Zoo Digital Share Discussion Threads

[scotty1] 03/5/2007 08:22

Good one macca,Now the "big boys" are into idvds you'll see a big change in
quality and quantity ( it had to happen sooner or later ;) ) They were never
going to let the small publishers get the "meat" .This is the begining and
it'll move fast now and zoo will be a part of it ;))


"We now see a step change as large publishers and Hollywood studios are entering the market with some high profile brands that will push the boundaries of interactive game play. In addition, these products will be published internationally"

[lab305] 03/5/2007 00:07

Well found macca.

[siwel100] 02/5/2007 18:13

Pierre Oreilly...Buy it, ignore it or short it, the choice is yours. So be a good lad, go and make your mind up.

[lab305] 02/5/2007 11:30

siwel-smart focus moving.

[lab305] 02/5/2007 10:17

P O if you wait for news before buying it will of course be too late.The price will instantly double again and no doubt you will say it is too high and unjustified and that you will await more news. The point is that the share was priced to go bankrupt and the rns dispelled that, hence the rise.The stock is a gamble and if they turn it round the rewards will be great.If you dont feel comfortable go and invest in the Halifax .

[artey] 02/5/2007 10:10

Sorry didnt realise it was the rest of us who were out of step.

[pierre oreilly] 02/5/2007 09:22

The point isn't about whether the loss is in the share price or not, the debate is about whether or not I, and therefore the regulatory authorities, have got my facts wrong, as has been posted.

One fact I posted was the loss about to be reported. I take it you now seem to accept that this partuicular fact is correct (against the accusation that I have my facts wrong).

I could pick another fact, but I'd prefer Sewil100 to pick a fact I psoetd which caused him to post Pierre O'Reilly...You have just about every fact wrong

If people are buying this on the basis of incoprrect intepretation of the facts (as it appears if they think I have my facts wrong), then it would probably be beneficial to them if their misinterpretations were pointed out.

[artey] 02/5/2007 09:05

Sorry B.O' the loss is already in the share price

[scotty1] 02/5/2007 09:02

But we already know about the loss Pierre.It's the forward looking statement
most will be watching,which imo will read a lot different from previous
statements.ZOO is a totally different animal now ;))

[pierre oreilly] 02/5/2007 08:58

Pierre O'Reilly...You have just about every fact wrong

could you be more specific on that statement Sewil? Which facts exactly have I got wrong? All the facts I posted were from recent RNSs and other definitive sources, so are you saying the information in those sources is wrong? If so, where do you get your supposedly correct information from?

Take one fact - Zoo are about to report a large loss at their next results. Are you saying that is incorrect?

[siwel100] 02/5/2007 08:48

No selloff from that huge volume last monday/tuesday, nice steady trading. Nice flag forming for a next step to 60p+.....all in all its very nice...:)

[macca28] 01/5/2007 17:23

went to sheffield today to watch the snooker
had a word with john parrot,
asked him what he thought of zootech?
he said it was crucible for them to win a few more contracts, ;-)

[donnydave] 01/5/2007 16:03

Pierre,
ZOO are still only around 1/2p pre-consolidation.
If you look at things from that perspective they still seem rather cheap.

[siwel100] 01/5/2007 15:58

Pierre O'Reilly...You have just about every fact wrong but if you think its to be avoided then give it a wide birth, there are thousands of other stocks, look for one you are comfortable with.

[philjeans] 01/5/2007 15:50

Pierre - intelligent post; I have been in and out of Zoo several times over past few months - presently in and holding despite your concerns, which are realistic but a shade too gloomy I think.

Try Tandem (tnd) for a good recovery prospect - have cash, no debt. big t/o and just about to report small return to profits - 2007 though will be mega! I hold - see you over there.

[pierre oreilly] 01/5/2007 15:41

It's not bearish, it's having the time to stand back in calmer times and examine/reassess the risk vs possible rewards.

[aerotus] 01/5/2007 15:34

You've suddenly gone all bearish on us. LOL!

[pierre oreilly] 01/5/2007 15:33

I have plenty of cash looking for a home, and I don't mind taking a flyer with it. At this stage, having gone through all available info, Zoo won't be one I'll consider further, unless some significant new cutomers are gained. The recent doubling of the price wasn't justified by the recent release in my opinion, so the price is now overcooked. We have a terrible mega loss yet to be reported (that's what the forecasts are now inline with!, and are post profit warning, a fact probably lost on the recent buyers), and that will take some swallowing. There will be massive cash outflow before financing, and to stand a cat in hells chance of price rocovery, this at least has to report positive cash flow. I expect the £2m cash expected will come from a payment from Disney, plus the quarter mill deferred from the give away, sorry sale, of a division. Zoo is still on the critical list and is a mega gamble, with the risk far outstripping any possible rewards (at the moment). I'll bide my time, and if a decent sale is announced, and cashflow looks like it may become positive, and losses are contained, I may reconsider. But the risk needs to be lowered somehow.

[scotty1] 01/5/2007 14:13

Yep siwel must say things unfolding in all the right places now ;)
been asking one or two questions myself again at ZOO and like
what I'm hearing,will keep them to myself as don't want to
be accused of ramping :) suffice to say none of the info is price
sensitive,but no the less I like the way the company is moving
with all the right people and infostructure now in place :)