We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xlmedia Plc | LSE:XLM | London | Ordinary Share | JE00BH6XDL31 | ORD USD0.000001 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | - | 0.00 | - |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advertising, Nec | 73.74M | -9.44M | -0.0359 | -3.41 | 32.17M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/1/2021 10:09 | Tvh123 and others, I am not too familiar with SCSW. Is it really so influential that it can move stocks? | sophia1982 | |
07/1/2021 08:59 | Nice when a plan comes together | nw99 | |
07/1/2021 08:22 | A glass of banana milkshake for me | nesquikme | |
07/1/2021 08:20 | Laggard could be just the place for cash for 2021 | nw99 | |
07/1/2021 08:13 | A chunk just went through and the spread has widened looks to be a good day coming here | john09 | |
07/1/2021 08:11 | Yes could be TVH123 | nw99 | |
06/1/2021 16:11 | Let's see if we get a similar uplift to RCH ahead of the next SCSW issue due this weekend... | tvh123 | |
06/1/2021 13:59 | Of course its different licenses for different purposes. The 2 companies exist for different purposes. Have a good one yourself | john09 | |
06/1/2021 13:58 | John09 - its two different license for two different purposes, I might be tedious but the facts are the facts. Have a great day. | oneillshaun | |
06/1/2021 13:55 | My suggestion is that given its a new year you finally move on from your failed employment stint at XL Media and look forward somewhere else | john09 | |
06/1/2021 13:54 | Shauny You’re a little tedious Xl media’s michigan license allows them to do what they do in michigan which is to operate an affiliate model in michigan i.e represent online sports betting and casinos through agreements just like they did in Scandinavia and send traffic to their sites and benefit from the wallet GMRs michigan license allows them to do what they do in michigan which is to provide slingo games direct to consumers or through their partners in michigan | john09 | |
06/1/2021 13:38 | I’m aware they are totally different businesses The direct comparison is that both have been awarded Michigan licenses as per the link i shared earlier in the week... | john09 | |
06/1/2021 13:23 | john09 - GMR is totally different business to XL media, this licence basically means that the games/content GMR produce have come up to the Michigan state standards and that GMR can now agree deals with gaming operators that have Michigan license. Really no comparison. | oneillshaun | |
06/1/2021 11:57 | It’s funny. GMR have RNSd that they got a license in Michigan. Sp up 12% XL Media got one too but havent RNSd | john09 | |
06/1/2021 10:04 | Shaun back to de-ramping . We must be about to go up | john09 | |
06/1/2021 09:13 | Anyone else think Ken Dorward forgot to add a few zeros to his recent share purchase, odd that you would only buy £1,080 in shares. | oneillshaun | |
06/1/2021 08:45 | Have they launched in Mitchigan | zingerburger | |
05/1/2021 22:34 | On the topic of the Google penalty, Stuart acknowledged in the interim financial statements that they do not get any significant feedback or clarity on the reasons for resubmissions being unsuccessful. He also acknowledged that as time passes, the domain authority on some of the original websites is eroding due to lack of traffic. This is why they have identified two sites where a joint venture partner will lead the efforts, sharing any upside and only a small number of additional sites were resubmitted in December that have been rebuilt on an open-source tech platform rather than their proprietary one. For most of the others, they are developing new high-level sites that will consolidate traffic from several former premium sites and should complete this process over the next quarter. Therefore, restatement by Google, while obviously being ideal, is no longer being regarded by management as a likely outcome and this is a much more realistic assumption. | tvh123 | |
05/1/2021 21:51 | Agree and look forward to further insightful contributions from you | scubadiverr | |
05/1/2021 19:24 | Agree with all points Bear in mind the price is 35p in terms of expectations | john09 | |
05/1/2021 19:16 | Critical with good reason, internally I am sure Stuart has performed wonders with building a structure, cost saving, building a new management team but for the last 12 months no real major European casino assets or US assets only finance sites, bingo sites and some sports sites with nothing to bet on, I want to hear about these new "content rich sites" the LATAM and the US assets the company built. He has been in full control for 12 months plus by the time the next update comes out. | oneillshaun | |
05/1/2021 16:45 | No it was a terribly worded RNS statement by Stuart when he said he expected them to be reranked last year, it should have said pray to yours gods that we can convince google to rerank them.For example casino.se was one of the highest ranked Swedish affiliate sites for years and was the absolute jewel of XL and generated millions in revenue it was all over page one of google for various key words I checked it today and it is a very dark place now no chance that will ever return to page one under XL ownership it could change if the ownership changed but no guarantee so huge risk for a new owners so they will only pay a fraction of what the company wants. | oneillshaun |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions