ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

FCEC First Chester County Corp. (MM)

7.86
0.00 (0.00%)
14 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type
First Chester County Corp. (MM) NASDAQ:FCEC NASDAQ Common Stock
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 7.86 0 01:00:00

- Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (DEFA14A)

18/11/2010 9:36pm

Edgar (US Regulatory)



Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

o

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

ý

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

FIRST CHESTER COUNTRY CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

On or about November 18, 2010, First Chester County Corporation ("First Chester"), the holding company for First National Bank of Chester County, mailed to its shareholders the following letter requesting that shareholders of First Chester vote "FOR" approval of the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Tower Bancorp, Inc., as amended, and enclosed a copy of First Chester's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

GRAPHIC

November 18, 2010

Dear Shareholder:

        You recently received proxy materials for First Chester Financial Corporation's upcoming special meeting of shareholders on December 8, 2010. I'm writing to you to provide additional information for your consideration and to request you to cast your vote " FOR " adoption of the agreement and plan of merger with Tower Bancorp, Inc. ("Tower").

        The Board of Directors has concluded that the merger is in the best interests of First Chester and its shareholders. In Tower, First Chester has a well-capitalized and profitable merger partner, and the combined company will continue to serve our communities, customers, and clients. As more fully described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio is subject to adjustment in the event that First Chester Delinquent Loans, as defined in and calculated in accordance with the merger agreement, are equal to or less than $35 million, or greater than $55 million, as of the last business day of the month prior to the closing date of the merger. Further, it is a condition of the merger that First Chester Delinquent Loans not exceed $90 million as of the last business day of the month prior to the closing date of the merger.

        If the merger were to close on or prior to November 30, 2010, the exchange ratio would have been 0.291 based on First Chester Delinquent Loans as of October 29, 2010 of $78.3 million As disclosed in the joint proxy statement/prospectus relating the proposed merger, the final exchange ratio cannot be determined until the closing of the merger, which is expected to occur in mid-December 2010, in which event the final exchange ratio would be determined based on First Chester Delinquent Loans calculated as of November 30, 2010.

        Additionally, enclosed is a copy of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. You should review the information contained in this report in conjunction with the information provided in the joint proxy statement/prospectus prior to casting your vote on the agreement and plan of merger with Tower.

        The Board of Directors, management and I believe that the merger is the best route forward for First Chester and urge you to vote " FOR " the adoption of the agreement and plan of merger on your proxy and submit your vote. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, the Board of Directors of First Chester urges you to complete and sign the proxy card enclosed with the joint proxy statement/prospectus and mail it promptly in the postage-prepaid envelope or, in the alternative, vote electronically over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com or by touch tone telephone at 1-800-690-6903. This will not prevent you from voting in person at the special meeting, but will assure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend. If you are a shareholder whose shares are registered in "street name," you will need additional documentation from your broker in order to vote in person at the special meeting.

        Continuing through the completion of the merger, Phoenix Advisory Services, First Chester's proxy solicitor, will make current exchange ratio and merger consideration information available to First Chester and Tower shareholders at the following toll-free number: 1-800-576-4314.

        Thank you for your time to review this very important material and for your affirmative vote on the agreement and plan of merger.

Sincerely,    
GRAPHIC    
John A. Featherman, III
Chairman, CEO and President
   

Table of Contents

Additional Information About the Merger

        The proposed transaction will be submitted to the shareholders of First Chester and Tower for their consideration and approval. In connection with the proposed transaction, Tower has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a registration statement on Form S-4, which has been declared effective by the SEC and includes a joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents to be distributed to the shareholders of Tower and First Chester on or about November 5, 2010. Investors are urged to read the registration statement and the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transaction and any other relevant documents filed with the SEC, as well as any amendments or supplements to those documents, because they will contain important information. Investors can obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus, as well as other filings containing information about Tower and First Chester, free of charge from the SEC's Internet site (www.sec.gov), by contacting Tower Bancorp, Inc., 112 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, Attention: Brent Smith, Investor Relations, telephone 717-724-4666 or by contacting First Chester Financial Corporation, 9 North High Street, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19381 Attention: John Stoddart, Investor Relations, telephone 484-881-4141. INVESTORS SHOULD READ THE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING A DECISION CONCERNING THE TRANSACTION.

Participants in the Transaction

        Tower, First Chester and their respective directors, executive officers, and certain other members of management and employees may be soliciting proxies from Tower and First Chester shareholders in favor of the transaction. Information regarding the persons who may, under the rules of the SEC, be considered participants in the solicitation of the Tower and First Chester shareholders in connection with the proposed transaction is set forth in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC. You can also find information about Tower's executive officers and directors in its definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 23, 2010, which is available at the SEC's Internet site (www.sec.gov). Additional information about First Chester's executive officers and directors is set forth in its Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 27, 2010, which is available at the SEC's Internet site. You can also obtain free copies of these documents from Tower or First Chester, as appropriate, using the contact information above.

         This document is not an offer to sell shares of Tower's securities which may be issued in the proposed transaction. Such securities are offered only by means of the joint proxy statement/prospectus referred to above.

About First Chester County Corporation

        First Chester County Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, First National Bank of Chester County, is a financial institution with $1.2 billion in assets and with 23 branch offices located in Chester, Delaware, Lancaster and Cumberland counties. Founded in 1863, First National Bank of Chester County is the eighth oldest national bank in the country. First National provides quality financial services to individuals, businesses, government entities, non profit organizations, and community service groups. Wealth Management and Trust Services are provided through First National Wealth Management, a division of First National Bank of Chester County. For more information, visit www.1nbank.com. Mortgage services are provided through American Home Bank, a division of First National Bank of Chester County. American Home Bank (AHB) has multiple national delivery channels in the retail and wholesale mortgage arena as well as joint venture mortgage partnerships with builders and systems-built manufacturers. For more information visit www.bankahb.com.

Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements

        This document may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results and trends could differ materially from those set forth in such statements due to various risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and experience to differ from those projected include, but are not limited to, the following: ineffectiveness of the company's business strategy due to changes in current or future market conditions; the effects of competition, and of changes in laws and regulations, including industry consolidation and development of competing financial products and services; interest rate movements; changes in credit quality; inability to achieve merger-related synergies; difficulties in integrating distinct business operations, including information technology difficulties; volatilities in the securities markets; and deteriorating economic conditions, and other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Tower Bancorp, Inc.'s and First Chester County Corporation's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

2


Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)    

ý

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    .

Commission File No. 1-34500

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
  23-2288763
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

9 North High Street
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

(Address of principal executive office)
(Zip code)

(484) 881-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý     No  o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  o     No  o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o   Accelerated filer  ý   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company  o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o     No  ý

        The number of shares outstanding of Common Stock of the registrant as of November 8, 2010 was 6,317,925.


Table of Contents

INDEX

 
   
   
  Page  

Part I.

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    2  

 

Item 1—Financial Statements

   
2
 

     

Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009

   
2
 

     

Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and 2009 (unaudited)

   
3
 

     

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and 2009 (unaudited)

   
4
 

     

Consolidated Statements of Equity Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and 2009 (unaudited)

   
5
 

     

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

   
6
 

 

Item 2—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   
35
 

 

Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   
51
 

 

Item 4—Controls & Procedures

   
51
 

Part II.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

   
54
 

 

Item 1—Legal Proceedings

   
54
 

 

Item 1A—Risk Factors

   
54
 

 

Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

   
54
 

 

Item 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities

   
55
 

 

Item 4—[Removed and Reserved]

   
55
 

 

Item 5—Other Information

   
55
 

 

Item 6—Exhibits

   
55
 

Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements." These forward-looking statements are made in good faith pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. References to "we," "our" and the "Corporation" refer to First Chester County Corporation, together in each case with our consolidated subsidiaries unless the context suggests otherwise.

        The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate and management's beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements, including as a result of risks discussed in "Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

i


Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)
  September 30,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 
 
  (unaudited)
   
 

ASSETS

             
 

Cash and due from banks

  $ 18,186   $ 20,853  
 

Federal funds sold and other overnight investments

    2,441     1,721  
 

Interest bearing deposits

    38,488     124,107  
           
       

Total cash and cash equivalents

    59,115     146,681  
 

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

   
58,204
   
82,698
 
 

Loans and leases

   
835,388
   
901,889
 
 

Less: allowance for loan and lease losses

    (22,101 )   (23,217 )
           
       

Net loans and leases

    813,287     878,672  
 

Premises and equipment, net

   
18,761
   
20,513
 
 

Deferred tax asset, net

    1,182     2,593  
 

Bank owned life insurance

    1,526     1,474  
 

Other real estate owned

    4,080     3,692  
 

Other assets

    18,500     32,560  
 

Discontinued assets (see Note 6):

             
   

Mortgage loans and related derivative instruments

    158,125     205,150  
   

Other discontinued assets held for sale

    3,640     3,203  
           
       

Total assets

  $ 1,136,420   $ 1,377,236  
           

LIABILITIES

             
 

Deposits

             
   

Non-interest-bearing

  $ 149,203   $ 155,647  
   

Interest-bearing (including certificates of deposit over $100 thousand of $188,420 and $250,757 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

    821,050     954,653  
           
   

Total deposits

    970,253     1,110,300  
 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

    73,239     172,897  
 

Subordinated debentures

    20,795     20,795  
 

Other liabilities

    11,921     13,097  
 

Discontinued liabilities (see Note 6)

    4,690     3,245  
           
       

Total liabilities

  $ 1,080,898   $ 1,320,334  
           

EQUITY

             
 

Common stock, par value $1.00; authorized 25,000,000 shares; outstanding, 6,354,475 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

  $ 6,354   $ 6,354  
 

Additional paid-in capital

    23,801     23,678  
 

Retained earnings

    24,227     25,753  
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

    415     (499 )
 

Treasury stock, at cost: 34,879 shares and 13,702 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

    (442 )   (209 )
           
       

Total First Chester County Corporation stockholders' equity

    54,355     55,077  
 

Non-controlling interests

    1,167     1,825  
           
     

Total equity

  $ 55,522   $ 56,902  
           
       

Total liabilities and equity

  $ 1,136,420   $ 1,377,236  
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

2


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands—except per share)
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

INTEREST INCOME

                         
 

Loans and leases, including fees

  $ 11,949   $ 13,565   $ 36,391   $ 40,140  
 

Investment securities

    413     764     1,306     2,991  
 

Federal funds sold and deposits in banks

    40     5     233     40  
                   
     

Total interest income

    12,402     14,334     37,930     43,171  
                   

INTEREST EXPENSE

                         
 

Deposits

    2,351     2,881     7,869     9,854  
 

Subordinated debt

    286     295     833     721  
 

Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings

    891     1,388     3,317     4,360  
                   
     

Total interest expense

    3,528     4,564     12,019     14,935  
                   

Net interest income

    8,874     9,770     25,911     28,236  
 

Provision for loan and lease losses

    369     11,222     767     17,693  
                   
     

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

    8,505     (1,452 )   25,144     10,543  
                   

NON-INTEREST INCOME

                         
 

Wealth management and advisory services

    939     965     2,928     2,931  
 

Service charges on deposit accounts

    561     669     1,726     1,961  
 

(Loss) gain on sales and calls of investment securities, net

    (9 )   1     (9 )   1  
 

Operating lease rental income

    222     314     726     999  
 

Net gain (loss) on the sales of fixed assets and other real estate owned

    46     162     (29 )   279  
 

Write down of other real estate owned

            (1,333 )    
 

Bank owned life insurance

    16     13     52     39  
 

Net impairment losses on available for sale securities:

                         
   

Total impairment loss

        (1,576 )       (1,576 )
   

Portion of loss in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

                 
                   
       

Net impairment losses recognized in operations

        (1,576 )       (1,576 )
 

Other

    633     523     1,838     1,552  
                   
     

Total non-interest income

    2,408     1,071     5,899     6,186  
                   

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

                         
 

Salaries and employee benefits

    3,471     5,367     10,581     15,493  
 

Occupancy, equipment and data processing

    1,681     1,811     5,110     5,410  
 

Depreciation expense on operating leases

    179     259     585     828  
 

FDIC deposit insurance

    598     422     1,938     1,897  
 

Bank shares tax

    (173 )   207     305     674  
 

Professional services

    2,564     1,100     7,074     2,508  
 

Marketing

    153     216     529     836  
 

Other real estate expense

    45     1     107     16  
 

Communications expense

    176     177     516     628  
 

Other

    765     1,022     3,072     2,893  
                   
     

Total non-interest expense

    9,459     10,582     29,817     31,183  
                   
     

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    1,454     (10,963 )   1,226     (14,454 )

INCOME TAXES

    582     (3,891 )   582     (4,610 )
                   

NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

  $ 872   $ (7,072 ) $ 644   $ (9,844 )

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

                         

Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of taxes of $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $617 thousand and $2.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively

    (594 )   1,122     (1,145 )   8,021  

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

    173     494     1,025     1,363  
                   

Net (loss) income attributable to discontinued operations

  $ (767 ) $ 628   $ (2,170 ) $ 6,658  

NET INCOME (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION

  $ 105   $ (6,444 ) $ (1,526 ) $ (3,186 )
                   

PER SHARE DATA

                         
 

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations (Basic)

  $ 0.14   $ (1.12 ) $ 0.11   $ (1.57 )
                   
 

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations (Diluted)

  $ 0.14   $ (1.12 ) $ 0.11   $ (1.57 )
                   
 

Net (loss) income per share from discontinued operations (Basic)

  $ (0.12 ) $ 0.10   $ (0.35 ) $ 1.06  
                   
 

Net (loss) income per share from discontinued operations (Diluted)

  $ (0.12 ) $ 0.10   $ (0.35 ) $ 1.06  
                   
 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to First Chester County Corporation (Basic)

  $ 0.02   $ (1.02 ) $ (0.24 ) $ (0.51 )
                   
 

Net income (loss) per share attributable to First Chester County Corporation (Diluted)

  $ 0.02   $ (1.02 ) $ (0.24 ) $ (0.51 )
                   
 

Dividends declared

  $   $ 0.14   $   $ 0.42  
                   

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

    6,318,986     6,306,889     6,325,258     6,272,682  
                   

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

    6,318,986     6,306,889     6,325,258     6,272,682  
                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2010   2009  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Net loss attributable to First Chester County Corporation

  $ (1,526 ) $ (3,186 )
 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

    1,025     1,363  
           
 

Net loss including non-controlling interests

  $ (501 ) $ (1,823 )
           
 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

             
   

Depreciation

    2,200     2,728  
   

Provision for loan and lease losses

    767     17,693  
   

Amortization of investment security premiums and accretion of discounts, net

    309     300  
   

Amortization of deferred loan fees

    (1,129 )   (728 )
   

Losses (gains) on sales and calls of investment securities available for sale, net

    9     (1 )
   

Net losses (gains) from sales of fixed assets and OREO

    29     (279 )
   

Write down of other real estate owned

    1,333      
   

Net gain from mortgage banking activities

    (33,910 )   (37,172 )
   

Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale

    1,430,326     1,897,596  
   

Origination of mortgage loans held for sale

    (1,349,440 )   (1,950,649 )
   

Net cash paid for the settlement of derivative contracts

    (1,006 )   (277 )
   

Stock-based compensation expense

    93     147  
   

Other than temporary impairment on investment securities available for sale

        1,576  
   

Decrease (increase) in deferred tax asset

    939     (3,201 )
   

Decrease (increase) in other assets

    9,730     (12,339 )
   

Increase in other liabilities

    1,294     2,369  
           
     

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    61,043     (84,060 )
           

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Net decrease (increase) in loans

    65,747     (21,108 )
 

Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale

    245     33,641  
 

Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of investment securities available-for-sale

    26,031     10,048  
 

Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale

    (713 )   (16,649 )
 

Proceeds from the sale of OREO

    2,064     5,060  
 

Purchase of premises and equipment

    (576 )   (3,794 )
 

Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment

    184     114  
           
     

Net cash provided by investing activities

    92,982     7,312  
           

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

             
 

Change in subsidiary's shares from non-controlling interest

    (1,683 )   (1,009 )
 

Net increase in short term Federal Home Loan Bank and other short term borrowings

        49,700  
 

Increase in long term Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings

        58,300  
 

Repayment of long term Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings

    (99,658 )   (77,047 )
 

Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures

        5,330  
 

Net decrease in deposits

    (140,047 )   (29,077 )
 

Cash dividends paid

        (1,759 )
 

Net treasury stock transactions

    (203 )   111  
           
     

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (241,591 )   4,549  
           
     

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

    (87,566 )   (72,199 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    146,681     95,150  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 59,115   $ 22,951  
           

Supplementary cash flow information:

             
 

Interest paid

  $ 13,627   $ 17,611  
 

Income taxes paid

  $   $ 2,750  
 

Loans transferred to real estate owned

  $ 3,890   $ 2,963  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

 
  Common Stock    
   
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (loss)
   
   
   
   
 
 
  Additional
Paid -in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Treasury
Stock
  Non-
Controlling
Interest
  Total
Equity
  Comprehensive
Income
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  Shares   Par Value  

Balance January 1, 2009

    6,331,975   $ 6,332   $ 24,708   $ 57,899   $ (3,292 ) $ (1,815 ) $ 1,485   $ 85,317        
 

Cumulative effect adjustment under ASC 860-50

   
   
   
   
240
   
   
   
   
240
       
                                         

Balance January 1, 2009, as adjusted

    6,331,975     6,332     24,708     58,139     (3,292 )   (1,815 )   1,485     85,557        
 

Change in subsidiary shares from non-controlling interest

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(1,009

)
 
(1,009

)
     
 

Net income

                (3,186 )           1,363     (1,823 ) $ (1,823 )
 

Cash dividends declared

                (2,632 )               (2,632 )      
 

Other comprehensive income

                                       
   

Net unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale

                    2,769             2,769     2,769  
 

Treasury stock transactions

            (1,330 )           1,441         111        
 

Stock based compensation

            147                     147        
 

Stock based compensation tax benefit

            (10 )                   (10 )      
                                       
 

Total comprehensive income

                                                  $ 946  

Balance September 30, 2009

   
6,331,975
 
$

6,332
 
$

23,515
 
$

52,321
 
$

(523

)

$

(374

)

$

1,839
 
$

83,110
       
                                         

Balance January 1, 2010

    6,354,475   $ 6,354   $ 23,678   $ 25,753   $ (499 ) $ (209 ) $ 1,825   $ 56,902        
 

Change in subsidiary shares from non-controlling interest

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
(1,683

)
 
(1,683

)
     
 

Net (loss) income

                (1,526 )           1,025     (501 ) $ (501 )
 

Other comprehensive income

                                       
   

Net unrealized gains on investment securities Available-for-sale

                    914             914     914  
 

Treasury stock transactions

            30             (233 )       (203 )      
 

Share based compensation

            93                     93        
                                       
 

Total comprehensive loss

                                                  $ 413  

Balance September 30, 2010

   
6,354,475
 
$

6,354
 
$

23,801
 
$

24,227
 
$

415
 
$

(442

)

$

1,167
 
$

55,522
       
                                         

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

        The foregoing unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") for interim financial information. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation, which includes reclassifications for discontinued operations (see Note 6 for discontinued operations disclosure and Note 13 for earnings (loss) per share). Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (our "2009 Annual Report").

        Prior to January 1, 2010, our business was conducted through two primary segments, community banking and mortgage banking. During the first quarter 2010, we announced the potential sale of our American Home Bank ("AHB") mortgage banking segment. Accordingly, the mortgage banking operations related to this segment have been reclassified, and are now presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Certain assets and liabilities of this former segment are presented as discontinued assets and liabilities held for sale. The statements of cash flows are presented on a consolidated basis, including both continuing and discontinued operations. The notes to the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to exclude discontinued operations unless otherwise noted. Footnote segment disclosures are not provided. Refer to Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information related to discontinued operations.

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Chester County Corporation ("First Chester" or the "Corporation") and First National Bank of Chester County (the "Bank"). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

2. Going Concern

        The Corporation's financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. However, due to the Corporation's financial results, the substantial uncertainty throughout the U.S. banking industry and other matters discussed in this report, a substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

        As further described in Note 5, on October 16, 2009, the Bank entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"). On August 27, 2010, the Bank entered into a formal written agreement with the OCC, which supersedes and replaces

6


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

2. Going Concern (Continued)


the MOU. The OCC also mandated higher individual minimum capital ratios ("IMCRs"), which the Bank was required to achieve by December 31, 2009. Continued operations may depend on the Corporation's ability to comply with the terms of the formal agreement, the IMCRs and the closing of the pending merger with Tower Bancorp, Inc. ("Tower"). For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation incurred a net loss from operations, primarily from the higher provisions for loan losses due to increased levels of non-performing assets, the write-off of goodwill and the establishment of a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets. Our efforts to raise capital to comply with the IMCRs prior to the deadline ultimately resulted in the planned merger with Tower, as described in Note 3 below, which was announced on December 28, 2009. In addition, in efforts to conserve capital, we elected to reduce and subsequently suspend our cash dividends on our common stock beginning with the third quarter of 2009. However, despite the above efforts, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Bank was below certain IMCR thresholds. The Corporation has been compliance with the IMCRs since the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as further discussed in Note 5.

        Management and the board of directors are committed to the planned merger with Tower. However, if the announced merger were not to occur, then Management would seek to recapitalize the Bank by finding another merger partner or by raising additional capital in the public or private markets. The Corporation is completing a regular planning cycle for 2011, which includes, among other things, updating the Corporation's strategic business plan and creating detailed operating and marketing plans for the Bank as an independent company.

3. Pending Merger

        On December 27, 2009, the Corporation entered into a definitive merger agreement, as amended (the "Merger Agreement"), with Tower, the holding company for Graystone Tower Bank ("Graystone"), pursuant to which First Chester will merge with and into Tower (the "Merger"), with Tower being the surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement also provides that upon consummation of the merger, the Bank will merge with and into Graystone, with Graystone as the surviving institution (the "Bank Merger"). The Merger Agreement additionally provides for the potential sale of the AHB segment at or prior to the consummation of the Merger. At the effective time of the Merger, the board of directors of Tower will be increased by three (3) directors and three (3) of the current directors of First Chester selected by the board of directors of First Chester, with the approval of Tower's board of directors, will be added to the board of directors of Tower, to serve as such for no less than three years.

        Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of First Chester will receive 0.453 shares of Tower common stock for each share of First Chester common stock they own. The Merger Agreement establishes loan delinquency thresholds and provides for an increase or reduction in the consideration paid by Tower to First Chester shareholders in the event of specified increases or decreases in First Chester's loan delinquencies prior to closing. If the merger had closed in October 2010, the exchange ratio would have been 0.291 based on First Chester Delinquent Loans of $76.2 million calculated as of September 30, 2010.

        Directors and executive officers of First Chester have entered into Voting Agreements with Tower, pursuant to which they have agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of common stock of First

7


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

3. Pending Merger (Continued)


Chester owned by them in favor of the approval of the Merger at the special shareholder's meeting to vote upon the Merger.

        Consummation of the Merger is subject to certain terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, receipt of various regulatory approvals and approval by both Tower's and First Chester's shareholders and First Chester's loan delinquencies not exceeding $90 million in the aggregate. As of September 30, 2010, all regulatory approvals have been received from the bank regulators. However, certain of these approvals contain expiration dates such that extensions may need to be obtained if the merger is not closed prior to the end of 2010.

        On November 1, 2010, First Chester and Tower jointly announced that the companies will each hold a special meeting of its respective shareholders on December 8, 2010 for purposes of considering and approving the Merger. The Merger is currently anticipated to close in mid-December 2010. The transaction remains subject to approval by the shareholders of Tower and First Chester, as well as the satisfaction of other closing conditions. First Chester and Tower mailed the joint proxy statement/prospectus related to the special meetings to their respective shareholders on or about November 5, 2010.

4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The update requires companies to provide more information in their disclosures about the credit quality of their financing receivables and the credit reserves held against them. The amendments that require disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for the periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. ASU No. 2010-20 will enhance the disclosure requirements for financing receivables and credit losses, but will not impact the Corporation's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This guidance removes the requirement for a SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of GAAP. ASU 2010-09 is intended to remove potential conflicts with the SEC's literature and all of the amendments are effective upon issuance, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. The Corporation adopted the guidance for the interim period ending June 30, 2010 with no impact on the Corporation's financial condition or results of operations.

        In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance requires: (1) disclosure of the significant amount transferred in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers; and (2) separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures set forth in FASB Accounting Standards Codifications (ASC) 820, "Fair Value

8


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)


Measurements and Disclosures": (1) For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and (2) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2011, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, and the guidance did not have an impact on the Corporation's financial condition or results of operations.

        In June 2009, the FASB updated ASC 860, "Transfers and Servicing," to eliminate the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity ("QSPE"), modify the criteria for applying sale accounting to transfers of financial assets or portions of financial assets, differentiate between the initial measurement of an interest held in connection with the transfer of an entire financial asset recognized as a sale and participating interests recognized as a sale and remove the provision allowing classification of interests received in a guaranteed mortgage securitization transaction that does not qualify as a sale as available-for-sale or trading securities. The updates to ASC 860 clarify (i) that an entity must consider all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously or in contemplation of a transfer, (ii) the isolation analysis related to the transferor and its consolidated subsidiaries and (iii) the principle of effective control over the transferred financial asset. The updates to ASC 860 also enhance financial statement disclosures. The updates to ASC 860 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 with earlier application prohibited. Revised recognition and measurement provisions are to be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date and the disclosure provisions are to be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date. The guidance was effective for January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on the Corporation's financial condition or results of operations.

        In June 2009, the FASB updated ASC 810, "Consolidation," to modify certain characteristics that identify a variable interest entity ("VIE"), revise the criteria for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, add an additional reconsideration event to determining whether an entity is a VIE, eliminating troubled debt restructurings as an excluded reconsideration event and enhance disclosures regarding involvement with a VIE. Additionally, with the elimination of the concept of QSPEs in the updates to ASC 860, entities previously considered QSPEs are now within the scope of ASC 810. Entities required to consolidate or deconsolidate a VIE will recognize a cumulative effect in retained earnings for any difference in the carrying amount of the interest recognized. The updates to ASC 810 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 with earlier application prohibited. The guidance was effective for January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on the Corporation's financial condition or results of operations.

5. Regulatory Matters

Supervisory Actions

        The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can prompt certain mandatory, and possibly

9


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

5. Regulatory Matters (Continued)


additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators involving factors such as the risk weights assigned to assets and what items may be counted as capital. Regulators also have broad discretion to require any institution to maintain higher capital levels than otherwise required by statute or regulation, even institutions that are considered "well-capitalized" under applicable regulations.

        On October 16, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank entered into an MOU with the OCC. An MOU with regulatory authorities is an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action, such as a formal written agreement or order. Under the MOU, the Bank has agreed to address, among other things, the following matters:

    develop a comprehensive three-year capital plan;

    take action to protect criticized assets and adopt and implement a program to eliminate the basis of criticism of such assets;

    establish an effective program that provides for early problem loan identification and a formal plan to proactively manage those assets;

    review the adequacy of the Bank's information technology activities and Bank Secrecy Act compliance and approve written programs of policies and procedures to provide for compliance; and

    establish a Compliance Committee of the Board to monitor and coordinate the Bank's adherence to the provisions of the MOU.

        On August 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Bank entered into a formal written agreement with the OCC, which supersedes and replaces the MOU. The formal agreement requires that the Board of Directors of the Bank ensure that the Bank takes those actions identified in the MOU (described above), and, in some cases, augments those requirements, such as by establishing a written program regarding criticized assets of $750,000 or above, rather than the $1,000,000 threshold referenced in the MOU. In addition, the formal agreement adds a number of new requirements, requiring the Bank to: (i) ensure the Bank has adequate and competent senior management; (ii) develop and implement a written profit plan to improve and sustain the earnings of the Bank; (iii) develop and implement a written program to improve loan portfolio management; (iv) review the methodology for the Bank's allowance for loan and lease losses and establish a program providing for the maintaining of an adequate allowance; and (v) adopt and implement a written interest rate risk policy. Unlike the MOU, the formal agreement is a form of formal enforcement action enforceable by the OCC through several means, including injunctions and the assessment of civil money penalties against the Bank, its Board of Directors and/or its management.

        The Board of Directors and Management have initiated corrective actions to comply with the provisions of the formal agreement.

10


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

5. Regulatory Matters (Continued)

        Additionally, in November 2009, the Bank was advised that the OCC established IMCRs for the Bank higher than the capital ratios generally applicable to banks under current regulations. In the case of the Bank, the OCC established IMCRs requiring a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least eight percent (8%), a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least ten percent (10%) and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least twelve percent (12%) which the Bank was required to achieve by December 31, 2009. The Corporation's efforts to raise capital prior to the deadline ultimately resulted in the planned merger with Tower Bancorp, which was announced on December 28, 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation also received notice from the Federal Reserve, its primary regulator, that the Federal Reserve must approve any dividends to be paid in advance of the declaration or payment of the dividend.

        For the purpose of satisfying the IMCRs, during December 2009, the Corporation entered into an amendment to our existing loan agreement with Graystone to recapitalize the Bank. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation borrowed the full $26.0 million available under the credit facility which was contributed to the Bank as Tier 1 capital. Additionally, Graystone purchased $52.5 million in first lien residential real estate and commercial loan participations at a 1.5% discount.

        As set forth in the tables below, as of September 30, 2010, the Bank met the IMCR thresholds for all capital ratios, but as of December 31, 2009, the Bank was below the IMCR thresholds for Tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital.

 
  Actual   For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
  To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Individual Minimum
Capital Ratios
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio  

As of September 30, 2010:

                                     
 

Leverage Ratio

                                     
   

Corporation

    73,418     6.35 %   46,245     ³ 4.00 %   N/A     N/A  
   

Bank

    102,509     8.88 %   46,163     ³ 4.00 %   92,326     ³ 8.00 %
 

Tier I Capital Ratio

                                     
   

Corporation

    73,418     8.38 %   35,060     ³ 4.00 %   N/A     N/A  
   

Bank

    102,509     11.72 %   34,996     ³ 4.00 %   87,490     ³ 10.00 %
 

Total Risk Based Capital Ratio

                                     
   

Corporation

    86,971     9.92 %   70,121     ³ 8.00 %   N/A     N/A  
   

Bank

    113,616     12.99 %   69,992     ³ 8.00 %   104,988     ³ 12.00 %

11


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

5. Regulatory Matters (Continued)

 

 
  Actual   For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
  To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Individual Minimum
Capital Ratios
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio  

As of December 31, 2009:

                                     
 

Leverage Ratio

                                     
 

Corporation

    76,459     5.71 %   53,522     ³ 4.00 %   N/A     N/A  
 

Bank

    102,617     7.68 %   53,472     ³ 4.00 %   106,943     ³ 8.00 %
 

Tier I Capital Ratio

                                     
 

Corporation

    76,459     7.79 %   39,262     ³ 4.00 %   N/A     N/A  
 

Bank

    102,617     10.47 %   39,203     ³ 4.00 %   98,008     ³ 10.00 %
 

Total Risk Based Capital Ratio

                                     
 

Corporation

    89,936     9.16 %   78,525     ³ 8.00 %   N/A     N/A  
 

Bank

    115,035     11.74 %   78,407     ³ 8.00 %   117,610     ³ 12.00 %

Dividend Restrictions

        The Bank, as a national bank, is required by federal law to obtain the approval of the OCC for the payment of dividends if the total of all dividends declared by the Board of Directors of the Bank in any calendar year will exceed the total of the Bank's net income for that year and the retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock, subject to the further limitations that a national bank can pay dividends only to the extent that the payment of such dividends would not cause the Bank to become "undercapitalized" (as defined under federal law). There were no dividends declared or payable by the Bank as of September 30, 2010.

        During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation received notice from the Federal Reserve Board that the Federal Reserve must approve any dividends to be paid by the Corporation in advance of the declaration or payment of the dividend. The Corporation announced during the first quarter 2010 that it will not be paying any dividends prior to the completion of the proposed merger. There were no dividends declared or payable by the Corporation as of September 30, 2010.

6. Discontinued Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

        On March 4, 2010, the Corporation and Tower entered into an amendment to the Merger Agreement, which provides for the merger of the Bank with and into Graystone, with Graystone as the surviving institution. Graystone and the Bank entered into a Bank Plan of Merger on March 4, 2010. The amendment additionally provides for the potential sale of the AHB division at or prior to the consummation of the Merger. The Corporation has engaged a financial advisor to assist in the sale of the AHB division.

        The results of operations of a component of an entity that has either been disposed of, or is classified as held for sale, shall be reported in discontinued operations if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been, or will be, eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a

12


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

6. Discontinued Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (Continued)


result of the disposal transaction and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

        In determining whether the Corporation met the conditions for a qualified plan of sale, management considered the relevant accounting guidance and concluded that the "held for sale" conditions were met during the first quarter 2010. Management determined that the Corporation will exit significant mortgage banking activities after the sale of AHB and, as such, certain assets and liabilities of the Corporation's mortgage banking operations will be presented as discontinued assets held for sale and the results of operations directly related to mortgage banking activity will be presented as discontinued operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and for all future periods.

        Loans held for sale and related derivative instruments are shown as a separate disposal group separate from other AHB assets. Based on discussions with interested third parties to date, management anticipates that these assets, although discontinued from the Corporation's future business model most likely will not be sold in the transaction as described above. These assets although directly related to the mortgage banking segment's operations are to be sold by the Corporation in the normal course of business shortly after the close of a potential sale transaction. The Corporation does not expect to originate significant loans held for sale after the completion of the sale of its mortgage banking operations.

        The remaining assets, disposal group 2, will likely be sold as indicated in the amended Merger Agreement noted above. The carrying value of these assets are required to be at the lower of their carrying value or fair market value less costs to sell, and depreciation and amortization expense associated with assets held-for-sale ceases.

 
  September 30,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 

Disposal Group 1

             
 

Loans held for sale, at fair value

  $ 155,264   $ 202,757  
 

Derivative instruments, at fair value

    2,861     2,393  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 158,125   $ 205,150  
           
 

Fair value of derivative instruments

  $ 384   $  
           
   

Total liabilities

  $ 384   $  
           

Disposal Group 2

             
 

Premises and equipment

  $ 2,044   $ 1,956  
 

Other miscellaneous assets

    1,596     1,247  
           
   

Total assets

  $ 3,640   $ 3,203  
           
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  $ 4,306   $ 3,245  
           
   

Total liabilities

  $ 4,306   $ 3,245  
           

13


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

6. Discontinued Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (Continued)

        Results of operations for discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below.

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Interest income(1)

  $ 1,480   $ 2,867  

Interest expense(2)

    392     803  
           
 

Net interest income

    1,088     2,064  

Non-interest income

    10,557     12,472  

Non-interest expense

    12,239     12,797  
           

(Loss) income before income taxes

    (594 )   1,739  

Income taxes

        617  
           

Net (loss) income prior to non-controlling interest

  $ (594 ) $ 1,122  
           

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

  $ 173   $ 494  
           

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  $ (767 ) $ 628  
           

 

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Interest income(1)

  $ 4,166   $ 7,810  

Interest expense(2)

    1,120     2,364  
           
 

Net interest income

    3,046     5,446  

Non-interest income

    34,029     40,714  

Non-interest expense

    38,220     35,601  
           

(Loss) income before income taxes

    (1,145 )   10,559  

Income taxes

        2,538  
           

Net (loss) income prior to non-controlling interest

  $ (1,145 ) $ 8,021  
           

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

  $ 1,025   $ 1,363  
           

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  $ (2,170 ) $ 6,658  
           

(1)
Interest income excludes interest income earned on the Corporation's residential and construction loans held for investment that was previously disclosed as part of the results of operations of the mortgage banking segment. Management anticipates that these held for investment portfolios will remain as part of the Corporation's continuing community banking operations after the sale of the mortgage banking business.

(2)
Interest expense of the mortgage banking segment is based on management's internal methodology of allocating consolidated interest expense of the Corporation's existing funding sources to the mortgage banking segment's assets directly related to discontinued

14


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

6. Discontinued Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (Continued)

    loans held for sale and certain discontinued non-interest earning assets held for sale. This allocation methodology is consistent with management's previous segment reporting policies, however, it excludes any funding costs attributable to the Corporation's residential and construction loans held for investment that were previously disclosed as part of the results of operations of the mortgage banking segment. Imputed interest expense of the mortgage banking segment is shown as part of the consolidated statement of operations as deposit and Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances and other borrowings interest expense. To properly report the net loss (income) from discontinued operations, interest expense from deposits of $356 thousand and $1.0 million and interest expense from FHLB advances and other borrowings of $36 thousand and $99 thousand for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2010, respectively, was reclassified from the Corporation's continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations to interest expense from discontinued operations. Interest expense from deposits of $631 thousand and $2.0 million and interest expense from FHLB advances and other borrowings of $172 thousand and $352 thousand for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009, respectively, was reclassified from the Corporation's continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations to interest expense from discontinued operations.

7. Investment Securities

        The Corporation's investment portfolio consists of the following categories of securities:

    US Treasury —Consists of debt securities issued by the US Government.

    US Government Agency Notes —Consists of debt instruments issued by US Government agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Bank and Freddie Mac.

    US Government Agency Mortgage Backed Securities —Consists of residential mortgage pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations "CMOs" issued by US government agencies such as GNMA, FNMA and Freddie Mac. The GNMA pass-through securities or the underlying GNMA securities backing the CMOs are guaranteed by the US Government, while the FNMA and Freddie Mac pass-through securities or the underlying FNMA and Freddie Mac securities backing the CMOs are guaranteed by the respective US Government agency.

    Collateralized Mortgage Obligations—Residential —Consists of private label CMOs backed by non-government agency residential mortgage pools.

    Collateralized Mortgage Obligations—Commercial —Consists of private label CMOs backed by non-government agency commercial mortgage pools.

    State and Municipal —Consists of securities issued by state, city or local governments.

    Corporate Debt Securities —Consists of corporate debt securities.

    Bank equity securities —Consists of equity securities of banks, bank holding companies or bank trust preferred securities.

15


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

7. Investment Securities (Continued)

    Other Equity Securities —Consists primarily of equity securities of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair market value of the Corporation's available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:

September 30, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)
  Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
 

US Treasury

  $ 5,001   $ 11   $   $ 5,012  

US Government agency mortgage-backed securities

    29,408     1,166         30,574  

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Residential

    1,042     8     (84 )   966  

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Commercial

    1,003         (47 )   956  

State and municipal

    2,346     41         2,387  

Corporate debt securities

    7,044         (525 )   6,519  

Bank equity securities

    270     60         330  

Other equity securities

    11,460             11,460  
                   

Totals

  $ 57,574   $ 1,286   $ (656 ) $ 58,204  
                   

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)
  Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
 

US Treasury

  $ 20,003   $ 13   $   $ 20,016  

US Government agency notes

    2,040     7         2,047  

US Government agency mortgage-backed securities

    36,193     902     (100 )   36,995  

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Residential

    1,249         (251 )   998  

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Commercial

    1,004         (196 )   808  

State and municipal

    4,542     52         4,594  

Corporate debt securities

    7,056         (1,191 )   5,865  

Bank equity securities

    525     50     (42 )   533  

Other equity securities

    10,842             10,842  
                   

  $ 83,454   $ 1,024   $ (1,780 ) $ 82,698  
                   

        The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following table. Expected maturities will

16


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

7. Investment Securities (Continued)


differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(Dollars in thousands)
  Amortized
Cost
  Fair
Value
 

Due in one year or less

  $ 5,840   $ 5,864  

Due after one year through five years

    7,560     7,353  

Due after five years through ten years

         

Due after ten years

    991     701  
           

    14,391     13,918  

Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs

    31,453     32,496  

Bank equity and other equity securities

    11,730     11,790  
           

  $ 57,574   $ 58,204  
           

        Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $245 thousand. Gross losses from the sale of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $9 thousand. Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.3 million and $33.6 million respectively. Gross gains from the sale of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $1 thousand. The principal amount of investment securities pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law were $46.4 million at September 30, 2010 and $71.4 million at December 31, 2009. Other than US government agency mortgage back securities and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, there were no securities held from a single issuer that represented more than 10% of stockholders' equity.

        The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010.

 
  Less than 12 months   12 months or
longer
  Total  
(Dollars in thousands) Description of Securities
  Number
of
Securities
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
 

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Residential

    1             568     (84 )   568     (84 )

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Commercial

    1             957     (47 )   957     (47 )

Corporate debt securities

   
6
   
995
   
(5

)
 
5,524
   
(520

)
 
6,519
   
(525

)
                               

Total temporarily impaired investment securities

    8   $ 995   $ (5 ) $ 7,049   $ (651 ) $ 8,044   $ (656 )
                               

17


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

7. Investment Securities (Continued)

        The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2009.

 
  Less than 12 months   12 months or
longer
  Total  
(Dollars in thousands) Description of Securities
  Number
of
Securities
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
Value
  Unrealized
Losses
 

US Government agency mortgage-backed securities

    5   $ 9,386   $ (100 ) $   $   $ 9,386   $ (100 )

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Residential

   
3
   
292
   
   
700
   
(251

)
 
992
   
(251

)

Collateralized mortgage obligations—Commercial

    1             808     (196 )   808     (196 )

Corporate debt securities

   
6
   
   
   
5,865
   
(1,191

)
 
5,865
   
(1,191

)

Bank equity securities

   
2
   
   
   
213
   
(42

)
 
213
   
(42

)
                               

Total temporarily impaired investment securities

    17   $ 9,678   $ (100 ) $ 7,586   $ (1,680 ) $ 17,264   $ (1,780 )
                               

Other than Temporary Impairment

        In accordance with ASC 320-10, "Investments—Debt and Equity Securities," the Corporation evaluates its securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") throughout the year. Each investment that has a fair value less than the book value is reviewed on a quarterly basis by management. Management considers at a minimum the following factors that, both individually or in combination, could indicate that the decline is other-than-temporary: (a) the Corporation has the intent to sell the security; (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery; and (c) the Corporation does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Among the factors that are considered in determining intent is a review of capital adequacy, interest rate risk profile and liquidity at the Corporation. An impairment charge is recorded against individual securities if the review described above concludes that the decline in value is other-than-temporary. There were no impairments recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 on available for sale securities.

        Specific conclusions for each category of securities with an unrealized loss position and where management believed an other than temporary impairment analysis was warranted are summarized below:

CMO—Residential and Commercial

        There are a total of two private label CMO securities that had unrealized loss positions at September 30, 2010. One of the securities had a AA- rating from S&P, and the other had a B- rating from S&P. All contractual cash flows have been received on these securities. Each of these issuances has subordinated tranches supporting principal. In addition, we conducted due diligence of

18


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

7. Investment Securities (Continued)


publicly available information regarding these securities and no material information came to our attention that would indicate an inability to recover our basis in these securities. We reviewed and considered information about the underlying collateral as well as information provided by our professional investment advisors. This information indicated likelihood that subordinate tranches of the CMO provide sufficient protection to the Bank's senior tranches such that management can conclude that the probability of suffering a principal loss is unlikely. Because the Corporation does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, it does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2010.

Corporate Debt Securities

        There are a total of six securities in this category that had unrealized loss positions at September 30, 2010. All of these securities are obligations of well-known, established companies or subsidiaries thereof. All contractual cash flows have been received on these securities. Depreciation on three of the securities accounted for 93% of the total depreciation in this category. For these three securities management reviewed rating agency information and noted that all three securities had below investment grade ratings. Current news and filings, the length and duration of the depreciation, and a review of the analysis performed by our third party investment advisor indicated that there was no information that would indicate a going concern or other issue that would impair our ability to recover our cost basis. As the Corporation does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized cost basis, it does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2010.

8. Loans and Leases

        The following charts present information about major loan classifications as well as impaired loans and lease balances as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

September 30, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)
  Loan
Balance
  Impaired
Loan
Balance
  Number of
Impaired
Loans
  Specific
Allowance
on Impaired
Loans
 

Commercial loans

  $ 305,143   $ 21,248     62   $ 3,252  

Real estate—commercial

    246,172     16,871     16     2,728  

Real estate—commercial construction

    52,512     9,065     7      

Real estate—residential

    92,980     3,047     11     816  

Real estate—residential construction

    27,433     1,065     3     406  

Consumer loans

    110,327     1,380     34     252  

Lease financing receivables

    821     83     3     83  
                   

Totals

  $ 835,388   $ 52,759     136   $ 7,537  
                   

19


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

8. Loans and Leases (Continued)

        Unearned income included in the carrying amount of the loan balances above was $1.0 million at September 30, 2010. The amount of deposit account overdrafts classified as loans above totaled $252 thousand at September 30, 2010.

        The non-accrual loan and lease balance was $35.8 million at September 30, 2010. The approximate gross interest income that would have been recorded for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010 if the $35.8 million in non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms was $553 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. The actual amount of interest income included in net income as of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 on these loans was $28 and $183 thousand, respectively resulting from interest earned prior to the loans being placed on non-accrual status.

        We identify a loan as impaired when it is probable that interest and/or principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. ASC 310-10-35, "Receivables," requires us to individually examine loans where it is probable that we will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal payments according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement and assess for impairment. The average recorded investment in the September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 impaired loans was $54.3 million and $25.2 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010, interest income recognized during the time within the period that the loans were impaired was $178 thousand and $401 thousand, respectively.

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)
  Loan
Balance
  Impaired
Loan
Balance
  Number of
Impaired
Loans
  Specific
Allowance
on Impaired
Loans
 

Commercial loans

  $ 334,286   $ 13,269     35   $ 1,029  

Real estate—commercial

    261,643     12,071     11     3,637  

Real estate—commercial construction

    66,204     8,786     8     135  

Real estate—residential

    88,024     2,601     7     644  

Real estate—residential construction

    29,387     2,137     7     874  

Consumer loans

    120,767     2,596     42     1,148  

Lease financing receivables

    1,578     167     8     55  
                   

Totals

  $ 901,889   $ 41,627     118   $ 7,522  
                   

        Unearned income included in the carrying amount of the loan balances above was $746 thousand at December 31, 2009. The amount of deposit account overdrafts classified as loans above totaled $220 thousand at December 31, 2009.

        The non-accrual loan and lease balance was $27.6 million at December 31, 2009. The approximate gross interest income that would have been recorded for the twelve months ending December 31, 2009 if the $27.6 million in non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms was $1.8 million. The actual amount of interest income included in net income as of December 31, 2009 on these loans was $960 thousand resulting from interest earned prior to the loans being placed on non-accrual status.

20


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

8. Loans and Leases (Continued)

        The following chart presents changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2010   2009  

Balance at beginning of period

  $ 21,534     15,528  
 

Provision charged to operating expenses

    369     11,222  
 

Recoveries

    781     90  
 

Loans charged-off

    (628 )   (3,183 )
 

Allowance adjustment—Other

    45     (167 )
           

Balance at end of Period

  $ 22,101   $ 23,490  
           

 

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2010   2009  

Balance at beginning of period

  $ 23,217   $ 10,335  
 

Provision charged to operating expenses

    767     17,693  
 

Recoveries

    1,059     339  
 

Loans charged-off

    (3,157 )   (4,549 )
 

Allowance adjustment—Other

    215     (328 )
           

Balance at end of Period

  $ 22,101   $ 23,490  
           

9. Income Taxes

        At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the valuation allowance against the Corporation's deferred tax was $7.7 million and $7.5 million, respectively. The valuation allowance is recorded against a portion of the Corporation's deferred tax assets after concluding that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would not be realized. In evaluating the ability to recover our deferred tax assets, Management considers all available positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate realizability of our deferred tax assets including past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In addition, general uncertainty surrounding the future economic and business conditions have increased the likelihood of volatility in our future earnings. The Corporation has concluded and recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset, except for amounts available for carry back claims.

10. Other Real Estate Owned

        Other real estate owned ("OREO") represents property owned by the Bank following default by the borrowers. OREO property acquired through foreclosure is initially transferred at fair value based on an appraised value less estimated cost to dispose. Adjustments are subsequently made to mark the property below this amount if circumstances warrant. Losses arising from foreclosure transactions are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Costs to maintain real estate owned and any subsequent

21


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

10. Other Real Estate Owned (Continued)


gains or losses are included in the Corporation's results of operations. The following table summarizes properties held as OREO as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

(Dollars in thousands)
  September 30,
2010
  Number of
properties
  December 31,
2009
  Number of
properties
 

Land

  $ 3,453     7   $ 49     1  

Residential 1 - 4 family

    627     5     3,643     15  
                   

Total

  $ 4,080     12   $ 3,692     16  
                   

11. Other Assets

        During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation received cash proceeds in full payment of an $8.7 million receivable recorded in other assets during the year ended December 31, 2009, which related to a former BOLI policy which the Bank had surrendered in 2008. The Corporation also received an income tax refund of $3.1 million during the second quarter of 2010 which was recorded as a receivable in other assets at December 31, 2009.

12. Borrowings

        At September 30, 2010, the Bank had borrowings totaling $73.2 million compared to $172.9 million at December 31, 2009. During 2010, borrowings from the FHLB decreased $100.1 million to $44.4 million as compared to December 31, 2009. Scheduled maturities of $52.5 million and prepayments of $56.7 million net of advances of $10.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $99.2 million. The remaining decrease was due to amortization.

        The Corporation deferred its regularly scheduled interest payments on its outstanding junior subordinated notes relating to its $20.8 million of trust preferred securities beginning with the regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments that would otherwise have been made in September 2010. The terms of the junior subordinated notes and the related trust indentures allow the Corporation to defer such payments of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default. During the deferral period, the respective trusts will suspend the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities. During the deferral period, the Corporation may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior subordinated notes.

22


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

13. Earnings (Loss) per Share

Three Months ended September 30, 2010

 
  Income
(thousands)
(numerator)
  Shares(1)
(denominator)
  Per Share
Amount
 

Basic income from continuing operations per share

                   
 

Net income from continuing operations

  $ 872     6,318,986   $ 0.14  

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net income from continuing operations available to common stockholders

  $ 872     6,318,986   $ 0.14  
               

Basic loss from discontinued operations per share

                   
 

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $ (767 )   6,318,986   $ (0.12 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss from discontinued operations available to common stockholders

  $ (767 )   6,318,986   $ (0.12 )
               

Basic income available to common stockholders per share

                   
 

Net income available to common stockholders

  $ 105     6,318,986   $ 0.02  

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net income available to common stockholders

  $ 105     6,318,986   $ 0.02  
               

(1)
204,737 anti-dilutive weighted average shares have been excluded from this computation because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

23


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

13. Earnings (Loss) per Share (Continued)

Three Months ended September 30, 2009

 
  Income
(thousands)
(numerator)
  Shares(1)
(denominator)
  Per Share
Amount
 

Basic loss from continuing operations per share

                   
 

Net loss from continuing operations

  $ (7,072 )   6,306,889   $ (1.12 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders

  $ (7,072 )   6,306,889   $ (1.12 )
               

Basic income from discontinued operations per share

                   
 

Net income from discontinued operations

  $ 628     6,306,889   $ 0.10  

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders

  $ 628     6,306,889   $ 0.10  
               

Basic loss available to common stockholders per share

                   
 

Net loss available to common stockholders

  $ (6,444 )   6,306,889   $ (1.02 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss available to common stockholders

  $ (6,444 )   6,306,889   $ (1.02 )
               

(1)
234,109 anti-dilutive weighted average shares have been excluded from this computation because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

24


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

13. Earnings (Loss) per Share (Continued)

Nine Months ended September 30, 2010

 
  Income
(thousands)
(numerator)
  Shares(1)
(denominator)
  Per Share
Amount
 

Basic income from continuing operations per share

                   
 

Net income from continuing operations

  $ 644     6,325,258   $ 0.11  

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net income from continuing operations available to common stockholders

  $ 644     6,325,258   $ 0.11  
               

Basic loss from discontinued operations per share

                   
 

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $ (2,170 )   6,325,258   $ (0.35 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss from discontinued operations available to common stockholders

  $ (2,170 )   6,325,258   $ (0.35 )
               

Basic loss available to common stockholders per share

                   

Diluted net loss available to common stockholders

  $ (1,526 )   6,325,258   $ (0.24 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss available to common stockholders

  $ (1,526 )   6,325,258   $ (0.24 )
               

(1)
204,737 anti-dilutive weighted average shares have been excluded from this computation because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

25


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

13. Earnings (Loss) per Share (Continued)

Nine Months ended September 30, 2009

 
  Income
(thousands)
(numerator)
  Shares(1)
(denominator)
  Per Share
Amount
 

Basic loss from continuing operations per share

                   
 

Net loss from continuing operations

  $ (9,844 )   6,272,682   $ (1.57 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders

  $ (9,844 )   6,272,682   $ (1.57 )
               

Basic income from discontinued operations per share

                   
 

Net income from discontinued operations

  $ 6,658     6,272,682   $ 1.06  

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders

  $ 6,658     6,272,682   $ 1.06  
               

Basic loss available to common stockholders per share

                   
 

Net income available to common stockholders

  $ (3,186 )   6,272,682   $ (0.51 )

Effect of dilutive securities

                   
 

Options to purchase common stock

             
               

Diluted net loss available to common stockholders

  $ (3,186 )   6,272,682   $ (0.51 )
               

(1)
234,109 anti-dilutive weighted average shares have been excluded from this computation because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

26


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

14. Comprehensive Income

        Components of comprehensive income are presented in the following charts:

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Dollars in thousands
  2010   2009  

Unrealized gains on securities:

             
 

Unrealized gains arising in period

  $ 370   $ 4,425  
 

Reclassification adjustment

    (9 )   (1,575 )
           
 

Net unrealized gains

    361     2,850  
           

Other comprehensive income before taxes

    361     2,850  

Income tax expense

    (123 )   (969 )
           

Other comprehensive income

    238     1,881  
           

Net income (loss) including non-controlling interests

    278     (5,950 )

Comprehensive income (loss)

    516     (4,069 )

Less comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

    (173 )   (494 )
           

Comprehensive income (loss) for First Chester County Corporation

  $ 343   $ (4,563 )
           

 

 
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Dollars in thousands
  2010   2009  

Unrealized gains on securities:

             
 

Unrealized gains arising in period

  $ 1,395   $ 5,771  
 

Reclassification adjustment

    (9 )   (1,575 )
           
 

Net unrealized gains

    1,386     4,196  
           

Other comprehensive income before taxes

    1,386     4,916  

Income tax expense

    (472 )   (1,427 )
           

Other comprehensive income

    914     2,769  
           

Net (loss) including non-controlling interests

    (501 )   (1,823 )

Comprehensive income

    413     946  

Less comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

    (1,025 )   (1,363 )
           

Comprehensive (loss) for First Chester County Corporation

  $ (612 ) $ (417 )
           

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820-10 clarifies proper fair value determination in a market that is not active and

27


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)


provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The Corporation considered the requirements of ASC 820-10 when estimating fair value.

        ASC 825-10—Financial Instruments permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. The Corporation elected to account for loans held for sale under this election option.

        ASC 820-10 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        A description of the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as the classification of the instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, are as follows:

        Securities:     Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted securities.

28


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        Mortgage Servicing Rights ("MSRs"):     To determine the fair value of MSRs, the Bank uses an independent third party to estimate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. This valuation method incorporates an assumption that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, which include estimates of the cost to service, the discount rate, custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds, and default rates and losses. The fair value of servicing rights was determined using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 12.5%, prepayment speeds ranging from 10.5% to 50.7% depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of 1.02%. The Corporation records the MSR as a recurring Level 3.

        The Corporation had no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

29


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The table below presents the balance of assets and liabilities from continuing operations at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2010
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Assets

                         

Investment securities available for sale:

                         
 

U.S. Treasury

  $ 5,012   $   $   $ 5,012  
 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities

        30,574         30,574  
 

CMO—Residential

        966         966  
 

CMO—Commercial

        956         956  
 

State and municipal

        2,387         2,387  
 

Corporate debt securities

        6,519         6,519  
 

Bank equity securities

        330         330  
 

Other equity securities

            11,460     11,460  

Mortgage servicing rights

            449     449  

 

December 31, 2009
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Assets

                         

Investment securities available for sale:

                         
 

U.S. Treasury

  $ 20,016   $   $   $ 20,016  
 

U.S. Government agency

        2,047         2,047  
 

U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities

        36,995         36,995  
 

CMO—Residential

        998         998  
 

CMO—Commercial

        808         808  
 

State and municipal

        4,594         4,594  
 

Corporate debt securities

        5,865         5,865  
 

Bank equity securities

    3     530         533  
 

Other equity securities

            10,842     10,842  

Mortgage servicing rights

            575     575  

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

        A description of the valuation methodologies and classification levels used for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are listed as follows. These listed instruments are subject to fair value adjustments (impairment) as they are valued at the lower of cost or market.

        Loans and leases:     The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, Management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected

30


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)


repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At September 30, 2010 substantially all of the impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. In accordance with ASC 820-10 impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Corporation records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. The Bank's policies require loan officers to regularly review accounts. Consistent with OCC guidance appraisals are updated as warranted based on specific facts and circumstances. Appraisals are also updated whenever a loan becomes criticized or classified.

        OREO:     OREO is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or Management's estimation of the value of the collateral. The Corporation records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

        The table below presents the balance of assets and liabilities from continuing operations at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2010
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Impaired loans & leases

  $   $   $ 45,222   $ 45,222  

OREO

            4,080     4,080  

 

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2009
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total  

Impaired loans & leases

  $   $   $ 34,105   $ 34,105  

OREO

            3,692     3,692  

Disclosures about financial instruments

        The table below presents the rollforward of assets from continuing operations that are valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)
  Mortgage
Servicing Rights
  Investments  

Beginning balance

  $ 575   $ 10,842  
 

Total gains realized/unrealized:

             
   

Included in earnings

    (126 )    
   

Included in other comprehensive loss

         

Purchases

        713  

Maturities/amortizations

        (95 )

Prepayments

         

Calls

         

Transfers into Level 3

         
           

Ending Balance

  $ 449   $ 11,460  

31


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

15. Fair Value Measurement and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The estimated fair values and carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities from continuing operations are summarized as follows:

 
  September 30, 2010   December 31, 2009  
(Dollars in thousands)
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Carrying
Amount
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Carrying
Amount
 

Financial Assets

                         
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 59,115   $ 59,115   $ 146,681   $ 146,681  
 

Investment securities available-for-sale

    58,204     58,204     82,698     82,698  
 

Gross loans and leases

    801,262     835,388     866,754     901,889  
 

Mortgage servicing rights

    449     449     575     575  

Financial Liabilities

                         
 

Deposits with no stated maturities

    538,121     538,121     594,278     594,278  
 

Deposits with stated maturities

    436,513     432,132     518,642     516,022  
 

FHLB and other borrowings

    75,258     73,239     175,904     172,897  
 

Subordinated debentures

    14,620     20,795     12,410     20,795  

Off-Balance-Sheet

                         
 

Commitments to extend credit and outstanding letters of credit

    119,956     119,956     205,468     205,468  

16. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plans

        At September 30, 2010, the Corporation had one stock based compensation plan, pursuant to which, shares of the Corporation's common stock could be issued, subject to certain restrictions. The plan, adopted in 2005, allows the Corporation to grant up to 150,000 shares of restricted stock to employees. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Corporation granted no shares of restricted stock under this plan. These restricted stock grants are subject to accelerated vesting of all or a portion of the shares upon the occurrence of certain events. A summary of the Corporation's unvested restricted shares is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except shares,
and per share data)
  Shares   Grant Date
Fair Value
  Aggregate Intrinsic
Value of
Unvested Shares
 

Unvested at January 1, 2010

    54,474   $ 10.57   $ 503  

Granted

      $          

Vested

    (2,199 ) $ 21.05        

Forfeited

    (1,400 ) $ 11.35        
                   

Unvested at September 30, 2010

    50,875   $ 10.09   $ 253  
                   

        The Corporation recorded approximately $29 thousand and $93 thousand and $47 thousand and $147 thousand of restricted stock expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

32


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

16. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Plans (Continued)

        The Corporation's ability to issue stock options under the Corporation's 1995 Stock Option Plan has expired. However, outstanding stock options remain in effect according to their terms. Aggregated information regarding the Corporation's 1995 Stock Option Plan and the options assumed in the AHB acquisition as of September 30, 2010 is presented below.

(Dollars in thousands, except shares,
per share and years data) Options
  Shares   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

    230,900   $ 15.79     3.32   $  

Granted

                       

Exercised

                       

Forfeited

    (26,163 ) $ 13.08              

Expired

                       

Outstanding at September 30, 2010

    204,737   $ 16.09     2.68   $  
                         

Exercisable at September 30, 2010

    204,737   $ 16.09     2.68   $  
                         

        There were no options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. There was no intrinsic value (market value on date of exercise less grant price) of options at September 30, 2010 as all options had an exercise price that was higher than the September 30, 2010 market price.

17. Commitment and Contingencies

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

        The Corporation maintains a reserve for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit which is reported in other liabilities in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition consistent with ASC 825-10. As of the balance sheet date, the Corporation records estimated losses inherent with unfunded loan commitments in accordance with ASC 450-20, and estimated future obligations under letters of credit in accordance with ASC 460-10. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of this reserve is integrated in the Corporation's process for establishing the allowance for loan losses and considers the probability of future losses and obligations that may be incurred under these off-balance sheet agreements. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was approximately $454 thousand and $669 thousand, respectively. Management believes this reserve level is sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to these commitments.

Loan Recourse

        The Corporation sells its residential mortgage loans on a non-recourse basis. The Corporation also provides representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of the loans sold. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, the Corporation may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan may be borne by the Corporation. If there is no breach of a representation and warranty provision, the Corporation has no obligation to repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor against loss. The unpaid principal balance of the loans sold by the Corporation represents the maximum potential

33


Table of Contents


FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

17. Commitment and Contingencies (Continued)


exposure related to representations and warranty provisions; however, the Corporation cannot estimate its maximum exposure because it does not service all of the loans for which it has provided a representation or warranty. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Corporation had a liability of $443 thousand and $688 thousand, respectively, included in Liabilities related to assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for probable losses related to the Corporation's recourse exposure. This liability is part of our discontinued mortgage banking operations, however it is anticipated that the Corporation will retain this liability after the anticipated sale of the mortgage banking division.

Asserted and Unasserted Claims

        Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Corporation but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Corporation's management and legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Corporation or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Corporation's legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought.

        If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Corporation's financial statements. The Corporation will disclose asserted claims when it is at least reasonably possible that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of the financial statements and unasserted claims when it is considered probable that a claim will be asserted and there is a reasonable possibility that the outcome will be unfavorable. The Corporation will not accrue a liability or disclose unasserted claims which management believes are only reasonably possible of assertion.

        Loss contingencies considered to be remote by management are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantee would be disclosed.

        As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation has been made aware of a potential claim that management believes is probable to be asserted by the beneficiaries of the American Home Bank Management Incentive Plan (the "AHB MIP") who may seek to set aside the Agreement to Finalize the AHB MIP dated May 4, 2009. The beneficiaries assert that the amounts received under the AHB MIP should be increased. Management has accrued a liability in the Corporation's financial statements in the amount of $300 thousand based on its evaluation of the circumstances related to this matter. Although the Corporation believes that its liability with respect to the claim will not exceed such amount, these matters are inherently unpredictable and there can be no assurance that relevant facts and circumstances will not change, necessitating future changes to the estimated liability.

34


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        This discussion is intended to further your understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

OVERVIEW

        The Corporation reported a net income from continuing operations of $872 thousand and $644 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to a net loss from continuing operations of $7.1 million and $9.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.

        The following is an overview of key factors affecting our September 30, 2010 results from continuing operations:

        During first quarter 2010, we announced the potential sale of the AHB mortgage banking segment. Accordingly, assets related to mortgage banking operations have been reclassified to discontinued assets held for sale and the mortgage banking operations related to this segment have been reclassified, and are now reflected as discontinued operations. Refer to Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information related to discontinued operations.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES

        Our accounting and reporting policies conform with GAAP and the general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Critical accounting estimates are necessary in the application of certain accounting policies and procedures, and are particularly susceptible to significant change. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. In addition to the information contained in Note 4 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and Note C of the consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report, management believes that

35


Table of Contents


the most critical accounting policies, which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments, are as follows:

Discontinued Operations

        In accordance with ASC 360-10-45, "Property, Plant and Equipment—Overall—Other Presentation Matters," we classify the assets and liabilities of a business as held-for-sale when management approves and commits to a formal plan of sale and it is probable that the sale will be completed. The carrying value of the net assets of the business held-for-sale are then recorded at the lower of their carrying value or fair market value, less costs to sell, and we cease to record depreciation and amortization expense associated with assets held-for-sale.

        In accordance with ASC 205-20-45, "Presentation of Financial Statements—Discontinued Operations—Other Presentation Matters," the results of operations of a component of an entity that has either been disposed of, or is classified as held for sale, shall be reported in discontinued operations if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been, or will be, eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

OTHER ASSETS

        Other assets decreased $14.1 million to $18.5 million at September 30, 2010 from $32.6 million at December 31, 2009. In 2010, the Corporation received cash proceeds in full payment an $8.7 million receivable recorded in other assets during the year ended December 31, 2009, which related to a former BOLI policy which the Bank had surrendered in 2008. The Corporation also received an income tax refund of $3.1 million during the second quarter 2010 which was recorded as a receivable in other assets at December 31, 2009.

NET INTEREST INCOME

        Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities. The following tables provides detail regarding the Corporation's average balances with corresponding interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) and interest expense as well as yield and cost information for the periods presented. Management's

36


Table of Contents


discussion and analysis of net interest income, interest income, and interest expense is based on aggregated amounts of continuing and discontinued operations.

 
  Three Months ended September 30,  
 
  2010   2009  
(Dollars in thousands)
  Average
Balance
  Interest   Rate%   Average
Balance
  Interest   Rate%  

ASSETS

                                     

Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits in banks and other overnight investments

  $ 63,364   $ 40     0.26 % $ 4,552   $ 5     0.50 %

Investment securities:

                                     
     

Taxable

    57,441     385     2.66 %   81,339     711     3.47 %
     

Tax-exempt(1)

    3,085     41     5.32 %   6,522     78     4.72 %
                               
 

Total investment securities

    60,526     426     2.79 %   87,861     789     3.56 %
 

Loans held for sale

   
143,322
   
1,479
   
4.10

%
 
236,970
   
2,866
   
4.80

%
 

Loans and leases:(2)

                                     
     

Taxable

    839,346     11,809     5.58 %   929,161     13,313     5.68 %
     

Tax-exempt(1)

    14,368     208     5.73 %   20,102     373     7.35 %
                               
     

Total loans and leases

    853,714     12,017     5.58 %   949,263     13,686     5.72 %
                               
 

Total interest-earning assets

    1,120,926     13,962     4.94 %   1,278,646     17,346     5.38 %

Non-interest-earning assets

                                     
 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

    (22,168 )               (12,383 )            
 

Cash and due from banks

    20,527                 17,010              
 

Other assets

    36,907                 59,184              
                                   
   

Total assets

  $ 1,156,192               $ 1,342,457              
                                   

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

                                     

Savings, NOW, and money market Deposits

  $ 406,610   $ 617     0.60 % $ 448,763   $ 941     0.83 %

Certificates of deposit and other time

    429,692     2,091     1.93 %   409,779     2,571     2.49 %
                               
 

Total interest-bearing deposits

    836,302     2,708     1.28 %   858,542     3,512     1.62 %

Subordinated debt

    20,795     286     5.45 %   20,795     295     5.63 %

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

    76,535     927     4.80 %   202,854     1,559     3.05 %
                               
 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

    933,632     3,921     1.67 %   1,082,191     5,366     1.97 %

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

                                     
 

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

    152,072                 152,047              
 

Other liabilities

    15,412                 18,301              
                                   
 

Total liabilities

    1,101,116                 1,252,539              
 

Equity

    55,076                 89,918              
                                   
 

Total liabilities and equity

  $ 1,156,192               $ 1,342,457              
                                   
   

Net interest income (tax equivalent) / margin on earning assets

        $ 10,041     3.55 %       $ 11,980     3.72 %
 

Less net interest income from discontinued operations(3)

          1,088                 2,064        
 

Less tax equivalent adjustment

          79                 146        
 

Net interest income from continuing operations

          8,874                 9,770        

37


Table of Contents


 
  Nine Months ended September 30,  
 
  2010   2009  
(Dollars in thousands)
  Average
Balance
  Interest   Rate%   Average
Balance
  Interest   Rate%  

ASSETS

                                     

Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits in banks and other overnight investments

  $ 119,225   $ 233     0.26 % $ 15,615   $ 50     0.43 %

Investment securities:

                                     
       

Taxable

    60,801     1,213     2.67 %   90,219     2,798     4.15 %
       

Tax-exempt(1)

    3,496     137     5.24 %   7,879     282     4.78 %
                               
 

Total investment securities

    64,297     1,350     2.81 %   98,098     3,080     4.20 %

Loans held for sale

   
132,168
   
4,165
   
4.21

%
 
218,619
   
7,805
   
4.77

%

Loans and leases:(2)

                                     
       

Taxable

    857,891     35,960     5.60 %   924,397     39,375     5.70 %
       

Tax-exempt(1)

    14,597     638     5.83 %   20,454     1,126     7.36 %
                               
       

Total loans and leases

    872,488     36,598     5.61 %   944,851     40,501     5.73 %
                               
 

Total interest-earning assets

    1,188,178     42,346     4.76 %   1,277,183     51,436     5.38 %

Non-interest-earning assets

                                     
 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

    (23,091 )               (11,403 )            
 

Cash and due from banks

    19,452                 18,563              
 

Other assets

    44,662                 55,785              
                                   
     

Total assets

  $ 1,229,201               $ 1,340,128              
                                   

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

                                     
 

Savings, NOW, and money market Deposits

  $ 420,066   $ 1,989     0.63 % $ 437,111   $ 3,187     0.97 %
 

Certificates of deposit and other time

    464,481     6,901     1.99 %   428,945     8,679     2.71 %
                               
       

Total interest-bearing deposits

    884,547     8,890     1.34 %   866,056     11,866     1.83 %
 

Subordinated debt

    20,795     833     5.35 %   18,585     721     5.18 %
 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings

    102,618     3,416     4.45 %   201,852     4,712     3.12 %
                               
       

Total interest-bearing liabilities

    1,007,960     13,139     1.74 %   1,086,493     17,299     2.13 %
 

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:

                                     
   

Non-interest-bearing demand deposits

    150,934                 148,424              
   

Other liabilities

    14,900                 16,555              
                                   

Total liabilities

    1,173,794                 1,251,472              

Equity

    55,407                 88,656              
                                   

Total liabilities and equity

  $ 1,229,201               $ 1,340,128              
                                   

Net interest income (tax equivalent) / margin on earning assets

        $ 29,207     3.29 %       $ 34,137     3.57 %

Net yield on interest-earning assets

                                     

Less net interest income from discontinued operations(3)

          3,046                 5,446        

Less tax equivalent adjustment

          250                 455        

Net interest income from continuing operations

          25,911                 28,236        

(1)
The indicated income and annual rate are presented on a taxable equivalent basis using the federal marginal rate of 34% adjusted for the TEFRA 20% interest expense disallowance for all periods presented.

(2)
Non-accruing loans are included in the average balance.

(3)
Net interest income of the discontinued operations includes income from loans held for sale and imputed interest expense calculated using the Corporation's internal matched funds transfer pricing methodology.

38


Table of Contents

        Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 was $10.0 million, a decrease of 16.2% from $12.0 million for the same period in 2009. Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 was $29.2 million, a decrease of 14.4% from $34.1 million for the same period in 2009. The net yield on interest-earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 3.55% for the three month period ended September 30, 2010, compared to 3.72% for the same period in 2009, an decrease of 17 basis points (one basis point is equal to 1 / 100 of a percent). For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the net yield on interest earning assets decreased 28 basis points to 3.29% from 3.57% during the same period in 2009.

        The yield earned on average interest-earning assets was 4.94% for the three month period ended September 30, 2010, compared to 5.38% for the same period in 2009, a decrease of 44 basis points. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the yield earned on interest earning assets decreased 62 basis points to 4.76% from 5.38% during the same period in 2009.

        Average interest-earning assets decreased approximately $157.7 million or 12.3% to $1.121 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $1.279 billion in the same period last year. The decrease in average interest-earning assets for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 was the result of a $93.6 million decrease in loans held for sale, a $95.5 million decrease in average total loans and leases, and a decrease of $27.3 million in investments securities available for sale. These decreases were partially offset by a $58.8 million increase in average Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits in banks balance.

        Average interest-earning assets decreased approximately $89.0 million or 7.0% to $1.188 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $1.277 billion in the same period last year. The decrease in average interest-earning assets for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 was the result of an $86.5 million decrease in loans held for sale, a $72.4 million decrease in average total loans and leases, and a decrease of $33.8 million in investments securities available for sale. These decreases were partially offset by a $103.6 million increase in average Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits in banks balance.

        Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased approximately $148.6 million or 13.7% to $933.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, from $1.082 billion in the same period in 2009. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities for the three month period was the result of a $126.3 million decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings and a decrease of $22.2 million in interest bearing deposits.

        Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased approximately $78.5 million or 7.2% to $1.008 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $1.086 billion in the same period in 2009. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities for the nine month period was the result of a $99.2 million decrease in FHLB advances and other borrowings, offset by an increase of $18.5 million in interest bearing deposits.

INTEREST INCOME

        Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased $3.4 million to $14.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the same period in 2009. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased $9.1 million to $42.3 million.

        On a tax equivalent basis, interest income on investment securities decreased 46.0% or $363 thousand to $426 thousand for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, interest income on investment securities decreased 56.2% or approximately $1.7 million to $1.4 million when compared to the same period in 2009. During the fourth quarter 2009, $52.8 million of securities were sold and

39


Table of Contents


$41.2 million of securities were purchased. The actions were taken primarily to reduce the risk weighted assets to assist the Bank in satisfying the IMCRs and shorten the duration of the investment portfolio to help mitigate the risk of rising interest rates. Matured and called securities as well as principal payments on mortgage-backed securities totaled $26.0 million during the first nine months of 2010.

        Interest income on loans held for sale decreased $1.4 million to $1.5 million during the three month period ended September 30, 2010. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, interest income on loans held for sale decreased $3.6 million to $4.2 million. These decreases were due to a significant decrease in the average loans held for sale balance. Average loans held for sale for the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2010 were $143.3 million and $132.2 million as compared to approximately $237.0 million and $218.6 million for the same periods in 2009.

        Interest income on loans, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased 12.2% or $1.7 million to $12.0 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to $13.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, interest income on loans, on a tax equivalent basis decreased 9.6% or $3.9 million to $36.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to $40.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. These decreases in interest income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 were primarily due to a $95.5 million or 10.1% decrease in average loans outstanding for the three month period and a $72.4 million or 7.7% decrease in average loans outstanding for the nine month period as compared to the same periods in 2009. These decreases in average loan balances were primarily due a $52.5 million loan sale to Tower in the fourth quarter 2009, lack of organic loan growth as well as significant fourth quarter 2009 charge-offs. In addition to the impact from the decrease in average loan balances, there was also a decrease in the tax equivalent yield earned on average loans outstanding, which decreased by 14 and 12 basis points to 5.58% and 5.61% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 from 5.72% and 5.73% for the same periods in 2009.

INTEREST EXPENSE

        Interest expense on deposit accounts decreased by approximately $804 thousand or 22.9% to $2.7 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 from $3.5 million for the same period in 2009. Interest expense on deposit accounts decreased approximately $3.0 million or 25.1% to $8.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $11.9 million for the same period in 2009. The decreases for the three and nine month periods were primarily due to a decrease in the average interest rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. The average rate paid for the three month period in 2010 was 1.28%, a 34 basis point decrease from 1.62% in 2009. The average rate paid for the nine month period in 2010 was 1.34%, a 49 basis point decrease from 1.83% in 2009. The impact from rate decreases was partially offset in the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 by increases in average interest-bearing deposit balances. These balances increased $18.5 million for the three month period to $884.5 million in 2010 from $866.1 million in 2009. These balances decreased $22.2 million for the three month period to $836.3 million in 2010 from $858.5 million in 2009. The increase in average interest bearing deposit balances during the nine month period was primarily due to a fourth quarter 2009 CD promotion which was undertaken to increase liquidity and lengthen the maturities of liabilities supporting earning assets to help mitigate the risk of rising interest rates.

        Interest expense on FHLB and other borrowings decreased $632 thousand or 40.5% to $927 thousand for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 from the same period in 2009. Interest expense on FHLB and other borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased approximately $1.3 million or 27.5% to $3.4 million from $4.7 million in 2009. These decreases in interest expense were primarily due to decreases in the average balances of these funding sources in 2010 as compared to 2009. The average balance of FHLB and other borrowings for the

40


Table of Contents

three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by 62.3% or $126.3 million compare to the same period in 2009. Average balances of these funding sources for the nine month period decreased 49.2% or $99.2 million compared to the same period in 2009. During the first nine months of 2009 other borrowings were increased to fund the growth of the mortgages held for sale portfolio as mortgage refinancing demand was high. The mortgages held for sale portfolio declined throughout 2009 and the other borrowing balances were reduced. With the increase in time deposits in the fourth quarter 2009, due to promotional efforts, and the further reduction in the mortgages held for sale portfolio in 2010, $52.5 million in FHLB advances that matured during 2010 were not replaced. Further, during 2010, $56.7 million of FHLB advances were prepaid to reduce the size of the balance sheet and help improve the Bank's Tier 1 Leverage capital ratio. Partly offsetting these decreases was a $26.0 million loan from Tower Bancorp in the fourth quarter 2009.

ASSET QUALITY AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

Allowance and provision for loan and lease losses

        Management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate. The determination for this allowance requires significant judgment, and estimates of probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio can vary significantly from the amounts actually observed. While management uses available information to recognize probable losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in the credits comprising the portfolio and changes in the financial condition of borrowers. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, and independent consultants engaged by the Corporation, periodically review the loan and lease portfolio and the allowance. Such reviews may result in adjustments to the provision based upon their analysis of the information available at the time of each examination. During 2010, there were no major changes in estimation methods that affected the allowance methodology from the prior year.

        The Corporation makes provisions for loan and lease losses in amounts necessary to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level, as established by use of the allowance methodology and by management review and judgment. The allowance for loans and lease losses decreased $1.1 million to $22.1 million at September 30, 2010, as compared to $23.2 million at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of non-performing loans decreased to 41.89%, as compared to 55.07% at December 31, 2009 as total non-performing loans increased $10.6 million to $52.8 million as compared to $42.1 million at December 31, 2009. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a $369 thousand and $767 thousand provision for loan and lease losses as compared to $11.2 million and $17.7 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively.

        The decrease in the September 30, 2010 required allowance for loan losses, as compared to December 31, 2009, can be attributed to the following factors:

41


Table of Contents

Charge-offs

        Charge-offs for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 were $628 thousand and $3.2 million, respectively, compared to $3.2 million and $4.5 million during the same periods in 2009. Charge-offs remain high due to the deterioration of economic conditions and resulting failure of businesses, devaluation of collateral values and negative impact on consumers' ability to service debt. A significant portion of loans charged-off in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to loans that had been evaluated and deemed impaired at December 31, 2009. Specific reserves allocated to loans charged-off during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $1.8 million at December 31, 2009.

        The following chart presents an analysis of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Dollars in thousands
  2010   2009   2010   2009  

Balance at beginning of period

  $ 21,534   $ 15,528   $ 23,217   $ 10,335  
                   

Provision charged to operating expense

    369     11,222     767     17,693  

Recoveries of loans previously charged-off

   
781
   
90
   
1,059
   
339
 

Loans charged-off

    (628 )   (3,183 )   (3,157 )   (4,549 )
                   

Net loan recoveries / (charge-offs)

    153     (3,093 )   (2,098 )   (4,210 )
                   

Allowance other adjustment(1)

    45     (167 )   215     (328 )
                   

Balance at end of period

  $ 22,101   $ 23,490   $ 22,101   $ 23,490  
                   

Period-end loans outstanding

  $ 835,388   $ 957,502   $ 835,388   $ 957,502  

Average loans outstanding

  $ 853,714   $ 949,263   $ 872,488   $ 944,851  

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of period-end loans outstanding

   
2.65

%
 
2.45

%
 
2.65

%
 
2.45

%

Net recoveries / (charge-offs) (annualized) to average loans outstanding

    0.07 %   (1.29 )%   (0.32 )%   (0.60 )%

(1)
The "Allowance other adjustment" represents the reclassification of an allowance for probable losses on unfunded loans and unused lines of credit. These loans and lines of credit, although unfunded, have been committed to by the Corporation.

42


Table of Contents

Non-performing assets

        Non-performing assets include those loans on non-accrual status, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, troubled debt restructurings and other loans deemed impaired and other real estate owned. Non-performing loans are generally collateralized and are in the process of collection. The percentage of non-performing loans to gross loans was 6.32% at September 30, 2010, compared to 4.67% at December 31, 2009. The non-accrual loan and lease balance at September 30, 2010 was $35.8 million, compared to $27.6 million at December 31, 2009.

Non-accrual loan and leases

        Loans are generally placed on non-accrual when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent at which time all accrued but unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is no longer accrued on such assets and any future payments are applied as a reduction in the principal balance of the loan. All non-accrual loans are considered impaired assets and are evaluated individually for required specific reserves. The approximate gross interest income that would have been recorded for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010 if the $35.8 million in non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms was approximately $553 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively. The actual amount of interest income included in net income for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010 on these loans was $28 thousand and $183 thousand, respectively relating to interest received prior to loans being placed on non accrual status.

Restructured and other impaired loans

        Through negotiations with a borrower, we may restructure a loan prior to the completion of its contractual term. Modification of a loan's terms constitutes a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") if we for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties grant a concession that we would not otherwise consider. Not all modifications of loan terms automatically result in a TDR. At September 30, 2010, we had $16.9 million in restructured and other impaired loans of which $5.6 million are considered by management to be TDRs. At September 30, 2010, these TDRs continue to perform under their re-negotiated terms and remain on accrual status.

        The remaining $11.3 million is comprised of loans which Management has reviewed individually and believes the borrower's financial performance and/or a shortfall in the value of collateral securing the loan provide enough evidence to deem the loan impaired. These other impaired loans were performing under their original contractual terms as of September 30, 2010.

Potential Problem Loans

        As a recurring part of its portfolio management program, we identified approximately $35.2 million in potential problem loans at September 30, 2010 compared to $54.1 million at December 31, 2009. Potential problem loans are loans that are currently performing, but where the borrower's operating performance or other relevant factors could result in potential credit problems, and are typically classified by our loan rating system as "substandard." At September 30, 2010, potential problem loans primarily consisted of commercial loans and commercial real estate. There can be no assurance that additional loans will not become nonperforming, require restructuring, or require increased provision for loan losses.

Other real estate owned

        OREO represents property owned by us following default by the borrowers. OREO property acquired through foreclosure is initially transferred at fair value based on an appraised value less estimated cost to dispose. Adjustments are subsequently made to mark the property below this amount if circumstances warrant. Losses arising from foreclosure transactions are charged against the allowance

43


Table of Contents


for loan losses. Costs to maintain real estate owned and any subsequent gains or losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations. The total OREO balance at September 30, 2010 was $4.1 million, as compared to $3.7 million at December 31, 2009.

        The following chart presents detailed information regarding non-performing loans and leases and OREO:

 
  September 30,    
 
 
  December 31,
2009
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  2010   2009  

Past due over 90 days and still accruing

  $   $   $ 530  

Non-accrual loans and leases(1)

    35,818     15,787     27,581  

Restructured and other impaired loans

    16,941     21,524     14,046  
               

Total non-performing loans and leases

    52,759     37,311     42,157  

Other real estate owned

   
4,080
   
3,062
   
3,692
 
               

Total non-performing assets

  $ 56,839   $ 40,373   $ 45,849  
               

Non-performing loans and leases as a percentage of total loans and leases

    6.32 %   3.90 %   4.67 %

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of non-performing loans and leases

   
41.89

%
 
62.96

%
 
55.07

%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and other real estate owned

   
6.77

%
 
4.20

%
 
5.06

%

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of non-performing assets

   
38.88

%
 
58.18

%
 
50.64

%

(1)
Generally, the Bank places a loan or lease in non-accrual status when principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection.

        We identify a loan as impaired when it is probable that interest and/or principal will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. ASC 310-10-35, "Receivables," requires us to individually examine loans where it is probable that we will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal payments according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement and assess for impairment. The average recorded investment in the September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 impaired loans was $54.3 million and $25.2 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010, interest income recognized during the time within the period that the loans were impaired was $178 thousand and $401 thousand, respectively.

44


Table of Contents

        The following charts present additional information about impaired loans and lease balances as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

September 30, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)
  Loan
Balance
  Impaired
Loan
Balance
  Number of
Impaired
Loans
  Specific
Allowance
on Impaired
Loans
 

Commercial loans

  $ 305,143   $ 21,248     62   $ 3,252  

Real estate—commercial

    246,172     16,871     16     2,728  

Real estate—commercial construction

    52,512     9,065     7      

Real estate—residential

    92,980     3,047     11     816  

Real estate—residential construction

    27,433     1,065     3     406  

Consumer loans

    110,327     1,380     34     252  

Lease financing receivables

    821     83     3     83  
                   

Totals

  $ 835,388   $ 52,759     136   $ 7,537  
                   

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)
  Loan
Balance
  Impaired
Loan
Balance
  Number of
Impaired
Loans
  Specific
Allowance
on Impaired
Loans
 

Commercial loans

  $ 334,286   $ 13,269     35   $ 1,029  

Real estate—commercial

    261,643     12,071     11     3,637  

Real estate—commercial construction

    66,204     8,786     8     135  

Real estate—residential

    88,024     2,601     7     644  

Real estate—residential construction

    29,387     2,137     7     874  

Consumer loans

    120,767     2,596     42     1,148  

Lease financing receivables

    1,578     167     8     55  
                   

Totals

  $ 901,889   $ 41,627     118   $ 7,522  
                   

NON-INTEREST INCOME

        Total non-interest income from continuing operations increased $1.3 million to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily due to a $1.6 million other than temporary impairment charge on four bank equity securities in the third quarter 2009. Offsetting this increase was a $108 thousand decrease in service charges on deposit accounts resulting from a decrease in deposit balances as well as a $116 thousand decrease in gains on sales of fixed assets and real estate owned.

        Total non-interest income from continuing operations decreased $287 thousand to $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2009. In June 2010, the Corporation sold eight other real estate owned properties to one buyer. A charge of $1.3 million was recorded during the first quarter 2010 to reduce the carrying amount of these assets to an amount that reflected the realizable value of these properties based on the actual sales price. Offsetting the nine month ended variance was a $1.6 million other than temporary impairment charge on four bank equity securities in the third quarter 2009. There were no such impairment charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

45


Table of Contents

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

        Total non-interest expense decreased $1.1 million to $9.5 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010, compared to $10.6 million during the same period in 2009. Total non-interest expense decreased $1.4 million to $29.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $31.2 million during the same period in 2009.

        Salaries and employee benefits decreased $1.9 million to $3.5 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $4.9 million to $10.6 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The primary driver of this reduction was the fourth quarter 2009 reduction in force.

        Offsetting these decreases, professional services expense increased $1.5 million to $2.6 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 from $1.1 million for the same period in 2009. Professional services expense increased $4.6 million to $7.1 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 from $2.5 million for the same period in 2009. The increases were primarily due to the increased legal, audit and consulting fees related to the merger with Tower and the restatement of our 2009 financial statements and related SEC filings.

INCOME TAXES

        At September 30, 2010 the valuation allowance against the Corporation's deferred tax asset was $7.7 million as compared to $7.5 million at December 31, 2009. The valuation allowance is recorded against a portion of the Corporation's deferred tax assets after concluding that it was more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset would not be realized. In evaluating the ability to recover our deferred tax assets, Management considers all available positive and negative evidence regarding the ultimate realizability of our deferred tax assets including past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In addition, general uncertainty surrounding the future economic and business conditions have increased the likelihood of volatility in our future earnings. The Corporation has concluded and recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset, except for amounts available for carry back claims.

LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

Liquidity Management

        The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to meet all financial commitments. Liquidity management addresses the Corporation's ability to meet deposit withdrawals either on demand or at contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature and to make new loans and investments as opportunities arise. Liquidity is managed on a daily basis enabling management to monitor changes in liquidity and to react accordingly to fluctuations in market conditions. The primary sources of liquidity for the Corporation are funding available from the growth of the existing deposit base, new deposits and cash flow from the investment and loan portfolios. The Corporation considers funds from such sources to comprise its "core" funding sources because of the historical stability of such sources of funds. Additional liquidity comes from the Corporation's credit facilities. Other deposit sources include a tiered savings product and certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000. Details of core deposits, non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts, and other deposit

46


Table of Contents


sources are highlighted in the following table and include aggregated amounts from both continuing and discontinued operations:

 
  For the Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2010
  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2009
 
(Dollars in thousands)
  Average
Balance
  Effective
Yield
  Average
Balance
  Effective
Yield
 

DEPOSIT TYPE

                         

NOW Accounts

  $ 217,393     0.41 % $ 193,760     0.78 %

Money Market

    111,589     1.04 %   158,668     1.17 %

Statement Savings

    39,618     0.39 %   40,198     0.55 %

Other Savings

    2,323     0.85 %   1,946     0.96 %

Tiered Savings

    49,143     0.87 %   46,650     1.05 %
                       

Total NOW Savings, and Money Market

    420,066     0.63 %   441,222     0.93 %

CDs Less than $100,000

   
264,781
   
1.96

%
 
276,274
   
2.55

%

CDs Greater than $100,000

    199,700     2.03 %   152,891     2.66 %
                       

Total CDs

    464,481     1.99 %   429,165     2.59 %

Total Interest Bearing Deposits

   
884,547
   
1.34

%
 
870,387
   
1.75

%

Non-Interest Bearing

                         
 

Demand Deposits

    150,934         149,967      
                       

Total Deposits

  $ 1,035,481         $ 1,020,354        
                       

        The Bank maintains credit facilities with the FHLB as well as the Federal Reserve. During the third quarter of 2010, average FHLB advances were $48.0 million and consisted of term advances with a variety of maturities. The average interest rate on these advances was 3.75%. At September 30, 2010, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity with FHLB of $107.7 million. FHLB advances are collateralized by a pledge on the Bank's portfolio of certain mortgage loans and a lien on the Bank's FHLB stock. In addition, the Bank has a backup line of credit available from the Federal Reserve, totaling $171.8 million. Federal Reserve borrowings are collateralized by a pledge on certain commercial and commercial real estate loans and a lien on the Bank's Federal Reserve stock.

        As part of its holding company cash management strategy, the Corporation deferred its regularly scheduled interest payments on its outstanding junior subordinated notes relating to its $20.8 million of trust preferred securities beginning with the regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments that would otherwise have been made in September 2010. The terms of the junior subordinated notes and the related trust indentures allow the Corporation to defer such payments of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default. During the deferral period, the respective trusts will suspend the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities. During the deferral period, the Corporation may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior subordinated notes. We expect our deferral of interest on the junior subordinated notes will preserve approximately $270 thousand of cash per quarter based upon the interest payments completed during the first and second quarters of 2010.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

        The goal of interest rate sensitivity management is to avoid fluctuating net interest margins, and to enhance consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates. Such sensitivity is measured as the difference in the volume of assets and liabilities in the existing portfolio

47


Table of Contents


that are subject to repricing in a future time period. The Corporation's net interest rate sensitivity gap within one year including assets and liabilities of discontinued operations is a negative $173.6 million or 15.3% of total assets at September 30, 2010. The Corporation's gap position is one tool used to evaluate interest rate risk and the stability of net interest margins. Another tool that management uses to evaluate interest rate risk is a computer simulation model that assesses the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income under various interest rate forecasts and scenarios. Management has set acceptable limits of risk within its Asset Liability Committee ("ALCO") policy and monitors the results of the simulations against these limits quarterly. As of the most recent quarter-end, results are within policy limits and indicate an acceptable level of interest rate risk, except rate simulations quantifying the impact of an interest rate declines of 100 basis points or more. Given the historically low interest rate levels the Bank is currently operating in, Management believes it is unlikely interest rates would decline 100 basis points or more in the future. Management monitors interest rate risk as a regular part of corporate operations with the intention of maintaining a stable net interest margin. The following table presents our interest rate sensitivity analysis as of September 30, 2010 and includes aggregated amounts from both continuing and discontinued operations:

(Dollars in thousands)
  Within
one year(1)
  Two
through
five years(1)
  Over
five
Years(1)
  Non-rate
Sensitive(1)
  Total(1)  

ASSETS

                               
 

Federal funds sold and overnight investments

  $ 2,441   $   $   $   $ 2,441  
 

Investment securities

    29,819     12,506     15,879         58,204  
 

Interest bearing deposits in banks

    38,488                 38,488  
 

Loans held for sale

    155,781                 155,781  
 

Net loans and leases

    311,400     353,806     170,182     (22,101 )   813,287  
 

Cash and due from banks

                18,186     18,186  
 

Premises and equipment

                20,805     20,805  
 

Other assets

                29,228     29,228  
                       
 

Total assets

  $ 537,929   $ 366,312   $ 186,061   $ 46,118   $ 1,136,420  
                       

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

                               
 

Non-interest bearing deposits

  $   $   $   $ 149,203   $ 149,203  
 

Interest bearing deposits

    645,553     172,656     2,841         821,050  
 

FHLB advances and other Borrowings

    50,531     20,264     2,444         73,239  
 

Subordinated debentures

    15,465         5,330         20,795  
 

Other liabilities

                16,611     16,611  
 

Capital

                55,522     55,522  
                       
 

Total liabilities & capital

  $ 711,549   $ 192,920   $ 10,615   $ 221,336   $ 1,136,420  
                       
 

Net interest rate sensitivity gap

  $ (173,620 ) $ 173,392   $ 175,446   $ (175,218 )      
                         
 

Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap

  $ (173,620 ) $ (228 ) $ 175,218   $        
                         
 

Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap divided by total assets

    (15.3 )%   0.0 %   15.4 %            
                           

(1)
Amounts above are shown consolidated and do not exclude the balances related to the mortgage banking division's discontinued operations. Presentation with the exclusion of these balance sheet amounts was deemed not meaningful by management.

        The nature of our current operations is such that we are not subject to foreign currency exchange or commodity price risk. However, the Bank is subject to interest rate risk with respect to its mortgage

48


Table of Contents


banking division. When the Bank contractually commits with a customer to an interest rate on a residential mortgage loan that it intends to sell, the Bank may be at risk that the value of the loan, when ultimately sold, will be less than par. To hedge this risk, the Bank enters into a derivative contract, primarily consisting of forward loan sale commitments. Additionally, our liquidity planning takes into account current risks in our mortgage banking operations. We sell residential mortgage loans to various secondary market investors under several agreements. In the event we breach certain requirements within these agreements, the investors have the ability to suspend or terminate the agreements. A suspension or termination could expose us to interest rate and liquidity risk, and also limit our ability to manage our balance sheet size and maintain compliance with regulatory capital guidelines. Prior to filing this report, we were in default under these agreements due to our failure to file our audited financial statements within the specified timeframe and our failure to satisfy the IMCRs. We will continue to be in default under certain agreements due to the inclusion of a "going concern" explanatory paragraph in the auditors' report regarding the consolidated financial statements. To date, two of the investors under these agreements have terminated their agreements with us. Additionally, other investors, to whom we sell nearly 88% of our loan production, have verbally indicated that although we are in breach of the above mentioned requirements, they will forebear the defaults for an unspecified period of time.

CAPITAL ADEQUACY

        We are subject to Risk-Based Capital Guidelines adopted by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies. The Bank is also subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the OCC. Under these requirements, the regulatory agencies have set minimum capital ratio thresholds. To be considered "well capitalized" banks must generally maintain a Tier I leverage ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risked-based capital ratio of at least 10%. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the OCC advised management that they had established new higher capital ratio requirements on the Bank (individual minimum capital ratios, or IMCRs) thereby requiring the Bank to maintain its Tier 1 leverage ratio at not less than 8%, its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio at not less than 10% and its total risk-based capital ratio at not less than 12%. The Bank was required to achieve these new higher levels by December 31, 2009.

        Our efforts to raise capital before the OCC's deadline consummated in the definitive merger agreement with Tower Bancorp. As part of the merger agreement, Graystone Tower Bank increased our loan from $4 million, which was entered into on November 20, 2009, to up to a maximum of $26 million. We used the increased proceeds to make a capital contribution to the Bank in effort to satisfy the capital requirements established by the OCC. The loan, as modified, is a non-revolving one year term loan bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, and is secured by a pledge of all of the common stock of the Bank. Additionally, under the definitive merger agreement, Graystone purchased $52.5 million in first lien residential real estate and commercial loan participations at a 1.5% discount in effort to assist the Bank in satisfying the IMCRs.

        Management and the board of directors are committed to the planned merger with Tower. However, if the announced merger were not to occur, then Management would seek to recapitalize the Bank by finding another merger partner or by raising additional capital in the public or private markets. The Corporation is completing a regular planning cycle for 2011, which includes, among other things, updating the Corporation's strategic business plan and creating detailed operating and marketing plans for the Bank as an independent company.

49


Table of Contents

        As set forth in the table below, as of September 30, 2010, the Bank met the IMCR thresholds for all capital ratios, but as of December 31, 2009 the Bank was below the IMCR thresholds for Tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital. The Corporation's and Bank's risk-based capital ratios, shown below, have been computed in accordance with regulatory accounting policies.

 
  September 30,
2010
  December 31,
2009
  Current
Requirements to
remain "Well
Capitalized"(*)
 

Corporation

                   

Leverage Ratio

    6.35 %   5.71 %   N/A  

Tier I Capital Ratio

    8.38 %   7.79 %   N/A  

Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio

    9.92 %   9.16 %   N/A  

Bank

                   

Leverage Ratio

    8.88 %   7.68 %   8.00 %

Tier I Capital Ratio

    11.72 %   10.47 %   10.00 %

Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio

    12.99 %   11.74 %   12.00 %

(*)
Ratios imposed by the OCC under the IMCRs.

REGULATORY MATTERS

        On October 16, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank entered into an MOU with the OCC. An MOU with regulatory authorities is an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action, such as a formal written agreement or order. Among other things, under the MOU, the Bank has agreed to address the following matters:

        On August 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Bank entered into a formal written agreement with the OCC, which supersedes and replaces the MOU. The formal agreement requires that the Board of Directors of the Bank ensure that the Bank takes those actions identified in the MOU (described above), and, in some cases, augments those requirements, such as by establishing a written program regarding criticized assets of $750,000 or above, rather than the $1,000,000 threshold referenced in the MOU. In addition, the formal agreement adds a number of new requirements, requiring the Bank to: (i) ensure the Bank has adequate and competent senior management; (ii) develop and implement a written profit plan to improve and sustain the earnings of the Bank; (iii) develop and implement a written program to improve loan portfolio management; (iv) review the methodology for the Bank's allowance for loan and lease losses and establish a program providing for the maintaining of an adequate allowance; and (v) adopt and implement a written interest rate risk policy. Unlike the MOU, the formal agreement is a form of formal enforcement action enforceable by

50


Table of Contents


the OCC through several means, including injunctions and the assessment of civil money penalties against the Bank, its Board of Directors and/or its management.

        The Board of Directors and management have initiated corrective actions to comply with the provisions of the formal agreement.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        There have been no material changes in the Corporation's assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation in the 2009 Annual Report. Please refer to Item 7A of the Corporation's 2009 Annual Report for more information.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        As of September 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-5(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our President and CEO, Chief Operating Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation and the identification of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as described below, management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        As reported in our 2009 Annual Report, Management conducted a thorough and methodical evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which resulted in the identification of three material control weaknesses. Management continues their ongoing efforts to correct and revise the existing processes surrounding these material weaknesses and additional changes will be implemented as determined necessary.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

        During the third quarter of 2009, management identified a material weakness in our internal controls related to the design and implementation of policies to promptly identify problem loans and to quantify the elements of risk in problem loans. The Bank's policies and procedures were not systematically applied, which caused a failure in the identification of problem loans on a timely basis and a failure to accurately estimate the risk in the portfolio; this in turn caused a failure to accurately determine the appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL"). We also discovered a monitoring weakness that contributed to the characterization of the status of certain loans to be classified as fully performing, when in fact these loans were not. Management concluded that the ALLL and the provision for loan and lease losses as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 should be increased by $3.5 million. As a result of the June 30, 2009 ALLL shortfall of $3.5 million, amounts originally recorded as provision for loan and lease losses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were restated to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. This restatement created a material misstatement in the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as well as related footnote disclosures. During the fourth quarter of 2009 and subsequent to year-end, we began taking the steps described below to remediate the material

51


Table of Contents


weakness surrounding the ALLL as disclosed in our Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009.

Mark-to-Market Accounting of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

        Subsequent to year-end, management identified a material weakness in internal controls related to our process to review the valuation of mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale represent mortgage loans originated by us and held until sold to secondary market investors. Upon the closing of a residential mortgage loan originated by us, the mortgage loan is typically warehoused for a period of time and then sold into the secondary market. While in this warehouse phase, mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at fair value under the fair value option with changes in fair value recognized through earnings. An error was identified in our process to properly identify a certain population of loans held for sale prior to sending the loan details to our third party valuation firm. As such, we erroneously excluded from the population to be fair valued, loans which were identified for sale but for which we were awaiting the consideration from the counterparty to complete the sales transaction. These particular loans were correctly classified as loans held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet; however, the unrealized gain associated with these loans was not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet and the statement of operations. This error resulted in an understatement in the carrying amount of loans held for sale for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2009, as well as an understatement of net income for each quarter. As a result of this material weakness, the Bank increased net gains from mortgage banking by $1.2 million, $14 thousand and $2.7 million for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, in April 2010, management discovered another process error relating to the accounting for the mark-to-market of mortgage loans held for sale, which produced an additional increase in net gains from mortgage banking of $215 thousand as of December 31, 2009, which was correctly reflected in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, management concluded that these deficiencies constitute a material weakness in internal controls related to our process to review the valuation of mortgage loans held for sale.

Subsequent Events

        In May 2010, management discovered an error related to our process of reviewing, accounting for and the reporting of subsequent events, which resulted in the improper application of GAAP. Specifically, $6.7 million of the provision for loan and lease losses, which was recorded subsequent to December 31, 2009, should have been recorded as of December 31, 2009. This error was correctly reflected in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

        During the fourth quarter 2009 and subsequent to year-end, management began taking steps to remediate the material weakness surrounding the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The following steps have been completed as of the time of this filing:

52


Table of Contents

        Management continues to review existing policies, procedures and practices for compliance with risk rating, accountability and timeliness regarding credit administration, risk recognition, credit management and credit assessment.

Mark-to-Market Accounting of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

        Subsequent to December 31, 2009, and immediately following management's identification of the material weakness surrounding the mark-to-market accounting of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale, management enhanced an existing process that will ensure the portfolio of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale is complete prior to delivery to the third party valuation firm. At each month-end a reconciliation is performed to ensure the loans held for sale included in the file sent to the third party valuation firm reconciles to our internal subledger. This internal subledger of loans held for sale is reconciled to our general ledger. These reconciliations are reviewed by management monthly to ensure timely completion and that reconciling items, if any, are appropriately addressed.

Subsequent Events

        Management has created and implemented procedures to review and evaluate events occurring after the end of each quarter, but prior to issuing financial statements, to determine if there is any impact on the quarterly or annual financial statements. As of the date of this report, management is continuing their ongoing efforts to correct, revise and test the processes surrounding the material weaknesses described above. Additional changes will be implemented as determined necessary.

53


Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

        There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Corporation, or any of its subsidiaries, is a party or of which any of their respective property is the subject.

ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS.

        For a summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part 1, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in our 2009 Annual Report. There have been no material changes in the risk factors relevant to our operations, except as discussed below:

         Compliance with the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Reform Act may increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our earnings.

        On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") into law. The Dodd-Frank Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial-services industry. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act creates a new federal financial consumer protection agency, tightens capital standards, imposes clearing and margining requirements on many derivatives activities, and generally increases oversight and regulation of financial institutions and financial activities. In addition to the self-implementing provisions of the statute, the Dodd-Frank Act calls for many administrative rulemakings by various federal agencies to implement various parts of the legislation. The financial reform legislation and any implementing rules that are ultimately issued could have adverse implications on the financial industry, the competitive environment, and our business. We will have to apply resources to ensure that we are in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and any implementing rules, which may increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our earnings.

ITEM 2.     UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

        The following table provides the total repurchases made by the Company during the three months ended September 30, 2010:

Period
  Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
(a)(1)
  Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Unit)
(b)(1)
  Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
(c)
  Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
(d)
 

July 1 to July 31

    490   $ 8.40          

August 1 to August 31

      $          

September 1 to September 30

      $ 8.40          
                   

Total

    490   $ 8.40          
                   

(1)
Pursuant to the trust agreement between the Corporation and the trustee, these shares were repurchased from our 401(k) Plan. The purchase price was the average between the bid and the ask on the repurchase date.

54


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.     DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

        None.

ITEM 4.     [REMOVED AND RESERVED.]

ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION.

        None.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS.

        The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

55


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on November 9, 2010.

    FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION

 

 

/s/ JOHN A. FEATHERMAN, III

John A. Featherman, III
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ ERIC A. SEGAL

Eric A. Segal
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

56


Table of Contents


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
  Exhibit
  2.1   Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between First Chester County Corporation and Tower Bancorp, Inc., dated as of December 27, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 28, 2009.)

 

2.2

 

First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between First Chester County Corporation and Tower Bancorp, Inc., dated March 4, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2010.)

 

2.3

 

Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between First Chester County Corporation and Tower Bancorp, Inc., dated August 25, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 26, 2010.)

 

2.4

 

Third Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between First Chester County Corporation and Tower Bancorp, Inc., dated August 25, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 2, 2010.)

 

2.5

 

Form of Bank Plan of Merger by and between First National Bank of Chester County and Graystone Tower Bank (included as Exhibit F to the First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger filed herewith as Exhibit 2.2.)

 

3.1

 

Amended Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed May 14, 2004.)

 

3.2

 

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation's Form 8-A filed October 22, 2009.)

 

3.3

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Corporation's Form 8-A filed October 22, 2009.)

 

10.1

 

Limited Waiver dated May 5, 2010 relating to Loan Agreement between First Chester County Corporation and Graystone Tower Bank dated November 20, 2010, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2010).

 

10.2

 

Amendment to Limited Waiver dated July 26, 2010, relating to Loan Agreement between First Chester County Corporation and Graystone Tower Bank dated November 20, 2010, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Corporation's Annul Report on Form 10-K filed on July 27, 2010.)

 

10.3

 

Agreement by and between the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and First National Bank of Chester County, dated August 27, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2010.)

 

10.4

 

Letter Agreement between First Chester County Corporation and Graystone Tower Bank dated October 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 2, 2010.)

 

10.5

 

Letter Agreement between First Chester County Corporation and Tower Bancorp, Inc. dated October 28, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 2, 2010.)

57


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Exhibit
  31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

 

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

*
Filed herewith.

58



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John A. Featherman, III, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Chester County Corporation;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2010   /s/ JOHN A. FEATHERMAN, III

John A. Featherman, III
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)


EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric A. Segal, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Chester County Corporation;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2010   /s/ ERIC A. SEGAL

Eric A. Segal
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)


EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Chester County Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Featherman, III, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: November 9, 2010

    /s/ JOHN A. FEATHERMAN, III

John A. Featherman, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chairman of the Board


EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Chester County Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric A. Segal, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: November 9, 2010

    /s/ ERIC A. SEGAL

Eric A. Segal
Interim Chief Financial Officer


1 Year First Chester County Corp. (MM) Chart

1 Year First Chester County Corp. (MM) Chart

1 Month First Chester County Corp. (MM) Chart

1 Month First Chester County Corp. (MM) Chart

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock