We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valirx Plc | LSE:VAL | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BLH13C52 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 3.45 | 3.40 | 3.50 | 3.45 | 3.45 | 3.45 | 29,524 | 07:40:09 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical Laboratories | 0 | -2.37M | -0.0262 | -1.32 | 3.11M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
29/9/2023 11:24 | 1. They initially agreed to 6 new evaluations more than a year ago and delivered none and significant time lost as a result. Now they propose 4. 2. There can only be a material update on 201 as she is trying to spin this out to end of year. Get the placing done in the meantime then pull the plug on ThX. It makes perfect commercial sense, last thing she needs is to crash the share price pre placement 3. There is at least two years more work or more on both CLX and 301 in the meantime the cash burn continues which needs funding. 4. The Q&A was like a pre placing promotional video to me, carefully staged but go off what they deliver not what they say | porky9 | |
29/9/2023 07:44 | To be fair Suzy did say there is no thing as a certainty with 201. So to say it is a done deal is misleading to say the least. I anticipate we will get some significant information on the progress before years end. I am guessing what has taken so long and why THX are the best option is because of the limited data and only 12 subjects that was gathered and a lot of additional work needs to be done. Some are being overly cynical and some are genuinely not viewing this with any sense or reason! My advice is check the facts for yourself. I also thought the Q&A was exceptionally good and covered a lot of SH concerns. | ben gibbons | |
29/9/2023 07:24 | Well l thought the Q&A was excellent and good to see we will have a significant update on THX so was not dead as many thought. The proof is in the pudding and a good flurry of buyers yesterday that we're happy with the news.THX comes in then no placing next year.4 new IP every year, lab operational and still the cherry on the cake which is the legacy IP, particularly 201 and 301.CTX looks super exciting so no VAL certainly not a one trick pony! | wulber | |
28/9/2023 17:01 | No problem :-) | ben gibbons | |
28/9/2023 16:55 | “We are expecting significant updates from them (TheoremRx) before year end “ “We have every indication we that we will be able to put out a substantial update before the end of the year” I didn’t expect this level of confidence in a Q&A TBH. Not after 2 years and failed deadlines. Now they absolutely must deliver by year end, no ifs, buts or maybes. Otherwise it’s p45 time for the bod. | siliconmark | |
28/9/2023 14:12 | https://www.brrmedia | ben gibbons | |
28/9/2023 14:10 | Have you got a link to the Q&A BG? | carlisle44 | |
28/9/2023 13:17 | Decent Q&ANear certainty of TRX completing is stretching it a bit according to Suzy.Placing still very probable.They certainly seem to be listening to the discussions on the forums.Fair play to them they are being very transparent.No conspiracy theories going on here.Listen to the organ grinder not the monkeys. | ben gibbons | |
28/9/2023 07:52 | What’s the difference between shield therapeutics and valirx? Nothing. They both have issues with insider trading. lol 😂.👇 | jasonpugh | |
28/9/2023 07:35 | Another jam tomorrow RNS. Make that number 169 RNS’s over the past 12 years of jam tomorrow. Surely it falls again today on the back of that nonsense RNS. Heads should role. | francoismyname | |
27/9/2023 08:41 | Reality setting in . | francoismyname | |
27/9/2023 06:55 | There are many complicated answers to lifes big questions my friend but Google knows the answer to everyone of them. | ben gibbons | |
26/9/2023 23:10 | I think you have cracked it Ben And there was me and i just thought "what is the answer to life the universe and everything else" was simply 42 Google confirmed same..... but clearly its more complex than that... take care | porky9 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions