ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

TRIN Trinity Exploration & Production Plc

38.20
-1.30 (-3.29%)
19 Apr 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Trinity Exploration & Production Plc LSE:TRIN London Ordinary Share GB00BN7CJ686 ORD USD0.01
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.30 -3.29% 38.20 39.00 40.00 39.50 39.50 39.50 97,963 16:35:22
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Trinity Exploration & Pr... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 11376 to 11399 of 29825 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  461  460  459  458  457  456  455  454  453  452  451  450  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
17/7/2018
10:30
I have been told the Share centre is yet to allocate and return money (family member uses them).

This good will gesture is turning into a complete mess. I presume it was done to prevent people saying this was a heavily discounted placing to benefit management and insiders (yesterday’s RNS closed that off for me). However we are still having people saying that and few are happy with their allocations. So we are worse off than had it all be closed and done and dusted a few days after the announcement. I personally think we would have barely dipped below 20p and by now would have it well behind us.

mark10101
17/7/2018
09:08
ii say delays but will get shares before the 20th!!??? Crazy - why only them
otemple3
17/7/2018
09:00
Its not peculiar its absolutely ridiculous.
dunderheed
17/7/2018
08:51
Just for the records: Interactive Investors have not delivered the shares yet :) it starts to look even more peculiar.
acsatix
17/7/2018
07:49
It's just a full stop lol.
dunderheed
17/7/2018
07:29
The pinball post to which you refer, Dunderheed, is not showing on my screen
mesquida
17/7/2018
07:18
Correct-without the Fundraise,the capex programme would have been under a bit of pressure in my view.We can debate the timing but the fact is the company is now very well positioned, debt free and plenty of cashflow.I would rather raise money on the front foot which is what the BOD have done.
pinkfoot2
17/7/2018
07:16
I do find your posts exceptionally informative pieball, this mornings another very good example.
dunderheed
17/7/2018
06:44
They messed up. The share price had hit 27p this year, on the Friday OPEC had announced their increase and oil stocks including TRIN were rising. TRIN was heading upwards to 21p and would have risen to 27p as other oil stocks the following week rose.The dilution was excessive, they should have waited and raised money at 30p+.All they have done is put a cap on things and underplayed their currency (share price). Very poor.
che7win
16/7/2018
22:06
It depends how you look at it.

Without an intensive capex program, Trinity had enough cash in the bank to pay off the debt.

However, if you say that cash is bank is committed to capex, then Trinity did not have enough money to pay off the debt.

The latter sounds bogus because there's been no heads up prior to placing of any such commitment.

But Ive thought about all this, and I do believe that this continuous drilling program is actually such a good idea that it is critical to commit to it now and not faff around doing a drill here and there. Particularly as it doesn't sound like they had the cash to buy the 3D seismic study and get on with horizontal drilling.

Even better if there's a decent aquisition they can do with the cash raised.

whiskeyinthejar
16/7/2018
21:35
I’ve read the presentation again and it’s very clear this fundraise was about cleansing the balance sheet and pushing on with a new drill programme-and have a nice buffer in the balance sheet.Fees in high side but not massive.

I doubt a rights issue would have facilitated this without the same discount

pinkfoot2
16/7/2018
20:55
Pinkfoot2, obviously we needed to sort out the convertibles and thus limit the dilution, but surely the convertibles could have been paid off out of operational cash flow. What we now have is a significant dilution ( admittedly not as severe as would have been the case if the convertibles had converted on the original terms ) but perhaps more worrying is that we have a total loss of goodwill in the minds of many private investors in the Company, and that loss of goodwill might take quite some time to repair. But I do not blame the Company, rather I blame the brokers and the Stock Exchange for allowing the whole fund raising process for small companies to so spectacularly fail the private investor.
mesquida
16/7/2018
17:51
Not being difficult-just giving my view which is very positive.I have learned many times to learn from history but not the and reinvent it-better to look forward and this is no different.The same goes for AAOG where the BOD have or I hope have learned from their errors.

Good luck all

pinkfoot2
16/7/2018
16:38
Last operational update was 16.04 on 7am. When do you think we will hear about current operations ? If followed that logic it should have been today morning.
diseasex
16/7/2018
14:14
pinkfoot...I see you are determined to continue with pushing your view which has been discussed and put to bed by most posters on this board. I have been around long enough to know about the "naughty convertables" thank you and of course the balance sheet is much more robust...my hard earned has gone into help making it so. I do not intend to pursue our one to one any more so I say politely thank you for your view and give you my regards.
marvelman
16/7/2018
13:57
for the records: the company raides 20 m and paid 1.4 m in fees... so 7% went to the arrangers..

hardly peanuts... a ights issue would probably run this this ballpark or less as it is a rather straightforward process rather than this cumbersome two stages placement one of which was requiring same effort as a rights issue for just 2m usd (I think it paid for the fees in fact, as probaly it costed quite alot to run itself... totally idiotic if you hear me)

acsatix
16/7/2018
12:43
Would you rather they left those naughty convertibles in play at 6p per share which were due to convert in 2019?

The balance sheet is much more robust after a general tidy up

pinkfoot2
16/7/2018
12:28
Rather a fortune in fees than 28% of my holding wiped out overnight Pinkfoot. You have your view on this although it does appear to be at odds with most posters here but you do have a view and that's your prerogative.
marvelman
16/7/2018
12:28
I am still waiting on iii, when I chased this morning they said that they were still waiting to hear on their allocation from Trinity
nafafa
16/7/2018
12:16
As part of the Placing presentation-the BOD did do a limited open offer to give all the chance but a full blown rights issue would have cost a fortune in fees.

I have to say they presented extremely well and the plan is very robust.

pinkfoot2
16/7/2018
11:51
pinkfoot, glad you got a large chunk some of us got next to nothing! when did you quiz them on it?
archie61
16/7/2018
11:37
I know why the raised the cash-i quizzed them on it and am happy enough.We are now well funded and absolutely going forwards so relax
pinkfoot2
16/7/2018
11:26
BODs will always be insiders. Here at least they have skin in the game and have also suffered.

But I get your comments wwick / marvel...

melody9999
16/7/2018
11:21
...they do unfortunately, Pinkfoot but we were hoping these were different. I doubt whether many would ever "get behind" this BOD after the debacle suffered by most PI's. However, it is certainly time to draw a line under this event and wait to recover our investment with hopefully a premium to it.
marvelman
Chat Pages: Latest  461  460  459  458  457  456  455  454  453  452  451  450  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock