ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

WJA Wameja Limited

7.90
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Wameja Limited LSE:WJA London Ordinary Share AU0000053472 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 7.90 7.80 8.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Wameja Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1026 to 1049 of 1150 messages
Chat Pages: 46  45  44  43  42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
01/4/2021
14:47
I bought tremor a month ago (not the exact date or time ) and I'm up above 40...
tomv33
01/4/2021
14:20
Not likely to get the 8p any time soon. On the other hand, as smithless points out, a good 33% to be had if prepared to take the risk.
cornishman33
31/3/2021
16:56
there is an rns at 16.15 this afternoon
Full Year aidited Accounts


dont know what tomake of it - will welcome comments

ali47fish
30/3/2021
14:44
Tomv33 not sure about that. Potentially 33% return if very patient. Picked some up yesterday and today at under 6p.
smithless
24/3/2021
09:30
Not really worth holding for 8p unless you have a holding of about a million +
tomv33
23/3/2021
17:56
smithless, my understanding is that eservglobal's third party software supplier doesn't suddenly have issues. According to the Preliminary Final Report RNS (26/02/2021):-

At the date of this preliminary financial report, the directors consider there to be no present obligation or material exposure under the Indemnity on the basis that:
-- there has been no claim by the third-party software supplier against eServGlobal or Seamless arising from the non - renewal of licences, or any other matter,

i.e. it is not the third-party software provider that is complaining.

daveme
23/3/2021
13:35
Tabhair - I agree with your observations. I usually look at such situations with an open mind ie no smoke without fire. I have looked over the recent released accounts of Seamless and it mentions nothing of the issued with Wameja. Seamless is a small company and if it was material it would be mentioned. So why the delay with the audit by Wameja? The problem may be Seamless hasn't said why in detail what its claim is and without detail Wameja can't complete. It's strange why eservglobal's third party software supplier should suddenly have issues, as its been part of its mobile payment package for years without problems. IMHO either Seamless have done something and are trying to blame Wameja or a warranty claim for an ex employee of eservglobal which is suing Seamless (rebuffed by Warmeja and has no merit) has angered them to do this and delay the takeover to get compensation. The management of Wameja have nothing to gain by delaying, as all options etc were cancelled as part of the Mastercard takeover terms. Not without risk obviously, but this deal is important to Mastercard, as Homesend is an important part of its Fintech project, so still expect the deal to be done. Also the fact Richard Griffiths has £6m riding on this gives me comfort, as he not an idiot (hopefully)
smithless
23/3/2021
11:43
The claim initiated by Seamless could just be a shakedown to try and slow down the sale of Wameja to Mastercard in a cynical ploy to try and extort some extra cash.

The other alternative is that Wameja management themselves are on a go-slow and are allowing this deal to drag out in order to trigger some sort of payments to themselves.

I don't see how this claim can possibly be material. The ESG core business was sold for 2M Euro, their revenues were 7M EUR a year. Given Wameja is being sold for 97M, if Seamless were successful in their claim, the amount is going to be very small. Instead of shareholders getting 8p, perhaps we only get 7.8-7.9p after the cost of the claim is taken out.

tabhair
19/3/2021
09:01
Well why doesn't MC just complete the Wameja deal if the the potential claim is just a "pittance" ?
masurenguy
19/3/2021
08:27
That's what Wameja management stated in its prelims as of 31 Dec 2020 announced 26 Feb 2021 and the language used in its recent updates hasn't changed ie no change from 31 Dec. Against Mastercard £97m offer for WJA, the potential claim by Seamless, whatever it is, is a pittance. If you go onto the IR website for Seamless, it has changed the software Botswana Telecoms used when it bought the client list off eservglobal to its own ERS 360 solution. Quote from Seamless CEO 30/9/2020 on the back of Botswana order. The order comes from one of the customers at eServGlobal and is a testament to the trust the customer has in us when they go from an older platform to our flagship product, ERS 360 °. The migration enables the operator to improve its operational performance," says Tommy Eriksson, CEO of SDS. I think Wameja is being mucked around, for what purpose i have no idea.
smithless
18/3/2021
19:45
So your saying That Seamless has not even said the reason for their claim?.
johnv
18/3/2021
14:11
Bid may fail and in which case administration will come

Be cheaper for Mastercard to buy off administrators with no liability

middlesboroughfc
18/3/2021
11:31
Forget my previous comment above was looking at Woodbois
which is next to wamega on my monitor.[IDIOT]

victor2
18/3/2021
09:35
Difficult to do the audit when Seamless has 'not particularised the basis upon which it believes that there is a potential claim under the Indemnity'. As said, frustrating and I'm sure Wameja management have through its lawyers have given them a time period to state the potential claim or stop the claim.
Taken from 26 Feb 2021 RNS prelims re Seamless potential claim.

At the date of this preliminary financial report, the directors consider there to be no present obligation or material exposure under the Indemnity on the basis that:



· there has been no claim by the third-party software supplier against eServGlobal or Seamless arising from the non - renewal of licences, or any other matter, and



· Seamless has not particularised the basis upon which it believes that there is a potential claim under the Indemnity.

smithless
18/3/2021
09:25
Id like to know who sold all those millions yesterday there should
be a stewards inquiry.

victor2
18/3/2021
08:55
At this rate we should buy more
tomv33
18/3/2021
07:59
How frustrating. The sale of the business to Seamless was only for a total consideration of 2m euros!! If you read Seamless reports and accounts they have made great claims about the returns it has made from eServGlobal clients that came with the acquisition. The whole potential indemnity claim, if it has any substance, must only come to a couple of 100,000 euro's!!! The wait continues.
smithless
18/3/2021
07:27
Taking their time, not sure how long an audit should last. Business seems to be doing well as they have expanded the capital requirement.
dr biotech
18/3/2021
07:05
Further delay ! ☹
masurenguy
26/2/2021
16:13
any comment about the rsn today- why is the format different?
ali47fish
26/2/2021
06:54
https://www2.asx.com.au/markets/company/WJA
johnv
26/2/2021
06:51
Final year report is out on Aussie stock market.
johnv
22/2/2021
19:54
Ali - as Dr Biotech says, probably won't make too much difference - all depends how large their positions are.
largeronald
22/2/2021
19:42
I though I would mention as it was most probably the reason for today's drop. There is about 30 companies on the UK markets affected, the other 1000s of so are most probably in the US.
johnv
Chat Pages: 46  45  44  43  42  41  40  39  38  37  36  35  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock