We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Versarien Plc | LSE:VRS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B8YZTJ80 | ORD 0.01P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.00025 | -0.24% | 0.106 | 0.103 | 0.109 | 0.11 | 0.102 | 0.11 | 5,589,307 | 16:35:08 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals & Chem Preps, Nec | 11.64M | -8.07M | -0.0244 | -0.04 | 330.78k |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/5/2017 14:03 | It would be reassuring to believe 'we' were the only researchers/distribu (research from 2008 onwards) However, I'm not clued-up on worldwide patents. | axotyl | |
16/5/2017 13:35 | Is RODGERBRIDGE giving us all "insider" information? | anley | |
16/5/2017 13:24 | Roger - that is positive news - I can see Novalia doing great things & they are up & selling! - Can you provide a link that confirms Novalia & all others buy the ink from VRS & that we have exclusivity re its sale, use and distribution worldwide? - If it is indeed the cheapest & easiest produced ( and best?) then things do look rosy Handy - I want to be a "we" on the bull side of this stock - But have to check it out - Maybe jumped the gun a little as you state.... | pcjoe | |
16/5/2017 12:51 | handygandhi. We sell the ink to Novalia and others. Nokia have purchased a large amount that has been delivered. | rogerbridge | |
16/5/2017 11:53 | BBC Radio 4 this morning, prog. on Carbon, Graphene discussed about 12 mins in: by Univ. Manchester researcher. Nothing too exciting. | axotyl | |
16/5/2017 11:46 | pcjoe "So is the Ink ours? - Do we sell to Novalia or others?" As a non-shareholder "ours" and "we" are an odd choice of words. | handygandhi | |
16/5/2017 10:54 | One of the most promising ink formulations is conductive inks - and worth keeping a beady eye on this bearing in mind its potential :- The relationship between Cambridge Graphene, Versarien and Novalia is in the last paragraph. | vasilis | |
16/5/2017 10:52 | Just search the thread pcjoe, 'placing' should bring up a plethora of information as will 'cheap' and 'novalia'. | luckyorange | |
16/5/2017 10:27 | HI SG - Hows it Goin? - Been following VRS recently on your heads up - it looks very interesting but a bit to go yet for me yet re having confidence to invest The ink looks like their ace in the hole but currently only surviving 10 washes in the hotpoint or so re their clothing/textile idea it seems, so possibly not quite ready yet for that application I see this other lot are using the Ink also - - & actually selling some pretty neat toys from their online shop already - So is the Ink ours? - Do we sell to Novalia or others? - If we only have a license to use then what are the restrictions to use? (presumably we cant compete with Novalia etc) I have fired out these & few other questions to Cambridge Graphene Ltd Starting from scratch here but recognising potential - My major concern - The CEO is embarked on a whistle stop tour promoting the CO. when firm heavyweight contracts still up in the air - Just trying to boost share price for a placing? - Also if the ink is such a shoe in for success , then how did Versarien pick it up so cheap? - the price paid seems like peanuts for a potential world beater | pcjoe | |
16/5/2017 10:14 | Thanks Abergele. For the record I feel the same way. | shavian | |
16/5/2017 10:07 | Going by what has happened at HUR (25 million warrants £0.01) I can only say how happy I am to have a CEO and CFO who believe in capital growth and as little dilution of shareholder funds as possible as they strive to grow VSR into a major player in the graphene market. | phoenixs | |
16/5/2017 09:48 | Hello Phoenixs,,,I was unaware of the above from you as I did delete that post at the same time,on the virtues of not raking up the past,it's bad enough with the news people,,all done,let it drop now eh... | abergele | |
16/5/2017 09:43 | abergele, We all have our views about many happenings in this world and I do not disagree with you for one moment about that thankfully dead person, but lets get back to what this thread has been about which is VRS. No offence intended to anyone. | phoenixs | |
16/5/2017 09:30 | For those that struggle with charts, here is a good visual chart set up, where it says SINDU type in VRS.L and it will load up when you press update. Nothing is guaranteed of course but you can see where the price has 'bounced' off the 50 day moving average and the MACD is on the point of turning up. There are plenty of other options for you to play with but as a visual reference it is a good chart and looking positive. | luckyorange | |
16/5/2017 09:18 | This is surreal. | axotyl | |
16/5/2017 09:09 | Shavian I am so sorry you believe it is politics.. it was plain murder and sadism.. where is it a political view there mate..I shall delete what I wrote last night if the owner of this thread wishes me to... | abergele | |
16/5/2017 07:53 | abergele Our thoughts are aligned on that topic I have a deep dislike for those that cause misery for others. Piers Morgan put it well and typically didn't hold back on his opinion of such scum. | superg1 | |
16/5/2017 00:20 | Not here please Abergele. Please take your politics elsewhere. | shavian | |
15/5/2017 23:13 | superg1,great write ups and info a always....I've been reading up many of the back posts of yours to date of now, post deleted,ongrounds I don't want to rake up thoughts of that evil Brady...good luck all shareholders,,thanks Superg1.. | abergele | |
15/5/2017 22:01 | Cambridge Nano looks good NOT. It got a mention on Cambridge day but it has an issue with lateral sizes of the GNPs. No need to worry about that though as two directors resigned this month and it looks like they have near £10 million of debt. | superg1 | |
15/5/2017 21:18 | No I wasn't there but felt as if I was listening to the vox markets podcast, Neill said everything that you guys reported back plus I felt a little bit more because every week seems to move it on and fire him up just a little bit more. | luckyorange | |
15/5/2017 21:07 | Just mooching about looking at the ADVFN free BB list and it seems to me considering the supposed number of subscribers and the amount of companies available that very few post in recent times. The highly busy BBs of a year or two ago seem to have slipped into the ether. Perhaps a sign that ADVFN will do the same as time goes on. | superg1 | |
15/5/2017 18:15 | Were you there Lucky as that is one line he did say. Something like "We are very busy so let us get on with it" Neill and Chris helped take one company from £18 mill to £75 mill revenue. They know what they are doing. | superg1 | |
15/5/2017 17:49 | There was a lot I was going to say but better not, except for this, NR has a very big interest in this company, has built it up (with help) from two blokes in a garage, has past experience of being a director, has worked in F1, has many many contacts and probably doesn't need the advice given on a bb (however well meaning). Let him get on with it and see where it takes us, somewhere pretty good I suspect, just a little patience required for goodness sake! | luckyorange | |
15/5/2017 16:42 | They got the understanding of the team right hence I suspect they were there. A guy from Cantor Fitzgerald was there too. I'm doing the middle ground as few understand the sector and there were some that didn't know a lot about VRS or graphene. It is true that some have high costs but equally there may have been an assumption with high graphene prices achieved that it has high costs to produce it. Obviously I'm talking about a continuous production process driven by demand not a few guys costing £30k each per year with sales of grams. | superg1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions