Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[richgrumpa] 17/7/2020 08:18

Pentecost/ Tom / whoever you are, you have never supported this company. Stop your irritating posts please. We wouldn't want some unsuspecting visitor here to get the impression that you are in any way genuine...

[grabster] 17/7/2020 08:09

Just a reminder for those casually dismissing "the world's largest network of graphene researchers and commercial professionals" as insignificant:



and

[pentacosttempleton] 17/7/2020 07:47

Roger while I agree there are reports of other big companies like Huawei buying non-verified graphene.

As I keep saying here I'd very much like to see Neill explain this especially after the failure to get a China deal over the line.

I continue to back this great British company but we clearly need more of an explanation as to what is going on.

[adejuk] 17/7/2020 07:12

correct andy

[alchemy] 17/7/2020 05:51

What RtG is saying is anything but VRS is flakey.

[andy] 17/7/2020 00:33

adejuk16 Jul '20 - 19:13 - 106032 of 106039

andy
on the offer

---


Surely you value your stocks on the bid?


The value of anything is what you can sell it for.

[rogerthegrouch] 16/7/2020 22:57

Verification is an absolute must for companies like Aecom before it would be considered into an industrial product like the CNCT Arch. These are the waters Versarien are fishing in with success. They are targeting sustainable and scalable revenue with huge companies that require such verification. Rolls and Airbus are 2 more examples that had strict tender requirements.

Standards need to evolve and will do. Councils verification was the first step, there will be many more standards created which I expect Versarien to sail through. Helps that Denis it’s deeply involved in the process too

[harvey26311] 16/7/2020 22:04

Alot of people pixxed off here and they have the right to say so as the share price isn't looking look. People will big up vrs to recuperate but the share price doesn't lie. Neil might be a nice guy but look where we are. Lack of news. Are we moving forward? Gla

[forestfred] 16/7/2020 21:42

Lots of collaborations were still very much in the game .
Not aware of any reputable graphene companies flying at the moment the market is still evolving trying to get it into commercial products .
For me it will happen if and when it’s meant to .

No amount of slating the company is going to change the outcome .
Ff

[shoelaces] 16/7/2020 21:21

I would love for someone to change my mind but for the realists out there, we need to be asking questions of those who keep banging the same drum. I'll get us started with a few things I'd like to understand if I'm to take this badge of honour seriously. Has anybody else gone through the process? If so, why did they fail? If not, why haven't they bothered? What is the councils benchmark for VERIFICATION considering a single product hasn't reached commercialisation just yet? How much did NR and VRS pay for this independent verification?

[shoelaces] 16/7/2020 21:04

I'm tired of the purists rolling out the 'verified Graphene' line in every other post. It's evidently meaningless. It holds no water with me.After about 18 months of absolutely tripe, I'm sick of NR.Let's hope new additions to the team will affect actual change and commercial deals.Not Mickey Mouse rubber stamps from a 'council' that has absolutely no standing in the industry and that have done NOTHING to further the cause of their one and only verified golden child.

[66sequoia] 16/7/2020 19:53

hTTps://twitter.com/GrapheneCouncil/status/1283830384912932865?s=09 ......link contains 2 you tube videos, I am not sure if VRS are involved in these, I have not had time to watch but there is bound to be a chance to learn more about Graphene.

[pentacosttempleton] 16/7/2020 19:47

Yes SoldierBoy but they are not selling The Graphene Council verified graphene. Versarien have had their process independently verified to show Nanene is what Versarien say it is.

I know which product I would choose to buy.

[adejuk] 16/7/2020 19:13

andy
on the offer
not the bid

[andy] 16/7/2020 18:05

adejuk,


I make it the fourth consecutive day it has closed below 40p.

[1teepee] 16/7/2020 17:34

Hopefully it's not like when we were told to expect an update every other time.

[cheek212] 16/7/2020 17:21

The last RNS re the loan stated that more information would be announced upon completion of the security - I am guessing this has yet to be finalised as no more info yet announced. Depending on what security is taken, they will need to agree a Deed of priority with Santander which in my experience always delays the security because the hIgh street banks are sh&t, and extremely slow at agreeing legal docs. All depends with Innovate want a debenture though. If they are taking a specific charge over the new machinery then they will need a deed of partial release from Santander which will be as equally painful i expect. All in all, I would hope this is done within a month though even with Covid delays - should normally only take 2-3 weeks.

[1teepee] 16/7/2020 17:17

Supposedly validated with the mas agreement as well

[adejuk] 16/7/2020 16:50

as far as i can recall, this is the first time in the current decline that we have fallen below 40p at eod
this is not a good signal even during a small market pullback
it really is time for the bod to do something to close some deals and issue a positive rns.
the business model, which i thought was proven with the announcement of the china deal, is still contingent.

[laginaneil] 16/7/2020 15:56

Hello Folks,

Just notice on Bloomberg TV some news about Greentown Labs, the place Steve

went to this year.

Here is link on line



Could VRS get in the mix anyway here with Graphene?

If BB block you try:

[mavfav] 16/7/2020 13:45

New China wants to drive innovation more than the US so will look to advancing quicker and harder. Our product will undoubtedly help that Also could you imagine our product being used to make products better that we couldn't use.....I know nooothing

[mavfav] 16/7/2020 13:43

Mr Squire my personal thoughts are the country needs something to help kickstart the economy but I also think that there needs to be a balancing act. I totally get why China would want to create that law given the unlawfulness and destruction of protests. The demand for quality Graphene doesn't stop just because huawei must be removed in 2027 (note even if trump won this time that's after he's gone). There will be some serious making up in that time as well and building bridges. Innovation does not stop but it finds a way. That way will come to fruition as well and I've no doubt that come it's 100% BVT owned that will become apparent The world will realise the new norm and innovation will help provide that. Take construction for example. If you noted on there videos their building site could be controlled by 4-5 people compared to a 200 strong workforce. I'm pretty sure and building company sees that as an attractive propositionThat's just one example but microbiology has no doubt advanced in this time too. Then take a look at MAS and think I'm sure they will be seeing this as an opportunity as well. Transport systems are changing too. They need extra capacity now to enable the back to work even tho it may be a different format than before. Innovation drives drives change and sometimes change drives innovation but one this for sure and that's if you don't innovate you fall behind. America really has to step up to the plate as they are falling behind and I look forward to hearing what's going on there. I know we have the bottle to drive innovation too I know nooothing

[alchemy] 16/7/2020 11:52

The mid price is a smidgeon Red.Volume is low.I'm looking fir the zoom too, but it isn't to be seen in today's trades as yet.