We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00775 | 7.16% | 0.116 | 0.107 | 0.125 | 0.12 | 0.107 | 0.11 | 21,337,592 | 16:35:12 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 11.64M | -8.07M | -0.0244 | -0.05 | 396.94k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/9/2021 14:01 | Scurrilous rumour that Lansted and the Government are thinking of completely bypassing VRS and transferring the money directly into the BOD's bank accounts. I cannot vouch for the veracity of the rumour but it would make sense. | kemche | |
01/9/2021 13:58 | Philby After "salesman know thy product" and Always Be Closing, I'd like to think that even a self-confessed engineer such as Mr Ricketts would know to sell benefits rather than features, wouldn't you? | pandar | |
01/9/2021 13:04 | Interesting approach to road repair. Would graphene enhance the material ? | serratia | |
01/9/2021 13:03 | On the subject of Chutney Sloppy .. while I was in Sainsbury's cafe waiting for breakfast, I knocked up the Fish Sloppy that Jonny suggested. My companion asked what I was doing, when I showed her she said: 'When are you going to leave those poor men alone? | yombo araka | |
01/9/2021 12:59 | Last week Roger's shoddy Terminator Rabbit received more up ticks than Boochy's much superior Terminator Wombat. Now it seems that Sparky's lazy, automated images have received more ticks than my beautifully hand crafted Chutney Sloppy. It's a sad day when people prefer cheap gimmicks to genuine works of art 😶 | yombo araka | |
01/9/2021 12:54 | Directaplus. I know it's unfashionable but they sold the benefits of their graphene rather than talked about the features as NR and so many do on this post. The connecting words between features and benefits are "which means that". In this case which means that we will add 10% to the cost of your resurfacing but you will get 50% increase in durability. It's the first page of the sales manual but still works. | philbyk144 | |
01/9/2021 12:46 | Laginaneil, Of course it's REACH certified and one would imagine meets the specification required by the contractor. That would be good practice wouldn't you think? | gicater | |
01/9/2021 12:41 | Took me all of 30 secs, can't take any pride in this whatsoever 😐 | yombo araka | |
01/9/2021 12:30 | Hello Gicater, Reference: '..using graphene by Iterchimica in Italy..' Do we know anything about the quality of the graphene, is it REACH certified what specification does it meet? Wonder who's graphene is used in the oxfordshire trial... Remember if it's not 'good' graphene it may not provide the full benefits. | laginaneil | |
01/9/2021 12:26 | It wasn't a 'challenge' Sparky I merely asked for suggestions as what to do next with the Sloppy image. As for your contributions: 1. I created the Bristol Bus image in the first place. 2. I posted similar animated/singing clips (featuring Fest/Slop) using Wombo weeks ago. Do your research before you start issuing risible challenges mollusc .. NB: All my recent work has been done 'by hand' using a phone and online tools, apart from selecting the base image Wombo/Reface does the work for you. | yombo araka | |
01/9/2021 12:20 | I wonder if it's a 2 year trial - you'd think they would want at least 8 seasons to show how it holds up in different weather etc. hxxps://www.theconst | gicater | |
01/9/2021 12:16 | Top drawer 👍 | jonnysquare | |
01/9/2021 11:56 | Cotswold Sparky just knocked the ball out of the park and possibly the Earth's gravitational pull. | eel tamer | |
01/9/2021 11:37 | Does any live near Curbridge in Oxfordshire. They resurfaced 800 yards of the high street with graphene infused asphalt at the end of 2019. It would great to know how that is holding up? | philbyk144 | |
01/9/2021 11:36 | Come on, Yombo, you could do much better...challenge accepted CS | cotswoldsparky | |
01/9/2021 11:26 | Regarding road resurfacing, there should be interesting information coming soon from the trials using graphene by Iterchimica in Italy and for Highways England. Obviously for something like roads, lengthy trials are required, given the huge costs of road resurfacing and ensuing traffic disruption. | gicater | |
01/9/2021 11:03 | How about a large fish? | jonnysquare | |
01/9/2021 11:02 | I can't keep this going by myself lads, come on return the ball now and then 😶 | yombo araka | |
01/9/2021 10:39 | Flatcoat, your comment is extremely short-sighted and totally misses the point. The key reason potholes don't get filled quickly, is because they don't tend to get reported until the holes are quite large and therefore the costs to repair hundreds of them are excessive for council's with stretched budgets. The benefits of graphene infused tarmac are as follows: 1) The graphene tarmac equivalent will be far more hardwearing, so potholes will be far less prevalent (less maintenance vehicles, fuel, workers, materials, etc). The cost savings would be significant. 2) Only minimal degradation would create warning messages to centralised maintenance locations to notify that repairs are required before any significant damage is done, so very low cost repairs could be conducted by single persons or small teams (depending on minimum H&S requirements) in multiple local areas very quickly, preventing any significant repairs ever being required 3) Cost savings via fewer and quicker repairs can be used to relay more roads with enhanced tarmac, creating a virtuous circle. Future cost savings are only prevented if initial investment is are not committed to roll out the new tarmac materials as a default choice up front by local authorities. That will only happen if the new tarmac costs are prohibitive compared to existing material costs. | schmally | |
01/9/2021 10:18 | And a great job he’s doing of that. | dil 21 | |
01/9/2021 10:09 | Sloppy either about to embrace or 'shoo' away the pink chap (probably the latter as he's a nasty c*nt) ? | yombo araka |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions