UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
for the quarterly period ended:
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from:
to
Commission file number:
0-26366
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
23-2812193
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer identification No.)
|
732 Montgomery Avenue, Narberth, PA 19072
(Address of principal Executive Offices)
(610) 668-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
þ
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
Applicable only to corporate issuers:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2009
|
$2.00 par value
|
|
10,846,639
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2009
|
$0.10 par value
|
|
2,095,681
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 1.
Financial Statements
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
9,112
|
|
|
$
|
5,910
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
32,243
|
|
|
|
7,349
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
41,355
|
|
|
|
14,259
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale (AFS) at fair value
|
|
|
377,159
|
|
|
|
350,302
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost
|
|
|
10,952
|
|
|
|
10,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities and FHLB stock
|
|
|
388,111
|
|
|
|
361,254
|
|
Leases held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Loans and leases
|
|
|
707,413
|
|
|
|
700,722
|
|
Less allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
27,269
|
|
|
|
28,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases
|
|
|
680,144
|
|
|
|
671,814
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
30,360
|
|
|
|
30,016
|
|
Real estate owned via equity investment
|
|
|
19,106
|
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
14,332
|
|
|
|
13,580
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
20,244
|
|
|
|
10,346
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
6,926
|
|
Investment in real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
49,954
|
|
|
|
45,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,252,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
$
|
53,387
|
|
|
$
|
50,886
|
|
Interest bearing
|
|
|
758,753
|
|
|
|
709,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
812,140
|
|
|
|
760,068
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
252,076
|
|
|
|
253,681
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
Obligations related to real estate owned via equity investment
|
|
|
12,368
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
7,716
|
|
|
|
6,102
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
14,620
|
|
|
|
14,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,146,694
|
|
|
|
1,094,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, Series A 5% perpetual, $1,000 liquidation value, 500,000
shares authorized, 30,407
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and 0 shares at December 31,
2008
|
|
|
27,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, par value $2.00 per share, authorized 18,000,000 shares; issued,
11,345,127 at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
22,690
|
|
|
|
22,690
|
|
Class B, par value $0.10 per share; authorized, 3,000,000 shares; issued,
2,095,681 at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
126,362
|
|
|
|
123,425
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(40,360
|
)
|
|
|
(33,561
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(25,393
|
)
|
|
|
(26,106
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost, shares of Class A, 498,488 at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(6,971
|
)
|
|
|
(6,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Royal Bancshares shareholders equity
|
|
|
104,166
|
|
|
|
79,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
106,280
|
|
|
|
81,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,252,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-2-
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including fees
|
|
$
|
11,344
|
|
|
$
|
13,684
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Investment securities AFS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable interest
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
Tax exempt interest
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Deposits in banks
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
|
20,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
6,934
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
Obligations related to real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
10,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
7,069
|
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
|
|
|
4,272
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Income related to real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Gains on sales of loans and leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Impairment loss on AFS securities
|
|
|
(4,238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains on sales of other real estate owned
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
Net losses on the sale of AFS investment securities
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other (Loss) Income
|
|
|
(3,583
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
Professional and legal fees
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
Pennsylvania shares tax
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
FDIC and state assessments
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Expenses related to real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Other Expenses
|
|
|
7,226
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(6,537
|
)
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income
|
|
$
|
(6,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Royal Bancshares
|
|
$
|
(6,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
Less Preferred stock Series A accumulated dividend and accretion
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(6,968
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss basic
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends Class A shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends Class B shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-3-
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss
Three months ended March 31, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
stock
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
paid in
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
Shareholders
|
(In thousands, except dividend per share data)
|
|
Series A
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
capital
|
|
deficit
|
|
loss
|
|
stock
|
|
Interest
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
11,345
|
|
|
$
|
22,690
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
123,425
|
|
|
$
|
(33,561
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
|
$
|
81,585
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
(6,537
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of
reclassification and taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series A perpetual preferred stock
(30,407 shares) and warrants to purchase
common stock (1,104,307 shares)
|
|
|
27,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,407
|
|
Accretion of discount on preferred stock
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
27,628
|
|
|
|
11,345
|
|
|
$
|
22,690
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
126,362
|
|
|
$
|
(40,360
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,393
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,114
|
|
|
$
|
106,280
|
|
|
|
|
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Loss
Three months ended March 31, 2008
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
stock
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
paid in
|
|
Retained
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
Treasury
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
Shareholders
|
(In thousands, except dividend per share data)
|
|
Series A
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
capital
|
|
earnings
|
|
loss
|
|
stock
|
|
Interest
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
11,329
|
|
|
$
|
22,659
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
122,578
|
|
|
$
|
8,527
|
|
|
$
|
(1,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,867
|
|
|
$
|
148,234
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of
reclassification and taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Class A $0.15; Class B $0.1725)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,001
|
)
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
11,329
|
|
|
$
|
22,659
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
122,750
|
|
|
$
|
7,569
|
|
|
$
|
(4,406
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,025
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,014
|
|
|
$
|
144,771
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-4-
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(6,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Net (accretion) amortization of discounts and premiums on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investments
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
275
|
|
Benefit for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
Loss (gains) on sales of other real estate
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Gains on sales of loans and leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Net losses on sales of investment securities
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Distribution from investments in real estate
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Gain from sale of premises of real estate owned via equity investment
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
Income from equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Income from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
Impairment of available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
|
4,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from call/maturities of held-to-maturity (HTM) investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,005
|
|
Proceeds from call/maturities of available-for-sale (AFS) investment securities
|
|
|
64,790
|
|
|
|
30,391
|
|
Proceeds from sales of AFS investment securities
|
|
|
15,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of AFS investment securities
|
|
|
(112,210
|
)
|
|
|
(7,327
|
)
|
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
Net increase in loans
|
|
|
(20,862
|
)
|
|
|
(7,907
|
)
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sale of premises of real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
Distribution from investments in real estate
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Net decrease in real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(52,305
|
)
|
|
|
87,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in non-interest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits and savings accounts
|
|
|
8,120
|
|
|
|
(23,286
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit
|
|
|
43,952
|
|
|
|
(56,928
|
)
|
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,562
|
)
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(1,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds (repayment) of mortgage debt of real estate owned via equity investments
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
30,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
80,892
|
|
|
|
(91,389
|
)
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
27,096
|
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
14,259
|
|
|
|
10,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
41,355
|
|
|
$
|
11,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
7,671
|
|
|
$
|
10,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to other real estate owned
|
|
$
|
9,898
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
-5-
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Royal
Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. (Royal Bancshares or the Company) and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Royal Investments of Delaware, Inc., including Royal Investments of Delaware, Incs
wholly owned subsidiary, Royal Preferred, LLC, Royal Captive Insurance Company, Royal Asian Bank
(effective July 17, 2006, prior thereto, a division of Royal Bank America) and Royal Bank America
(Royal Bank), including Royal Banks subsidiaries, Royal Real Estate of Pennsylvania, Inc., Royal
Investments America, LLC, RBA Property LLC, Narberth Property Acquisition LLC, and its five 60%
ownership interests in Crusader Servicing Corporation, Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC, Royal Bank
America Leasing, LP, RBA ABL Group, LP and RBA Capital, LP. During the first quarter of 2008,
Royal Bank discontinued operations of RBA ABL Group, LP. The two Delaware trusts, Royal Bancshares
Capital Trust I and Royal Bancshares Capital Trust II are not consolidated per requirements under
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (R). These consolidated
financial statements reflect the historical information of the Company. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
1.
Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) for interim
financial information. The interim financial information included herein is unaudited; however,
such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) that
are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the
interim periods. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services
industry. Applications of the principles in the Companys preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These estimates and
assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.
2.
Segment Information
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Segment Reporting, established
standards for public business enterprises to report information about operating segments in their
annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in subsequent interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It also
established standards for related disclosure about products and services, geographic areas, and
major customers. Operating segments are components of an enterprise, which are evaluated regularly
by the chief operating decision makers in deciding how to allocate and assess resources and
performance. The Companys chief operating decision makers are the Chief Executive Officer and the
President. The Company has identified its reportable operating segments as Community Banking,
Tax Liens and Equity Investments. The Company has two operating segments that do not meet the
quantitative thresholds for requiring disclosure, but have different characteristics than the
Community Banking, Tax Liens and Equity Investments segments, and from each other, RBA Leasing and
RBA Capital (Other in the segment table below). The Tax Liens segment includes Crusader Servicing
Corporation and Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC (collectively the Tax Lien Operation); and the
Equity Investments segment is a wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Bank, Royal Investments America,
that makes equity investments in real estate and had extended mezzanine loans to real estate
projects. At March 31, 2009 and 2008, one such equity investment in real estate meets the
requirements for consolidation
under FIN 46 (R) based on Royal Investments America being the primary financial beneficiary, and
therefore the Company is reporting on a consolidated basis said investment as a Variable Interest
Entity (VIE). This was determined based on the amount invested by Royal Investments America
compared to our partners. The VIE is included below in the Equity Investment category.
-6-
Community banking
The Companys Community Banking segment which includes Royal Bank America and Royal Asian Bank
(the Banks) consists of commercial and retail banking. The Community Banking business
segment is managed as a single strategic unit which generates revenue from a
variety of products and services provided by the Banks. For example, commercial lending is
dependent upon the ability of the Banks to fund cash needed to make loans with retail deposits and
other borrowings and to manage interest rate and credit risk. While the Banks make very few
consumer loans, cash needed to make such loans would be funded similarly to commercial loans.
Tax lien operation
The Companys Tax Lien Operation consists of purchasing delinquent tax certificates from local
municipalities at auction and then processing those liens to either encourage the property holder
to pay off the lien, or to foreclose and sell the property. The tax lien operation earns income
based on interest rates (determined at auction) and penalties assigned by the municipality along
with gains on sale of foreclosed properties.
Equity investments
In September 2005, the Company, together with a real estate development company, formed a limited
partnership. The Company is a limited partner in the partnership (Partnership). The Partnership
was formed to convert an apartment complex into condominiums. The development company is the
general partner of the Partnership. The Company invested 66% of the initial capital contribution,
or $2.5 million, with the development company investing the remaining equity of $1.3 million. The
Company is entitled to earn a preferred return on the $2.5 million capital contribution. In
addition, the Company made two mezzanine loans totaling $9.2 million at market terms and interest
rates. As of March 31, 2009, the Partnership also had $12.4 million outstanding of senior debt
with another bank. Upon the repayment of the mezzanine loan interest and principal and the initial
capital contributions and preferred return, the Company and the development company will both
receive 50% of the remaining distribution, if any. The Company is not obligated to pay the senior
debt.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
the Partnership assesses the recoverability of fixed assets based on estimated future operating
cash flows. The Company had previously recognized $10.0 million in impairment ($8.5 million in
2007 and $1.5 million in 2008). There was no further impairment in the first quarter of 2009. The
Companys investment in this entity is further discussed in Note 12 Real Estate Owned via Equity
Investment.
Other segments
RBA Capital and RBA Leasing are reported in this category. RBA Capital is a re-discount lender.
RBA Leasing is a small ticket leasing company. Neither RBA Capital nor RBA Leasing met the
threshold requirements under SFAS 131 that would preclude them from being combined and reported
below as Other segments. During the fourth quarter of 2008, management decided to wind down the
operation of RBA Capital. In the near future, the operations of the subsidiary will be folded into
Royal Bank. See the Results of Operations by Business Segments section in Item 2 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion on
these subsidiaries.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-7-
The
following tables present selected financial information for reportable business segments for
the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
Tax Lien
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,086,271
|
|
|
$
|
83,771
|
|
|
$
|
17,452
|
|
|
$
|
65,480
|
|
|
$
|
1,252,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
812,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
12,634
|
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
|
$
|
16,354
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,841
|
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
Total other
(loss) income
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(3,583
|
)
|
Total other
expenses
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
7,226
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(7,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(6,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income attributable to Royal Bancshares
|
|
$
|
(7,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
(6,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
Tax Lien
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,047,635
|
|
|
$
|
62,536
|
|
|
$
|
18,245
|
|
|
$
|
56,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,184,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
689,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
16,929
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
|
$
|
20,072
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,440
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
10,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,489
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
624
|
|
|
$
|
9,899
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Total other
(loss) income
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Total other
expenses
|
|
|
5,649
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) attributable to Royal Bancshares
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income earned by the Community Banking segment related to the Tax Lien Operation was
approximately $928,000 and $907,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Interest income earned by the Community Banking segment related to the Other Segment was
approximately $524,000 and $780,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
3.
Per Share Information
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. The Company has two
classes of common stock currently outstanding. The classes are A and B, of which one share of Class
B is convertible into 1.15 shares of Class A. Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution
and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS takes into account the potential dilution that
could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted
into common stock using the treasury stock method. For the three months ended
-8-
March 31, 2009 all options to purchase shares of common stock were anti-dilutive in the computation of diluted EPS, as
exercise price exceeded average market price and as a result of the net loss for the quarter. For
the three months ended March 31, 2008, options to purchase 358,311 common shares, respectively,
were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive
as exercise price exceeded average market price. Basic and diluted EPS are
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
Average shares
|
|
Per share
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
(numerator)
|
|
(denominator)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(6,968
|
)
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Average shares
|
|
Per share
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
(numerator)
|
|
(denominator)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
13,342
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders plus
assumed exercise of options
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
13,364
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9 Stock Option Plans for a discussion on the Companys stock option and restricted stock
plan.
4.
Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, requires the reporting of other comprehensive
income, which includes net income (loss) as well as certain other items, including unrealized gains
and losses on available for sale securities (AFS), which results in changes to equity during the
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising during period
|
|
$
|
(4,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,109
|
)
|
Reduction in deferred tax valuation allowance related to
preferred and common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
923
|
|
Less adjustment for impaired preferred and common stock
|
|
|
4,238
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
Less reclasification adjustment for losses
realized in net income
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
(333
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,041
|
)
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
Unrecognized benefit obligation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for amortization
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive (loss) income, net
|
|
$
|
(326
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising during period
|
|
$
|
(4,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,811
|
)
|
Less reclasification adjustment for losses
realized in net income
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
(4,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,843
|
)
|
Unrecognized benefit obligation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for amortization
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss, net
|
|
$
|
(4,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Investment Securities
:
The carrying value and approximate fair value of investment securities at March 31, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
cost
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
48,721
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,735
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
Preferred and common stock
|
|
|
19,364
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(6,298
|
)
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
214,307
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
(4,762
|
)
|
|
|
212,035
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,282
|
)
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
47,727
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(8,079
|
)
|
|
|
39,676
|
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
36,282
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(8,937
|
)
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
8,405
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
8,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
411,029
|
|
|
$
|
3,707
|
|
|
$
|
(37,577
|
)
|
|
$
|
377,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying value and approximate fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
cost
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
53,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,061
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
48,109
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,191
|
|
Preferred and common stock
|
|
|
23,907
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8,911
|
)
|
|
|
15,004
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
121,559
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
(6,293
|
)
|
|
|
116,915
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,840
|
)
|
|
|
26,160
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
57,445
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
(6,748
|
)
|
|
|
51,338
|
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
36,316
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
(6,778
|
)
|
|
|
30,144
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
7,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
383,838
|
|
|
$
|
4,230
|
|
|
$
|
(37,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
350,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
The AFS portfolio had gross unrealized losses of $37.6 million at March 31, 2009, which slightly
declined from gross unrealized losses of $37.8 million at December 31, 2008. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $4.2 million impairment charge related to preferred and
common stocks. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, gross unrealized losses increased for
collateralized debt obligations, corporate bonds, trust preferred securities and other securities
which was offset by the impairment charge for preferred and common stocks and recoveries in
collateralized mortgage obligations. The gross unrealized losses are primarily related to the
turbulent credit and financial markets coupled with the current economic environment. As a result
many of the investment securities are expected to increase in value once the markets become
normalized and the resulting fair market values recover. Management expects full collection of
cash flows on the non impaired investments in the AFS portfolio.
Preferred and common stock had gross unrealized losses of $6.3 million and $8.9 million at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The investments in marketable equity securities
consist primarily of six separate diversified managed accounts of large cap, small cap and mid-cap
stocks. As a result of the length of time some of the equity securities have been in a loss
position and/or the severity of the loss position, management has deemed that individual stocks
within these separate managed accounts have unrealized losses that are other than temporary at
March 31, 2009. Consequently the Company recorded an impairment charge to earnings of $3.1 million
in the first quarter of 2009. One of the preferred stock investments within the financial services
industry, which is currently not rated by the rating agencies, was deemed impaired in the amount of
$1.1 million at March 31, 2009, and the Company recorded a charge to earnings in this amount for
the first quarter of 2009. However, the Company continues to receive dividend payments on the
preferred stock. The severity of the unrealized loss is correlated to the decline of the stock
market that started in the fall of 2007, but is primarily due to the decline that has occurred
during the past year as a result of the current economic recession. Because the Company has the
ability and intent to hold the remainder of the preferred and common stock investments until a
recovery of fair value, it does not consider the impairment to be other than temporary on the
remainder of these investments. Of the $6.3 million in gross unrealized losses for this investment
category, $1.0 million has occurred for more than twelve months and $5.3 million has occurred for
less than twelve months.
The collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) within the AFS portfolio had gross unrealized
losses of $4.8 million at March 31, 2009 as compared to unrealized losses of $6.3 million at
December 31, 2008. The unrealized losses in CMOs relate to lack of market liquidity and changes in
market credit spreads. The credit ratings for these investments have experienced some ratings
declines; however, the unrealized loss has improved due to the stabilization of delinquencies and
foreclosures in the mortgage pools within the CMOs. Of the CMOs that are rated, none are below
investment grade. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a
recovery of fair value, it does not consider the impairment to be other than temporary. Of the
$4.8 million in total unrealized losses for this investment category, $2.3 million has occurred for
more than twelve months and $2.5 million has occurred for less than twelve months.
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) had gross unrealized losses of $9.3 million and $8.8
million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The unrealized losses for the
Companys CDO investments relate to the credit default risk of the pool of diversified companies
within each of three collateralized debt obligations. The decline reflects the uncertainty
associated with the current economic recession and the potential for increased company bankruptcies
that could potentially result in losses within these investments. The CDO valuations were
determined using a copula method, which is a type of market standard valuation modeling for
structured credit derivative products that is dependent on the correlated default events of the
obligors within the underlying collateral pool. Two of the CDOs have a diversified pool of
approximately 100 companies that have experienced additional defaults during the first quarter of
2009. Based upon the number of defaults occurring to date and the maturities of these CDOs in
December of 2009, the Company expects full payment of principal at maturity. The remaining CDO,
which has a diversified pool of close to 100 companies, also experienced additional defaults during
the first quarter of 2009 and matures in June of 2010. Based upon the defaults to date and the
CDOs maturity date, management expects to receive full payment of principal at maturity. Gross
unrealized losses for this investment category have occurred for more than twelve months.
Corporate bonds had gross unrealized losses of $8.1 million and $6.7 million at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The Companys unrealized losses in investments in corporate bonds
represent credit risk of the underlying issuers, which are primarily financial institutions and
insurance companies. The ratings for some of the
-11-
corporate bonds continue to decline during the first quarter of 2009 due to downgrading by the
ratings agencies based on the issuers 2008 financial results. Despite the below investment grade
rating on a few of the corporate bonds, management did not consider them to be other than
temporarily impaired because of the consensus analysts earnings projections for 2009 or 2010.
Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair
value or maturity, it does not consider the investments to be other than temporarily impaired at
March 31, 2009. Of the $8.1 million in total unrealized losses for this investment category, $4.7
million has occurred for more than twelve months and $3.4 million has occurred for less than twelve
months.
Trust preferred securities had gross unrealized losses of $8.9 million at March 31, 2009 and $6.8
million at December 31, 2008, respectively. These trust preferred securities were purchased from
individual financial institutions and therefore are not pooled trust preferred securities. The
unrealized losses in investments in trust preferred securities of the Company reflect the credit
concerns related to the financial institutions that issued these long term financial obligations.
The recent financial losses and reductions of capital coupled with bank failures and the overall
market uncertainty within the financial services industry has resulted in lower values for all
trust preferred securities. The valuations of trust preferred securities were based upon the
average of fair market values received from three separate bond trading firms due to the current
illiquidity of these investment securities. Their individual valuations were based primarily upon
the long term viability of the underlying financial institution for each investment security and
active trades in comparable products. Based upon the strength of the financial institutions that
issued these debt instruments and the intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair
value or maturity, the Company doesnt consider these investments to be other than temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2009. Of the $8.9 million in total unrealized losses for this investment
category, $300,000 has occurred for more than twelve months and $8.6 million has occurred for less
than twelve months.
Investment securities within the AFS portfolio are marked to market quarterly and any resulting
gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of taxes, within the equity section
of the balance sheet as shown in Note 4 Comprehensive Income. Unrealized gains and losses are not
recorded through a gain or charge to earnings in the consolidated income statement. However if
unrealized losses are determined to be other than temporarily impaired a charge to earnings will be
recorded instead of other comprehensive income.
The Company will continue to monitor these investments to determine if the continued negative
trends, market valuations or credit defaults result in impairment that is other than temporary.
6.
Loans and Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
88,689
|
|
|
$
|
86,278
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
176,667
|
|
|
|
167,204
|
|
Land Development
|
|
|
72,783
|
|
|
|
74,168
|
|
Construction and land development mezzanine
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
36,425
|
|
|
|
27,480
|
|
Real Estate non-residential
|
|
|
220,894
|
|
|
|
234,573
|
|
Real Estate non-residential-mezzanine
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
4,111
|
|
Real Estate multi-family
|
|
|
14,541
|
|
|
|
14,059
|
|
Real Estate -1-4 family mezzanine
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
61,955
|
|
|
|
64,168
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
29,434
|
|
|
|
26,123
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans
|
|
$
|
708,669
|
|
|
$
|
702,163
|
|
Deferred fees, net
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases
|
|
$
|
707,413
|
|
|
$
|
700,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12-
The Company classifies its leases as capital leases, in accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting
for Leases, as amended by SFAS No. 98 and No. 145. The difference between the Companys gross
investment in the lease and the cost or carrying amount of the leased property, if different, is
recorded as unearned income, which is amortized to income over the lease term by the interest
method.
The Companys policy for income recognition on restructured loans is to recognize income on
currently performing restructured loans under the accrual method.
The Company identifies a loan as impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not
be collected according to the contractual term of the loan agreement. The Companys policy for
interest income recognition on impaired loans is to recognize income on currently performing
restructured loans under the accrual method. The Company recognizes income under the accrual basis
when the principal payments on the loans become current and the collateral on the loan is
sufficient to cover the outstanding obligation to the Company. Excess proceeds received over the
principal amounts due are recognized as income on a cash basis. If these factors do not exist, the
Company does not recognize income.
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
46,701
|
|
|
$
|
69,350
|
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
|
|
23,347
|
|
|
|
16,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
70,048
|
|
|
$
|
85,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
8,710
|
|
|
$
|
12,882
|
|
Non-accrual and impaired loans were $70.0 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $85.8 million at
December 31, 2008, a decrease of $15.8 million. The primary reasons for this decrease were
transfers to other real estate owned and charge-offs of $9.2 million and $4.5 million,
respectively. If interest had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $1.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company has no troubled debt restructured loans or
loans past due 90 days or more on which it has continued to accrue interest during the quarter.
Total cash collected on impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31,
2008 was $4.8 million and $658,000 respectively, of which $4.5 million and $658,000 million was
credited to the principal balance outstanding on such loans, respectively.
The Company grants commercial and real estate loans, including construction and land development
primarily in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area as well as selected locations throughout
the mid-Atlantic region. The Company ceased new mezzanine lending in 2007. The Company also has
participated with other financial institutions in selected construction and land development loans
outside these geographic areas. The Company has a concentration of credit risk in commercial real estate, construction and land development loans
at March 31, 2009. A substantial portion of its debtors ability to honor these contracts is
dependent upon the housing sector specifically and the economy in general.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-13-
7.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning period
|
|
$
|
28,908
|
|
|
$
|
19,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs by loan type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Real Estate non-residential
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,469
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries by loan type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan (charge offs)
|
|
|
(4,436
|
)
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period
|
|
$
|
27,269
|
|
|
$
|
21,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and lease charge-offs were $4.5 million during the first quarter of 2009. The majority of the
charge-offs were attributed to non-residential real estate loans and non-residential mezzanine
loans that became non-performing in the past nine months. The Company defines a mezzanine loan as
a financing that bridges the gap between private equity investment and the traditional bank loan.
Generally, it is a secured junior mortgage lien along with a pledge of ownership interest in a
project. In substantially all mezzanine loans, a personal guarantee of the principal individual is
obtained.
8.
Pension Plan
The Company has a noncontributory nonqualified defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan)
covering certain eligible employees. The Companys Pension Plan provides retirement benefits under
pension trust agreements. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees
compensation during the highest three consecutive years during the last 10 years of employment.
Net periodic defined benefit pension expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14-
9.
Stock Option Plans
Outside Directors Stock Option Plan
The Company previously adopted a non-qualified Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the
Directors Plan). Under the terms of the Directors Plan, 250,000 shares of Class A stock were
authorized for grants. Each director was entitled to a grant of an option to purchase 1,500 shares
of stock annually, which are exercisable one year after the grant date and must be exercised within
ten years of the grant. The options were granted at the fair market value at the date of the
grant. The ability to issue new grants under this plan has expired. See the discussion below
concerning the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The following table presents the activity related to the Directors Plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term (yrs)
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
95,950
|
|
|
$
|
18.82
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,575
|
)
|
|
|
21.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
94,375
|
|
|
$
|
18.77
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
94,375
|
|
|
$
|
18.77
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax
intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had they
exercised their options on March 31, 2009. The intrinsic value varies based on the changes in the
market value in the Companys stock.
|
Employee Stock Option Plan and Appreciation Right Plan
The Company previously adopted a Stock Option and Appreciation Right Plan (the Employee Plan).
The Employee Plan is an incentive program under which Company officers and other key employees were
awarded additional compensation in the form of options to purchase under the Employee Plan, up to
1,800,000 shares of the Companys Class A common stock (but not in excess of 19% of outstanding
shares). At the time a stock option is granted, a stock appreciation right for an identical
number of shares may also be granted. The option price is equal to the fair market value at the
date of the grant. The options are exercisable at 20% per year beginning one year after the date
of grant and must be exercised within ten years of the grant. The ability to issue new grants
under the plan has expired. See the discussion below concerning the 2007 Long- Term Incentive
Plan.
The following table presents the activity related to the Employee Plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term (yrs)
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
685,873
|
|
|
$
|
19.72
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(252,790
|
)
|
|
|
19.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
433,083
|
|
|
$
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
332,550
|
|
|
$
|
19.27
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15-
(1) The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total
pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock
exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had
they exercised their options on March 31, 2009. The intrinsic value varies based on the changes in
the market value in the Companys stock.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Under the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, all employees and non-employee directors of the Company
and its designated subsidiaries are eligible participants. The plan includes 1,000,000 shares of
Class A common stock (of which 250,000 shares may be issued as restricted stock), subject to
customary anti-dilution adjustments, or approximately 9.0% of total outstanding shares of the Class
A common stock. As of March 31, 2009, 172,390 stock options and 18,682 shares of restricted stock
from this plan have been granted. For the stock options, the option strike price is equal to the
fair market value at the date of the grant. For employees, the stock options are exercisable at
20% per year beginning one year after the date of grant and must be exercised within ten years of
the grant. For outside directors, the stock options vest 100% one year from the grant date and
must be exercised within ten years of the grant date. The restricted stock is granted with an
estimated fair value equal to the market value of the Companys closing stock price on the date of
the grant. Restricted stock will vest three years from the grant date, if the Company achieves
specific goals set by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. These
goals include a three year average return on assets compared to peers, a three year average return
on equity compared to peers and a minimum return on both assets and equity over the three year
period.
The following table presents the activity related to stock options granted under the 2007 Long-Term
Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Term (yrs)
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
161,901
|
|
|
$
|
10.89
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(22,249
|
)
|
|
|
15.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
139,652
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
28,340
|
|
|
$
|
20.08
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax
intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had they
exercised their options on March 31, 2009. The intrinsic value varies based on the changes in the
market value in the Companys stock.
|
For all Company plans as of March 31, 2009, there were 221,185 nonvested stock options and
nonvested performance-based restricted stock and unrecognized compensation cost of $843,000.
10.
Interest Rate Swaps
For asset/liability management purposes, the Company uses interest rate swaps which are agreements
between the Company and another party (known as counterparty) where one stream of future interest
payments is exchanged for another based on a specified principal amount (known as notional amount).
The Company will use interest rate swaps to hedge various exposures or to modify interest rate
characteristics of various balance sheet accounts. Such derivatives are used as part of the
asset/liability management process, are linked to specific liabilities, and have a high correlation
between the contract and the underlying item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the
hedge period.
The Company had utilized interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of its fixed rate time
deposits to a variable rate (fair value hedge) to fund variable rate loans and investments as well
as convert a portion of variable
-16-
rate borrowings (cash flow hedge) to fund fixed rate loans. Interest rate swap contracts represent
a series of interest flows exchanged over a prescribed period. Each quarter the Company used the
Volatility Reduction Measure (VRM) to determine the effectiveness of their fair value hedges.
The Company did not have any interest rate swaps agreements as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
11.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Companys financial
instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for
substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates
indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of March 31, 2009 and have not
been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to
that date. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the
respective reporting date may be different than the amounts reported at March 31, 2009. Due to a
wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates,
comparisons between the Companys disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements. The Bank adopted SFAS 157 effective for its
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP
157-2). FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at
least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The adoption of FSP 157-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements and results of operations. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset is Not
Active (FSP 157-3), to clarify the application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive
market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 was effective
immediately.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
,
to require disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in
annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting
,
to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting
periods. This FSP shall be effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity may early adopt FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 only if it also elects to early adopt FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value
When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
,
and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The Company did not early adopt this
pronouncement. This adoption of this staff position will result in additional disclosures about
fair value financial instruments in connection with the Companys June 30, 2009 quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, but will not result in a change in the reported values of any amounts on the
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). The objective of an
other-than-temporary impairment analysis under existing U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) is to determine whether the holder of an investment in a debt or equity security
for which changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in earnings (such as securities
classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale) should recognize a loss in earnings when the
investment is impaired. An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than
its amortized cost basis. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amend the other-than-temporary impairment
guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the
presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in
the financial statements. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
-17-
shall be effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. If an entity elects to adopt early
either FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset
or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, or
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the
entity also is required to adopt early FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2. Additionally, if an entity
elects to adopt early FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, it is required to adopt FSP FAS 157-4. The
Company did not early adopt this pronouncement. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 on its consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair
value in accordance with SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurements when the volume and level of activity
for an asset or liability has significantly declined. FSP FAS 157-4 also offers guidance on
identifying circumstances when a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 shall be effective for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. If a reporting
entity elects to adopt early either FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 or FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the reporting entity also is
required to adopt early FSP FAS 157-4. Additionally, if the reporting entity elects to adopt early
FSP FAS 157-4, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 also must be adopted early. The Company did not early
adopt this pronouncement. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FSP FAS 157-4 on its
consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used
to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority
to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under
SFAS 157 are as follows:
|
Level 1:
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little
or no market activity).
|
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by
level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
March 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
12,849
|
|
|
$
|
301,447
|
|
|
$
|
62,863
|
|
|
$
|
377,159
|
|
-18-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
48,731
|
|
|
$
|
223,314
|
|
|
$
|
78,257
|
|
|
$
|
350,302
|
|
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
78,257
|
|
Total gains/(losses) (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
(12,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
62,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of investment securities for 2009 is described and presented above under SFAS 157
guidelines. The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted
market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2),
which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without
relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on
the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are
not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to
reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on
available market evidence (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, managements best estimate
is used. Level 3 investment securities primarily include trust preferred securities and CDOs.
During the third quarter of 2008, the market for investments in trust preferred securities became
less liquid and as a result, inputs into the determination of the fair values of the Companys
trust preferred securities could not be determined principally from or corroborated by observable
market data. Consequently, management transferred these securities into Level 3. The CDO
valuations were determined using a copula method, which is a type of market standard valuation
modeling for structured credit derivative products that is dependent on the correlated default
events of the obligors within the underlying collateral pool.
For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by
level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
March 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,991
|
|
|
$
|
37,991
|
|
-19-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,468
|
|
|
$
|
56,468
|
|
Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS 114)
,
in which the Company has measured impairment generally
based on the fair value of the loans collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon
independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the
expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.
12.
Real Estate Owned via Equity Investment
The Company, together with third party real estate development companies, forms variable interest
entities (VIEs) to construct various real estate development projects. These VIEs account for
acquisition, development and construction costs of the real estate development projects in
accordance with SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate
Projects, and account for capitalized interest on those projects in accordance with SFAS No. 34,
Capitalization of Interest Cost, as amended by SFAS No. 58,
Capitalization of Interest Cost in
Financial Statements That Include Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method
.
Due to the
present economic conditions, management has made a decision to curtail new equity investments.
In accordance with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, the full accrual method is
used by the VIEs to recognize profit on real estate sales. Profits on the sales of this real
estate are recorded by the VIEs when cash in excess of the amount of the original investment is
received, and calculation of same is made in accordance with the terms of the partnership
agreement. Neither the VIEs nor the Company are obligated to perform significant activities after
the sale to earn profits, and there is no continuing involvement with the property. The usual
risks and rewards of ownership in the transaction have passed to the acquirer.
In July 2003, Royal Bank (through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Investments America, LLC)
received regulatory approval to acquire ownership interest in real estate projects. With the
adoption of FIN 46(R) the Company is required to perform an analysis to determine whether such
investments meet the criteria for consolidation into the Companys financial statements. As of
March 31, 2009, the Company has one VIE which is consolidated into the Companys financial
statements. This VIE met the requirements for consolidation under FIN 46(R) based on Royal
Investments America being the primary financial beneficiary. This was determined based on the
amount invested by Royal Investments America compared to the Companys partners. In September
2005, the Company, together with a real estate development company, formed a limited partnership.
Royal Investments America is a limited partner in the partnership (the Partnership). The
Partnership was formed to convert an apartment complex into condominiums. The development company
is the general partner of the Partnership. The Company invested 66% of the initial capital
contribution, or $2.5 million, with the development company investing the remaining equity of $1.3
million. The Company is entitled to earn a preferred return on the $2.5 million capital
contribution. In addition, the Company made two mezzanine loans totaling $9.2 million at market
terms and interest rates. As of March 31, 2009, the Partnership also had $12.4 million outstanding
of senior debt with another bank. Upon the repayment of the mezzanine loan interest and principal
and the initial capital contributions and preferred return, the Company and the development company
will both receive 50% of the remaining distribution, if any. The Company utilized the period of
January 1, 2009 through February 28, 2009 in consolidating the financial statements of the
Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
the Partnership assesses the recoverability of fixed assets based on estimated future operating
cash flows. The Company has recognized $10 million in impairment charges related to this asset
through December 31, 2008. No further impairment of this asset occurred during the first quarter
of 2009. The measurement and recognition of the impairment was based on estimated future
discounted operating cash flows.
-20-
At March 31, 2009, the Partnership had total assets of $20.8 million of which $19.1 million is real
estate as reflected on the consolidated balance sheet and total borrowings of $21.6 million, of
which $9.2 million relates to the Companys mezzanine loans discussed above. None of the third
party borrowings are guaranteed by the Company. The Company has made an investment of $11.7
million in this Partnership ($2.5 million capital contribution and $9.2 million of mezzanine
loans). The impairments mentioned above have contributed to an overall reduction in the Companys
investment. At March 31, 2009 the remaining amount of the investment in and receivables due from
the Partnership totaled $6.5 million.
As of December 31, 2008, the Partnership projected sales insufficient to repay a portion of its
mortgages payable by June 9, 2009, has delinquent condominium fees resulting in a technical default
and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The Partnerships December 31, 2008 financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Partnership will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
13.
Trust Preferred Securities
Management previously determined that Royal Bancshares Capital Trust I/II (Trusts) utilized for
the Companys $25.8 million of pooled trust preferred securities issuance, qualifies as a variable
interest entity under FIN 46. The Trusts issued mandatory redeemable preferred stock to investors
and loaned the proceeds to the Company. The Trusts hold, as their sole asset, subordinated
debentures issued by the Company in 2004. At March 31, 2009, the interest rates paid on Capital
Trust I and Capital Trust II were 3.47% and 5.80%, respectively.
The Company does not consolidate the Trusts as FIN 46(R) precludes consideration of the call option
embedded in the preferred stock when determining if the Company has the right to a majority of the
Trusts expected returns. The non-consolidation results in the investment in common stock of the
Trusts to be included in other assets with a corresponding increase in outstanding debt of
$774,000. In addition, the income received on the common stock investments is included in other
income. The Federal Reserve Bank has issued final guidance on the regulatory treatment for the
trust-preferred securities issued by the Trusts as a result of the adoption of FIN 46(R). The final
rule would retain the current maximum percentage of total capital permitted for trust preferred
securities at 25%, but would enact other changes to the rules governing trust preferred securities
that affect their use as a part of the collection of entities known as restricted core capital
elements. The final adoption of the rule has delayed the effective date until March 31, 2011.
Management is evaluating the effects of the final rule and does not anticipate a material impact on
its capital ratios.
14.
Investment in Real Estate Joint Ventures
The Company reviewed the financial reporting of its real estate acquisition, development and
construction (ADC) loans during 2007. As a result of this review, the Company determined that
three ADC loans should have been accounted for as investments in real estate joint ventures in
accordance with AICPA Practice Bulletin 1 and SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.
An investment in a real estate joint venture of this nature is distinguished from an equity
investment in real estate by the fact that the Company is not a party to an operating agreement and
has no legal ownership of the entity that owns the real estate. The Company reclassified two of
these ADC loans in the amount of $10.7 million to investments in real estate joint ventures as of
December 31, 2006. One investment in the amount of $4.7 million was to fund the purchase of
property for construction of an office and residential building, which was paid off during the
second quarter of 2008, which resulted in a gain on sales related to real estate joint ventures of
$1.1 million, and the other investment for $6.0 million was to fund the construction of a 55 unit
condominium building. The third investment in the amount of $2.5 million was classified as an
investment in a real estate joint venture at December 31, 2007 and was to fund the acquisition of a
marina project. The balance of the investment in the construction of a 55 unit condominium
building of $5.9 million was impaired for its full amount during the third quarter of 2007 and the
impairment was charged to operating expenses during the same quarter. As of March 31, 2009, the
balance of the marina investment was $2.5 million, for a total investment in real estate joint
ventures of $2.5 million.
-21-
15.
Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount
of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and
conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
The contract amounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit
risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open-end lines of credit
|
|
$
|
78,360
|
|
|
$
|
98,549
|
|
Commitment to extend credit
|
|
|
10,352
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
16.
Shareholders Equity
On February 20, 2009, as part of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) established by the United
States Department of Treasury (Treasury), the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (the
Purchase Agreement) with Treasury, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 30,407
shares of the Companys Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, without par
value per share (the Series A Preferred Stock), and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share.
In conjunction with the purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock, Treasury received a warrant to
purchase 1,104,370 shares of the Companys Class A common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of
$30.4 million in cash The Series A Preferred Stock will qualify as Tier 1 capital and will pay
cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum
thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock may generally be redeemed by the Company at any time
following consultation with its primary banking regulators. The warrant issued to the Treasury has
a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to
anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $4.13 per share of the common stock. The Companys intention
is to utilize the extra capital provided by the CPP funds to support its efforts to prudently and
transparently provide lending and liquidity.
17.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been
reclassified to conform to the current years presentation format. There was no effect on net
income for the periods presented herein as a result of a reclassification.
18.
Recent accounting pronouncements
Accounting pronouncements related to fair value disclosures are discussed in Note 11 Fair Value of
Financial Instruments.
In December 2007, FASB issued FAS No. 141 (Revised 2007) (FAS 141(R)), Business Combinations.
SFAS 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R)
an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in a transaction at the acquisition date fair value with limited exceptions. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 31, 2008. SFAS 141(R) may not be adopted before that date. In future periods the
Company will apply SFAS 141(R) to its consolidated financial statements when business combinations
occur.
-22-
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement amends ARB 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also amends certain of ARB 51s consolidation
procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The implementation of SFAS 160 did not have
a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161). The new standard amends SFAS No. 133 and is intended to improve
financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced
disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption
permitted. The implementation of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles used in the preparation of financial statements. This Statement is effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected
cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The implementation of this
FSP did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements and results
of operations.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit Derivatives
and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and
Clarification of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 161 (FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4). FSP 133-1 and FIN
45-4 amends and enhances disclosure requirements for sellers of credit derivatives and financial
guarantees. It also clarifies that the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 161 are effective for
quarterly periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and fiscal years that include those periods.
FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November
15, 2008. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In November 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers
of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to
prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as 2014. The SEC will
make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently
assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial
statements, and it will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of
IFRS.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations (EITF 08-6). EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and
impairment considerations involving equity method investments. EITF 08-6 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The implementation of
this EITF did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
-23-
In November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-7, Accounting for Defensive Intangible
Assets (EITF 08-7). EITF 08-7 clarifies the accounting for certain separately identifiable
intangible assets which an acquirer does not intend to actively use but intends to hold to prevent
its competitors from obtaining access to them. EITF 08-7 requires an acquirer in a business
combination to account for a defensive intangible asset as a separate unit of accounting which
should be amortized to expense over the period the asset diminishes in value. EITF 08-7 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The
implementation of this EITF did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position
and results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets. This FSP amends SFAS 132(R), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and
Other Postretirement Benefits, to provide guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets
of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets
required by this FSP shall be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The
Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 132(R)-1 on its consolidated financial position
and results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities
(FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 amends FASB SFAS 140 Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, to require
public entities to provide additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets. It also
amends FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to require public enterprises,
including sponsors that have a variable interest in a variable interest entity, to provide
additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. Additionally, this
FSP requires certain disclosures to be provided by a public enterprise that is (a) a sponsor of a
qualifying special purpose entity (SPE) that holds a variable interest in the qualifying SPE but
was not the transferor of financial assets to the qualifying SPE and (b) a servicer of a qualifying
SPE that holds a significant variable interest in the qualifying SPE but was not the transferor of
financial assets to the qualifying SPE. The disclosures required by FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8
are intended to provide greater transparency to financial statement users about a transferors
continuing involvement with transferred financial assets and an enterprises involvement with
variable interest entities and qualifying SPEs. FSP SFAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R) are effective for
reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after December 15, 2008. The implementation of FSP
SFAS 140-4 and Fin 46(R) did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment of Guidance of
EITF Issue No. 99-20 (FSP EITF 99-20-1). FSP EITF 99-20-1 amends the impairment guidance in EITF
Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests
and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,
to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has
occurred. FSP EITF 99-20-1 also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary
impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other related guidance. FSP EITF 99-20-1 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and shall be
applied prospectively. Retrospective application to a prior interim or annual reporting period is
not permitted. The implementation of this EITF did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In January 2009, the FASB issued EITF 08-10, Selected Statement 160 Implementation Questions. As
mentioned previously SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 and establishes the accounting for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. EITF 08-10 addresses
concerns that other authoritative guidance exists that may conflict with SFAS 160 for the
recognition of a gain or loss upon deconsolidation of subsidiaries when the subsidiary is
in-substance real estate or the transaction involves an equity method investee or joint venture.
EITF 08-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The implementation of this EITF did not have an impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
-24-
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities
Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends and
clarifies SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations"
,
to address application issues
raised by preparers, auditors, and members of the legal profession on initial recognition and
measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies in a business combination. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 shall be effective for
assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. In future periods the Company will apply FSP FAS 141(R)-1 to its consolidated
financial statements when business combinations occur.
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended to assist in understanding and evaluating the
changes in the financial condition and earnings performance of the Company and its subsidiaries for
the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008. This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, the Company may include forward-looking statements relating to such matters as
anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products,
research and development activities and similar matters in this and other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a
safe harbor for forward-looking statements. When we use words such as believes, expects,
anticipates or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. In order to comply
with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the
Companys actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other
expectations expressed in the Companys forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties
that may affect the operations, performance development and results of the Companys business
include the following: general economic conditions, including their impact on capital expenditures;
interest rate fluctuations; business conditions in the banking industry; the regulatory
environment; rapidly changing technology and evolving banking industry standards; competitive
factors, including increased competition with community, regional and national financial
institutions; new service and product offerings by competitors and price pressures and similar
items.
All forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on information available as of
the date of this report. These statements speak only as of the date of this report, even if
subsequently made available by the Company on its website, or otherwise. The Company expressly
disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect future statements to
reflect future events or developments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services
industry. Applications of the principles in the Companys preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These estimates and
assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial
statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note A to the Companys consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008) lists significant accounting policies used in the development and
presentation of the Companys consolidated financial statements. The following discussion and
analysis, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify
and address key variables and other quantitative and qualitative factors that are necessary for an
understanding and evaluation of the Company and its results of operations. The Company is an
-25-
investor in a variable interest entity and is required to report its investment in the variable
interest entity on a consolidated basis under FIN 46(R). The variable interest entity is
responsible for providing its financial information to the Company. We complete an internal review
of this financial information. This review requires substantive judgment and estimation. The
Company has identified accounting for allowance for loan and leases losses, deferred tax assets,
other than temporary impairment on investments securities, accounting for acquisition, development
and construction loans and derivative securities as among the most critical accounting policies and
estimates in that they are important to the presentation of the Companys financial condition and
results of operations, and they require difficult, subjective or complex judgments as a result of
the need to make estimates.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Financial Highlights and Business Results
Results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between
interest income on interest earning assets and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities.
Interest earning assets consist principally of loans and investment securities, while interest
bearing liabilities consist primarily of deposits and borrowings. Interest income is recognized
according to the effective interest yield method. Net income is affected by the provision for loan
and lease losses, the level of non-interest income (loss) and non-interest expenses, including
salary and employee benefits, occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. Interest income is
also affected by the level of non-accrual loans.
At March 31, 2009, the Company had consolidated total assets of approximately $1.3 billion, total
loans and leases of $707.4 million, total deposits of approximately $812.1 million, and
shareholders equity of approximately $106.3 million. The Company had interest income of $16.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, reflecting a decrease of $3.7 million, or 18.5%,
from the comparable period of 2008. The decline in interest income was attributed to a lower level
of investments
;
a 200 basis point reduction in the prime rate by the Federal Reserve since the end
of the first quarter in 2008; and an increase in non-performing loans since March 31, 2008, that
resulted in the loss of accrued interest. The prime rate reduction negatively impacted prime based
and variable rate loans. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $9.3
million resulting in a decrease of $888,000, or 8.7%, from the comparable period of 2008 due to
improved pricing of deposit products, mainly higher cost time deposits. The Company recorded a net
loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of $6.8 million compared to net income of $1.0 million
reported for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The net loss in 2009 was primarily associated with
$4.2 million in impairment charges on equity securities in the available-for-sale investment
portfolio, an increase in nonperforming loans which resulted in the loss of interest income
associated with those nonperforming loans, and lower yields on loans and investments.
The chief sources of revenue for the Company are interest income from extending loans and interest
income from investing in security instruments, mostly through its subsidiaries Royal Bank and Royal
Asian. Both Royal Bank and Royal Asian principally generate commercial real estate loans primarily
secured by first mortgage liens. These types of loans make up 27% and 72% of the loan portfolios
of Royal Bank and Royal Asian at March 31, 2009, respectively. Additionally, Royal Bank and Royal
Asian offer construction loans, including construction loans for commercial real estate projects
and for residential home development. At March 31 2009, construction loans comprised 27% and 13%,
respectively, of the Royal Bank and Royal Asian loan portfolios. Land development loans at March
31, 2009 comprised 11% and 0% of the loan portfolios of Royal Bank and Royal Asian, respectively.
Construction loans and land development loans can have more risk associated with them, especially
when a weakened economy, such as we are experiencing now, adversely impacts the commercial rental
or home sales market. During 2005, the Company received permission to offer loans, including
mezzanine loans, by the Federal Reserve Board. Royal Bank also offers mezzanine loans. Mezzanine
loans are typically inherently more risky, higher rewarding, loans. They are often secured by
subordinate lien positions with loan to value ratios typically between 75% and 95% of collateral
value. The Company and its subsidiaries do not typically offer mezzanine loans
for purposes other than the acquisition or construction of projects related to real estate. On
occasion, the Company has extended mezzanine financing on a project where Royal Bank extended
senior debt financing. During the fourth quarter of 2007, management of the Company made a
decision to curtail mezzanine lending due to the elevation of risk given the current economic
conditions. At March 31, 2009, the Company had $5.7 million in mezzanine loans outstanding, and
the percentage of mezzanine loans in the Company consolidated
-26-
loan portfolio was 0.8% of the
portfolio. Mezzanine loans inherently carry more risk and accordingly at March 31, 2009, the
portion of the Companys loan loss reserve attributed to mezzanine loans was $1.6 million, or 27%
of outstanding mezzanine loans. Net earnings of the Company are largely dependent on taking in
deposits at competitive market rates, and then redeploying those deposited funds into loans and
investments in securities at rates higher than those paid to the depositors to earn an interest
rate spread. Please see the Net Interest Margin section in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation below for additional information on interest yield
and cost.
Consolidated Net Loss
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of $6.8 million, compared to net
income of $1.0 million for the comparable quarter of 2008. The net loss was primarily the result
of a $4.2 million impairment loss on available for sale investment securities, an increase in
nonperforming loans which resulted in the loss of interest income associated with those
nonperforming loans, and lower yields on loans and investments. Net interest income declined $2.8
million to $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $9.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. As a consequence of the slowdown in the housing market and the
economic recession, the Company continued to experience a weakening in the performance of real
estate related loans and impairment losses on equity investments. Impaired and non-accrual loans
are reviewed in the Credit Risk Management section of this report while the impaired investment
securities are discussed in the Investment Securities section under Financial Condition. Basic
and diluted losses per common share were both $0.53 for the first quarter of 2009, as compared to
basic and diluted earnings per common share of $0.08 for the comparable quarter of 2008.
Interest Income
Total interest income for the first quarter of 2009 amounted to $16.4 million, which represented a
decline of $3.7 million, or 18.5 %, from the comparable quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily
driven by a decline in the yields on all earning assets, loans in particular, due to a 200 basis
point decline in the prime rate during the past twelve months related to the Federal Reserves
monetary policy that negatively impacted prime based loans and investments purchased within the
past two quarters. Additionally, the year over year increase in non-accrual loans negatively
impacted the yield on interest earning assets. Average interest earning assets, which amounted to
$1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2009, increased $15.8 million, or 1.4%, above the first
quarter of 2008 due almost entirely to an increase in cash equivalents year over year. Average loan
balances of $720.4 million in the first quarter of 2009 increased $69.4 million (10.7%) year over
year and was entirely offset by a decline in average investment securities of $69.3 million (14.6%)
year over year. The loan growth was attributed to an increased focus on commercial and industrial
lending during the past two quarters, the introduction of small business lending in the fourth
quarter of 2008, advances against existing outstanding loans, continued growth in tax certificates
and minimal loan prepayments. The decline in investment securities was primarily attributed to
maturities and calls of agency bonds during the first two quarters of 2008.
The yield on average interest earning assets for the first quarter of 2009 of 5.80% amounted to a
decline of 136 basis points from the prior years first quarter yield. The yield reduction was
comprised of year over year declines of 250, 42 and 206 basis points for cash equivalents (0.63%
versus 3.13%), investments (4.98% versus 5.40%) and loans (6.39% versus 8.45%), respectively. Lower
interest rates on all three earning asset categories reflected the general market decline in
interest rates during the past year and the significant impact on variable rate loans in
particular. In addition the yield on average loans was negatively impacted by the increase of
non-accrual loans during the past year. Non-accrual loans were $70.0 million at March 31, 2009
compared to $41.9 million at March 31, 2008.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense of $9.3 million in the first quarter of 2009 declined by $888 thousand, or
8.7%, from the comparable quarter of 2008. The reduction in interest expense was mainly associated
with a decline in rates paid on retail and brokered deposits. The average interest rate paid on
average interest-bearing deposits for the first quarter of 2009 was 3.47% resulting in a decline of
78 basis points from the level of 4.25% during the comparable quarter
-27-
of 2008. As a result of the
general decline in market interest rates, lower interest rates were paid on existing customer money
market and savings accounts coupled with lower interest rates paid on new deposits, primarily
customer and brokered time deposits. Average interest-bearing liabilities of $1.0 billion increased
by $48.5 million, or 4.9%, due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits of $74.2 million, or
11.3%, which was partially offset by a reduction in borrowings, primarily consisting of FHLB
advances, of $25.7 million, or 7.9%. As a result of the decline in market interest rates, retail
and brokered deposits became more attractive during the past two quarters and management shifted
the funding emphasis to these deposits and away from FHLB advances. Management elected to reduce
the reliance on FHLB advances due to the suspension of the dividend at year end 2008 coupled with
the current requirement of full collateral delivery status for FHLB advances. The average interest
rate paid on FHLB advances of 4.04% during the first quarter of 2009 increased modestly from 3.94%
during the prior years first quarter. The overall increase in interest-bearing liabilities was
approximately triple the increase in interest earning assets primarily due to the decline in
funding associated with a reduction in shareholders equity and a modest reduction in non-interest
bearing deposits.
Net Interest Margin
The net interest margin in the first quarter of 2009 of 2.52% declined 103 basis points from 3.55%
in the comparable quarter of 2008. The impact of the reduction of the prime rate on variable rate
loans within the loan portfolio coupled with the negative impact associated with the increased
level of non-performing loans added to the already existing net interest margin compression.
Although a significant segment of the loan portfolio experienced an immediate decrease in yields on
loans as the prime rate declined, the funding side of the balance sheet will only experience a
lagged decline in rates paid on deposits since the majority of the deposits are time deposits that
will re-price only at maturity. In addition, FHLB advances are fixed rate borrowings that will not
immediately re-price since they mature over the next few years. In order to mitigate the impact of
the margin decline, management has transitioned lower yielding investment securities that have
matured or were called into new higher yielding loans during the past year. At March 31, 2009 loans
amounted to 61% and investment securities amounted to 32% of total interest earning assets, while
the same percentages at March 31, 2008 amounted to 59% and 38% of interest earning assets,
respectively, for loans and investments securities.
The following table represents the average daily balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders
equity and the respective interest bearing assets and interest bearing liabilities, as well as
average rates for the periods indicated, exclusive of interest on obligations related to real
estate owned via equity investment. The loans outstanding include non-accruing loans. The yield
on earning assets and the net interest margin are presented on a fully tax-equivalent (FTE) and
annualized basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt
investments and loans using the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for each period presented.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-28-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,931
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
Investments securities
|
|
|
405,406
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
474,658
|
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
720,425
|
|
|
|
11,344
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
|
|
651,001
|
|
|
|
13,684
|
|
|
|
8.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets
|
|
|
1,143,762
|
|
|
|
16,354
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
|
1,127,972
|
|
|
|
20,072
|
|
|
|
7.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-earning assets
|
|
|
50,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,193,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,201,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
730,452
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
656,239
|
|
|
|
6,934
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
300,127
|
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
325,823
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
1,030,579
|
|
|
|
9,245
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
%
|
|
|
982,062
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
53,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
14,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
95,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,193,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,201,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,109
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-29-
Rate Volume Analysis
The following tables sets forth a rate/volume analysis, which segregates in detail the major
factors contributing to the change in net interest income exclusive of interest on obligation
through real estate owned via equity investment, for the three month period ended March 31, 2009,
as compared to the respective period in 2008, into amounts attributable to both rates and volume
variances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total short term earning assets
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Investments securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
(963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(425
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial demand loans
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,007
|
)
|
Commercial mortgages
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Residential and home equity
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Leases receivables
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
635
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Loan fees
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
$
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total decrease in interest income
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,473
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW and money market
|
|
$
|
(297
|
)
|
|
$
|
(833
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,130
|
)
|
Savings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
964
|
|
|
$
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
$
|
(682
|
)
|
Trust preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
increase (decrease) in interest expense
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
(1,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease in net interest income
|
|
$
|
(952
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Management
The Companys loan and lease portfolio (the credit portfolio) is subject to varying degrees of
credit risk. The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses (the allowance) to
absorb possible losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on the review and
evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio, along with ongoing, quarterly assessments of the
probable losses inherent in that portfolio. The allowance represents an
-30-
estimation made pursuant to
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, or SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. The adequacy of the allowance is determined through evaluation of the credit
portfolio, and involves consideration of a number of factors, as outlined below, to establish a
prudent level. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective and requires significant
estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases based on historical
loss experience and consideration of current economic trends, which may be susceptible to
significant change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance, while
recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management adjusts the level of the allowance through the
provision for loan and lease losses, which is recorded as a current period expense. The Companys
systematic methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance includes: (1) the formula
allowance reflecting historical losses, as adjusted, by loan category, and (2) the specific
allowance for risk-rated credits on an individual or portfolio basis.
The Company uses three major components in determining the appropriate value of the loan and lease
loss allowance: standards required under SFAS No. 114, an historical loss factor, and an
environmental factor. Utilizing standards required under SFAS No. 114, loans are evaluated for
impairment on an individual basis considering current collateral values (current appraisals or rent
rolls for income producing properties), all known relevant factors that may affect loan
collectability, and risks inherent in different kinds of lending (such as source of repayment,
quality of borrower and concentration of credit quality). Once a loan is determined to be impaired
(or is classified) such loans will be deducted from the portfolio and the net remaining balance
will used in the historical and environmental analysis.
The formula allowance, which is based upon historical loss factors, as adjusted, establishes
allowances for the major loan and lease categories based upon a five year rolling average of the
historical loss experienced. The factors used to adjust the historical loss experience address
various risk characteristics of the Companys loan and lease portfolio including: (1) trends in
delinquencies and other non-performing loans, (2) changes in the risk profile related to large
loans in the portfolio, (3) changes in the growth trends of categories of loans comprising the loan
and lease portfolio, (4) concentrations of loans and leases to specific industry segments, and (5)
changes in economic conditions on both a local and national level.
Management recognizes the higher credit risk associated with commercial and construction loans. As
a result of the higher credit risk related to commercial and construction loans, the Company
computes its formula allowance (which is based upon historical loss factors, as adjusted) using
higher quantitative risk weighting factors than used for its consumer related loans. As an example,
the Company applies an internal quantitative risk-weighting factor for construction loans which is
approximately three times higher than the quantitative risk-weighting factor used for multi-family
real estate loans. These higher economic risk factors for commercial and construction loans are
used to compensate for the higher volatility of commercial and construction loans to changes in the
economy and various real estate markets.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not be collected
according to the contractual term of the loan agreement. Analysis resulting in specific allowances,
including those on loans identified for evaluation of impairment, includes consideration of the
borrowers overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support available from
financial guarantors and the sufficiency of collateral. For such loans that are classified as
impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or
observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. These
factors are combined to estimate the probability and severity of inherent losses. Then a specific
allowance is established based on the Companys calculation of the potential loss in individual
loans. Additional allowances may also be established in special circumstances involving a
particular group of credits or portfolio when management becomes aware that losses incurred may
exceed those determined by application of the risk factors.
The Company classifies its leases as capital leases, in accordance to SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases, as amended by SFAS 98 & 145. The difference between the Companys gross investment in the
lease and the cost or
carrying amount of the leased property, if different, is recorded as unearned income, which is
amortized to income over the lease term by the interest method.
-31-
The amount of the allowance is reviewed and approved by the Chief Operating Officer (COO), Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) and the Chief Accounting Officer (CAO) on at least a quarterly basis.
The provision for loan and lease losses was $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
$3.3 million in the comparable quarter of 2008. The deteriorating real estate market that
continued from 2008 into the first three months of 2009 caused housing sales to slow and has
negatively impacted construction loans throughout the banking industry. This weak sales market has
affected land development, construction and mezzanine loans of the Company. The Company has
considered these economic conditions in its methodologies used in setting the allowance for loan
and lease losses.
The allowance for loan and lease losses declined $1.6 million from $28.9 million at December 31,
2008 to $27.3 million at March 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to $4.4 million in
net charge-offs of impaired loans recorded in the first quarter of 2009 of which $2.4 million had
previously been included in the specific reserves. Impaired loans declined $15.8 million during
the first quarter of 2009. The primary reasons for this decrease were transfers to other real
estate owned and charge-offs of $9.2 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The majority of the
partially charged-off loans during the first quarter of 2009 were related to non-residential loans
including two mezzanine loans. The allowance for loan and lease losses was 3.85% of total loans
and leases at March 31, 2009 and 4.13% at December 31, 2008.
Management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate at March 31, 2009.
However, its determination requires significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses inherent
in the credit portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management
uses available information to recognize probable losses, future changes to the allowance may be
necessary based on changes in the credits comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial
condition of borrowers, such as may result from changes in economic conditions. In addition,
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, and independent consultants
engaged by the Company, periodically review the credit portfolio and the allowance. Such review may
result in additional provisions based on these third-party judgments of information available at
the time of each examination. During the first three months of 2009, there were changes in
estimation methods or assumptions that affected the allowance methodology. These changes included
increasing the risk factors specific to construction, non-residential, and RBA Capital loans.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-32-
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months ended
|
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning period
|
|
$
|
28,908
|
|
|
$
|
19,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1,009
|
)
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,852
|
)
|
Construction and land development-mezzanine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Single family residential-mezzanine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,220
|
)
|
Real estate- non-residential
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
Real estate- non-residential mezzanine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
Leases
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,469
|
)
|
|
|
(12,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan (charge offs)
|
|
|
(4,436
|
)
|
|
|
(12,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
21,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period
|
|
$
|
27,269
|
|
|
$
|
28,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan type is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans in each
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans in each
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
category to total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
category to total
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
11,607
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
11,548
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
Land Development
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Constr. and land develop. mezzanine
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Real Estate non-residential
|
|
|
5,674
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
Real Estate non-res. mezzanine
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Real Estate multi-family
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Real Estate -1-4 family mezzanine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,269
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,908
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-33-
The Companys non-performing assets are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans
(1)
|
|
$
|
70,048
|
|
|
$
|
85,830
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
20,244
|
|
|
|
10,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
90,292
|
|
|
$
|
96,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
7.21
|
%
|
|
|
8.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans
|
|
|
9.90
|
%
|
|
|
12.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease loss to non-accrual loans
|
|
|
38.93
|
%
|
|
|
33.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
$
|
707,413
|
|
|
$
|
700,722
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,252,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,175,586
|
|
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
|
|
$
|
27,269
|
|
|
$
|
28,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL / Loans & Leases (MD & A)
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Generally, a loan is placed on non-accruing status when it has been delinquent for a
period of
90 days or more unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) increased $9.9 million from $10.3 million at December 31, 2008 to
$20.2 million at March 31, 2009. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company foreclosed on the
collateral of three separate loans that were non-accrual at December 31, 2008 and were transferred
to OREO at fair value.
The composition of non-accrual loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accruing Loans:
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
Specifc
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
32,331
|
|
|
$
|
4,929
|
|
Land Development
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction & Land Develop. mezzanine
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
Real Estate-Non-Residential
|
|
|
5,603
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
Real Estate-Non-Residential mezzanine
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & industrial
|
|
|
13,248
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
70,048
|
|
|
$
|
8,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34-
Non-accrual loan activity for the first three months of 2009 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter Actvity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
decreases
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
OREO
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
41,485
|
|
|
$
|
4,966
|
|
|
$
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,331
|
|
Land development
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
|
4,442
|
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
Construction & land development mezzanine
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Real Estate-Non-Residential
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
5,603
|
|
Real Estate-Non-Residential
mezzanine
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Commercial & Industrial
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,248
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
6,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(1,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,830
|
|
|
$
|
13,392
|
|
|
$
|
(15,474
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a detailed list of the significant additions to non-accrual loans during the first
quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
A $3.0 million loan, in which the bank is a participant, became non-accrual during
the first quarter of 2009. The loan is collateralized by a first lien Deed of Trust on
two parcels comprising 141.6 acres in Highland, Howard County, Maryland. The land was
purchased in August, 2005. The original plan was to build 37 single family lots
averaging over 3 acres each under contract with a national builder to take down these
lots over a minimum of two years. The contract with the builder has been amended five
times. To date, there have been only five lots taken down. The loan has been declared
in default and a confession of judgment has been filed. A foreclosure action is being
commenced. An impairment analysis was performed in accordance with SFAS 114 and the
loan was deemed impaired. A charge-off was recorded in the amount of $913,000.
|
|
|
|
|
Two loans in the aggregate amount of $4.8 million for a construction project in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, to renovate a historic building into a luxury hotel and to
construct 86 residential condominiums connected to the hotel became non-accrual during
the first quarter of 2009. The two loans are under a forbearance agreement. These
loans are loan participations in larger loans in the aggregate of $60.3 million. The
hotel is fully operational and the construction of the condominiums is complete. As of
the date of this filing, approximately 33% percent of the condominiums have been sold.
Preliminary appraisals as of March 2009 indicated impairment in accordance with SFAS
114. Consequently, the Company established a specific reserve of $218,000 for these
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.9 million loan for a fully leased 100,000 square foot industrial building and
1.5 acre parcel of land located in Berks County, Pennsylvania became non-accrual in the
first quarter of 2009. The borrower brought the loan current in April 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
One loan of RBA Capital in the amount of $1.5 million was related to one borrower
extending loans to third-party buyers of single family residences in need of rehab
work. During the first quarter of 2009, the borrower failed to meet certain loan
covenants and terms and the loan was classified as impaired. RBA Capital has taken
over management of this portfolio and is in the process of working out the underlying
assets in the portfolio. The independent valuations showed a portfolio value of over
$2.0 million and the expectation is that all of the principal and expenses will be
recovered.
|
Non-accrual and impaired loans were $70.0 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $85.8 million at
December 31, 2008, a decrease of $15.8 million. The primary reasons for this decrease were
transfers to other real estate owned and charge-offs of $9.2 million and $4.5 million,
respectively. If interest had been accrued, such income would have been approximately $1.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company has no troubled debt restructured loans or
loans past due 90 days or more on which it has continued to accrue interest during the quarter.
-35-
The Company identifies a loan as impaired when it is probable that interest and principal will not
be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Analysis resulting in
specific allowances, including those on loans identified for evaluation of impairment, includes
consideration of the borrowers overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support
available from financial guarantors and the sufficiency of collateral. For such loans that are
classified as impaired, per FAS 114 analysis, a specific allowance is established only when the
discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is
lower than the carrying value of that loan.
The Company recognizes income under the accrual basis when the principal payments on the loans
become current and the collateral on the loan is sufficient to cover the outstanding obligation to
the Company. Excess proceeds received over the principal amounts due are recognized as income on a
cash basis. If these factors do not exist, the Company does not recognize income.
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
46,701
|
|
|
$
|
69,350
|
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
|
|
23,347
|
|
|
|
16,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
70,048
|
|
|
$
|
85,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
8,710
|
|
|
$
|
12,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter
|
|
|
ended March 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
77,939
|
|
|
$
|
33,200
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total cash collected on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008
was $4.8 million and $658,000, respectively.
The Companys policy for interest income recognition on restructured loans is to recognize income
on currently performing impaired loans under the accrual method.
Credit Classification Process
All loans, at the time of presentation to the appropriate loan committee, are given an initial loan
risk rating by the Chief Credit Officer (CCO). From time to time, and at the general direction
of any of the various loan committees, the ratings may be changed based on the findings of that
committee. Items considered in assigning ratings include the financial strength of the borrower
and/or guarantors, the type of collateral, the collateral lien position, the type of loan and loan
structure, any potential risk inherent in the specific loan type, and higher than normal monitoring
of the loan or any other factor deemed appropriate by any of the various committees for changing
the rating of the loan. Any such change in rating is reflected in the minutes of that committee.
The riskier classifications include Watch, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss.
The loan review function is outsourced to a third party vendor which applies the Companys loan
rating system to specific credits. Upon completion of a loan review, any loan receiving an adverse
classification by the reviewer is presented to the Loan Review Committee for discussion. Minutes
outlining in detail the Committees findings and
-36-
recommendations are issued after each meeting for follow-up by individual loan officers. The Committee is comprised of the voting members of the
Officers Loan Committee. The CCO is the primary bank officer dealing with the third party vendor
during the reviews.
All loans are subject to initial loan review. Additional review is undertaken with respect to loans
providing potentially greater exposure. This is accomplished by:
|
a.
|
|
Reviewing all loans of $1 million or more annually;
|
|
|
b.
|
|
Reviewing 25% of all loans from $500,000 up to $1 million annually;
|
|
|
c.
|
|
Reviewing 2% of all loans below $500,000 annually; and
|
|
|
d.
|
|
Reviewing any loan requested specifically by bank management.
|
Loans on the Companys Special Assets Committee list are also subject to loan review even though
they are receiving the daily attention of the assigned officer and monthly attention of the Special
Assets Committee.
A watch list is maintained and reviewed at each meeting of the Loan Review Committee. Loans are
added to the watch list, even though current or less than 30 days delinquent if they exhibit
elements of substandard creditworthiness. The watch list contains a statement for each loan as to
why it merits special attention, and this list is distributed to the Board on a monthly basis.
Loans may be removed from the watch list if the Loan Review Committee determines that exception
items have been resolved or creditworthiness has improved. Additionally, if loans become serious
collection matters and are listed on the Banks monthly delinquent loan or Special Assets Committee
lists, they may be removed from the watch list.
Potential Problem Loans
Potential problem loans are loans not currently classified as non-performing loans, but for which
management has doubts as to the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment terms. The
assets are principally commercial loans delinquent more than 30 days but less than 90 days.
Potential problem loans amounted to approximately $43.5 million and $8.8 million at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. The principal reason for the increase has been a weakening of
the credit quality in our commercial loan portfolio particularly related to companies in the
residential homebuilder construction industry. Management has considered the trend in growth of
potential problem loans and has included a factor for same in the formula used to set the Companys
general loan loss reserve.
Residential construction and land development loans comprise the bulk of potential problem loans,
aggregating $24.8 million of the $43.5 million in total potential problem loans outstanding at
March 31, 2009. The chief reason that residential constructions loans have continued to weaken is
due in large part to the poor sales market for homes, especially new construction. Homebuilders
and developers have been challenged in generating the cash flow needed to make loan payments. Many
residential construction loans have interest reserves from which monthly interest payments are
taken. However, the lengthening of the marketing period due to a weak sales economy has caused
depletion in these reserves. In cases where interest reserves are nearing depletion, the Company
seeks to obtain additional collateral from its borrowers, where possible, prior to advancing
additional funds to restore interest reserves.
Other (Loss) Income
For the first quarter of 2009 other loss was $3.6 million compared to other income of $1.3 million
for the first quarter of 2008. The other loss was directly related to $4.2 million in impairment
charges related to equity investments. Refer to Note 5 Investment Securities to the consolidated
financial statements for more information on the impairment charges. In addition, revenue related
to real estate owned via equity investments declined $502,000 ($185,000 in the first quarter of
2009 compared to $687,000 in the first quarter of 2008) as a result of significantly lower sales of
condominiums. The consolidated real estate owned via an equity investment is associated with the
Partnership described in Note 2 Segment Information and Note 12 Real Estate Owned via Equity
Investments. Also contributing to the decline in non-interest income year over year was an
increase in net losses on the sales of AFS securities of $164,000 ($214,000 in 2009 compared to
$50,000 in 2008), a decrease of
-37-
$97,000 related to the sales of other real estate owned ($37,000 loss in 2009 versus a $60,000 gain in 2008), and a $63,000 decrease in gains on the sales of loans
and leases. These reductions were partially offset by an increase of $126,000 related to income
from bank owned life insurance as a result of a $5.0 million additional purchase during the second
quarter of 2008.
Other Expense
For the first quarter of 2009 other expense of $7.2 million increased $622,000 from the first
quarter of 2008. This increase is related to an increase in professional and legal fees of
$269,000 due mainly to increased auditing expenses, approximately $270,000 in expenses related to
the increase in the Companys non-performing assets, an increase in FDIC Insurance and Pennsylvania
Department of Banking expense of $151,000 related to increased insurance premiums, and a $97,000
increase in occupancy and equipment expenses partly due to a new lease for additional office space
in December of 2008. Partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in salaries and wages of
$298,000 from the comparable quarter of 2008 which was due to the Company not accruing for
management bonuses during the first quarter of 2009.
On
February 27, 2009 the Board of Directors for the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) voted to amend the restoration plan for
the Deposit Insurance Fund. Additionally, the Board adopted an
interim rule which if implemented, would impose a 10 basis point
emergency assessment for every $100 of insured deposits as of
June 30, 2009. The special assessment payment is to be paid on
September 30, 2009, however, as the rule stands, the full amount
will be accrued in the second quarter of 2009, when it is anticipated
to be enacted and the June 30 deposits will be measurable.
Income Tax Expense
Total income tax expense for the first quarter of 2009 was $0 compared to a tax expense of $116,000
in the first quarter of 2008. The Company did not record a tax benefit despite the net loss in the
first quarter of 2009 since it concluded at December 31, 2008 that it was more likely than not that
the Company would not generate sufficient future taxable income to realize all of the deferred tax
assets and therefore established a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as of December
31, 2008 in the amount of $15.5 million. During the first quarter of 2009, the valuation
allowance increased $2.6 million to $18.1 million as of March 31, 2009 based on activity during the
first quarter. Managements conclusion was based on consideration of the relative weight of the
available evidence and the uncertainty of future market conditions on results of operations. The
effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 0% compared to the 10.0% for the same period
in 2008.
Results of Operations by Business Segments
On June 29, 1995, pursuant to the plan of reorganization approved by the shareholders of Royal Bank
America, formerly Royal Bank of Pennsylvania (Royal Bank), all of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Royal Bank were acquired by the Company and were exchanged on a one-for-one basis for common stock of the
Company. On July 17, 2006, Royal Asian Bank (Royal Asian) was chartered by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania Department of Banking and commenced operation as a Pennsylvania state-chartered bank.
Prior to obtaining a separate charter, the business of Royal Asian was operated as a division of
Royal Bank. The principal activities of the Company is supervising Royal Bank and Royal Asian,
collectively known as the Banks, which engage in a general banking business principally in
Montgomery, Chester, Bucks, Philadelphia and Berks counties in Pennsylvania and in Northern and
Southern New Jersey and Delaware. The Company also has a wholly owned non-bank subsidiary, Royal
Investments of Delaware, Inc., which is engaged in investment activities.
The Company has identified its reportable operating segments as Community Banking, Tax Liens
and Equity Investments. The Company has two operating segments that do not meet the quantitative
thresholds for requiring disclosure, but have different characteristics than the Community Banking,
Tax Liens and Equity Investments segments, and from each other, RBA Leasing and RBA Capital
(Other in the segment table below). For a description of the different business segments refer to
Note 2 Segment Information to the consolidated financial statements.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-38-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
Tax Lien
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,086,271
|
|
|
$
|
83,771
|
|
|
$
|
17,452
|
|
|
$
|
65,480
|
|
|
$
|
1,252,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
812,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
12,634
|
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
|
$
|
16,354
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,841
|
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
691
|
|
|
$
|
7,069
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
Total other
(loss) income
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(3,583
|
)
|
Total
other expenses
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
7,226
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(7,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(6,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income attributable to Royal Bancshares
|
|
$
|
(7,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
(6,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Community
|
|
|
Tax Lien
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,047,635
|
|
|
$
|
62,536
|
|
|
$
|
18,245
|
|
|
$
|
56,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,184,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
689,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
16,929
|
|
|
$
|
1,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
|
$
|
20,072
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,440
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
10,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,489
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
624
|
|
|
$
|
9,899
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Total
other expenses
|
|
|
5,649
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112
|
)
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) attributable to Royal Bancshares
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Bank Segment
Royal Bank America
Royal Bank was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on July 30, 1963, was chartered by
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Banking and commenced operation as a Pennsylvania
state-chartered bank on October 22, 1963. Royal Bank is the successor of the Bank of King of
Prussia, the principal ownership of which was acquired by the Tabas family in 1980. The deposits of
Royal Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). During the
fourth quarter of 2006, Royal Bank formed a subsidiary, Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC, to purchase
and service delinquent tax liens. Royal Bank owns 60% of the subsidiary. During the fourth quarter
of 2006, Royal Bank formed a subsidiary, RBA Capital, LP, to originate structured or re-discounted
debt. Royal Bank owns 60% of the subsidiary. During the fourth quarter of 2008, management decided
to wind down the operation of RBA Capital. In the near future, the operations of the subsidiary
will be folded into Royal Bank. On October 17, 2008, Royal Bank established RBA Property LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary. RBA Property was formed to hold other real estate owned acquired through
foreclosure of collateral associated with non-performing loans. On December 1, 2008, Royal Bank
established Narberth Property Acquisition LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary. Narberth Property
Acquisition was formed to hold other real estate owned acquired through foreclosure of collateral
associated with non-accrual loans.
-39-
Royal Bank derives its income principally from interest charged on loans, interest earned on
investment securities, and fees received in connection with the origination of loans and other
services. Royal Banks principal expenses are interest expense on deposits and operating expenses.
Operating revenues, deposit growth, investment maturities, loan sales and the repayment of
outstanding loans provide the majority of funds for activities.
Royal Bank conducts business operations as a commercial bank offering checking accounts, savings
and time deposits, and loans, including residential mortgages, home equity and SBA loans. Royal
Bank also offers safe deposit boxes, collections, internet banking and bill payment along with
other customary bank services (excluding trust) to its customers. Drive-up, ATM, and night
depository facilities are available. Services may be added or deleted from time to time. The
services offered and the business of Royal Bank is not subject to significant seasonal
fluctuations. Royal Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve Fedline Wire Transfer System.
Service Area:
Royal Banks primary service area includes Montgomery, Chester, Bucks, Delaware,
Berks and Philadelphia counties, Southern and Northern New Jersey and the State of Delaware. This
area includes residential areas and industrial and commercial businesses of the type usually found
within a major metropolitan area. Royal Bank serves this area from fifteen branches located
throughout Montgomery, Philadelphia and Berks counties and New Jersey. Royal Bank also considers
Washington DC, and the states of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Florida,
Maryland, Northern Virginia and Delaware as a part of its service area for certain
products and services. Frequently, Royal Bank will do business with clients located outside of its
service area. Royal Bank has loans in twenty-six states via loan originations and/or participations
with other lenders who have broad experience in those respective markets. Royal Banks headquarters
are located at 732 Montgomery Avenue, Narberth, PA.
Competition:
The financial services industry in our service area is extremely competitive.
Competitors within our service area include banks and bank holding companies with greater
resources. Many competitors have substantially higher legal lending limits.
In addition, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market and other
mutual funds, brokerage firms, mortgage companies, leasing companies, finance companies and other
financial services companies offer products and services similar to those offered by Royal Bank, on
competitive terms.
Many bank holding companies have elected to become financial holding companies under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which give a broader range of products with which Royal Bank must
compete. Although the long-range effects of this development cannot be predicted, it will likely
further narrow the differences and intensify competition among commercial banks, investment banks,
insurance firms and other financial services companies. The Company has not elected financial
holding company status.
Employees:
Royal Bank employed approximately 169 people on a full-time equivalent basis as of March
31, 2009.
Deposits:
At March 31, 2009, total deposits of Royal Bank were distributed among demand deposits
(8%), money market deposit, savings and Super Now accounts (28%) and time deposits (64%). At March
31, 2009, deposits increased $51.6 million to $735.1 million, from year-end 2008, or 7.5%,
primarily due to a $45.2 million increase in time deposits. Management decided to raise deposit
rates to increase liquidity and to not increase the level of FHLB advances due to FHLB full
collateral delivery requirement to Royal Bank and the FHLBs suspension its stock dividend.
Included in Royal Banks deposits are approximately $12.8 million of intercompany deposits that are
eliminated through consolidation.
Current market and regulatory trends in banking are changing the basic nature of the banking
industry. Royal Bank intends to keep pace with the banking industry by being competitive with
respect to interest rates and new types or classes of deposits insofar as it is practical to do so
consistent with Royal Banks size, objective of profit maintenance and stable capital structure.
Lending:
At March 31, 2009, Royal Bank, including its subsidiaries, had a total net loan portfolio
of $623.9 million, representing 55% of total assets. The loan portfolio is categorized into
commercial demand, commercial mortgages,
-40-
residential mortgages (including home equity lines of
credit), construction, real estate tax liens, asset based loans, small business leases and
installment loans. At March 31, 2009, loans increased $5.5 million from year end 2008.
Business results
: Total interest income of Royal Bank for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was
$14.7 million compared to $18.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of 21%.
The decline in interest income was attributed to a lower level of investments and a 200 basis point
reduction in the prime rate by the Federal Reserve since the end of the first quarter in 2008. The
prime rate reduction negatively impacted prime based and variable rate loans coupled with an
increase in non-accrual loans that resulted in the loss of $1.5 million in interest income.
Interest expense was $8.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, compared to $9.6 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of 13%. Royal Bank recorded a net loss for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 of $2.3 million compared to net income of $1.0 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008. The loss is due to the $2.7 million, or 30%, reduction in net interest
income from $9.0 million in the first quarter of 2008 to $6.3 million in the first quarter of 2009
for the reasons mentioned above. Total assets of Royal Bank were $1.1 billion at March 31, 2009
and March 31, 2008. The above amounts reflect the consolidation totals for Royal Bank and its
subsidiaries. The subsidiaries included in these amounts are Royal Investments America, Royal Real
Estate, RBA Capital, Royal Bank America Leasing, Royal Tax Lien Services, Crusader Servicing
Corporation, and RBA Property LLC.
Royal Asian Bank
Royal Asian was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on October 4, 2005, and was
chartered by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Banking and commenced operation as a
Pennsylvania state-chartered bank on July 17, 2006. Royal Asian is an insured bank by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). Royal Asian derives its income principally from
interest charged on loans and fees received in connection with the other services. Royal Asians
principal expenses are interest expense on deposits and operating expenses. Operating revenues,
deposit growth, and the repayment of outstanding loans provide the majority of funds for
activities.
Service Area:
Royal Asians primary service area includes Philadelphia County, Northern New Jersey,
and New York City. The service area includes residential areas and industrial and commercial
businesses of the type usually found within a major metropolitan area. Royal Asian serves this area
from six branches located throughout Philadelphia, Northern New Jersey, and New York City. Royal
Asian also considers the states of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Washington DC, California,
Maryland, Northern Virginia and Delaware as a part of its service area for certain products and
services. Frequently, Royal Asian will do business with clients located outside of its service
area.
Royal Asian conducts business operations as a commercial bank offering checking accounts, savings
and time deposits, and loans, including residential mortgages, home equity and SBA loans. Royal
Asian also offers collections, internet banking, safe deposit boxes and bill payment along with
other customary bank services (excluding trust) to its customers. Drive-up, ATM, and night
depository facilities are available. Certain international services are offered via a SWIFT machine
which provides international access to transfer information through a secured web based system.
This system is for informational purposes only and no funds are transferred through SWIFT. Services
may be added or deleted from time to time. The services offered and the business of Royal Asian is
not subject to significant seasonal fluctuations. Royal Asian through its affiliation with Royal
Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve Fedline Wire Transfer System.
Competition:
The financial services industry in our service area is extremely competitive.
Competitors within our service area include banks and bank holding companies with greater
resources. Many competitors have substantially higher legal lending limits.
In addition, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market and other
mutual funds, mortgage companies, leasing companies, finance companies and other financial services
companies offer products and services similar to those offered by Royal Bank, on competitive terms.
Employees:
Royal Asian employed approximately 26 people on a full-time equivalent basis as of March
31, 2009.
-41-
Deposits:
At March 31, 2009, total deposits of Royal Asian were distributed among demand deposits
(8%), money market deposit, savings and Super Now accounts (14%) and time deposits (78%). At March
31, 2009, total deposits were $89.8 million, which amounted to a decrease of $2.8 million, or 3%,
from the level at December 31, 2008.
Lending:
Royal Asian had a total net loan portfolio of $65.7 million, representing 63% of total
assets at March 31, 2009 that grew $2.5 million, or 4%, from the level at December 31, 2008. The
loan portfolio is comprised of commercial demand, commercial mortgages, construction, and
installment loans.
Business results:
Net interest income of Royal Asian for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, amounted
to $805,000 which was a decrease of $76,000 from the comparable quarter of 2008. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, Royal Asian recorded a net loss of $59,000 compared to net income of $36,000
in the first quarter of 2008. Total assets of Royal Asian amounted to $104.6 million at March 31,
2009 compared to $106.9 million at December 31, 2008.
Current market and regulatory trends in banking are changing the basic nature of the banking
industry. Royal Asian intends to keep pace with the banking industry by being competitive with
respect to interest rates and new types or classes of deposits insofar as it is practical to do so consistent with Royal Asians
size, objective of profit maintenance and stable capital structure.
Royal Investments of Delaware
On June 30, 1995, the Company established a special purpose Delaware investment company, Royal
Investments of Delaware (RID), as a wholly owned subsidiary. Legal headquarters are at 1105 N.
Market Street, Suite 1300, Wilmington, DE 19899. RID buys, holds and sells investment securities.
Business results
: Total interest income of RID for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, of $319,000
declined 42% from $548,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. For the three months ended March
31, 2009, RID reported a net loss of $4.4 million, compared to net income of $152,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The decline in net income year-over-year was primarily related to the
$4.2 million in impairment charges on preferred and common stocks in the available for sale
investment portfolio. At March 31, 2009 total assets of RID were $44.1 million, of which $6.0
million was held in cash and cash equivalents and $17.0 million was held in investment securities.
The amounts shown above include the activity related to RIDs wholly owned subsidiary Royal
Preferred LLC. Royal Bank has extended loans to RID, secured by securities and as per the
provisions of Regulation W. At March 31, 2009, the amount due Royal Bank from RID was $9.4
million.
Royal Captive Insurance Company
On November 21, 2007, the Company established Royal Captive Insurance Company, a wholly owned
subsidiary. Royal Captive Insurance was formed to insure commercial property and comprehensive
umbrella liability for the Company and its affiliates. At March 31, 2009, total assets of Royal
Captive Insurance were $2.6 million.
Royal Preferred LLC
On June 16, 2006 the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary RID, established Royal Preferred
LLC as a wholly owned subsidiary. Royal Preferred LLC was formed to purchase a subordinated
debenture from Royal Bank America. At March 31, 2009, Royal Preferred LLC had total assets of
approximately $20.2 million.
Royal Bancshares Capital Trust I and II
On October 27, 2004, Royal Bancshares formed two Delaware trust affiliates, Royal Bancshares
Capital Trust I and Royal Bancshares Capital Trust II, in connection with the sale of an aggregate
of $25.0 million of a private placement of trust preferred securities. The interest rates for the
debt securities associated with the Trusts at March 31, 2009 amounted to 3.47% and 5.80%,
respectively for Capital Trust I and Capital Trust II.
-42-
Tax Lien Operations
Crusader Servicing Corporation
The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Bank, holds a 60% ownership interest in
Crusader Servicing Corporation (CSC). Legal headquarters are at 732 Montgomery Avenue, Narberth,
PA 19072. CSC acquires, through auction, delinquent property tax liens in various jurisdictions,
assuming a lien position that is generally superior to any mortgage liens on the property, and
obtaining certain foreclosure rights as defined by local statute. Due to a change in CSC
management, Royal Bank and other shareholders, constituting a majority of CSC shareholders, voted
to liquidate CSC under an orderly, long term plan adopted by CSC management. Royal Bank will
continue acquiring tax liens through its newly formed subsidiary, Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC. At
March 31, 2009, total assets of CSC were $19.6 million. Included in total assets is $5.3 million
for the Strategic Municipal Investments (SMI) portfolio, which is comprised of residential,
commercial, and land tax liens, primarily in Alabama. In 2005, CSC entered into a partnership with
Strategic Municipal Investments (SMI), ultimately acquiring a 50% ownership interest in SMI. In
connection with acquiring this ownership interest, CSC extended financing to SMI in the approximate
amount of $18.0 million, which was used by SMI to purchase a tax lien portfolio at a discount. As
a result of the recent deterioration in residential, commercial and land values principally in
Alabama, management concluded based on an analysis of the portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2008
that the loan was impaired by approximately $2.5 million. In the first quarter of 2009, CSC
charged-off $1.2 million of the impairment. The outstanding SMI loan balance was $5.3 million and
$6.6 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Business results
: Net interest income of CSC for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 amounted to
$164,000, a decrease of $49,000, or 23%, from the comparable quarter of 2008. Net loss for CSC for
the three months ended March 31, 2009, was $39,000 compared to net income of $64,000 for the
comparable period of 2008. At March 31, 2009, total assets of CSC were $19.6 million, of which
$18.5 million was held in net tax liens. Royal Bank has extended loans to CSC at market interest
rates, secured by the tax lien portfolio of CSC and as per the provisions of Regulation W. At
March 31, 2009, the amount due Royal Bank from CSC was $17.6 million.
Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC
On November 17, 2006, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Bank, formed Royal Tax
Lien Services, LLC (RTL). Royal Bank holds a 60% ownership interest in RTL. Legal headquarters
are 732 Montgomery Avenue, Narberth, Pennsylvania 19072. RTL was formed to purchase and service
delinquent tax certificates. RTL typically acquires delinquent property tax liens through public
auctions in various jurisdictions, assuming a lien position that is generally superior to any
mortgage liens that are on the property, and obtaining certain foreclosure rights as defined by
local statute.
Business results:
Net interest income of RTL of $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
increased $662,000 or 1.1 times, for the comparable quarter of 2008 largely due to increased
interest on certificates and penalty income year-over-year associated with a significant increase
in tax liens. Net income for RTL of $797,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 increased
$477,000, or 1.5 times, from the comparable quarter of 2008 due to a significant increase in tax
liens year-over-year. At March 31, 2009, total assets of RTL were $64.1 million, of which the
majority was held in tax liens as compared to total assets at December 31, 2008 of $64.6 million,
of which the majority was held in tax liens.
Royal Bank has extended loans to RTL at market interest rates, secured by the tax lien portfolio of
RTL and as per the provisions of Regulation W. At March 31, 2009, the amount due Royal Bank from
RTL was $62.2 million.
Equity Investments Segment
Royal Investments America
On June 23, 2003, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Bank, established Royal
Investments America, LLC (RIA) as a wholly owned subsidiary. Legal headquarters are at 732
Montgomery Avenue, Narberth, Pennsylvania. RIA was formed to invest in equity real estate ventures
subject to limitations imposed by the FDIC and Pennsylvania Department of Banking by regulation.
-43-
Business results
: At March 31, 2009, total assets of RIA under FIN 46(R) were $21.1 million
compared to $21.2 million at December 31, 2008. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, RIA had a net
loss of $2,000 compared to net income of $309,000 for the comparable period of 2008. The 2008
period included a gain on sales of real estate. For more information about Royal Investments
America refer to Note 12 Real Estate Owned via Equity Investment to the consolidated financial
statements. Royal Bank had previously extended loans to RIA at market interest rates, secured by
the loan portfolio of RIA and as per the provisions of Regulation W. At March 31, 2009, there were
no outstanding loans from Royal Bank to RIA.
Other Segment
Royal Bank America Leasing, LP
On July 25, 2005, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Bank, formed Royal Bank
America Leasing, LP (Royal Leasing). Royal Bank holds a 60% ownership interest in Royal Leasing.
Legal headquarters are 550 Township Line Road, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. Royal Leasing was formed to
originate small business leases. Royal Leasing originates small ticket leases through its internal
sales staff and through independent brokers located throughout its business area. In general, Royal
Leasing will portfolio individual small ticket leases in amounts of up to $250,000. Leases
originated in amounts in excess of that are sold for a profit to other leasing companies. On
occasion, Royal Bank will purchase municipal leases originated by Royal Leasing for its own
portfolio. These purchases are at market based on pricing and terms that Royal Leasing would expect
to receive from unrelated third-parties. From time to time Royal Leasing will sell small lease
portfolios to third-parties and will, on occasion, purchase lease portfolios from other
originators. During the first three months of 2009 and 2008, neither sales nor purchases of lease
portfolios were material.
Business results
: At March 31, 2009, total assets of Royal Leasing were $28.6 million, including
$28.2 million in net leases, as compared to $25.7 million in assets at December 31, 2008. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Royal Leasing had net interest income of $361,000, an increase of
$50,000 from the comparable period of 2008; provision for lease losses of $197,000 versus $119,000
in the comparable quarter of 2008; non-interest income of $97,000 as compared to $129,000 in the
first quarter of 2008; and non-interest expense of $103,000 versus $189,000 for the first quarter
of 2008. Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $103,000, an increase of $17,000, or
20%, from $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Royal Bank has extended loans to RBA Leasing at market interest rates, secured by the lease
portfolio of RBA Leasing and as per the provisions of Regulation W. At March 31, 2009, the amount
due Royal Bank from RBA Leasing was $22.1 million.
RBA Capital, LP
On October 1, 2006, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Royal Bank, formed RBA
Capital, LP (RBA Capital). Royal Bank holds a 60% ownership interest in RBA Capital. Legal
headquarters are 150 North Radnor Chester Road, Radnor Pennsylvania 19087. RBA Capital was formed
to lend to lenders on a re-discounted basis. By on a re-discounted basis, we mean the main business
line of RBA Capital is to extend loans to other lenders (RBA Loan). These other lenders are
typically not financial institutions, but rather individuals, smaller corporations, or partnerships
(Borrowing Lender) that make small loans including, but not limited to, loans to contractors,
home buyers or the purchasers of smaller, owner occupied, commercial real estate buildings
(Discounted Loans). The Discounted Loans can also be small construction or improvement loans. The
lender is required to have equity in each Discounted Loan so as to afford RBA Capital a prudent
maximum loan to value ratio for its portion of the RBA Loan extended for the respective Discounted
Loan. By way of an example, if a Borrowing Lender wanted to extend financing for one of its
borrowers to purchase property for $100,000, the Borrowing Lender would not lend the full purchase
price to its borrower, but rather would impose a loan to value (LTV) limit, generally discounting
the purchase price by 15% to maintain a maximum LTV of 85%, thereby lending $85,000 to its borrower
for the purchase. The Borrowing Lender would then borrow funds from RBA Capital to fund loan
advances to its borrower. RBA Capital would not lend 100% of the Borrowing Lenders loan advances,
but would instead re-discount those advances by generally striving to maintain a 65% LTV ratio,
and
-44-
would in this example lend $65,000 to the Borrowing Lender. The Discounted Loans are then pledged
to RBA Capital as collateral for its RBA Loan. RBA Capital typically originates its loans through
internal sales staff and advertising in trade publications. RBA Capital on occasion will refer
loans to Royal Bank, or for certain larger loans it originates, participate with Royal Bank in the
loan. Royal Bank pays RBA Capital a referral fee for loans referred from RBA Capital or for loans
participated with RBA Capital. All transactions between Royal Bank and RBA Capital are on
commercially reasonable terms at market rates and terms that would be paid, received or granted by
unrelated third-parties. During the fourth quarter of 2008, management decided to wind down the
operation of RBA Capital. In the near future, the operations of the subsidiary will be folded into
Royal Bank.
Business results
: At March 31, 2009, total assets of RBA Capital were $36.8 million versus $37.5
million at December 31, 2008. Net loans amounted to $36.7 million at March 31, 2009, a decrease of
$622,000, or 1.7%, from $37.3 million at December 31, 2008. Net interest income of $331,000 for the
first quarter of 2009 increased $17,000, or 5.4%, from the comparable quarter of 2008. RBA Capital
had net income for the first quarter of 2009 of $92,000 versus a net loss of $307,000 in the
comparable quarter of 2008
.
The increase was due to the provision for loan losses booked in the
first quarter of 2008. Royal Bank has extended loans to RBA Capital at market interest rates,
secured by the loan portfolio of RBA
C
apital and as per the provisions of Regulation W.
At March 31, 2009, the amount due Royal Bank from RBA Capital was $36.3 million.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Consolidated Assets
Total consolidated assets as of March 31, 2009 were $1.3 billion, an increase of $77.4 million, or
6.6%, from December 31, 2008. This increase was attributed to a $27.1 million increase in cash and
cash equivalents, a $26.9 million growth in AFS investments, a $9.9 million increase in real estate
owned, and an $8.6 million increase in net loans.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Total cash and cash equivalents increased $27.1 million from $14.3 million at December 31, 2008 to
$41.4 million at March 31, 2009, resulting from a $52.7 million increase in deposits during the
first quarter of 2009.
Investment Securities
Total investment securities grew $26.9 million, or 7.7%, to $377.2 million at March 31, 2009, from
the level of $350.3 million at December 31, 2008. FHLB stock was $10.1 million at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified its HTM investment securities to
available-for-sale (AFS). The transferred investment securities had a total book value of $37.6
million and a fair value of $34.7 million. The unrealized loss of $3.0 million on these securities
was recorded, net of tax, as accumulated other comprehensive income, an adjustment to stockholders
equity. The Company has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until the market
recovers. Additionally, the transfer of these securities to AFS will allow the Company greater
flexibility in managing credit risk in its investment portfolio and the Companys overall
liquidity. As a result of this transfer, the Company will not classify any future purchases of
investment securities into HTM for at least two years.
The AFS portfolio had gross unrealized losses of $37.6 million at March 31, 2009, which slightly
declined from gross unrealized losses of $37.8 million at December 31, 2008. During the first
quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $4.2 million impairment charge related to preferred and
common stocks. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, gross unrealized losses increased for
collateralized debt obligations, corporate bonds, trust preferred securities and other securities
which was offset by the impairment charge for preferred and common stocks and recoveries in
collateralized mortgage obligations. The gross unrealized losses are primarily related to the
turbulent credit and financial markets coupled with the current economic environment. As a result
many of the investment securities are expected to increase in value once the markets become
normalized and the resulting fair market values recover.
Preferred and common stock had gross unrealized losses of $6.3 million and $8.9 million at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The investments in marketable equity securities
consist primarily of six separate
-45-
diversified managed accounts of large cap, small cap and mid-cap stocks. As a result of the length
of time some of the equity securities have been in a loss position and/or the severity of the loss
position, management has deemed that individual stocks within these separate managed accounts have
unrealized losses that are other than temporary at March 31, 2009. Consequently the Company
recorded an impairment charge to earnings of $3.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. One of the
preferred stock investments within the financial services industry, which is currently not rated by
the rating agencies, was deemed impaired in the amount of $1.1 million at March 31, 2009, and the
Company recorded a charge to earnings in this amount for the first quarter of 2009. However, the
Company continues to receive dividend payments on the preferred stock. The severity of the
unrealized loss is correlated to the decline of the stock market that started in the fall of 2007,
but is primarily due to the decline that has occurred during the past year as a result of the
current economic recession. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold the remainder
of the preferred and common stock investments until a recovery of fair value, it does not consider
the impairment to be other than temporary on the remainder of these investments. Of the $6.3
million in gross unrealized losses for this investment category, $1.0 million has occurred for more
than twelve months and $5.3 million has occurred for less than twelve months.
The collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) within the AFS portfolio had gross unrealized
losses of $4.8 million at March 31, 2009 as compared to unrealized losses of $6.3 million at
December 31, 2008. The unrealized losses in CMOs relate to lack of market liquidity and changes in
market credit spreads. The credit ratings for these investments have experienced some ratings
declines however the unrealized loss has improved due to the stabilization of delinquencies and
foreclosures in the mortgage pools within the CMOs. Of the CMOs that are rated, none are below
investment grade. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a
recovery of fair value, it does not consider the impairment to be other than temporary. Of the
$4.8 million in total unrealized losses for this investment category, $2.3 million has occurred for
more than twelve months and $2.5 million has occurred for less than twelve months.
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) had gross unrealized losses of $9.3 million and $8.8
million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The unrealized losses for the
Companys CDO investments relate to the credit default risk of the pool of diversified companies
within each of three collateralized debt obligations. The decline reflects the uncertainty
associated with the current economic recession and the potential for increased company bankruptcies
that could potentially result in losses within these investments. The CDO valuations were
determined using a copula method, which is a type of market standard valuation modeling for
structured credit derivative products that is dependent on the correlated default events of the
obligors within the underlying collateral pool. Two of the CDOs have a diversified pool of
approximately 100 companies that have experienced additional defaults during the first quarter of
2009. Based upon the number of defaults occurring to date and the maturities of these CDOs in
December of 2009, the Company expects full payment of principal at maturity. The remaining CDO,
which has a diversified pool of close to 100 companies, also experienced additional defaults during
the first quarter of 2009 and matures in June of 2010. Based upon the defaults to date and its
maturity date management expects to receive full payment of principal at maturity. Gross
unrealized losses for this investment category have occurred for more than twelve months.
Corporate bonds had gross unrealized losses of $8.1 million and $6.7 million at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The Companys unrealized losses in investments in corporate bonds
represent credit risk of the underlying issuers, which are primarily financial institutions and
insurance companies. The ratings for some of the corporate bonds continue to decline during the
first quarter of 2009 due to downgrading by the ratings agencies based on the issuers 2008
financial results. Despite the below investment grade rating on a few of the corporate bonds,
management did not consider them to be other than temporarily impaired because of the consensus
analysts earnings projections for 2009 or 2010. Because the Company has the ability and intent to
hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, it does not consider the investments to be
other than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. Of the $8.1 million in total unrealized losses
for this investment category, $4.7 million has occurred for more than twelve months and $3.4
million has occurred for less than twelve months.
Trust preferred securities had gross unrealized losses of $8.9 million at March 31, 2009 and $6.8
million at December 31, 2008, respectively. The unrealized losses in investments in trust referred
securities of the Company reflect the credit concerns related to the financial institutions that
issued these long term financial obligations. The recent financial losses and reductions of capital
coupled with bank failures and the overall market uncertainty within the
-46-
financial services industry has resulted in lower values for all trust preferred securities. The
valuations of trust preferred securities were based upon the average of fair market values received
from three separate bond trading firms due to the current illiquidity of these investment
securities. Their individual valuations were based primarily upon the long term viability of the
underlying financial institution for each investment security and active trades in comparable
products. Based upon the strength of the financial institutions that issued these debt instruments
and the intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value or maturity, the Company
doesnt consider these investments to be other than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. Of the
$8.9 million in total unrealized losses for this investment category, $300,000 has occurred for
more than twelve months and $8.6 million has occurred for less than twelve months.
Investment securities within the AFS portfolio are marked to market quarterly and any resulting
gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of taxes, within the equity section
of the balance sheet as shown in Note 4 Comprehensive Income. Unrealized gains and losses are not
recorded through a gain or charge to earnings in the consolidated income statement. However if
unrealized losses are determined to be other than temporarily impaired a charge to earnings will be
recorded instead of other comprehensive income.
The Company will continue to monitor these investments to determine if the continued negative
trends, market valuations or credit defaults result in impairment that is other than temporary.
Loans and Leases
Total loans increased $6.7 million, or 1.0%, from the $700.7 million level at December 31, 2008 to
$707.4 million at March 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase of $9.5 million in
construction loans, $8.9 million in single family residential loans, $3.3 million in leasing, which
were partially offset by a decrease of $13.7 million in non-residential real estate. The Company
has become more selective in approving land development loans given the existing loan concentration
coupled with the current extremely weak housing market. In addition, the Company recently hired
commercial lenders to focus primarily on the commercial and industrial business sector.
The following table represents loan balances by type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
88,689
|
|
|
$
|
86,278
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
176,667
|
|
|
|
167,204
|
|
Land Development
|
|
|
72,783
|
|
|
|
74,168
|
|
Const. and land develop. mezzanine
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Single family residential
|
|
|
36,425
|
|
|
|
27,480
|
|
Real Estate non-residential
|
|
|
220,894
|
|
|
|
234,573
|
|
Real Estate non-res. mezzanine
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
4,111
|
|
Real Estate multi-family
|
|
|
14,541
|
|
|
|
14,059
|
|
Real Estate -1-4 family mezzanine
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
61,955
|
|
|
|
64,168
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
29,434
|
|
|
|
26,123
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans and leases
|
|
$
|
708,669
|
|
|
$
|
702,163
|
|
Deferred fees, net
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases
|
|
$
|
707,413
|
|
|
$
|
700,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
Total deposits, the primary source of funds, grew $52.1 million, or 6.9%, to $812.1 million at
March 31, 2009, from December 31, 2008. Deposits increased across all categories except savings.
The largest increases in deposits occurred in time deposits over $100,000 and time deposits under
$100,000 which increased $34.8 million, or 10.7%, and $9.1
-47-
million, or 5.2%, respectively, at March 31, 2009. Management decided to raise specific deposit
rates to grow deposits and to improve liquidity.
The following table represents ending deposit balances by type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand (non-interest bearing)
|
|
$
|
53,387
|
|
|
$
|
50,886
|
|
NOW and Money Markets
|
|
|
199,863
|
|
|
|
193,869
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
14,796
|
|
|
|
15,171
|
|
Time deposits (over $100)
|
|
|
360,779
|
|
|
|
325,958
|
|
Time deposits (under $100)
|
|
|
183,315
|
|
|
|
174,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
812,140
|
|
|
$
|
760,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
Total borrowings, which include short and long-term borrowings, decreased $1.6 million, or 0.6%, to
$274.1 million at March 31, 2009, from $275.7 million at December 31, 2008. This reduction is
attributed to the monthly payments on amortizing borrowings during the first three months of 2009.
During the first quarter of 2009, management decided not to incur additional borrowings because of
the FHLB full collateral delivery requirement to Royal Bank and the FHLBs suspension its stock
dividend.
Obligations Related to Equity Investments in Real Estate
The Company consolidated into its balance sheet $12.4 million of debt at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, related to a real estate equity investment of which none is
guaranteed by the Company. Due to the slow sales of units during January and February there was
minimal change in the balance from year end.
Shareholders Equity
Consolidated
shareholders equity increased $24.7 million, or 30.3%, to $106.3 million at March 31,
2009 from $81.6 million at December 31, 2008. On February 20, 2009, the Company received
approximately $30.4 million via the issuance of preferred stock under the Troubled Assets Relief
Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Plan (CPP) established by the U.S. Treasury. Other
comprehensive loss declined $700,000 to $25.4 million at March 31, 2009 from $26.1 million at
December 31, 2008. Refer to the Capital Adequacy section for more information on the TARP funds.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
The Company and its banking subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by state and federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines involve
quantitative measure of assets and liabilities calculated under regulatory accounting practices.
Quantitative measures established by banking regulations, designed to ensure capital adequacy,
required the maintenance of minimum amounts of capital to total risk weighted assets and a
minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio, as defined by the banking regulations. At March 31, 2009, the
Company was required to have a minimum Tier 1 and total capital ratios of 4% and 8%, respectively,
and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3% plus an additional 100 to 200 basis points.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-48-
The tables below provide a comparison of the Company, Royal Bank and Royal Asians risk-based
capital ratios and leverage ratios for March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be well capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For capital
|
|
capitalized under prompt
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
adequacy purposes
|
|
corrective action provision
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
163,095
|
|
|
|
15.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
84,997
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
126,087
|
|
|
|
13.11
|
%
|
|
|
76,966
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
96,208
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
|
17.96
|
%
|
|
|
6,556
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8,194
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
149,642
|
|
|
|
14.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,498
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
113,888
|
|
|
|
11.84
|
%
|
|
|
38,483
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,725
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
13,689
|
|
|
|
16.71
|
%
|
|
|
3,278
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital (to average assets, leverage)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
149,642
|
|
|
|
12.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
36,211
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
113,888
|
|
|
|
10.27
|
%
|
|
|
33,267
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,445
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
13,689
|
|
|
|
13.17
|
%
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,196
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be well capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For capital
|
|
capitalized under prompt
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
adequacy purposes
|
|
corrective action provision
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
136,273
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
83,611
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
97,478
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
%
|
|
|
76,007
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
95,008
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
14,739
|
|
|
|
18.65
|
%
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
7,903
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
123,013
|
|
|
|
11.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
41,806
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
85,406
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
%
|
|
|
38,003
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,005
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
13,749
|
|
|
|
17.40
|
%
|
|
|
3,161
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,742
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital (to average assets, leverage)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company (consolidated)
|
|
$
|
123,013
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,835
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Royal Bank
|
|
|
85,406
|
|
|
|
7.81
|
%
|
|
|
32,819
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,698
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Royal Asian
|
|
|
13,749
|
|
|
|
13.97
|
%
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,921
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The Companys ratios compare favorably to the minimum required amounts of Tier 1 and total capital
to risk weighted assets and the minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio, as defined by banking regulations.
The Company currently meets the criteria for a well-capitalized institution, and management
believes that the Company will continue to meet its minimum capital requirements. At present, the
Company has no commitments for significant capital expenditures.
-49-
On February 20, 2009, as part of the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) established by the United
States Department of Treasury (Treasury), the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (the
Purchase Agreement) with Treasury, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 30,407
shares of the Companys Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, without par
value per share (the Series A Preferred Stock), and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share.
In conjunction with the purchase of the Series A Preferred Stock, Treasury received a warrant to
purchase 1,104,370 shares of the Companys Class A common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of
$30.4 million in cash. The Series A Preferred Stock will qualify as Tier 1 capital and will pay
cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum
thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock may generally be redeemed by the Company at any time
following consultation with its primary banking regulators. The warrant issued to the Treasury has
a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to
anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $4.13 per share of the common stock. The Companys intention
is to utilize the extra capital provided by the CPP funds to support its efforts to prudently and
transparently provide lending and liquidity.
LIQUIDITY & INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Liquidity is the ability to ensure that adequate funds will be available to meet the Companys
financial commitments as they become due. In managing its liquidity position, all sources of funds
are evaluated, the largest of which is deposits. Also taken into consideration are securities
maturing in one year or less, other short-term investments and the repayment of loans. These
sources provide alternatives to meet its short-term liquidity needs. Longer liquidity needs may be
met by issuing longer-term deposits and by raising additional capital. The liquidity ratio is
calculated by adding total cash and investments less reserve requirements, the sum then divided by
deposits and short-term liabilities. The ratio is generally maintained at a level equal to or
greater than 20%.
The Companys level of liquidity is provided by funds invested primarily in corporate bonds,
capital trust securities, U.S. agencies, and to a lesser extent, federal funds sold. The overall
liquidity position is monitored on a weekly basis.
In managing its interest rate sensitivity positions, the Company seeks to develop and implement
strategies to control exposure of net interest income to risks associated with interest rate
movements. Interest rate sensitivity is a function of the repricing characteristics of the
Companys assets and liabilities. These include the volume of assets and liabilities repricing, the
timing of the repricing, and the interest rate sensitivity gaps is a continual challenge in a
changing rate environment.
(The balance of this page was left blank intentionally.)
-50-
The following table shows separately the interest sensitivity of each category of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
Over 5
|
|
Non-rate
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
0 - 90
|
|
91 - 365
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Sensitive
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
41.4
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
125.9
|
|
|
|
143.2
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
377.2
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
177.3
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.8
|
|
Variable rate
|
|
|
298.8
|
|
|
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
|
415.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
306.1
|
|
|
|
146.3
|
|
|
|
216.4
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
|
680.1
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.9
|
|
|
|
154.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
415.8
|
|
|
$
|
313.6
|
|
|
$
|
359.6
|
|
|
$
|
107.3
|
|
|
$
|
56.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,253.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
121.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214.6
|
|
Certificate of deposits
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
246.6
|
|
|
|
244.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544.1
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
317.0
|
|
|
|
365.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
812.1
|
|
Borrowings
(1)
|
|
|
81.3
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
186.0
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
312.2
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.3
|
|
|
|
106.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & capital
|
|
$
|
153.7
|
|
|
$
|
336.6
|
|
|
$
|
551.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
$
|
194.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,253.0
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate GAP
|
|
$
|
262.1
|
|
|
$
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(191.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
90.4
|
|
|
$
|
(137.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate GAP
|
|
$
|
262.1
|
|
|
$
|
239.1
|
|
|
$
|
47.4
|
|
|
$
|
137.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP to total assets
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
-2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP to total equity
|
|
|
228
|
%
|
|
|
-22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP to total assets
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP to total equity
|
|
|
228
|
%
|
|
|
225
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The $12.4 million in borrowings classified as non-rate sensitive are related to
variable interest entities and are not obligations of the Company.
|
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is mitigated somewhat by a portion of the Companys
loan portfolio consisting of floating rate loans, which are tied to the prime lending rate but
which have interest rate floors and no interest rate ceilings. Although the Company is originating
fixed rate loans, a portion of the loan portfolio continues to be comprised of floating rate loans
with interest rate floors. At March 31, 2009, floating rate loans with floors and without floors
were $112.6 million and $303.0 million, respectively.
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The information presented in the Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity section of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results Operations of this Report
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4T CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange
-51-
Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities Exchange Commissions rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this
report, the Company evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, except as described
below, our CEO and CFO concluded, subject to the limitations on
effectiveness described in Item 9A(T) in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at March 31, 2009.
As described in Item 9A(T) in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2008,
management had identified a material weakness associated with internal controls related to the
accounting for deferred income taxes. To remediate this weakness, the Company engaged a nationally
recognized independent public accounting firm to review the Companys accounting procedures related
to deferred income taxes for December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. During 2009, the independent
public accounting firm will continue to perform this review on a quarterly basis.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than as described above, there have been no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting during the first quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any controls system. A controls system, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
its objectives are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there
are limits on resources, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs
and their impact on the business model. We intend to continue to improve and refine our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
As described under Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations, Royal Bank holds a 60% equity interest in each of Crusader Servicing Corporation
(CSC) and Royal Tax Lien Services, LLC (RTL). CSC and RTL acquire, through public auction,
delinquent tax liens in various jurisdictions thereby assuming a superior lien position to most
other lien holders, including mortgage lien holders. As previously discussed in the Companys
form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, on March 4, 2009, each of CSC and RTL received a
grand jury subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for New Jersey upon application of the
Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The subpoena seeks certain documents
and information relating to an ongoing investigation being conducted by the DOJ. Royal Bank has
been advised that neither CSC nor RTL are targets of the DOJ investigation, but they are subjects
of the investigation. Royal Bank, CSC and RTL are cooperating in the investigation.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3.
Default Upon Senior Securities
None
-52-
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to Vote Security Holders
On February 13, 2009, the Companys shareholders approved amendments (
Articles
Amendments
) to Article 4 of the Companys articles of incorporation and Paragraph 4 of the
Companys additional articles of incorporation at a special meeting of shareholders to (i) increase
the authorized shares of Class A common stock to 20 million from 18 million and (ii) authorize the
issuance by the Company of up to 500,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be
issued by the Companys board of directors in one or more series, from time to time, with each such
series to consist of such number of shares and to have such voting powers, designations,
preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions as determined by the board of
directors. The Articles Amendments were approved by the board of directors on November 4, 2008,
subject to shareholder approval, and were effective upon approval by the Companys shareholders and
the filing of the Articles Amendments with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania on February 13, 2009.
The voting results to increase the authorized shares of Class A common stock to 20 million from 18
million are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
% of voted
|
|
|
voted
|
|
shares
|
For
|
|
|
23,803,216
|
|
|
|
96.690
|
%
|
Against
|
|
|
812,342
|
|
|
|
3.300
|
%
|
Abstain
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
0.010
|
%
|
Broker non-vote
|
|
|
2,601,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
The voting results to authorize the issuance by the Company of up to 500,000 shares of preferred
stock are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
% of voted
|
|
|
voted
|
|
shares
|
For
|
|
|
26,478,434
|
|
|
|
97.276
|
%
|
Against
|
|
|
737,803
|
|
|
|
2.711
|
%
|
Abstain
|
|
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
0.014
|
%
|
Broker non-vote
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
Other Information
None
Item 6.
Exhibits
(a)
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3(i) of the Companys report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 30, 2009.)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.ii to
the Companys report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 30, 2009.)
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification Pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 signed by Robert R, Tabas, Principal Executive Officer of
Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania on May 15, 2009.
|
-53-
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification Pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 signed by Robert A. Kuehl, Principal Financial
Officer of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania on May 15, 2009.
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Robert R. Tabas,
Principal Executive Officer of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania on
May 15, 2009.
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Robert A. Kuehl,
Principal Financial Officer of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania on
May 15, 2009.
|
-54-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
(Registrant)
Dated: May 15, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert A. Kuehl
|
|
Robert A. Kuehl
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
-55-