Lead Plaintiff on May 22, 2017. On July 10, 2017, Lead Plaintiff filed an amended federal securities class action complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) against Rentech, Inc., Keith Forman, and Jeffrey Spain .

The Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company’s disclosures between March 2016 and November 2016 contained false and misleading statements because they failed to disclose certain material facts regarding Canadian operations, the Company’s accounting, and wood pellet facilities contracts. According to the Amended Complaint, these facts were later disclosed in a press release issued by Rentech on February 21, 2017 (the “Press Release”), a conference call with analysts and investors on March 16, 2017 (the “Conference Call”), and in the Company’s Forms 8-K and 10-K filed on April 4, 2017 (the “8-K” and “10-K”). The Amended Complaint also alleges that Company officers named in the Amended Complaint knowingly acquiesced in the issuance or dissemination of materially false and misleading statements. Lead Plaintiff seeks compensation for losses resulting from fluctuations in stock price of the Company in the period from March 2016 through April 2017, as well as attorney fees, expert fees and costs. The Jiangchen Lawsuit is at a preliminary (pleadings) stage. The Company believes the Jiangchen Lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend against these claims vigorously.

On March 24, 2017, Jingwen Fu, derivatively on behalf of Rentech, Inc., filed a shareholder derivative complaint against Keith Forman, Jeffrey R. Spain, Paul Summers and the members of the Rentech, Inc. board of directors (the “Derivative Defendants”) in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (the “Fu Lawsuit”). On May 8, 2017, Anton Shaigne, derivatively on behalf of Rentech, Inc., filed a shareholder derivative complaint against the Derivative Defendants in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (the “Shaigne Lawsuit”, and together with the Fu Lawsuit, the “Derivative Lawsuits”). The Derivative Lawsuits allege, among other things, that the Derivative Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maintain proper disclosure controls and making false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions concerning the Company’s business in the period from November 9, 2016 through the present, and in the case of the Shaigne Lawsuit also in calendar year 2016 related to the Company’s restatement of financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Derivative Lawsuits also allege unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of corporate assets by the Derivative Defendants. The Derivative Lawsuits seek to change certain corporate governance policies of the Company, to nominate at least four members for election to the Company Board of Directors and restitution from each of the Derivative Defendants, as well as attorney fees, expert fees and costs. The Derivative Lawsuits are stayed pending resolution of the Amended Complaint.

Regulation

The Company’s business is subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, provincial, state and local, environmental, health and safety regulations governing a wide range of matters, including the emission of air pollutants, the release of hazardous substances into the environment, the treatment and discharge of waste water and the storage, handling, use and transportation of the Company’s products, wood fibre feedstock, and other substances that are part of our operations. These laws include the Clean Air Act (the “CAA”), the federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and various other federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations. The laws and regulations to which the Company is subject are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. The ultimate impact on the Company’s business of complying with existing laws and regulations is not always clearly known or determinable due in part to the fact that the Company’s operations may change over time and certain implementing regulations for laws, such as the CAA, have not yet been finalized, are under governmental or judicial review or are being revised. These laws and regulations could result in increased capital, operating and compliance costs.

 

 

Note 12 — Income Taxes

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $26,000, which related to continuing operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.2 million, consisting of a $1.3 million income tax benefit in continuing operations and a $0.1 million income tax expense in discontinued operations. The allocation to discontinued operations was determined using the incremental method by subtracting the benefit that was generated from continuing operations from the provision for the Company as a whole. The Company’s effective income tax rate (income tax benefit as a percentage of loss from continuing operations before income taxes) was 2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The difference between the United States federal statutory rate of 35% and the effective rate primarily was attributable to the Company having a valuation allowance on substantially all of its net deferred tax assets, state taxes, outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries, and the impact of foreign earnings. The tax benefit for six months ended June 30, 2017 also includes a discrete income tax benefit of $1.4 million related to the reversal of uncertain tax positions.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $44.0 million, consisting of a $9.7 million income tax benefit in continuing operations and a $53.7 million income tax expense in discontinued operations. For the six

22

---

 

months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $44.8 million, consisting of a $12.1 million income tax benefit in continuing operations and a $56.9 million income tax expense in discontinued operations. The allocation to disco ntinued operations was determined using the incremental method by subtracting the benefit that was generated from continuing operations from the provision for the Company as a whole. The Company’s effective income tax rate (income tax benefit as a percenta ge of loss from continuing operations before income taxes) was 38% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The difference between the United States federal statutory rate of 35% and the effective rate primarily was attributable to the outside basis differe nce in foreign subsidiaries, the impact of foreign earnings, and state taxes.

Due to the gain on sale of RNP during the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company released valuation allowance associated with the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, research and development credits and alternative minimum tax credits. The resulting tax benefit is included as a component of the income tax expense in discontinued operations.

The Company has considered results of operations and concluded that it is more likely than not that substantially all the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Therefore, a valuation allowance has been recorded against substantially all of the net deferred tax asset.

 

 

 

Note 13 — Segment Information

The Company operates in three business segments, as described below. Results of the East Dubuque, Pasadena and the energy technologies segments are accounted for as discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s three business segments are:

•

Fulghum Fibres — The operations of Fulghum, which provides wood yard operations services and wood fibre processing services, sells wood chips to the pulp, paper and packaging industry, and owns and manages forestland and sells bark to industrial consumers in South America.

•

Wood Pellets: Industrial — The operations of this segment include the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities, which produce, aggregate and sell wood pellets for the utility and industrial power generation market, corporate allocations, and wood pellet development activities. The wood pellet development activities represent the Company’s personnel costs for employees dedicated to the wood pellet business infrastructure and administration costs, corporate allocations, expenses associated with the Company’s joint venture with Graanul Invest AS and third party costs.

•

Wood Pellets: NEWP — The operations of NEWP, which produces wood pellets for the residential and commercial heating markets.

23

---

 

The Company’s reportable operating segments have been d etermined in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on operating activities. The Company evaluates performance based upon several factors, of which the primary financial measure is segment operating income.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Revenues
Fulghum Fibres		$	17,553			$	20,829			$	37,488			$	48,265
Wood Pellets: Industrial			3,167				6,538				11,314				16,399
Wood Pellets: NEWP			4,018				4,426				8,157				7,066
Total revenues		$	24,738			$	31,793			$	56,959			$	71,730
Gross profit (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,336			$	2,939			$	3,621			$	7,605
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(1,574	)			(5,198	)			(4,961	)			(10,167	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(439	)			580				(82	)			1,014
Total gross loss		$	(677	)		$	(1,679	)		$	(1,422	)		$	(1,548	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,423			$	1,175			$	2,880			$	2,376
Wood Pellets: Industrial			1,166				1,346				3,670				2,654
Wood Pellets: NEWP			413				499				913				1,060
Total segment selling, general and administrative expenses		$	3,002			$	3,020			$	7,463			$	6,090
Depreciation and amortization
Fulghum Fibres		$	133			$	289			$	426			$	830
Wood Pellets: Industrial			1				53				13				100
Wood Pellets: NEWP			241				302				482				597
Total segment depreciation and amortization recorded in operating    expenses			375				644				921				1,527
Fulghum Fibres			1,723				1,936				3,691				3,822
Wood Pellets: Industrial			—				2,116				933				5,110
Wood Pellets: NEWP			804				290				1,286				458
Total depreciation and amortization recorded in cost of sales			2,527				4,342				5,910				9,390
Total segment depreciation and amortization		$	2,902			$	4,986			$	6,831			$	10,917
Other operating expenses
Fulghum Fibres		$	345			$	229			$	21,232		(1)	$	229
Wood Pellets: Industrial			—				—				—				—
Wood Pellets: NEWP			2				—				12				12
Total segment other operating expenses		$	347			$	229			$	21,244			$	241
Operating income (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	(565	)		$	1,247			$	(20,917	)	(1)	$	4,170
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(2,741	)			(6,596	)			(8,644	)			(12,920	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(1,095	)			(221	)			(1,490	)			(655	)
Total segment operating loss		$	(4,401	)		$	(5,570	)		$	(31,051	)		$	(9,405	)
Interest expense
Fulghum Fibres		$	515			$	576			$	1,012			$	1,147
Wood Pellets: Industrial			491				407				942				845
Wood Pellets: NEWP			147				151				283				292
Total segment interest expense		$	1,153			$	1,134			$	2,237			$	2,284
Net income (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	(819	)		$	521			$	(21,681	)		$	2,174
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(3,230	)			(7,015	)			(9,584	)			(13,753	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(1,204	)			(313	)			(1,704	)			(868	)
Total segment net loss		$	(5,253	)		$	(6,807	)		$	(32,969	)		$	(12,447	)
Reconciliation of segment net loss to consolidated net income (loss):
Segment net loss		$	(5,253	)		$	(6,807	)		$	(32,969	)		$	(12,447	)
Corporate and unallocated expenses recorded as selling, general and    administrative expenses			(3,145	)			(4,720	)			(7,367	)			(10,765	)
Corporate and unallocated depreciation and amortization expense			(78	)			(131	)			(156	)			(256	)
Corporate and unallocated income (expenses) recorded as other income    (expense)			2				(4,727	)			4				(4,723	)
Corporate and unallocated interest expense			(1,366	)			(1,375	)			(2,679	)			(3,798	)
Corporate income tax benefit (expense)			(71	)			10,148				(211	)			13,349
Equity in loss of CVR(2)			(27,212	)			(1,329	)			(28,130	)			(1,329	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)			—				305,100				96				310,674
Consolidated net income (loss)		$	(37,123	)		$	296,159			$	(71,412	)		$	290,705

24

---

 

 

(1)

Includes goodwill impairment of $13.1 million and asset impairments of $7.8 million.

(2)

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, equity in loss of investee includes $27.2 million, which includes the investment impairment of $26.7 million, the Company’s proportionate share of loss from its investment in CVR of $0.2 million and amortization of the basis differences of $0.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, equity in loss of investee includes $28.1 million, which includes the investment impairment of $26.7 million, the Company’s proportionate share of loss from its investment in CVR of $0.9 million and amortization of the basis differences of $0.5 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, equity in loss of investee includes $1.3 million, which includes the Company’s proportionate share of loss from its investment in CVR and amortization of the basis differences.

(3)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, income from discontinued operations, net of tax includes $358.6 million, which is the Company’s proportionate share of the book gain on sale of RNP.

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Total assets
Fulghum Fibres		$	124,996			$	155,646
Wood Pellets: Industrial			12,835				19,060
Wood Pellets: NEWP			60,096				61,674
Total segment assets		$	197,927			$	236,380
Reconciliation of segment total assets to consolidated total assets:
Segment total assets		$	197,927			$	236,380
Corporate and other			34,334				76,337
Consolidated total assets		$	232,261			$	312,717

 

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
Total goodwill
Fulghum Fibres		$	5,128			$	18,253
Wood Pellets: NEWP			10,323				10,323
Total goodwill		$	15,451			$	28,576

 

 

		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Capital expenditures
Fulghum Fibres		$	2,987			$	3,921
Wood Pellets: Industrial			851				2,885
Wood Pellets: NEWP			553				359
Corporate and other			53				551
Total capital expenditures - continuing operations		$	4,444			$	7,716
Discontinued operations			—				11,075
Total capital expenditures		$	4,444			$	18,791

 

The Company’s revenues by geographic area, based on where the customer takes title to the product, were as follows:

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
United States		$	14,986			$	16,822			$	31,729			$	33,150
Canada			3,167				6,538				11,314				16,399
Other			6,585				8,433				13,916				22,181
Total revenues		$	24,738			$	31,793			$	56,959			$	71,730

 

25

---

 

The following table sets forth assets by geographic area:

 

		As of
		June 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
		(in thousands)
United States		$	181,130			$	254,255
Canada			12,835				19,060
Other			38,296				39,402
Total assets		$	232,261			$	312,717

 

 

 

 

Note 14 — Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share Allocated to Rentech

Basic income (loss) per common share allocated to Rentech is calculated by dividing net income (loss) allocated to Rentech by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share allocated to Rentech is calculated by dividing net income (loss) allocated to Rentech by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect, calculated using (i) the “treasury stock” method for the unvested restricted stock units, outstanding stock options and warrants and (ii) the “if converted” method for the preferred stock if its inclusion would not have been anti-dilutive.

26

---

 

The Company's policy is to only allocate earnings to participating securities, i.e., restricted stock, for continuing operations, discontinued operations and in total during periods in whic h income is reported.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands, except for per share data)
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations		$	(37,123	)		$	(8,941	)		$	(71,508	)		$	(19,969	)
Less: Loss on redemption of preferred stock			—				(11,049	)			—				(11,049	)
Less: Preferred stock dividends			—				—				—				(1,320	)
Less: (Income) loss from continuing operations attributable    to noncontrolling interests			66				(41	)			77				(225	)
Less: Income from continuing operations allocated to    participating securities			—				—				—				—
Loss from continuing operations allocated to common    shareholders		$	(37,057	)		$	(20,031	)		$	(71,431	)		$	(32,563	)
Numerator:
Income from discontinued operations		$	—			$	305,100			$	96			$	310,674
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable    to noncontrolling interests			—				(116	)			—				(3,338	)
Less: Income from discontinued operations allocated to    participating securities			—				(7,599	)			(3	)			(7,957	)
Income from discontinued operations allocated to    common shareholders		$	—			$	297,385			$	93			$	299,379
Numerator:
Net income (loss) attributable to Rentech common shareholders		$	(37,057	)		$	284,953			$	(71,335	)		$	274,773
Less: Income allocated to participating securities			—				(7,100	)			—				(7,114	)
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders		$	(37,057	)		$	277,853			$	(71,335	)		$	267,659
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding			23,211				23,067				23,206				23,051
Effect of dilutive securities:
Preferred stock			—				—				—				—
Warrants			—				—				—				—
Common stock options			—				—				—				—
Restricted stock			—				—				—				—
Diluted shares outstanding			23,211				23,067				23,206				23,051
Basic:
Continuing operations		$	(1.60	)		$	(0.87	)		$	(3.08	)		$	(1.41	)
Discontinued operations		$	0.00			$	12.89			$	0.00			$	12.99
Net income (loss) per common share		$	(1.60	)		$	12.05			$	(3.07	)		$	11.61
Diluted:
Continuing operations		$	(1.60	)		$	(0.87	)		$	(3.08	)		$	(1.41	)
Discontinued operations		$	0.00			$	12.89			$	0.00			$	12.99
Net income (loss) per common share		$	(1.60	)		$	12.05			$	(3.07	)		$	11.61

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, 1.9 million shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options, stock warrants and restricted stock units were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, 1.7 million shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options, stock warrants and restricted stock units were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

 

 

27

---

 

Note 15 — Subsequent Events

Fulghum Fibres

In August 2017, Fulghum was notified by a customer of the exercise of its purchase option for six of Fulghum’s chip mills. The parties are in discussions to enter into new operating agreements for Fulghum to continue to operate the mills on terms similar to operating agreements at other Fulghum mills when Fulghum transfers the asset ownership to the customer. When the sale of the mills is consummated, the Company expects to receive a one-time cash payment of approximately $5.0 million.

In addition, the purchase option price of the six mills is below their carrying value, which would result in a potential write-down of fixed assets that the Company would expect to record during the three months ended September 31, 2017. The Company will also assess the impact on other long-lived assets related to changes to the operating agreements.

 

28

---

 

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS O F FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes presented in this report and in our Annual Report.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included in this report contains, and other reports or materials filed or to be filed by us with the SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us or our management) contain or will contain, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements may relate to financial results and plans for future business activities, and are thus prospective. The forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. They can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “should” and other comparable terms or the negative of them. You are cautioned that, while forward-looking statements reflect management’s good faith belief and best judgment based upon current information, they are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our results include the risk factors detailed in “Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Report and from time to time in our other periodic reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Such risks and uncertainties include, among other things:

•

our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months in the event our current and expected sources of funding are insufficient to fund working capital and continue operations, including as a result of our operating costs exceeding the amounts we have budgeted for those items;

•

whether our strategic review process will result in a transaction, and the risks that could arise if an appropriate strategic alternative(s) is not achieved on a timely basis and we are otherwise unable to secure additional sources of funds to address potential future liquidity needs;

•

our ability to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness and any other event resulting in the acceleration of our indebtedness;

•

our ability to successfully implement our reorganization plan and to achieve the cost savings we expect from the plan on the schedule we expect;

•

our ability to successfully execute our strategy, and mitigate the risks, with our wood fibre processing business;

•

our ability to comply with the terms of the various contracts relating to our Atikokan and Wawa Facilities, which could require us to pay penalties and other damages to the extent we do not;

•

our ability to continue to meet the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market;

•

additional costs for unforeseen engineering problems, problems with the performance of installed equipment, unavailability or failure of necessary equipment, or plant enhancements needed, but currently unknown, or other unforeseen events, at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities;

•

our ability to effectively operate our Atikokan Facility;

•

our ability to recover the costs of our wood fibre feedstock through sales of products made from such wood fibre feedstock, considering the volatility in the prices of our products and wood fibre feedstock;

•

adverse weather conditions, which can affect demand for, and delivery and production of, and wood pellet products;

•

our dependence on our customers to purchase and transport goods purchased from us and the potential loss of customers to competitors;

•

planned or unplanned shutdowns, or any operational difficulties, at our facilities;

•

potential operating hazards from accidents, fire, severe weather, floods or other natural disasters;

•

our ability and the associated cost to comply with laws and regulations regarding employee and process safety;

•

intense competition from other wood fibre processors;

•

risks arising from changes in existing laws or regulations, or their interpretation, or the imposition of new restrictions relating to emissions of greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide or energy production;

29

---

 

•

risks associated with projects located in rural areas or outside of the United States; and

•

risks associated with doing business outside of the United States, including foreign currency exposure and economic conditions in other countries impacting the demand for our products and our customers’ ability to pay us.

You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Although forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, unless required by law.

As used in this report, references to “Rentech” refer to Rentech, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “the Company” mean Rentech and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

OVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS

We are a pure play wood fibre processing company with three core businesses: contract wood handling and chipping services, the manufacture and sale of wood pellets for the U.S. heating market and the manufacture, aggregation and sale of wood pellets for the utility and industrial power generation market.

Our wood handling and chipping services business includes Fulghum, which operates 29 wood chipping mills in the United States and South America. Fulghum provides wood yard operations services and wood fibre processing services, and sells wood chips to the pulp, paper and packaging industry. Fulghum’s South American subsidiaries also own and manage forestland and sell bark to industrial consumers in South America.

Our U.S. wood pellet business consists of NEWP, which is one of the largest producers of wood pellets for the United States residential and commercial heating markets. NEWP operates four wood pellet facilities in the Northeast. The facilities are located in Jaffrey, New Hampshire; Deposit, New York; Schuyler, New York; and Youngsville, Pennsylvania.

Our Canadian wood pellet business consists of our Atikokan Facility and Wawa Facility, the latter of which we idled in early 2017. Wood pellets produced at the Atikokan Facility are being used primarily for utility power generation in Canada and wood pellets produced at the Wawa Facility were used primarily for utility power generation in the United Kingdom.

In February 2017, we announced that we have (i) decided to idle our Wawa Facility and (ii) reduced production at our Atikokan Facility to levels necessary to only fulfill the delivery requirements under the OPG Contract with OPG. These decisions result from many factors, including without limitation, continued difficulty with ramping up production and additional capital required to increase production to levels near the facilities design capacity, projected operating costs which exceed our original expectations and uncertainty around future profitability.

In addition, we initiated a formal process to explore a variety of strategic alternatives for the Wawa Facility and the Company as a whole. In conjunction with this process and to address potential future liquidity needs, we are considering strategic alternatives that may include, but are not limited to, a sale of us, a merger or other business combination, a sale of all or a material portion of our assets or a recapitalization.

Overview of our Results of Operations

Our operating segments have been affected in different ways by various negative and positive factors in the first six months of 2017. The results and outlook for our Wood Pellets: Industrial segment depend primarily on operating results from the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we shipped two vessels containing approximately 60,000 metric tons of wood pellets from the Port of Quebec, which was delivered to and accepted by Drax. The Atikokan Facility shipped approximately 20,000 metric tons of wood pellets to OPG during the six months ended June 30, 2017. However, we have had inventory write-downs of $3.3 million through June 30, 2017 as a result of a high level of fixed operating costs allocated to relatively low volumes produced at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities during the period. In addition, in February 2017 we announced that we have idled the Wawa Facility to conserve liquidity as we explore strategic alternatives for the facility.

30

---

 

Results at NEWP in the first six months of 2017 were negatively impacted by relatively warmer weather than in previous years, continuing depressed prices for competitor heating fuels such as heating oil and propane, and changes in consumer buying patterns where the consumer now makes purchases on an as-needed basis. As a result, NEWP’s sales volumes were significantly lower than historical levels, although higher than the first six months of 2016. NEWP’s revenue increased from $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. NEWP’s gross profit decreased from $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to a gross loss of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. In response to market conditions, NEWP began sca ling back production in February 2016. NEWP produced at approximately 65% of capacity during 2016, at approximately 33% of capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and is currently monitoring market demand and inventory levels and will adjust pr oduction accordingly .

Fulghum’s revenue was $37.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $48.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Fulghum’s gross profit was $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. In February of 2017, Fulghum was notified by a customer of its intent to exercise its purchase option on two of Fulghum’s mills. Fulghum expects the loss of these mills to negatively impact operating income and cash flow in the second half of 2017 and going forward. The customer’s decision was considered a triggering event to perform a goodwill impairment test for Fulghum U.S. as of March 31, 2017. The analysis of goodwill indicated an impairment to goodwill of $13.1 million, which was recorded during the first quarter of 2017. Since the purchase price under the option was lower than the carrying values of the two mills, during the first quarter of 2017, we wrote down the carrying values by $2.6 million. In addition, the processing agreements for the two mills totaling $3.9 million were written off as well as the spare parts inventory of $1.3 million. The total asset impairment charge recorded during the first quarter of 2017 was $7.8 million. In May 2017, the mills were sold resulting in net proceeds of $5.1 million. Since the carrying value was previously written down in 2017, the amount of loss on sale recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.3 million.  

Investment in CVR

As of June 30, 2017, the carrying value, before impairment charges, and fair value of our investment in CVR Common Units were $51.8 million and $25.1 million, respectively. Given this differential, we had been closely monitoring the performance of CVR to determine whether the investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. We considered a variety of factors in our impairment analysis, including the historical volatility in the price of CVR units, the seasonality of the fertilizer industry in which CVR operates and recent public statements made by CVR’s management regarding CVR’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and their future expectations. We concluded that the decline in value of the CVR Common Units is other than temporary and an impairment to the investment is required as of June 30, 2017. Therefore, as of June 30, 2017, we recorded an impairment to the investment of $26.7 million. As of June 30, 2017, the carrying value, after impairment charges, agreed with the fair value amount of $25.1 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparing our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The most significant estimates and judgments relate to: revenue recognition, inventories, valuation of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets, investment in CVR, recoverability of goodwill, accounting for major maintenance and the acquisition method of accounting. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates. No material change has occurred to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in the Annual Report.

FACTORS AFFECTING COMPARABILITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Our historical results of operations for the periods presented may not be comparable with our results of operations for the subsequent periods for the reasons discussed below.

 

31

---

 

Seasonality

Our Wood Fibre Processing Business

Wood Chipping Business — Fulghum Fibres

Our wood chipping mills typically operate throughout the year; however, there may be quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in processing revenue at individual mills. These fluctuations are usually due to variations in customer-controlled deliveries of logs, production levels at customers’ mills, maintenance requirements, and/or weather-related events. Our customer contracts typically stipulate minimum volume requirements and shortfall fees. Such fees partially mitigate volatility in revenues of our United States mills. When seasonal precipitation is expected to prevent deliveries or make deliveries of logs to the mills difficult, our customers frequently coordinate delivery schedules to build log inventories in advance of such conditions. Building sufficient inventory of logs at our mills enables Fulghum to process logs with few interruptions during the rainy season. Based on our customers’ expected relatively continuous wood chip requirements, the terms of our processing agreements and our customers’ focus on maintaining proper log inventories, we do not expect to experience material seasonality in Fulghum’s United States or Uruguayan operations. However, one of our mills in Chile typically ceases wood chip processing operations for one to two months during its winter season due to the customer’s inability to harvest and deliver logs to the facility. Since a significant portion of the revenue in Fulghum’s South American operations is derived from the sale of wood chips, primarily for export from Chile, an interruption in the supply of logs could adversely affect revenue and profitability. The export portion of Fulghum’s revenues, and the associated profits, may be more variable than the revenue and profits derived from processing fees pursuant to long-term contracts.

Wood Pellet Business — Industrial

We do not expect significant seasonality in our revenue from our Atikokan Facility. We have entered into the OPG Contract with OPG, which is a power utility company that operates throughout the year subject to maintenance shutdowns. We have been producing wood pellets from this facility year-round to meet the contractual requirements. Ground conditions during the wet season referred to as “spring break-up” or “snow melt”, may prevent or curtail the harvesting of wood limiting the supply of fibre for wood pellet production. We expect that our wood pellet mills will build sufficient wood inventory on site through the autumn and winter months to mitigate this potential interruption of wood supply. This inventory build-up may increase our working capital requirements.

Wood Pellet Business — NEWP

Since NEWP’s wood pellets are used for heating, its sales are seasonal. We typically ship the highest volume of wood pellets from our NEWP facilities during the third and fourth quarters of each year. During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, approximately 56% and 75%, respectively, of NEWP’s total annual volumes were shipped in the second half of the year. As a result of the seasonality of shipments and sales, we expect to experience significant fluctuations in NEWP’s revenues, income and net working capital levels from quarter to quarter. Weather conditions can significantly impact quarterly results by affecting the timing and amount of product demand and deliveries. To accommodate NEWP’s seasonal sales, we build up NEWP’s finished goods inventory from March through August of each year. This inventory build-up typically increases our working capital requirements.

The abnormally warm temperatures during the past winters have disrupted seasonal buying patterns of the last couple of years resulting in unusually low sales volumes during the year ended December 31, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2017. Customers who have historically bought wood pellets earlier in the spring, summer and fall in preparation for the upcoming winter season are now waiting to make their purchases on an as-needed basis. As a result, we expect incremental seasonality in our revenue. While these consumer buying patterns have continued in 2017, we believe that these patterns are temporary, and we expect consumer buying patterns and sales to return to historical trends and levels, respectively. In response to market conditions, NEWP began scaling back production in February 2016. NEWP produced at approximately 66% of capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2016, at approximately 65% of capacity during 2016, at approximately 33% of capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and is currently monitoring market demand and inventory levels and will adjust production accordingly.

32

---

 

Business Segments

We operate in three business segments, which are Fulghum Fibres, Wood Pellets: Industrial, and Wood Pellets: NEWP. See “Note 13 — Segment Information” in “Part I—Item 1. Financial Statements” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information on the description of the segments. Results of the East Dubuque, Pasadena and the energy technologies segments are accounted for as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Revenues
Fulghum Fibres		$	17,553			$	20,829			$	37,488			$	48,265
Wood Pellets: Industrial			3,167				6,538				11,314				16,399
Wood Pellets: NEWP			4,018				4,426				8,157				7,066
Total revenues		$	24,738			$	31,793			$	56,959			$	71,730
Gross profit (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,336			$	2,939			$	3,621			$	7,605
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(1,574	)			(5,198	)			(4,961	)			(10,167	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(439	)			580				(82	)			1,014
Total gross loss		$	(677	)		$	(1,679	)		$	(1,422	)		$	(1,548	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,423			$	1,175			$	2,880			$	2,376
Wood Pellets: Industrial			1,166				1,346				3,670				2,654
Wood Pellets: NEWP			413				499				913				1,060
Total segment selling, general and administrative expenses		$	3,002			$	3,020			$	7,463			$	6,090
Operating income (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	(565	)		$	1,247			$	(20,917	)	(1)	$	4,170
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(2,741	)			(6,596	)			(8,644	)			(12,920	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(1,095	)			(221	)			(1,490	)			(655	)
Total segment operating loss		$	(4,401	)		$	(5,570	)		$	(31,051	)		$	(9,405	)
Net income (loss)
Fulghum Fibres		$	(819	)		$	521			$	(21,681	)		$	2,174
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(3,230	)			(7,015	)			(9,584	)			(13,753	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(1,204	)			(313	)			(1,704	)			(868	)
Total segment net loss		$	(5,253	)		$	(6,807	)		$	(32,969	)		$	(12,447	)
Reconciliation of segment net loss to consolidated net income (loss):
Segment net loss		$	(5,253	)		$	(6,807	)		$	(32,969	)		$	(12,447	)
Corporate and unallocated expenses recorded as selling,    general and administrative expenses			(3,145	)			(4,720	)			(7,367	)			(10,765	)
Corporate and unallocated depreciation and amortization    expense			(78	)			(131	)			(156	)			(256	)
Corporate and unallocated income (expenses) recorded as    other income (expense)			2				(4,727	)			4				(4,723	)
Corporate and unallocated interest expense			(1,366	)			(1,375	)			(2,679	)			(3,798	)
Corporate income tax benefit (expense)			(71	)			10,148				(211	)			13,349
Equity in loss of CVR (2)			(27,212	)			(1,329	)			(28,130	)			(1,329	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (3)			—				305,100				96				310,674
Consolidated net income (loss)		$	(37,123	)		$	296,159			$	(71,412	)		$	290,705

 

(1)

Includes goodwill impairment of $13.1 million and asset impairments of $7.8 million.

(2)

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, equity in loss of investee includes $27.2 million, which includes the investment impairment of $26.7 million, our proportionate share of loss from our investment in CVR of $0.2 million and amortization of the basis differences of $0.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, equity in loss of investee includes $28.1 million, which includes the investment impairment of $26.7 million, our proportionate share of loss from our investment in CVR of $0.9 million and amortization of the basis differences of $0.5 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, equity in loss of investee includes $1.3 million, which is our proportionate share of loss from our investment in CVR and amortization of the basis differences.

33

---

 

(3)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, income from discontinued operations, n et of tax includes $358.6 million, which is our proportionate share of the book gain on sale of RNP.

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016:

Continuing Operations

Revenues

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Revenues:
Fulghum Fibres		$	17,553			$	20,829			$	37,488			$	48,265
Wood Pellets: Industrial			3,167				6,538				11,314				16,399
Wood Pellets: NEWP			4,018				4,426				8,157				7,066
Total revenues		$	24,738			$	31,793			$	56,959			$	71,730

 

Fulghum Fibres

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016				2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Revenues:
Services		$	13,699			$	15,457			$	29,685			$	32,079
Product			3,854				5,372				7,803				16,186
Total revenues - Fulghum		$	17,553			$	20,829			$	37,488			$	48,265

 

We generate revenues at Fulghum Fibres from providing wood yard operation services and wood fibre processing services, and selling wood chips to the pulp, paper and packaging industry. Fulghum also owns and manages forestland and sells bark to industrial consumers in South America. Service revenues are those earned under agreements for wood yard operations services and wood fibre processing services in the United States and South America. Product revenues are those earned by our Chilean operations from the sale of wood chips and bark.

Revenues were $17.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $20.8 million for the same period last year. Revenues from operations in the United States were $11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $12.4 million in the prior year period. Revenues from operations in South America were $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $8.4 million in the prior year period. The decrease in revenues from the United States operations is primarily due to the sale of two mills in May 2017 and lower processing volumes at other mills. The decrease in South America revenues was primarily due to fewer chip sales to Asia in 2017 as compared to 2016. Fewer vessels shipped during the three months ended June 30, 2017 than during the three months ended June 30, 2016; however, we expect export chip sales to pick up throughout the remainder of 2017 but to be lower than in 2016. Lower biomass product sales also contributed to the decrease in South America revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, our mills in the United States processed 2.3 million green metric tons, or GMT, of logs into wood chips and residual fuels; our mills in South America processed 0.6 million GMT of logs. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, our mills in the United States processed 2.6 million GMT of logs into wood chips and residual fuels; our mills in South America processed 0.8 million GMT of logs.

Revenues were $37.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $48.3 million for the same period last year. Revenues from operations in the United States were $23.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $26.1 million in the prior year period. Revenues from operations in South America were $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $22.2 million in the prior year period. The decrease in revenues from the United States operations is primarily due to the sale of two mills in May 2017 and one mill in April 2016, and lower processing volumes at other mills. The decrease in South America revenues was primarily due to fewer chip sales to Asia in 2017 as compared to 2016. Fewer vessels shipped during the six months ended June 30, 2017 than during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Lower biomass product sales also contributed to the decrease in South America revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our mills in the United States processed 4.8 million GMT of logs into wood chips and residual fuels; our mills in South America processed 1.4 million GMT of logs. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, our mills in the United States processed 5.8 million GMT of logs into wood chips and residual fuels; our mills in South America processed 1.7 million GMT of logs.

34

---

 

 

Wood Pellets: Industrial

We generate revenues from sales of wood pellets to industrial customers, specifically electric utilities generating electricity. Revenues were $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, earned by delivering approximately 23,000 metric tons of wood pellets. Revenues were $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, earned by delivering approximately 56,000 metric tons of wood pellets.

Revenues were $11.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, earned by delivering approximately 80,000 metric tons of wood pellets. Revenues were $16.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, earned by delivering approximately 120,000 metric tons of wood pellets.

Prior to our decision to idle the Wawa Facility in February 2017, the Wawa Company agreed to deliver approximately 336,000 metric tons to Drax in 2017. In January 2017 we shipped 48,000 metric tons of pellets to Drax. In March 2017, Drax and the Wawa Company agreed to cancel the next two shipments of 2017 without any penalties, leaving the Wawa Company with an obligation to deliver approximately 193,000 metric tons to Drax later in the year. In April 2017, we shipped most of the remaining inventory of approximately 12,000 metric tons of pellets to Drax pursuant to an amendment to the Drax Contract; this shipment does not affect our delivery obligations for 2017. The Wawa Facility has not produced any product during 2017. The Wawa Company is currently negotiating with Drax to cancel the remaining shipments in 2017.At this time we cannot make a determination if any penalties will be associated with future changes to the contract. Rentech, Inc. has guaranteed the payment obligations of the Wawa Company under the terms of the Drax Contract up to a maximum amount of CAD$20 million.

We reduced production at our Atikokan Facility to levels necessary to only fulfill the delivery requirements under the OPG Contract. We continue to monitor the Atikokan Facility under the new operating plan. The Atikokan Facility will no longer ship wood pellets to the Port of Quebec. We will continue to explore alternatives for selling additional wood pellets produced from the Atikokan Facility to increase its utilization and profitability.

Wood Pellets: NEWP

We generate revenues at NEWP from sales of wood pellets for the United States residential and commercial heating markets. Revenues were $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 on deliveries of 22,000 tons of wood pellets. Revenues were $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 on deliveries of 24,000 tons of wood pellets.

Revenues were $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 on deliveries of 43,000 tons of wood pellets. Revenues were $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 on deliveries of 37,000 tons of wood pellets.

Results at NEWP for the first six months of 2017 were negatively impacted by relatively warmer weather than in previous years, continuing depressed prices for competitor heating fuels such as heating oil and propane, and changes in consumer buying patterns where the consumer now makes purchases on an as-needed basis. As a result, NEWP’s sales volumes were significantly lower than historical levels, although higher than the first six months of 2016. NEWP began scaling back production in February 2016. NEWP produced at approximately 66% of capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2016, at approximately 65% of capacity during 2016, at approximately 33% of capacity during the six months ended June 30, 2017, and is currently monitoring market demand and inventory levels and will adjust production accordingly. Sales prices for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were also lower than in the same periods last year.

Cost of Sales

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Cost of sales:
Fulghum Fibres		$	16,217			$	17,890		$	33,867			$	40,660
Wood Pellets: Industrial			4,741				11,736			16,275				26,566
Wood Pellets: NEWP			4,457				3,846			8,239				6,052
Total cost of sales		$	25,415			$	33,472		$	58,381			$	73,278

 

35

---

 

Fulghum Fibres

Costs of sales include (i) service costs for our wood chipping mill operations, which primarily consist of costs for labor, repairs and maintenance, depreciation and utilities, and (ii) product costs relating to our sale of wood chips and bark in South America, which consist of costs to purchase, process and export wood fibre products.

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $16.2 million. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, and utilities comprised 82% of our cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Depreciation expense included in cost of sales was $1.7 million during the three-month period ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $17.9 million. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, and utilities comprised 83% of our cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Depreciation expense included in cost of sales was $1.9 million during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $33.9 million. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, and utilities comprised 82% of our cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Depreciation expense included in cost of sales was $3.7 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $40.7 million. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, and utilities comprised 84% of our cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Depreciation expense included in cost of sales was $3.8 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016.

The decreases in cost of sales between the periods in 2016 and the corresponding periods in 2017 are primarily due to the decrease in biomass and chip sales by our operations in South America between periods and the decrease in processing volumes at our mills in the United States.

Wood Pellets: Industrial

Cost of sales primarily consists of wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, transportation, electricity and depreciation.

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $4.7 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we wrote down our log inventory by $0.9 million as a result of a high level of fixed operating costs and repairs and maintenance expenses incurred at the Atikokan Facility allocated to relatively low volumes produced during the period. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, transportation and electricity comprised 71% of cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $11.7 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, we wrote down our wood pellet inventory by $5.2 million as a result of a high level of fixed operating costs allocated to relatively low volumes produced at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities during the period of ramp-up. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, transportation and electricity comprised 74% of cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $2.1 million for three months ended June 30, 2016.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $16.3 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we wrote down our log and wood pellet inventory by $3.3 million as a result of a high level of fixed operating costs and repairs and maintenance expenses incurred at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities allocated to relatively low volumes produced during the period. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, transportation and electricity comprised 68% of cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $0.9 million for six months ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $26.6 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, we wrote down our wood pellet inventory by $10.3 million as a result of a high level of fixed operating costs allocated to relatively low volumes produced at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities during the period of ramp-up. Wood fibre feedstock, labor, repairs and maintenance, transportation and electricity comprised 74% of cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $5.1 million for six months ended June 30, 2016.

The decreases in cost of sales between the periods in 2016 and the periods in 2017 are due to the decreases in sales volumes and inventory write-downs between periods.

36

---

 

Wood Pellets: NEWP

Cost of sales primarily consists of expenses for wood fibre feedstock, packaging, labor, electricity, freight and depreciation. Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $4.5 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, wood fibre feedstock, packaging, labor and electricity comprised 59% of cost of sales. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $0.8 million for three months ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $3.8 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, wood fibre feedstock, packaging, labor and electricity comprised 75% of cost of sales. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $0.3 million for three months ended June 30, 2016.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $8.2 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, wood fibre feedstock, packaging, labor and electricity comprised 62% of cost of sales. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $1.3 million for six months ended June 30, 2017.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $6.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, wood fibre feedstock, packaging, labor and electricity comprised 76% of cost of sales. Depreciation expense included in the cost of sales was $0.5 million for six months ended June 30, 2016.

The increase in cost of sales between the three months ended June 30, 2017 and the corresponding period in 2016 is primarily due to the increase in depreciation expense between periods and $0.3 million of charges relating to scaling back production at the facilities during the three months ended June 30, 2017, partially offset by lower wood fibre feedstock costs. The increase in cost of sales between the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the corresponding period in 2016 is primarily due to the increase in sales volumes and depreciation expense between periods and $0.5 million of charges relating to scaling back production at the facilities during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Gross Profit (Loss)

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Gross Profit (Loss):
Fulghum Fibres		$	1,336			$	2,939		$	3,621			$	7,605
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(1,574	)			(5,198	)		(4,961	)			(10,167	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(439	)			580			(82	)			1,014
Total gross loss		$	(677	)		$	(1,679	)	$	(1,422	)		$	(1,548	)

 

Fulghum Fibres

Gross profit was $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $2.9 million for the same period last year. Gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was 8%, compared to 14% for the same period in the prior year. The decreases in gross profit and gross margin were due primarily to lower revenues as a result of a decrease in biomass product sales in South America, a decrease in chip sales to Asia, the sale of two U.S. mills in May 2017, lower processing volumes at other U.S. mills, and an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses for the mills in South America.

Gross profit was $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $7.6 million for the same period last year. Gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was 10%, compared to 16% for the same period in the prior year. The decreases in gross profit and gross margin were due primarily to lower revenues as a result of a decrease in biomass product sales in South America, a decrease in chip sales to Asia, the sale of two U.S. mills in May 2017 and one U.S. mill in April 2016, lower processing volumes at other U.S. mills, and an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses for the mills in South America.

Wood Pellets: Industrial

Gross loss for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $1.6 million, compared to $5.2 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross loss margin was 50% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 80% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in gross loss was primarily due to the idling of the Wawa Facility, lower operating rates at the Atikokan Facility, and a reduction in inventory write-down in 2017.

37

---

 

Gross loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $5.0 million, compared to $10.2 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross loss margin was 44% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 62% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in gr oss loss was primarily due to the idling of the Wawa Facility, lower operating rates at the Atikokan Facility, and a reduction in inventory write-down in 2017.

Wood Pellets: NEWP

Gross loss for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.4 million, compared to gross profit of $0.6 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross loss margin was 11% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to gross profit margin of 13% for the same period in the prior year. Gross profit and gross profit margin were lower because of lower sales volumes and prices, higher depreciation expense and charges relating to scaling back production at the facilities during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Gross loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.1 million, compared to gross profit of $1.0 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross loss margin was 1% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to gross profit margin of 14% for the same period in the prior year. Gross profit and gross profit margin were lower because of lower sales prices, higher depreciation expense and charges relating to scaling back production at the facilities during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

Operating Expenses

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Operating expenses:
Fulghum Fibres, excluding impairments		$	1,901			$	1,692		$	3,654			$	3,435
Fulghum Fibres impairments			—				—			20,884				—
Wood Pellets: Industrial			1,167				1,398			3,683				2,753
Wood Pellets: NEWP			656				801			1,408				1,669
Corporate and unallocated expenses			3,223				6,277			7,523				12,446
Total operating expenses		$	6,947			$	10,168		$	37,152			$	20,303

 

Fulghum Fibres

Operating expenses were comprised primarily of selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization expense, impairment charges and loss on disposal of fixed assets. Operating expenses were $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.  

Operating expenses were $24.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Operating expenses, excluding impairments, were $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $2.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the same period in the prior year. Depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the same period in the prior year.

Fulghum Impairments . Fulghum’s goodwill impairment was $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Fulghum’s asset impairments totaled $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. See “Note 8 — Property, Plant and Equipment” and “Note 9 — Goodwill” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets . For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, loss on disposal of fixed assets was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, loss on disposal of fixed assets was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

38

---

 

Wood Pellets: Industrial

Operating expenses were primarily comprised of selling, general and administrative expenses, which include personnel costs, travel, acquisition-related and development costs associated with the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities, and other business development costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.3 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in corporate allocations, partially offset by an increase in transportation expenses due to estimated contractual penalties resulting from the idling of the Wawa Facility. Corporate allocations totaled $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. There were no corporate allocations to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment in 2017. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded estimated contractual penalties under the Canadian National Contract of $0.8 million. There were no contractual penalties under the Canadian National Contract recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $2.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in rail car and transportation expenses resulting from the idling of the Wawa Facility, partially offset by a decrease in corporate allocations. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded an estimated remaining liability under the TrinityRail Lease of $1.3 million and contractual penalties under the Canadian National Contract of $1.4 million. Corporate allocations totaled $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. There were no corporate allocations to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment in 2017.

In addition, we may need to record additional carload shortfall penalties for 2017 under the Canadian National Contract as a result of idling the Wawa Facility and the revised 2017 delivery scheduled to Drax.

Wood Pellets: NEWP

Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.4 million, compared to $0.5 million for the same period in the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.9 million, compared to $1.1 million for the same period in the prior year.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Depreciation expense relating to wood pellet processing assets was recorded in cost of sales.

Corporate and Unallocated Expenses

Corporate and unallocated expenses represent costs that relate directly to Rentech and its subsidiaries but are not allocated to a segment. Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses include cash and non-cash personnel costs, transaction-related expenses, insurance costs, facilities expenses, information technology costs and professional services fees for legal, audit, tax and investor relations activities.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3.1 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to $4.7 million for the same period last year. The decrease was a result of the Company’s cost saving efforts, including a decrease in personnel costs of $0.9 million, professional fees of $0.5 million, non-cash equity-based compensation expense of $0.4 million and rent expense of $0.2 million, which was partially offset by the absence of allocating a portion of corporate overhead to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. Non-cash equity-based compensation expense was $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Corporate allocations to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment totaled $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

39

---

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $7.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to $10.8 million for the same period last year. The decrease was a result of the Company’s cost saving efforts, including a decrease in personnel costs of $1.9 million, finance transaction costs of $0.8 million, non-cash equity-based compensation expense of $0.6 million, software costs of $0.5 million, rent expense of $0.4 million, professional fees of $0.3 million and lease commission expense of $0.2 million, which was partially offset by the absence of allocating a portion of corporate overhead to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment. Non-cash equity-based compensation expense was $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.2 million for the same period in the prior year. Corpora te allocations to the Wood Pellets: Industrial segment totaled $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Other operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 include write-offs for computer software of $1.0 million and leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment totaling $0.4 million.

Operating Income (Loss)

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Operating Income (Loss):
Fulghum Fibres		$	(565	)		$	1,247		$	(20,917	)		$	4,170
Wood Pellets: Industrial			(2,741	)			(6,596	)		(8,644	)			(12,920	)
Wood Pellets: NEWP			(1,095	)			(221	)		(1,490	)			(655	)
Corporate and unallocated expenses			(3,223	)			(6,277	)		(7,523	)			(12,446	)
Total operating loss		$	(7,624	)		$	(11,847	)	$	(38,574	)		$	(21,851	)

 

Fulghum Fibres

Operating loss was $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to operating income of $1.2 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to lower revenues due to a decrease in biomass product sales in South America, a decrease in chip sales to Asia, the sale of two U.S. mills in May 2017, and lower processing volumes at other U.S. mills, as discussed above.

Operating loss was $20.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to operating income of $4.2 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to lower revenues due to a decrease in biomass product sales in South America, a decrease in chip sales to Asia, the sale of two U.S. mills in May 2017 and one U.S. mill in April 2016, lower processing volumes at other U.S. mills, and asset and goodwill impairments, as discussed above.

Wood Pellets: Industrial

Operating loss was $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $6.6 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating loss was due to the idling of the Wawa Facility, lower operating rates at the Atikokan Facility, and decreases in inventory write-down and corporate allocations, partially offset by an increase in penalties, as discussed above.

Operating loss was $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $12.9 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating loss was due to the idling of the Wawa Facility, lower operating rates at the Atikokan Facility, and decreases in inventory write-down and corporate allocations, partially offset by an increase in penalties, as discussed above.

Wood Pellets: NEWP

Operating loss was $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0.2 million for the same period last year. Operating loss was $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0.7 million for the same period last year. Operating losses were higher in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods last year because of lower sales prices, higher depreciation expense and charges relating to scaling back production at the facilities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

40

---

 

Corporate and Unallocated Expenses

Operating loss was $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $6.3 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating loss was primarily due to savings from the Company’s cost reduction efforts, as described above.

Operating loss was $7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $12.4 million for the same period last year. The decrease in operating loss was primarily due to savings from the Company’s cost reduction efforts, as described above.

Discontinued Operations

Results of RNP and the Energy Technologies segment are accounted for as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See “Note 4 — Discontinued Operations” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

ADJUSTED EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as net income (loss) from continuing operations plus net interest expense and other financing costs, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation and amortization and unusual items, like impairment and debt extinguishment charges , fair value adjustments to earn-out consideration and equity investment in CVR . Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and by external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as investors and commercial banks, to assess:

•

the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; and

•

our operating performance and return on invested capital compared to those of other public companies, without regard to financing methods and capital structure.

Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating income, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA may have material limitations as a performance measure because it excludes items that are necessary elements of our costs and operations. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA presented by other companies may not be comparable to our presentation, since each company may define these terms differently.

The table below reconciles Fulghum’s Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to segment net income (loss) for Fulghum.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Fulghum net income (loss) per segment disclosure		$	(819	)		$	521		$	(21,681	)		$	2,174
Add Fulghum items:
Net interest expense			514				575			1,010				1,144
Asset impairment			—				—			7,759				—
Goodwill impairment			—				—			13,125				—
Income tax (benefit) expense			(99	)			428			(1,482	)			1,207
Depreciation and amortization			1,856				2,225			4,117				4,652
Other (1 )			(161	)			(278	)		1,236				(356	)
Fulghum's Adjusted EBITDA		$	1,291			$	3,471		$	4,084			$	8,821

 

(1)

Includes an expense of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 that represents the release of certain tax indemnifications from the previous owners of Fulghum.

41

---

 

The table below reconciles NEWP’s Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to segment net loss for NEWP.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
NEWP net loss per segment disclosure		$	(1,204	)		$	(313	)	$	(1,704	)		$	(868	)
Add NEWP items:
Net interest expense			147				150			283				291
Income tax expense			—				15			19				35
Depreciation and amortization			1,045				592			1,768				1,055
Other			(38	)			(74	)		(88	)			(114	)
NEWP's Adjusted EBITDA		$	(50	)		$	370		$	278			$	399

 

The table below reconciles Wood Pellet - Industrial’s Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to segment net loss for Wood Pellets: Industrial.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Wood Pellets: Industrial net loss per segment disclosure		$	(3,230	)		$	(7,015	)	$	(9,584	)		$	(13,753	)
Add Wood Pellets: Industrial items:
Net interest expense			491				380			1,067				818
Income tax expense			—				—			—				—
Depreciation and amortization			1				2,169			946				5,210
Other			(3	)			39			(127	)			16
Wood Pellets: Industrial Adjusted EBITDA		$	(2,741	)		$	(4,427	)	$	(7,698	)		$	(7,709	)

 

The table below reconciles Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (excluding equity in loss of CVR and discontinued operations), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to loss from continuing operations.

 

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,							For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016			2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Loss from continuing operations		$	(37,123	)		$	(8,941	)	$	(71,508	)		$	(19,969	)
Add items:
Net interest expense			2,518				2,480			5,039				6,051
Asset impairment			—				—			7,759				—
Goodwill impairment			—				—			13,125				—
Loss on debt repayment			—				3,295			—				3,295
Income tax benefit			(28	)			(9,705	)		(1,252	)			(12,107	)
Depreciation and amortization			2,980				5,117			6,987				11,173
Equity in loss of investee			27,212				1,329			28,130				1,329
Other(1)			(204	)			1,118			1,017				974
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA		$	(4,645	)		$	(5,307	)	$	(10,703	)		$	(9,254	)

 

(1)

Includes an expense of $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 that represents the release of certain tax indemnifications from the previous owners of Fulghum. The amounts for 2016 include the write-offs for the computer software, leasehold improvements, furniture and office equipment totaling $1.4 million.

42

---

 

CASH FLOWS  

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of cash flows:

 

		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2017				2016
		(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities - continuing operations		$	(6,818	)		$	12,604
Operating activities - discontinued operations			—				(23,672	)
Investing activities - continuing operations			775				(3,333	)
Investing activities - discontinued operations			—				17,797
Financing activities			(3,335	)			(5,268	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash			107				344
Decrease in cash		$	(9,271	)		$	(1,528	)

 

Operating Activities

Revenues were $57.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $71.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to the decrease in sales volumes at Fulghum, the Atikokan Facility and the Wawa Facility, partially offset by increases in sales volumes at NEWP.

Net cash used in operating activities – continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $6.8 million. We had net loss from continuing operations of $71.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which included a goodwill impairment charge of $13.1 million, asset impairment charges of $7.8 million, $7.0 million of depreciation and amortization expense and a $3.3 million write-down of inventory. Accounts receivable decreased by $5.8 million due primarily to timing of collections.  

Net cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $12.6 million. We had net loss from continuing operations of $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which included $11.3 million of depreciation and amortization expense, of which $1.8 million was included in the inventory write-down, and a $10.3 million write-down of inventory. Inventories increased by $14.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in inventory at NEWP because of the abnormally warm temperatures in the Northeast during the most recent winter that resulted in lower sales, partially offset by decreases in inventory at Fulghum and the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities due to timing of sales. Accounts receivable increased by $5.3 million primarily due to timing of sales.  

Net cash used in operating activities – discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $23.7 million. We had net income – discontinued operations of $310.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which includes $358.6 million for our share of the book gain on sale of RNP, and was partially offset by income tax expense of $56.9 million.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities – continuing operations was $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to net cash used in investing activities – continuing operations of $3.3 million for the same period in the prior year. Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily related to proceeds from the sale of two of Fulghum’s mills, partially offset by capital expenditures at Fulghum and the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily related to capital expenditures at the Atikokan and Wawa Facilities and some of Fulghum’s mills, partially offset by proceeds from disposals of assets and distributions received from our equity investment in CVR.

Net cash provided by investing activities – discontinued operations was $17.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

43

---

 

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $5.3 million for the same period in the prior year. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we made debt payments of $11.1 million and borrowed $7.8 million under various credit agreements. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we borrowed $23.8 million under various credit agreements. During the period, we made debt payments of $14.2 million, and RNP made cash distributions to holders of noncontrolling interests of $3.3 million. We also used $10.0 million, along with CVR Common Units valued at $97.1 million to repurchase the Preferred Stock. CVR Common Units valued at $45.0 million were used to pay down $41.7 million under the GSO Credit Agreement.

 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2017, our current assets and current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

Cash (1)		$	19,048
Accounts receivable			6,759
Inventories			24,075
Other current assets			6,728
Total current assets		$	56,610
Accounts payable		$	11,468
Accrued liabilities			12,319
Debt			15,879
Other current liabilities			7,781
Total current liabilities		$	47,447

 

At June 30, 2017, our debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

GSO Credit Agreement		$	47,176
Fulghum debt (2)			38,467
NEWP debt (3)			14,223
QS Construction Facility			13,609
Total debt		$	113,475

 

(1)

Amount includes cash of $8.7 million and $0.1 million at Fulghum and NEWP, respectively.

(2)

The Fulghum debt consists primarily of 15 term loans and four short term lines of credit with various financial institutions with each loan secured by specific property and equipment.

(3)

The NEWP debt consists primarily of four term loans and one short term line of credit with each loan secured by specific property and equipment.

Sources and Uses of Capital

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we funded operations and investments in our wood fibre processing business and corporate activities primarily through cash on hand.  

We have a history of operating losses and an accumulated deficit of $434.0 million as of June 30, 2017. We believe we have sufficient liquidity from cash on hand, expected working capital and other expected sources to fund operations and corporate activities through calendar year 2017, but we may have costs associated with maintaining the Wawa Facility in an idle state, pursuing strategic alternatives with respect to Rentech, Inc. and its operating businesses and other events that could arise that could increase our liquidity needs in 2017. We may need additional liquidity to fund corporate activities in 2018. As a result of the above, there exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date of the issuance of our financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Management’s plans to address these concerns are discussed below. 

We are attempting to address our liquidity needs through a combination of cost reductions within our businesses and pursuing strategic alternatives. In February 2017, we announced the idling of the Wawa Facility to conserve liquidity as we explore strategic alternatives for the facility. We also announced our plan to address potential liquidity needs by considering strategic alternatives for the Company as a whole that may include, but are not limited to, a sale of us, a merger or other business combination, a sale of all or a material portion of our assets, restructuring or a recapitalization. The Company’s pursuit of an option in its review of strategic alternatives may lead to or result in future goodwill or asset impairments in its financial statements. We have retained Wells Fargo Securities, LLC to assist in the strategic alternatives review process.  

44

---

 

Over the past 24 months, we have been reorganizing our businesses to lower our cost structure. We now expect to a chieve total consolidated annual SG&A expense savings of approximately $20 million, up from the $12 to $15 million we previously expected. We have completed restructuring actions that have resulted in approximately $13.6 million of consolidated SG&A expens e savings in 2016, excluding approximately $2.6 million of reorganization and transaction costs. We expect to achieve the additional savings of approximately $6.5 million in 2017, excluding reorganization expenses, shortfall penalties and transaction costs .

We expect our NEWP and Fulghum businesses to generate positive cash flow and be self-sufficient from a liquidity perspective in 2017; however, there can be no assurance that either business will perform in line with our expectations. We expect the Atikokan Facility to generate cash flow in the range of break-even to slightly positive under the revised operating plan to produce 45,000 metric tons of wood pellets per year. We expect that NEWP will need to renew its $6 million revolving credit facility in August 2017 to address seasonal working capital needs, but there can be no assurance the revolving credit facility will be renewed on acceptable terms. On May 5, 2017, Fulghum consummated the sale of the two chip mills resulting in net proceeds of $5.1 million that was paid by Fulghum to Rentech mostly in satisfaction of intercompany balances. The Company was required to offer the net proceeds of the sale as prepayment of its debt under the GSO Credit Agreement. In June 2017, the Company paid down the GSO Credit Agreement by $5.1 million.

In August 2017, Fulghum was notified by a customer of the exercise of its purchase option for six of Fulghum’s chip mills. The parties are in discussions to enter into new operating agreements for Fulghum to continue to operate the mills on terms similar to operating agreements at other Fulghum mills when Fulghum transfers the asset ownership to the customer. When the sale of the mills is consummated, we expect to receive a one-time cash payment of approximately $5.0 million. The sales proceeds will be used to pay off any underlying debt on the mills with any remaining proceeds being offered to GSO Capital Partners LP as a prepayment of the GSO Credit Agreement.

Our subsidiaries can distribute cash to us, although restrictions in our debt agreements may restrict such distributions. Under the GSO Credit Agreement we are required to maintain at least $5 million of cash on hand, including cash available for distribution from our subsidiaries. Under the NEWP credit facility, NEWP must receive the lender’s prior approval before making any cash distributions to Rentech, and the lender may not provide such approval. NEWP is also required to comply with financial performance covenants in its debt agreements. These covenants include maintaining: (i) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.4 to 1.0 on a trailing four quarter basis, (ii) a senior debt coverage ratio of less than 3.0 to 1.0 on a trailing four quarter basis and (iii) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.2 to 1.0 calculated at the end of each calendar year. As of June 30, 2017, NEWP required a waiver from its lender as it was not in compliance with the minimum debt service coverage ratio due to lower sales volumes and additional costs relating to scaling back production at the facilities. We expect NEWP to require similar waivers over the next two quarters. In the event we are unable to obtain the waivers from NEWP’s lender, the lender could exercise remedies against NEWP under the loan documents, including accelerating the debt so that it becomes due on demand. A default of the NEWP indebtedness would trigger a cross default of other indebtedness of the Company. Fulghum is required to comply with the financial performance covenants in its debt agreements. These covenants include maintaining (i) a minimum cash flow coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0, measured on a consolidated basis for Fulghum and its domestic subsidiaries and collectively for selected projects and (ii) a minimum tangible net worth of no less than $11.28 million plus 50% of the net income of Fulghum from and after December 31, 2010. As of June 30, 2017, Fulghum was in compliance with its financial covenants. In the event that Fulghum does not comply with these covenants, the debt agreements do not permit it to make cash distributions to Rentech. In the event that NEWP or Fulghum is not permitted to make cash distributions to Rentech, these restrictions would limit Rentech’s ability to access and use cash from its operating subsidiaries to fund its corporate activities and operations. A failure to comply with the debt agreements described above also could constitute an event of default, which would give rise to the right of the applicable lenders to seek remedies against NEWP or Fulghum, as applicable.

There is no assurance that the strategic review process will result in a transaction, that we will achieve the cost savings we expect, that an event resulting in the acceleration of our indebtedness or otherwise requiring additional liquidity will not occur or that we will not require an additional source of funds. If we require additional capital and are unable to obtain it, there would be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Debt Facilities

Our debt facilities used to support our wood fibre processing business and corporate activities are the Fulghum debt, the NEWP debt, the QS Construction Facility, the credit agreement with Bank of Montreal, or the BMO Credit Agreement, and the GSO Credit Agreement. Rentech’s consolidated current portion of debt is $15.9 million, of which $15.8 million represents outstanding principal balance and $0.1 million debt premium and debt issuance costs. Of this amount, Fulghum’s current portion of debt is $9.0 million, followed by $6.0 million for NEWP and $0.9 million for the Wawa Company. We expect Fulghum and NEWP to cover their respective current portion of debt and interest on debt during the next 12 months with their cash from operations. We expect to provide the Wawa Company with the funds to cover the current portion of its debt and interest on debt. We expect debt service, including interest on debt, related to the remaining debt during the next 12 months to be funded with cash on hand. For a description

45

---

 

o f the terms of our various debt instruments, see “Note 13 — Debt” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Part II—Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Annual Report and “Note 10 — Debt” to the consolidated financial sta tements included in this report.

Restriction on Sales of CVR Partners Common Units

Certain provisions of the GSO Credit Agreement may have substantial effects on our liquidity. The Company has pledged all of its CVR Common Units pursuant to the GSO Credit Agreement. For further information regarding these terms, see “Note 13 — Debt” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Part II—Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the Annual Report.

The CVR Common Units held by the Company are subject to further transfer restrictions arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

As a result of these restrictions, the Company may not be able to sell or otherwise transfer the CVR Common Units which could impact its liquidity.

Cash Distributions

We expect quarterly distributions from CVR, if made, to be a source of liquidity for our wood fibre processing and corporate activities. Cash distributions from CVR may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, and could be as low as zero for any quarter. We own approximately 7.2 million CVR Common Units. Assuming we continue to hold the CVR Common Units, we would receive quarterly distributions if made by CVR. However, our ownership interest in CVR may be reduced over t ime if we elect to sell any of our CVR Common Units or if additional Common Units were to be issued by CVR, as the case may be. While CVR paid a cash distribution to its common unitholders for the first quarter of 2017 of $0.02 per unit, CVR will not pay cash distributions for the second quarter of 2017.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Our contractual obligations from continuing operations as of June 30, 2017 are not materially different from those disclosed in “Part II—Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Contractual Obligations” in our Annual Report.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2017.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Refer to “Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements” to the consolidated financial statements, included in “Part I — Item 1. Financial Statements” of this report.

 

 

ITEM  3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For a quantitative and qualitative discussion about market risk relating to continuing operations, see “Part II — Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in our Annual Report. As of June 30, 2017, no material changes have occurred in the types or nature of market risk described in our Annual Report.

46

---

 

ITEM  4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, or DCP, that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, or Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer, or Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating DCP, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s DCP as of the end of the period covered by this report. Management has identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, or ICFR, as described below. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our DCP were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2017.

Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

As we have previously reported, we identified the following two material weaknesses which continue to exist as of June 30, 2017. We did not design and maintain effective internal controls over the review of the cash flow forecasts used in the accounting for long-lived asset impairment and recoverability. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective internal controls related to documenting management’s review of assumptions used in our cash flow forecasts for long-lived asset impairment and recoverability.  

In addition, we determined that we did not maintain effective internal controls over the allocation of GAAP income tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations. Specifically, we did not perform certain procedures over the allocation of the GAAP tax provision between continuing and discontinued operations.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in ICFR, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. These control deficiencies did not result in a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. However, these control deficiencies, if unremediated, could result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected by our internal controls. Accordingly, our management has determined that these control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses. For more information, see “Part II—Item 9A. Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in the Annual Report.

Plan for Remediation of the Material Weaknesses

During the fourth quarter of 2015, we designed a number of measures to address the material weakness relating to cash flow forecasts identified above. Specifically, we designed additional controls over documentation and review of the inputs and results of our cash flow forecasts used in the impairment testing for our Wawa and Atikokan Facilities. These controls included the implementation of additional review activities by qualified personnel and additional documentation and support of conclusions with regard to accounting for long-lived asset recoverability and impairment. In addition, we have reinforced our control requirements to ensure controls designed to review (i) the recording and disclosure of income taxes and (ii) the allocation of GAAP income tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations are performed at a level of consistency and precision which will prevent or detect material misstatements in the financial statements. We are in the process of implementing our remediation plan, and expect the control weaknesses to be remediated in the coming reporting periods. However, we are unable at this time to estimate when the remediation will be completed.

The process of designing and implementing an effective financial reporting system is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a financial reporting system that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations. As we continue to evaluate and take actions to improve our ICFR, we may determine to take additional actions to address control deficiencies or determine to modify certain of the remediation measures described above. We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses we have identified or avoid potential future material weaknesses.

47

---

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

As described in the Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Plan for Remediation of the Material Weaknesses sections above, there were changes in our ICFR during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our ICFR.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM  1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

A description of the legal proceedings to which the Company and its subsidiaries are a party is contained in “Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies — Litigation” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Part I — Item 1. Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

Exhibit Index

 

10.1	Separation Agreement, dated June 29, 2017, by and between Rentech, Inc. and Colin M. Morris
31.1	Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
32.1	Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
101	The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”) includes: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit), (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), detailed tagged.

 

 

 

48

---

 

SIGNAT URES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

		RENTECH, INC.
Dated: August 9, 2017		/s/ Keith B. Forman
		Keith B. Forman,
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: August 9, 2017		/s/ Paul M. Summers
		Paul M. Summers,
		Chief Financial Officer

 

 

49