We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zenith Energy Ltd. | LSE:ZEN | London | Ordinary Share | CA98936C8584 | COM SHS NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.14 | -6.36% | 2.06 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 121,731 | 16:35:01 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/5/2017 11:49 | ravin(lunatic is a fool...Why would anyone in their right mind say they've got someone on filter and yet wonder what they are saying, and reading others post to get the gist... Stop claiming to put posters on filter and debate it..IF YOU CAN... "Nice rise now..." Well seeing as its dropped nearly 50%, a minute rise to some will come as a mighty relief.. | grannyboy | |
08/5/2017 11:48 | FYI Don't get caught holding this pos! Andalas Energy Huge DIDSCOUNTED PLACING AT 0.05-0.06! News has reached guerrilla investing that a Huge Discounted Placing is now underway by the shysters at Andalas Energy (LON: ADL). Bucket shops are a buzz spinning and flipping out the latest ‘jackanory&rsq Dan x | daniel levi bmd | |
08/5/2017 11:41 | Nice rise now...looking promising for this week. Grab a bargain time👍㈇ | moormoney | |
08/5/2017 11:36 | Andy, Let's be grown adults here. I have read sea7 comments referring to 11smith and you then replied in line with those comments. Stop twisting words, you are well known for this on the CTAG board.The facts are there, I have not got the time to search through bb, one I have a life and two have a day job. Poster can merely go to the CTAG board and look through the last couple of months.As for the last comments, let me correct..If you are long here, why are you talking it down based on the past, under a diff name?!"Why not be real and positive about the future?!Are you short?Yes there have been delays in well results, but...The bottom line is this is a low budget workover program with great potential for a higher share valuation. Simple. | ravin146 | |
08/5/2017 11:19 | ravin46, What an incredible response, you are accusing me of being "in line" with a poster whose posts you say you cannot read! Think about it, it's a totally ridiculous statement, and factually incorrect, although you will never know that as you cannot read his posts! "As for your failure in CTAG it has been well reported on the bb. I have got the time to file through posts. CTAG is a dead duck. Fact. You can't twist that in any way." This is an outright lie, please post any proof that you can find about my "failure" in CTAG! You can't because you just made it up! "If you are long here, why talk it down based on it the past under diff name?!" Can you repeat that in English please? | andy | |
08/5/2017 11:15 | sea7, Fine, not sure what your point is then? He said there were no news releases over a three year period, you said there was lots, and I pointed out you were correct, there were lots of news releases, but only of the regulatory sort, not discoveries or acquisitionsm which I think he was referring to in his original comment. In a sense you are both right, but as investors we are looking for drill successes or prudent acquisitions to get excited about, not quarterly reports. | andy | |
08/5/2017 11:13 | Andy, I am alleging you as i have 11smith filtered and read between the line from sea7, you are in line with the responses. My opinion.As for your failure in CTAG it has been well reported on the bb. I have got the time to file through posts. CTAG is a dead duck. Fact. You can't twist that in any way.If you are long here, why talk it down based on it the past under diff name?!So are you short? | ravin146 | |
08/5/2017 11:05 | andy, My initial comments on historical news, was In response to 11smiths conversation. | sea7 | |
08/5/2017 10:56 | For the sake of a delay in drilling this price is really really low ! | oakville | |
08/5/2017 10:53 | ravin1468 May '17 - 10:40 - 1767 of 1769 0 2 "and allegedly in line with 11smith?" Exactly who is elleging this exactly? "You haven't really got a great track record investing in CTAG, which is in effect finished and is suspended indefinitely". Please tell me my buy and sell prices on CTAG? | andy | |
08/5/2017 10:52 | sea7, Well why are you discussing historical events if they have no bearing on today? You mentioned they made loads of news releases for the period under discussion, why did you do that if they "have no bearing"? I was just clarifying that the news releases you referred to were mandatory ones, not the sort that generated investor excitement. I was responding to your answer! | andy | |
08/5/2017 10:49 | ravin46, No agenda whatsoever, what's yours in asking me? | andy | |
08/5/2017 10:40 | Andy what is your agenda on talking about the past and allegedly in line with 11smith?You haven't really got a great track record investing in CTAG, which is in effect finished and is suspended indefinitely.Let us know your views. | ravin146 | |
08/5/2017 10:15 | andy, It is also cheaper to try to ensure that the amount of news releases are minimal. They have made seven news announcements since January of this year, relating to operational matters. What bearing does the historical news releases or lack of them, of over five years ago, have on todays projects. | sea7 | |
08/5/2017 10:10 | cashandcard, yes they have employed some small people, Ajerbizian little hobbit people, its thought they've taken the wrong sidetrack direction and will emerge somewhere near the Med. But the company has stated that there is no rush and the little people will be back on track..Eventually..A | grannyboy | |
08/5/2017 10:09 | sea78 May '17 - 07:48 - 1743 of 1763 0 0 Andy, Whilst there were no market sensitive news bulletins, the quarterly updates provide the detail required by the market. --- Exactly, that's my point, they were only issuing the mandatory news releases, required under Canadian market regulations, and material change reports when they issued stock for paying bills. But, there were no announcements of new projects or drill successes! | andy | |
08/5/2017 09:45 | Grannyboy, You could be onto something, they might be down the well sidetracking it by digging the 100m lateral section. That's why it taking so long ;) Cash | cashandcard | |
08/5/2017 09:41 | Cash, They will have the data on how long it took to drill the original well, so they will know what ground they will be cutting through. | sea7 | |
08/5/2017 09:37 | I'm giving them another 2-3 weeks to get this right. If they cannot complete atleast one of the workovers, it indicates to me a woeful understanding of the subsurface by company geo's and new studies and data will be needed to address this void. Cash | cashandcard | |
08/5/2017 09:35 | and you didn't get the sarcasm in my response. | sea7 | |
08/5/2017 09:35 | granny, I am looking at the timeframes of the work being done. Is it too difficult for you to understand the this type of operation is not a pick and shovel job. It is complex and takes time. Depending on what type of ground they will cut through on the actual sidetrack drilling, will decide how long it takes. If it is loosely consolidated sandstone, then a day or so, if they are drilling through much more compacted and solid material then it could be weeks to get through 80metres, case, cement and then drill 20 metres open hole. I am not the one deceiving myself, you are, by expecting instant results on a very risky and complex job. | sea7 | |
08/5/2017 09:32 | Obviously you don't get the irony/sarcasm in my post... | grannyboy | |
08/5/2017 09:30 | sea7, why do you allow yourself to be deceived... This workover on M-195 has now being going on for far too long, at least i'm blaming the oil workers for lacking experience or for being slow, but to believe the management that everything is hunky dorey is pushing it... | grannyboy | |
08/5/2017 09:30 | The fences must have needed some seriously deep foundations then, as you need to be able to dig a couple of miles down. | sea7 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions