- Quarterly Report (10-Q)

Table of Contents

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED: JUNE 30, 2012

 

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM             TO            

 

 

EDGAR Online, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

001-32194

(Commission File Number)

 

Delaware		06-1447017
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

11200 Rockville Pike, Suite 310, Rockville, Maryland 20852

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

[phone]

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES   x     NO   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES   x     NO   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer		¨		Accelerated filer		¨
Non-accelerated filer		¨		Smaller reporting company		x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES   ¨     NO   x

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at August 14, 2012: 35,590,439 shares.

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

Forward Looking Statements

The discussions set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain statements concerning potential future events. Such forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions by our management, as of the date of this Quarterly Report, including assumptions about risks and uncertainties faced by us. In addition, management may make forward-looking statements orally or in other writings, including, but not limited to, in press releases, in the annual report to shareholders and in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of such words as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “see” or “will,” or similar words. If any of management’s assumptions prove incorrect or should unanticipated circumstances arise, our actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. The differences could be caused by a number of factors or combination of factors including, but not limited to, those factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of this report, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as the other information in our periodic reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC, from time to time. Readers are strongly encouraged to consider those factors when evaluating any forward-looking statements concerning us. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report to reflect future events or developments. Investors should also be aware that while we, from time to time, do communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Investors should not assume that we agree with any report issued by any analyst or with any statements, projections, forecasts or opinions contained in any such report. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “EDGAR Online” include reference to our subsidiaries as well.

Index

 

		Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements			3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012 (unaudited)			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June  30, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)			4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Six Months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)			5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June  30, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited)			6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)			7
Item  2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			25
Item 1A. Risk Factors			25
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			27
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			27
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			27
Item 5. Other Information			27
Item 6. Exhibits			28
Signatures			29

 

2

---

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		December 31, 2011				June 30, 2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,418			$	4,396
Short-term investments			229				230
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $479 at December 31, 2011 and $248 at June 30, 2012			4,823				6,595
Other current assets			490				552
Total current assets			10,960				11,773
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $11,608 at December 31, 2011 and $12,704 at June 30, 2012			3,712				3,435
Goodwill			7,328				7,328
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $14,292 at December 31, 2011 and $14,742 at June 30, 2012			2,338				1,888
Other assets			418				419
Total assets		$	24,756			$	24,843
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	4,798			$	6,952
Deferred revenues			4,005				3,257
Current portion of long-term debt			667				1,500
Total current liabilities			9,470				11,709
Long-term debt			1,166				—
Other long-term liabilities			320				290
Total liabilities			10,956				11,999
Commitments and contingencies:
Redeemable preferred stock—Series B, convertible, $0.01 par value, 120,000 shares authorized and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012; liquidation preference of $14,785 at December 31, 2011 and $15,620 at June 30, 2012			14,114				14,981
Redeemable preferred stock—Series C, convertible, $0.01 par value, 90,000 shares authorized and 87,016 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012; liquidation preference of $9,837 at December 31, 2011 and $10,401 at June 30, 2012			8,390				9,050
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock—Series A, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012; no shares issued or outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, 35,498,496 shares issued and 35,215,078 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 35,873,857 shares issued and 35,590,439 shares outstanding at June 30, 2012			355				359
Additional paid-in capital			77,329				77,077
Accumulated deficit			(85,782	)			(88,017	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 283,418 shares at December 31, 2011 and 283,418 at June 30, 2012			(606	)			(606	)
Total stockholders’ deficit			(8,704	)			(11,187	)
Total liabilities, redeemable preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit		$	24,756			$	24,843

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Revenues:
XBRL filings			2,523				5,462				4,915				11,178
XBRL software			735				512				1,273				1,387
Data and solutions			1,940				2,001				3,756				3,914
Subscriptions			1,305				1,160				2,543				2,353
Total revenues			6,503				9,135				12,487				18,832
Cost of revenues			3,017				4,474				5,837				8,769
Gross profit			3,486				4,661				6,650				10,063
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing			1,239				990				2,239				1,814
Product development			1,585				942				2,602				1,757
General and administrative			3,199				3,974				6,458				7,129
Amortization and depreciation			850				772				1,727				1,546
			6,873				6,678				13,026				12,246
Loss from operations			(3,387	)			(2,017	)			(6,376	)			(2,183	)
Interest and other, net			(22	)			(23	)			(83	)			(51	)
Net loss			(3,409	)			(2,040	)			(6,459	)			(2,234	)
Dividends on preferred stock			(536	)			(690	)			(1,163	)			(1,398	)
Accretion on preferred stock			(12	)			(65	)			(24	)			(129	)
Net loss to common shareholders		$	(3,957	)		$	(2,795	)		$	(7,646	)		$	(3,761	)
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic			29,591				30,554				29,304				30,529
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted			29,591				30,554				29,304				30,529
Net loss per share—basic		$	(0.13	)		$	(0.09	)		$	(0.26	)		$	(0.12	)
Net loss per share—diluted		$	(0.13	)		$	(0.09	)		$	(0.26	)		$	(0.12	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		COMMON STOCK								TREASURY STOCK								ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL				ACCUMULATED DEFICIT				TOTAL
		SHARES				AMOUNT				SHARES				AMOUNT
Balance at December 31, 2011			35,498,496			$	355				283,418			$	(606	)		$	77,329			$	(85,782	)		$	(8,704	)
Net loss			—				—				—				—				—				(2,234	)			(2,234	)
Accrued dividends on Series B Preferred Stock			—				—				—				—				(835	)			—				(835	)
Accretion of issuance costs on Series B Preferred Stock			—				—				—				—				(32	)			—				(32	)
Accrued dividends on Series C Preferred Stock			—				—				—				—				(563	)			—				(563	)
Accretion from original fair market value to redemption value on Series C Preferred Stock			—				—				—				—				(97	)			—				(97	)
Stock-based compensation			375,361				4				—				—				1,275				—				1,279
Balance at June 30, 2012			35,873,857			$	359				283,418			$	(606	)		$	77,077			$	(88,017	)		$	(11,187	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011				2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(6,459	)		$	(2,234	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			1,170				1,083
Amortization of intangible assets			557				450
Stock-based compensation			2,038				1,279
Provision for losses on trade accounts receivable			225				183
Amortization of capitalized product costs			19				13
Amortization of deferred financing costs and discount			8				5
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(1,657	)			(1,955	)
Other, net			(264	)			(69	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			264				2,154
Deferred revenues			580				(748	)
Long-term payables			84				(30	)
Total adjustments			3,024				2,365
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities			(3,435	)			131
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures			(335	)			(190	)
Capitalized product development costs			(891	)			(630	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities			(1,226	)			(820	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable issued			2,000				—
Payments of notes payable			(1,437	)			(333	)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities			563				(333	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(4,098	)			(1,022	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			10,765				5,418
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	6,667			$	4,396
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$	83			$	44
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:
Accrued dividends on Series B and Series C Preferred Stock		$	1,163			$	1,398
Accretion of issuance costs on Series B Preferred Stock		$	24			$	32
Accretion of fair market value to redemption value on Series C Preferred Stock		$	0			$	97

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR ONLINE, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EDGAR Online, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“EDGAR Online” or “the Company”). All significant intercompany accounts are eliminated upon consolidation. EDGAR Online was incorporated in the State of Delaware in November 1995 under the name Cybernet Data Systems, launched its EDGAR Online website in January 1996, and went public in May 1999 under its current name. EDGAR Online is a leading provider of XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) filing services, software, data sets and analysis tools. The Company’s data products provide highly detailed fundamental financial information along with the source documents and are created through the use of proprietary high speed software that automates much of the data extraction and calculation processes. The Company’s XBRL Filing service uses parts of this same proprietary data extraction and processing software along with personnel skilled in accounting, rigorous quality processes and additional proprietary tools to assist public companies in the creation of XBRL filings for submission to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s XBRL analysis tool is a proprietary software tool that assists users in analyzing both the Company’s own proprietary XBRL data sets and industry standard XBRL data files. EDGAR Online delivers its data and analysis products via online subscriptions, as data licenses directly to end-users, embedded in other web sites and through a variety of redistributors. The Company delivers its XBRL filings services primarily through partnerships with financial printers and other providers of SEC compliance services. Consumers of the Company’s information are generally financial, corporate and advisory professionals who work in financial institutions such as investment funds, asset management firms, insurance companies and banks, stock exchanges and government agencies, as well as accounting firms, law firms, corporations and individual investors.

The unaudited interim financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2012 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, included herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements.

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2012, the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, changes in cash flows and changes in common stockholders’ deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for the full 2012 fiscal year or any future period.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC in March 2012. The condensed consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2011 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates embedded in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented concern the allowance for doubtful accounts and assumptions used in calculating stock compensation expense.

(2) MERGER AGREEMENT

On May 22, 2012, the Company announced that it had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of May 21, 2012, with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (“RRD”), and Leo Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of RRD (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of RRD.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Stock”), Series C Preferred Stock (“Series C Stock”) and common stock (“Common Stock”, and together with the Series B Stock and Series C Stock, the “Company Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time (except for those owned by RRD, Merger Sub, the Company or any of their respective subsidiaries or held by the Company in treasury) shall be automatically cancelled and converted into the right to receive $171.875, $158.790, and $1.092, in cash, respectively, without interest (the “Merger Consideration”), on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.

Each outstanding stock option of the Company, whether vested or unvested, will be cancelled and each holder thereof will either be (i) entitled to receive in consideration for such cancellation of each vested or unvested stock option, an amount equal to $1.092, the

 

7

---

Table of Contents

Merger Consideration payable for a share of Common Stock, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such stock option, minus the aggregate exercise price for the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such stock option (the “Option Consideration”), or (ii) cancelled without any present or future right to receive any portion of the Merger Consideration. The Option Consideration will only be payable if, when and to the extent it is greater than $0.

The Merger Agreement was approved by a unanimous vote of the Company’s board of directors (the “Company Board”), acting upon the unanimous recommendation of the special committee composed of independent directors of the Company Board (the “Special Committee”). In connection with the Company Board’s approval, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. rendered its opinion to the Company Board that, as of the date of the opinion and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth therein, the Merger Consideration to be received by holders of shares of Common Stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

Completion of the Merger is subject to a number of customary closing conditions.

The Company and RRD have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including covenants made by the Company not to solicit alternative transactions or, subject to certain exceptions, to enter into discussions concerning an alternative transaction, provide confidential information in connection with an alternative transaction, or change or withdraw its recommendation to Company stockholders of the Merger and Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for both the Company and RRD and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, the Company will be obligated to pay RRD a termination fee of $2.75 million.

A copy of the Merger Agreement can be found as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2012.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred $1,052 of expenses related to the proposed merger with RRD. Such expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

8

---

Table of Contents

(3) REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company derives revenues from four primary sources: XBRL filing processing fees, XBRL software fees, data and solutions fees and web services subscriptions fees. The Company recognizes XBRL filings revenue from fixed fees on a ratable basis as well as per-filing fees as the services are provided. The Company’s software revenues are derived from the licensing of software products, the maintenance and support of those software products and the performance of other professional services. The Company’s software is typically licensed with associated maintenance and support revenues. As there is not sufficient vendor-specific objective evidence to support the separate determination of the fair value of the license fee and undelivered maintenance and support, the total revenues are recognized ratably over the support period. The Company’s professional services revenues are either recognized as they are performed or ratably over a respective support period, dependent on whether the services represent a separate unit of accounting. Revenue from data licenses is recognized over the term of the underlying contracts. The Company’s data solutions sometimes involve upfront one-time customization fees along with more traditional data licensing arrangements for the ongoing delivery of the data solution. In addition, some of the Company’s data solutions are billed on a time and materials basis, per service level agreements or for delivery of data. Upfront customization fees are recognized systematically over the expected customer relationship period. Revenue from time and materials based agreements and data delivery is recognized as the services and data are provided. Revenue from subscriptions is recognized ratably over the subscription period, which is typically twelve months.

Revenue is recognized provided acceptance and delivery, if applicable, has occurred, collection of the resulting receivable is probable and no significant obligations remain. If amounts are received in advance of the services being performed, the amounts are recorded and presented as deferred revenues. Revenue is recognized net of any related state sales taxes charged and sales taxes payable are included in accrued expenses.

(4) LOSS PER SHARE

Loss per share information is determined using the two-class method, which includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and other securities that participate in dividends (“participating security”). The Company considers the Series B and Series C Preferred Stock to be participating securities because they include rights to participate in dividends with the common stock on a one for one basis, with the holders of Series B and Series C Preferred Stock deemed to have common stock equivalent shares based on a current conversion price of $1.10 and $1.45, respectively. In applying the two-class method, earnings are allocated to common stock shares and Series B and Series C Preferred Stock common stock equivalent shares based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding for the period. Since losses are not allocated to Series B or Series C Preferred Stock shares, the two-class method results in the same loss per common share calculated using the basic method for the periods presented in these financial statements.

Basic loss per common share excludes dilution for common stock equivalents and is computed by dividing the net loss, after deducting preferred stock dividends and the accretion of the beneficial conversion feature discount, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and reflects, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted and resulted in the issuance of common stock.

Diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012 as the Company reported a net loss and therefore all outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock grants and warrants are anti-dilutive. As such, diluted net loss per share does not include the effect of outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock grants and warrants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of 10,160,706 and 9,460,793, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of 6,767,815 and 6,803,091 , respectively, nor does it include 19,135,873 and 21,372,930 common shares issuable under the conversion provisions of our Series B and Series C Preferred Stock at June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

(5) SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS

The Company capitalizes software development costs in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 985-20 (“Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased, or Marketed”). Software development costs are capitalized after technological feasibility is established. Once the software products become available for general release to the public, the Company amortizes such costs over the related product’s estimated economic useful life to cost of revenues. Net capitalized software development costs (included in property and equipment) totaled $106 and $106 at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Related amortization expense, included in cost of revenues, totaled $11 and $13 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and $19 and $13 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

 

9

---

Table of Contents

The Company capitalizes internal-use software development costs in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40 (“Internal-Use Software”). The Company capitalizes internal-use software development costs once certain criteria are met. Once the internal-use software is ready for its intended use, the capitalized internal-use software costs will be amortized over the related software’s estimated economic useful life in amortization and depreciation expense. Our computer software is also subject to review for impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that the amount of the asset reflected in the Company’s balance sheet may not be recoverable. Net capitalized internal-use software costs (included in property and equipment) were $2,144 and $1,993 at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Related amortization expense totaled $860 and $781 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

(6) LONG-TERM DEBT

On April 5, 2007, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (“Rosenthal”) for additional working capital. Under the Financing Agreement, Rosenthal made a term loan in the original principal amount of $2,500 to the Company and agreed to provide up to an additional $2,500 under a revolving line of credit. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the Financing Agreement was payable at variable rates of interest over the published JPMorgan Chase prime rate. The Financing Agreement, as amended most recently on March 13, 2009, was renewed on March 31, 2011 and then was terminated on April 4, 2011. On that date, the Company repaid all amounts outstanding under the term loan and the first priority security interest was released. Interest expense under the Agreement, totaled $1 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and $54 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

On May 3, 2011, the Company entered into new commercial credit facilities (“Credit Facilities”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) for additional working capital. Under the Credit Facilities, SVB made a term loan in the original principal amount of $2,000 to the Company and agreed to provide up to an additional $3,000 under a revolving line of credit. The term loan is repayable in 36 equal monthly installments commencing October 1, 2011. Interest on borrowings under the term loan is payable at the published Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.75% and interest on borrowings under the revolving credit facility is payable at the published Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.25%. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities are evidenced by cross-collateralized agreements with SVB and are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets and a negative pledge on intellectual property. Interest expense under the Credit Facilities, totaled$0 and $22 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and $16 and $41 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

On February 28, 2012, we entered into a revised financing agreement (the “Revised Financing Agreement”) with SVB which amended and restated the Credit Facilities. Under the Revised Financing Agreement, the term loan made by SVB to the Company under the Credit Facilities, having a current outstanding principal balance of $1,500 as of June 30, 2012, remains outstanding and repayable in accordance with the existing payment schedule with an interest rate of 1.75% above the Wall Street Journal prime rate. The Revised Financing Agreement also provides for a working capital line of credit, subject to the maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants by the Company, as well as the availability of eligible accounts receivable against which SVB may advance funds. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit is 1.25% above the Wall Street Journal prime rate. Under the Revised Financing Agreement, the term loan will be converted into an advance under the line of credit in the event that a targeted “quick ratio” falls below a certain level. The aggregate principal amount of loans outstanding under the term loan and the line of credit may not exceed $5,000. The Company’s obligations to SVB are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets.

On June 29, 2012 we entered into a First Amendment to the Revised Financing Agreement. The First Amendment provides, generally, for a temporary suspension of the requirement to comply with the Revised Financing Agreement’s Adjusted EBITDA financial covenant for the period from May 31, 2012 through August 31, 2012. The First Amendment also restricts the Company’s ability to borrow under the Revised Financing Agreement’s working capital line of credit until the Company has delivered reports to SVB confirming its compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the measurement period ending on September 30, 2012.

The Revised Financing Agreement provides for the immediate repayment of all loans upon a change of control. As a result of signing the Merger Agreement dated May 21, 2012 all amounts outstanding under the term loan at June 30, 2012 have been included on the Balance Sheet as of that date as current liabilities.

 

10

---

Table of Contents

(7) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Compensation Expense

The Company records stock-based compensation expense under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 (“Awards Classified as Equity”). The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012 was recognized in the following statement of operations:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Cost of revenues		$	9			$	4			$	21			$	19
Sales and marketing			82				23				175				50
Product development			67				15				103				51
General and administrative			758				448				1,739				1,159
Total stock compensation expense		$	910			$	490			$	2,038			$	1,279

This expense increased the Company’s net loss per share by $0.03 and $0.02 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively and by $0.07 and $0.04 in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

There were no stock options granted in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The estimated per share weighted-average grant-date fair values of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.43. There were no stock options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2012. Amounts were determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based on the following assumptions:

 

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011		2012
Expected dividend yield		0.0%		0.0%
Expected volatility		74%		81%
Risk-free interest rate		3.00-3.13%		1.47-2.39%
Expected life in years		6		6.3

The assumptions used in calculating the value of stock options, which involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment, were based on the following:

 

•

Expected dividend yield —reflects the Company’s present intention to retain earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of the Company’s business;

 

•

Expected volatility —determined considering historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the preceding six years;

 

•

Risk-free interest rate —based on the yield available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term approximating the expected life of the stock option awards; and

 

•

Expected life —calculated as the weighted average period that the stock option awards are expected to remain outstanding based on historical experience.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Activity

In May 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) which replaced all previous stock option plans which in total had authorized the issuance of options to purchase up to 4,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock since the Company’s inception. All remaining available shares under the Company’s prior stock option plans became available under the 2005 Plan upon its adoption. In addition, the 2005 Plan, when adopted, authorized 1,087,500 new shares of common stock for equity awards. The 2005 Plan authorizes a broad range of awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, non-restricted stock and deferred stock. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 23, 2008, the 2005 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares available for grant by 1,000,000. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 10, 2009, the 2005 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares available for grant by an additional 1,000,000 shares. The 2009 amendment also makes clear that under the 2005 Plan the Company may not reprice stock options or stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 18, 2010, the 2005 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares available for grant by an additional 5,955,109 shares. The 2010 amendment also increased the limitation on the number of shares that may be granted under the 2005 Plan to any one participant in a given year from 300,000 to 1,000,000.

 

11

---

Table of Contents

Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Option awards generally vest over three years and have a ten year contractual term.

Option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was as follows:

 

		NUMBER OF OPTIONS				WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE				WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING CONTRACTUAL TERM				AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
Outstanding at December 31, 2011			4,277,126			$	1.45
Granted			—				—
Exercised			—				—
Cancelled			(659,044	)		$	1.14
Outstanding at June 30, 2012			3,618,082			$	1.34				7.19 years			$	343
Exercisable at June 30, 2012			1,600,341			$	1.79				4.81 years			$	26

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the market price of the Company’s common stock for those awards that have an exercise price below the market price at June 30, 2012. There were no options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

In addition, the Company has historically granted restricted shares under the 2005 Plan as well as out of the Company’s treasury stock. Restricted shares have no exercise price and vest depending on the individual grants. The fair value of the restricted shares is based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Restricted share activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was as follows:

 

		NUMBER OF SHARES				WEIGHTED AVERAGE GRANT- DATE FAIR VALUE				AGGREGATE INTRINSIC VALUE
Non-vested at December 31, 2011			3,898,310			$	1.33
Granted			479,887			$	0.64
Vested			(1,193,188	)		$	1.30
Cancelled			—			$	—
Non-vested at June 30, 2012			3,185,009			$	1.24			$	3,440

The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the market price of the Company’s common stock at June 30, 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested was $1,070, determined based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the respective vesting dates.

At June 30, 2012, 4,945,631 shares were available for grant under the 2005 Plan.

(8) CONCENTRATION OF RISK AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. R.R. Donnelley & Sons accounted for 19% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 and 47% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2012. PR Newswire accounted for 22% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 and 16% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2012. There was no other single customer that accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 or June 30, 2012.

R.R. Donnelley & Sons comprised 26% and 37% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively, and 27% and 39% of the Company’s total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The Company’s other customers are geographically dispersed throughout the United States with no single customer accounting for more than 10% of revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012. In addition, the Company has not experienced any significant credit losses to date from any one customer.

 

12

---

Table of Contents

The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, approximate their fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company’s short-term investments of $230 is comprised of a single Certificate of Deposit that is used to collateralize an Irrevocable Letter of Credit and cannot be withdrawn until the LOC is returned. The Company maintains a cash balance at two financial institutions with balances insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The financial statement carrying value of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value based on interest rates currently available to the Company for borrowings with similar characteristics and maturities.

(9) REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

Series B Preferred Stock

On January 28, 2010, the Company sold 120,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) to Bain Capital Venture Integral Investors, LLC (“Bain”) for $100.00 per share, for total proceeds of $12,000. The carrying value of the Series B Preferred Stock is reduced by the stock issuance costs and any discounts related to preferred dividends and is then accreted back to redemption value over the eight year redemption period.

The Series B Preferred Stock receives a compounding, cumulative, paid-in-kind dividend of 11.44% per annum. Following the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the dividend will no longer accrue. The dividends are cumulative, whether or not declared, accrue daily and compound annually. The dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock shall not be paid in cash.

Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the (i) original purchase price per share of $100.00 plus accrued but unpaid dividends by (ii) an initial conversion price of $1.10 per share, subject to adjustments for stock splits and combinations, dividends and distributions, reclassifications, exchanges or substitutions, mergers or reorganizations, and similar events. The shares of Series B Preferred Stock are not, however, convertible to the extent that such conversion would result in Bain and its affiliates owning in excess of 19.9% of the shares of the Company’s voting power. The Company evaluated the conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock and determined that it did not have to be recorded as a liability. To the extent that at any time sufficient shares of common stock are not available for the purpose of effecting the conversion of Series B Preferred Stock, a holder of Series B Preferred Stock may elect to require the Company to redeem such holder’s shares of Series B Preferred Stock (but only to the extent sufficient shares of common stock are not available).

Each holder of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such holder’s Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, but subject to the same limitation on conversion as set forth in the preceding paragraph.

On or at any time after the eighth anniversary of the Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (being January 28, 2018), if requested by holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding Series B Preferred Stock, each holder of Series B Preferred Stock shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all the Series B Preferred Stock for cash, at a redemption price equal to the original purchase price of $100.00, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or wind up of the Company, before any distribution is made to the holders of any security junior to the Series B Preferred Stock, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company available for distribution an amount equal to the greater of (i) the original per share purchase price of $100.00, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, or (ii) the amount that would be payable in respect of a share of common stock if all outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted into common stock immediately prior to such liquidation (without regard as to whether sufficient shares of common stock are available out of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock, for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock). The aggregate amount of the Series B Preferred Stock liquidation preference at June 30, 2012, calculated in accordance with the provisions of item (i) of this paragraph is approximately $15,620.

In the event of a change in control of the Company as defined in the Series B Preferred Stock designation, each holder of Series B Preferred Stock shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of such holder’s Series B Preferred Stock for cash, if the consideration in such change of control transaction is cash, but otherwise for consideration in the same form as all other stockholders will receive in such transaction, at a redemption price per share of Series B Preferred Stock equal to the greater of (i) the fair market value per share valued as of the date of the change of control determined on an as-converted to common stock basis (without regard as to whether sufficient shares of common stock are available out of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock, for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock) and (ii) the original purchase price of $100.00 per share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon; provided, however, that in the event of a change of control prior to the fifth anniversary of the issue date, accrued and unpaid dividends will include all dividends that would have accrued on the Series B Preferred Stock from the issue date through and including the fifth anniversary of the issue date. The aggregate amount payable to the Series B stockholders calculated in accordance with the provisions of item (ii) of this paragraph at June 30, 2012 would have been approximately $20,625. Refer to Financial Note #2.

 

13

---

Table of Contents

The redemption value of the Series B Preferred Stock, representing the original purchase price plus accrued and unpaid dividends, and the number of common shares issuable in the event the conversion provisions are exercised, at December 31 of each of the succeeding four year periods and at the fifth anniversary of the Agreement is expected to be as follows:

 

YEAR		REDEMPTION VALUE				COMMON SHARES ISSUABLE UPON CONVERSION
2011		$	14,785				13,441,182
2012		$	16,481				14,983,182
2013		$	18,367				16,697,273
2014		$	20,468				18,607,545
January 28, 2015		$	20,625				18,750,000

Series C Preferred Stock

On November 22, 2010, the Company issued a total of 87,016 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) in connection with the merger with UBmatrix, including the related sale of Series C Preferred Stock consummated in connection with the merger, at a per share purchase price of $100.00. The carrying value of the Series C Preferred Stock is reduced by the stock issuance costs and any discounts related to preferred dividends and is then accreted back to redemption value over the eight year redemption period.

The Series C Preferred Stock receives a compounding, cumulative, paid-in-kind dividend of 11.66% per annum. Following January 28, 2015 the dividend will no longer accrue. The dividends are cumulative, whether or not declared, accrue daily and compound annually. The dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock shall not be paid in cash.

Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder thereof into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the (i) original purchase price per share of $100.00, plus all accrued but unpaid dividends by (ii) an initial conversion price of $1.45 per share, subject to adjustments for stock splits and combinations, dividends and distributions, reclassifications, exchanges or substitutions, mergers or reorganizations, and similar events. The Company evaluated the conversion feature of the Series C Preferred Stock and determined that it did not have to be recorded as a liability. To the extent that at any time sufficient shares of common stock are not available for the purpose of effecting the conversion of Series C Preferred Stock, a holder of Series C Preferred Stock may elect to require the Company to redeem such holder’s shares of Series C Preferred Stock (but only to the extent sufficient shares of common stock are not available).

Each holder of Series C Preferred Stock is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such holder’s Series C Preferred Stock is convertible.

On or at any time after the earlier of (i) the date on which the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock notify the Company of their election to require the redemption of the Series B Preferred Stock in accordance with its terms, or (ii) the eighth anniversary of the issuance date of the Series C Preferred Stock (being November 22, 2018), if requested by holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding Series C Preferred Stock, each holder of Series C Preferred Stock shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all the Series C Preferred Stock for cash, at a redemption price equal to the original purchase price of $100.00, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or wind up of the Company, before any distribution is made to the holders of any security junior to the Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company available for distribution an amount equal to the greater (i) the original per share purchase price of $100.00, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, or (ii) the amount that would be payable in respect of a share of common stock if all outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock were converted into common stock immediately prior to such liquidation (without regard as to whether sufficient shares of common stock are available out of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock, for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock). The aggregate amount of the Series C Preferred Stock liquidation preference at June 30, 2012, calculated in accordance with the provisions of item (i) of this paragraph is approximately $10,401.

In the event of a change in control of the Company as defined in the Series C Preferred Stock designation, each holder of Series C Preferred Stock shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of such holder’s Series C Preferred Stock for cash, if the consideration in such change of control transaction is cash, but otherwise for consideration in the same form as all other stockholders will receive in such transaction, at a redemption price per share of Series C Preferred Stock equal to the greater of (i) the fair market value per share valued as of the date of the change of control determined on an as-converted to common stock basis (without regard as to whether sufficient shares of common stock are available out of the Company’s authorized but unissued stock, for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock) and (ii) the original purchase price of $100 per share, plus all accrued and

 

14

---

Table of Contents

unpaid dividends thereon; provided, however, that in the event of a change of control prior to January 28, 2015, accrued and unpaid dividends will include all dividends that would have accrued on the Series C Preferred Stock from the issue date through and including January 28, 2015. The aggregate amount payable to the Series C stockholders calculated in accordance with the provisions of item (ii) of this paragraph at June 30, 2012 would have been approximately $13,817. Refer to Financial Note #2.

The redemption value of the Series C Preferred Stock, representing the original purchase price plus accrued and unpaid dividends, and the number of common shares issuable in the event the conversion provisions are exercised, at December 31 of each of the succeeding four year periods and at January 28, 2015 is expected to be as follows:

 

YEAR		REDEMPTION VALUE				COMMON SHARES ISSUABLE UPON CONVERSION
2011		$	9,837				6,784,315
2012		$	10,988				7,577,534
2013		$	12,269				8,461,074
2014		$	13,699				9,447,635
January 28, 2015		$	13,817				9,529,123

 

15

---

Table of Contents

(10) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company reimbursed Bain for travel and third party consulting expenses related to strategic meetings with the Company which totaled $53 and $53 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Two principals of Bain were appointed to our Board of Directors in accordance with the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock, and representatives of Bain from time to time have, or will, provide consulting services to us. Effective September 30, 2010 and through March 28, 2011, one of those principals, John M. Connolly, functioned as our interim Chief Executive Officer and President after the resignation of Philip D. Moyer. On March 28, 2011, Mr. Connolly became Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. Other than the payment of Director Fees consistent with the fees paid to all non-executive Directors, there have been no additional fees paid to Bain or Bain Directors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2012.

(11) INCOME TAXES

Since its inception, the Company has incurred net operating losses and has incurred no federal or state income tax expense. At December 31, 2011, the Company has approximately $51,000 in federal net operating losses, which will expire between 2012 and 2031, and approximately $49,000 of state net operating loss carry forwards, which will expire between 2012 and 2031. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards is subject to limitations based on past and future changes in ownership of the Company. The Company has determined that it has experienced multiple ownership changes since inception, but does not believe that these past changes in ownership will restrict its ability to use its losses and credits within the carry forward period. Approximately $45,000 of the total federal net operating losses are currently subject to annual limitations ranging from approximately $1,400 to $3,100 per year. If we have further ownership changes, additional annual limitations on the use of our net operating loss carry-forwards may be imposed.

(12) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

Following the announcement of the Merger Agreement, three purported stockholders of the Company initiated legal actions challenging the merger: two in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, Shifrin v. EDGAR Online Inc. et al. , Case Number 363444 (filed May 24, 2012) and Yacobi v. EDGAR Online, Inc. et al. , Case Number 363644 (filed May 29, 2012); and one in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Trettel v. Farrell et al. , Case Number 7573 (filed May 29, 2012).

The various complaints filed in these actions collectively allege that the Company’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by their actions in approving the Merger Agreement and filing the preliminary proxy statement describing the merger. The plaintiffs in these actions have agreed to jointly prosecute these cases in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, and consolidation of the Maryland actions is pending.

On July 18, 2012, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding relating to the settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the actions. The settlement is subject to confirmatory discovery, court approval and customary conditions.

(13) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential disclosure or recognition to the date of the issuance of the condensed consolidated financial statements and believes all subsequent events are properly disclosed.

 

16

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS)

OVERVIEW

The Company’s data products provide highly detailed fundamental financial information along with the source documents and are created through the use of proprietary high speed software that automates much of the data extraction and calculation processes. The Company’s XBRL Filing service uses parts of this same proprietary data extraction and processing software along with personnel skilled in accounting, rigorous quality processes and additional proprietary tools to assist public companies in the creation of XBRL filings for submission to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s XBRL analysis tool is a proprietary software tool that assists users in analyzing both the Company’s own proprietary XBRL data sets and industry standard XBRL data files. Consumers of the Company’s information are generally financial, corporate and advisory professionals who work in financial institutions such as investment funds, asset management firms, insurance companies and banks, stock exchanges and government agencies, as well as accounting firms, law firms, corporations or individual investors. We launched our EDGAR Online web site and began selling our subscription services and establishing contractual relationships with business and financial information web sites to supply EDGAR content in January 1996.

We recognize revenue from providing the following services:

XBRL Filings. Our XBRL filings solutions provide partners and customers with a mechanism for converting financial statements into XBRL for filing with the SEC and potentially other regulators. R.R. Donnelley & Sons is one of our partners in this channel, whereby we provide services to their customer base for compliance with existing SEC regulations mandating the submission of XBRL tagged company reports. This XBRL filing solution leverages our data processing engine and proprietary business rules that we have developed for tagging US GAAP financials with the appropriate XBRL tags. Our process combines our XBRL knowledge and expertise with data-tagging automation and workflow. We recognize revenue from fixed fee arrangements on a ratable basis as well as per-filing fees as the services are provided. As of December 30, 2009, our relationship with R.R. Donnelley & Sons became non-exclusive for both parties. Since then, we have signed agreements with PR Newswire, Business Wire and Merrill Communications. We are exploring other potential XBRL partnerships and distribution agreements. We plan to structure our future agreements on the model we signed with other financial printers in which we receive minimum filings fees and/or minimum conversion jobs; however, we may on occasion sign contracts without minimums where we believe the relationship will not be material to our capacity or revenues, or where doing so would otherwise be advantageous to our interests.

XBRL Software. Our XBRL software revenues are derived from the licensing of XBRL software products, the maintenance and support of those software products and the performance of other professional services related to the software. The Company’s software is typically licensed with associated maintenance and support revenues. As there is not sufficient vendor-specific objective evidence to support the separate determination of the fair value of the license fee and undelivered maintenance and support, the total revenues are recognized ratably over a respective support period, dependent on whether the services represent a separate unit of accounting. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sale price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. If any of the criteria have not been met, then revenue is deferred until such time as all criteria have been met.

Data and Solutions. We produce a specialized line of data feeds, products and solutions based on content sets that we have extracted from SEC filings and other data providers. Both our data products and solutions consist of digital data feeds transmitted through various formats including hosted web pages, multiple application programming interfaces, and other response mechanisms. Our data products include, but are not limited to, full access to SEC filings in multiple formats, standardized and as-reported fundamental financial data, annual and quarterly financial statements, insider trades, institutional holdings, initial and secondary public offerings, Form 8-K disclosures, electronic prospectuses and other investment instrument disclosure information. Our data solutions include the configuration of our data products, the conversion of data from unstructured content into multiple formats including XML, XBRL and PDF, the storage and delivery of data and custom feeds and tools to access the information. Revenue from data licenses is recognized over the term of the contract, which are typically non-cancelable, one-year contracts with automatic renewal clauses. Our data solutions sometimes involve some upfront set up fees along with more traditional annual data licensing arrangements for the ongoing delivery of the data solution. In addition, some of our data solutions are billed on a time and materials basis, per service level agreements or for delivery of data. We review each contract in connection with the respective governing accounting literature to determine revenue recognition on a case-by-case basis. Revenue from time and materials based agreements and data delivery is recognized as the data and services are provided. Upfront customization fees are recorded systematically over the expected customer relationship period.

 

17

---

Table of Contents

Subscriptions . Our end-user subscription services include I-Metrix and I-Metrix Professional, EDGAR Pro and EDGAR Access. I-Metrix delivers a web only service while I-Metrix Professional allows a user to do in-depth analysis of companies and industries by providing fundamental data and a suite of tools and models that allow users to search, screen and evaluate the data via the web and a Microsoft Excel add-in. EDGAR Pro offers financial data, stock ownership, public offering data sets and advanced search tools for corporate reports filed via the EDGAR system. It is available via multi-seat and enterprise-wide contracts, and may also include add-on services such as global annual reports and conference call transcripts. EDGAR Access, our retail product, has fewer features than EDGAR Pro and is available via single-seat, credit card purchase only.

 

18

---

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The FASB recently issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income , which requires entities to present comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Entities will no longer have the option under U.S. GAAP to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. In addition, the amended guidance requires entities to show the effects of items reclassified from OCI to net income on the face of the financial statements. Public entities are required to adopt the amended guidance in fiscal years, and in interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities must adopt the guidance in fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012 and in interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted, and retrospective application is required. The adoption of these changes had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

The FASB recently issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs , which aligns the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Many of the amendments in this ASU will not result in a change in requirements, but simply clarify existing requirements. The amendments in this ASU that do change a principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements include the following: (1) the ASU permits an exception for measuring fair value when a reporting entity manages its financial instruments on the basis of its net exposure, rather than gross exposure, to those risks; (2) the ASU clarifies that the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement is related to the unit of account for the asset or liability being measured at fair value; (3) the ASU prohibits blockage discounts for level 2 and 3 investments; and (4) the amendments expand the fair value measurement disclosures. The ASU is to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011; early adoption is not permitted. For non-public entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011; early application is permitted, but no earlier than for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011.

 

19

---

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth the percentage relationships of certain items from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of total revenues.

 

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,								SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Total revenues			100	%			100	%			100	%			100	%
Cost of revenues			46				49				47				47
Gross profit			54				51				53				53
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing			19				11				18				10
Product development			24				10				21				9
General and administrative			50				44				52				38
Amortization and depreciation			13				8				13				8
Loss from operations			(52	)			(22	)			(51	)			(12	)
Interest and other, net			(0	)			(0	)			(0	)			(0	)
Net loss			(52	)%			(22	)%			(51	)%			(12	)%

REVENUES

Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased 41% to $9,135 from total revenues of $6,503 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The net increase in revenues was primarily attributable to a $2,939, or 117%, increase in XBRL filings revenues, which was offset by a $223, or 30% decrease in software revenues. Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased 51% to $18,832 from total revenues of $12,487 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The net increase in revenues was primarily attributable to a $6,263, or 127%, increase in XBRL filings revenues.

XBRL FILINGS

 

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,								SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Revenues (in $000s)		$	2,523			$	5,462			$	4,915			$	11,178
Percentage of total revenue			39	%			60	%			39	%			59	%

The increases in XBRL filings revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 from the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily related to the final implementation phase of the SEC mandate requiring all SEC registered companies to file XBRL with effect from periods ending after June 15, 2011.

XBRL SOFTWARE

 

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,								SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Revenues (in $000s)		$	735			$	512			$	1,273			$	1,387
Percentage of total revenue			11	%			6	%			10	%			7	%

The decrease in XBRL software revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from June 30, 2011 is attributable to one-time revenues in 2011 which were not repeated in the current period. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from June 30, 2011 is attributable to new license agreements.

 

20

---

Table of Contents

DATA AND SOLUTIONS

 

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,								SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Revenues (in $000s)		$	1,940			$	2,001			$	3,756			$	3,914
Percentage of total revenue			30	%			22	%			30	%			21	%

Data and solutions revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were consistent with revenues from the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to the annual value of new data and solutions contracts being the same as the annual value of cancelled data and solutions contracts.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

 

		THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,								SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
		2011				2012				2011				2012
Revenues (in $000s)		$	1,305			$	1,160			$	2,543			$	2,353
Percentage of total revenue			20	%			13	%			20	%			12	%

Subscription revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased from the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 due to decreased sales of our premium products, EDGAR Pro and I-Metrix Professional, as well as decreased sales of EDGAR Access, our retail service. Our subscription business has been impacted by substantial business and workforce reductions in the financial services community over the past two years and the continuing slow economic climate in general.

 

21

---

Table of Contents

COST OF REVENUES

Cost of revenues primarily consists of salaries and benefits of operations employees to create XBRL filings and produce data sets, fees paid to acquire data and the amortization of costs related to developing our I-Metrix products that were previously capitalized. Total cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased $1,457, or 48%, to $4,474 from $3,017 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The net increase in cost of revenues was primarily due to a $523 increase in payroll related expenses related to the increase in our XBRL filings business and $980 of costs associated with SunGard, which supplies additional staff for the filings business. Total cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased $2,932, or 50%, to $8,769 from $5,837 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The net increase in cost of revenues was primarily due to a $867 increase in payroll related expenses related to the increase in our XBRL filings business and $2,169 of costs associated with SunGard.

GROSS PROFIT

Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased $1,175, or 34%, to $4,661 from $3,486 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The gross profit percentage decreased to 51% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from 54% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased $3,413, or 51%, to $10,063 from $6,650 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The gross profit percentage was consistent at 53% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the six months ended June 30, 2011. We expect our gross profit percentages will increase over time as we have improved our efficiency in the XBRL filings business through technology and intensive training.

OPERATING EXPENSES

Sales and Marketing . Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, sales commissions, advertising expenses, and costs of marketing materials. Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $249, or 20%, to $990 from $1,239 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $425, or 19%, to $1,814 from $2,239 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The net decreases were primarily due to decreases in payroll related expenses as a result of a decrease in the sales personnel compared to the corresponding period in 2011.

Product Development . Product development expenses, which consist primarily of salaries and benefits and outside development costs, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $643, or 41%, to $942 from $1,585 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $845 or 33%, to $1,757 from $2,602 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decreases were primarily due to a reduced number of development personnel in 2012 compared to the corresponding period in 2012 and lower outside development costs for consultants.

General and Administrative . General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, insurance, fees for professional services, general corporate expenses and facility expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased $775, or 24%, to $3,974 from $3,199 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased $671, or 10%, to $7,129 from $6,458 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The net increases were primarily due to expenses of $1,052 related to the Merger Agreement.

Depreciation and Amortization . Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of property and equipment and the amortization of finite lived intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $78, or 9%, to $772 from $850 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Depreciation and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $181, or 11%, to $1,546 from $1,727 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decreases are a result of lower capital purchases for the year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net cash generated in operating activities was $131 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net cash used in operations of $3,435 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the decrease in net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and an increase in the change in Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities was $820 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $1,226 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower capital purchases and lower capitalized product development expenses.

Net cash used in financing activities was $333 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to net cash generated in financing activities of $563 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

22

---

Table of Contents

On April 5, 2007, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. (“Rosenthal”) for additional working capital. Under the Financing Agreement, Rosenthal made a term loan in the original principal amount of $2,500 to the Company and agreed to provide up to an additional $2,500 under a revolving line of credit. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the Financing Agreement was payable at variable rates of interest over the published JPMorgan Chase prime rate. The Financing Agreement, as amended most recently on March 13, 2009, was renewed on March 31, 2011 and then was terminated on April 4, 2011. On that date, the Company repaid all amounts outstanding under the term loan and the first priority security interest was released.

On May 3, 2011, the Company entered into new commercial credit facilities (“Credit Facilities”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) for additional working capital. Under the Credit Facilities, SVB made a term loan in the original principal amount of $2,000 to the Company and agreed to provide up to an additional $3,000 under a revolving line of credit. The term loan is repayable in 36 equal monthly installments commencing October 1, 2011. Interest on borrowings under the term loan is payable at the published Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.75% and interest on borrowings under the revolving credit facility is payable at the published Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.25%. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities are evidenced by cross-collateralized agreements with SVB and are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets and a negative pledge on intellectual property.

On February 28, 2012, we entered into a revised financing agreement (the “Revised Financing Agreement”) with SVB which amended and restated the Credit Facilities. Under the Revised Financing Agreement, the term loan made by SVB to the Company under the Credit Facilities, having a current outstanding principal balance of $1,500 as of June 30, 2012, remains outstanding and repayable in accordance with the existing payment schedule with an interest rate of 1.75% above the Wall Street Journal prime rate. The Revised Financing Agreement also provides for a working capital line of credit, subject to the maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants by the Company, as well as the availability of eligible accounts receivable against which SVB may advance funds. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit is 1.25% above the Wall Street Journal prime rate. Under the Revised Financing Agreement, the term loan will be converted into an advance under the line of credit in the event that a targeted “quick ratio” falls below a certain level. The aggregate principal amount of loans outstanding under the term loan and the line of credit may not exceed $5,000,000. The Company’s obligations to SVB are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets.

On June 29, 2012 we entered into a First Amendment to the Revised Financing Agreement. The First Amendment provides, generally, for a temporary suspension of the requirement to comply with the Revised Financing Agreement’s Adjusted EBITDA financial covenant for the period from May 31, 2012 through August 31, 2012. The First Amendment also restricts the Company’s ability to borrow under the Revised Financing Agreement’s working capital line of credit until the Company has delivered reports to SVB confirming its compliance with the Adjusted EBITDA covenant for the measurement period ending on September 30, 2012.

The Revised Financing Agreement provides for the immediate repayment of all loans upon a change of control. As a result of signing the Merger Agreement dated May 21, 2012 all amounts outstanding under the term loan at June 30, 2012 have been included on the Balance Sheet as of that date as current liabilities.

At June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $4,396. We had no off-balance sheet arrangements at June 30, 2012. We believe that our existing capital resources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for funding working capital needs, capital expenditures and debt obligations for at least the next 12 months. Thereafter, if the remaining cash from the proceeds from our Series B and Series C preferred stock issuance, new bank credit facilities, and cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms attractive to us, or at all. The failure to raise capital when needed could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders would be reduced.

 

23

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes in our exposure to market risk from that disclosed in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principle executive and financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and can therefore only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the design will succeed in achieving its stated goals.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We hired our new Chief Executive Officer, Robert J. Farrell, effective March 28, 2011. Effective March 28, 2011, Mark Maged resigned as Chairman of the Board of Directors and assumed the newly created role of Lead Independent Director. John M. Connolly, a member of our Board of Directors who had functioned as our interim Chief Executive Officer and President since March 31, 2011 assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors as of that date. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of Controls

Because of their inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

24

---

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.

 

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Following the announcement of the Merger Agreement, three purported stockholders of the Company initiated legal actions challenging the merger: two in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, Shifrin v. EDGAR Online Inc. et al. , Case Number 363444 (filed May 24, 2012) and Yacobi v. EDGAR Online, Inc. et al. , Case Number 363644 (filed May 29, 2012); and one in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Trettel v. Farrell et al. , Case Number 7573 (filed May 29, 2012).

The various complaints filed in these actions collectively allege that the Company’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by their actions in approving the Merger Agreement and filing the preliminary proxy statement describing the merger. The plaintiffs in these actions have agreed to jointly prosecute these cases in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, and consolidation of the Maryland actions is pending.

On July 18, 2012, the parties entered into a memorandum of understanding relating to the settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the actions. The settlement is subject to confirmatory discovery, court approval and customary conditions.

 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

The risk factors, which were included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, have been updated with respect to results from the period covered by this report. Other than those below, there were no other material changes from the risk factors previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Please refer to Item I of our Annual Report for 2011 for disclosures regarding other risks and uncertainties related to our business.

Failure to complete the merger could negatively impact the market price of EDGAR Online Common Stock.

If the merger is not completed for any reason, EDGAR Online will be subject to a number of material risks, including the following:

 

•

the market price of EDGAR Online Common Stock may decline;

 

•

costs relating to the merger, such as legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and, in specified circumstances, termination fees, must be paid by EDGAR Online, even if the merger is not completed;

 

•

the diversion of management’s attention from the day-to-day business of EDGAR Online, the potential disruption to its employees and its relationships with customers, suppliers and distributors and potential diversion from certain aspects of its previously announced product development program may make it difficult for EDGAR Online to regain its financial and market positions; and

 

•

the potential disruption in the existing contractual relationship between EDGAR Online and RR Donnelley, which accounted for 26.8% of our revenue in 2011.

If the merger agreement is not adopted by our stockholders at the special meeting or any adjournment of the special meeting, EDGAR Online, RR Donnelley and Merger Sub will not be permitted under Delaware law to complete the merger, and each of EDGAR Online, RR Donnelley and Merger Sub will have the right to terminate the merger agreement. Upon such termination, EDGAR Online may be required to pay RR Donnelley a termination fee.

Further, if the merger is terminated and our Board of Directors seeks another merger or business combination, stockholders cannot be certain that we will be able to find a party willing to pay an equivalent or better price than the price to be paid in the proposed merger.

Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause EDGAR Online to lose key personnel.

Our current and prospective employees may be uncertain about their future roles and relationships with EDGAR Online following the completion of the merger. This uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key management and personnel.

EDGAR Online’s executive officers and directors have certain interests in the merger different from other stockholders that may have influenced them to approve the merger agreement and merger and recommend the adoption of the merger agreement.

EDGAR Online’s directors and executive officers have interests in the transaction that are different from, and in addition to, the interests of EDGAR Online stockholders generally, including with respect to employment, indemnification, stock options and other arrangements, which may present a potential conflict of interest. Our Board of Directors, and the executive officers in making recommendations to our Board of Directors relating to the merger, was aware of these interests and considered that these interests may be different from, and in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally, among other matters, in approving the merger agreement and the merger, and in determining to recommend that our stockholders vote for adoption of the merger agreement.

 

25

---

Table of Contents

EDGAR Online will no longer exist as an independent public company following the merger and EDGAR Online’s stockholders will forego any increase in our value.

If the merger is completed, EDGAR Online will be a subsidiary of RR Donnelley and will no longer be a publicly held corporation, and our stockholders will forego any increase in our value that might have otherwise resulted from our possible growth.

 

26

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

 

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

 

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

 

27

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

a. Exhibits:

 

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.**
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.**
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.**
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.**
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.**
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.**

 

*	filed or furnished herewith, as the case may be

**	submitted electronically herewith

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit June 30, 2012, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Users of these data are advised pursuant to Rule 401 of Regulation S-T that the information contained in the XBRL documents is unaudited and these are not the official publicly filed financial statements of the Company. In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

 

28

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: August 14, 2012				EDGAR ONLINE, INC.
				By:		/s/    R OBERT J. F ARRELL
						Robert J. Farrell Chief Executive Officer and President
				By:		/s/    D AVID J. P RICE
						David J. Price Chief Financial Officer

 

29