We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verditek Plc | LSE:VDTK | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BF2C0424 | ORD GBP0.0004 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.13 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 509k | -1.87M | -0.0034 | -22.79 | 42.99M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
18/9/2020 18:51 | I'm not being controversial.I genuinely have seen many instances where a company will come out and quash damaging rumours.Companies are required to monitor these bulletin boards too, so they will be aware of the aspirations being cast regarding their ownership of patents and IP. | festario | |
18/9/2020 18:40 | Come on Festario, you're better than this. | 32campomar | |
18/9/2020 18:07 | Well there's a big difference between being 'required to respond to rumours', which is what you suggested,which is an absolute nonsense, as it's just not true ,and issuing any updates that require a RNS. Sometimes companies respond to articles in a paper, digital or otherwise , eg take over rumours etc but companies sure ain't going to issue RNS out every time some fruit loop posts some rubbish on the BB. | astralvision | |
18/9/2020 18:02 | Well, actually, I don't.Over the years of investing in GVC and IOF, they have had to issue RNS's about social media speculation on several occasions.Takeover rumours, key staff leaving etc.... if the rumour is TRUE, the Nomad advises the company, who are required to clarify it and state the fact. | festario | |
18/9/2020 17:06 | So why don't you or he ask the company? Why keep Spreading this stuff day in, day out? I would genuinely like to know that and why my question is never answered. I think most sensible people on here know the answer to that. | 32campomar | |
18/9/2020 16:50 | It depends whether you consider what SuperG has raised to constitute social media speculation?Because the company are required to respond to such rumours, especially if it may impact the share price or cause a disorderly market.I'm not sure about the latter, but the share price has certainly come under pressure since his claims.If I was still a shareholder here, I would want the company to come out and clarify this matter. | festario | |
18/9/2020 16:40 | Campomar is correct.If you think a company should respond every time some fruit loop posts up some nonsense, where would it end?As in , oh, they've not responded, must be true then.Best ignored. | astralvision | |
18/9/2020 15:10 | It's got nothing to do with confirmation bias. Do you honestly think the CEO and directors will get involved with some fruit cake on a platform like ADVFN? I repeat the same question. If he is that concerned then why hasn't he directly contacted the company? Because he knows what he is saying is defamatory with a sole aim of unsettling the share price. As a poster said yesterday it's a tactic employed by climate deniers to muddy the waters and spread doubt when there is none | 32campomar | |
18/9/2020 14:55 | Fair play to you rovi70I would ask fellow VDTK thread users not to trash other threads please.We can be better than that! | astralvision | |
18/9/2020 14:49 | Super g string trashed this thread. I also know you are also one of his pet sheep he let out for the day | 1teepee | |
18/9/2020 14:46 | 32campomar 18 Sep '20 - 14:13 - 2488 of 2489 The company would not be "lowering themselves" as you put it, they would be dispelling any doubt that their integrity is 100% intact. Surely that is the first thing to consider when looking to invest in any company? As a shareholder (which I assume you are)you should forensically analyse every and any potential risk to your capital. Confirmation bias behaviour is easy to slip into. I have learned this the hard way. | monts12 | |
18/9/2020 14:40 | Sorry to all, astralvision A member of this group trashed the VRS thread with Three 3 times the amount, have just returned from a long walk and I came back into this thread so as to delete my post. | rovi70 | |
18/9/2020 14:37 | I have also just added. | weyweyumfozo | |
18/9/2020 14:24 | Hi campomarAgree with you, frustrating that someone can just trash the thread.Think advfn should re think their 'blue users' policy.Ultimately it won't make any difference to VDTK. I've added more. | astralvision | |
18/9/2020 13:49 | Obviously Astralvision the frustration is aimed at one poster only having ruined the thread. He's filtered now. | 32campomar | |
18/9/2020 12:57 | Ok fair enough, think I'll take myself off here for a bit it's just a waste of time reading the same bullshi* over and over | 32campomar | |
18/9/2020 12:54 | Google pc plod and try not to laugh, it's got him to a t. !! | arab3 | |
18/9/2020 12:48 | I think the time has come for RR to deliver. Its the only way to respond. | rogerramjett | |
18/9/2020 12:44 | Astral vision, I think the time has come to moderate his posts - enough is enough. | 32campomar |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions