Totally Share Discussion Threads

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:25

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:24

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:23

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:22

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[football] 21/6/2021 21:22

oh dear that doesn't sound good unless your a no win no fee lawyer



Don’t do it


Call Handler (Former Employee) - Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear - 8 June 2021
I was warned about this job before taking it and looked past it, giving it a chance. Worst mistake ever. Myself and almost every other colleague I trained alongside experienced a massive decline in our mental state due to the draining nature of the role alongside the low morale and non-existent management. Calls can be emotionally damaging for a non-clinical member of staff. You are not told who to report to, leaving it difficult to ask for help when needed. You are constantly watched and monitored, with your every move being criticised. Calls are intense and literally back to back. On one occasion I had an unconscious patient on the line and we were understaffed so I was told to end the call and say a nurse would call back. Reviews and feedback on your performance are not given unless you keep at the managers and even then they criticise but offer no help to better your ability leaving you to doubt yourself and have little to no confidence. I wish I had listened to an ex-call handler when they advised me not to take the job. It was detrimental to my health.
Pros
Pay is ok but not worth it
Cons
Very short breaks, no performance reviews, calls way too intense for someone not a medical professional

[thordon] 21/6/2021 21:20

just reads dribble , but then some will read and sell.

The art of making share price fall is sad and the seller my not be a person that reads RNS as we do.

anyway never thought go this low so will be buying more

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:16

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:15

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:15

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 21:13

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 21:06 - 9913 of 9913
0 0 1
Ralph,

That's probably why CEO sold 1/3 of his holding in Dec. He knew he wouldn't be able to sell any for 90 days after the IPO.


90 days only takes up to Sept, which is when H1 results are normally due. Given H1 end is end of this month, majority of the 90 day period was a closed period anyway.

;-)

[sikhthetech] 21/6/2021 21:07

Happens every time results are due....

Best ignore them.

if you're interested:

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:33

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:33

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:32

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:31

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:31

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 20:30

BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:21 - 9886 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
If you say so John.
BARKBOO21 Jun '21 - 17:26 - 9887 of 9905 Edit
0 0 0
Up 2% on the Nasdaq - a small swing, and the first signs this is being backed.
sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9905
0 0 1
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[nobbygnome] 21/6/2021 20:08

Oh dear some trolls have turned up here....

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 17:38

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9890
0 0 0
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 17:37

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9890
0 0 0
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[barkboo] 21/6/2021 17:36

sikhthetech21 Jun '21 - 17:28 - 9888 of 9890
0 0 0
fjordic,

"US Analysts would normally be in a blackout for 40 days"

So with limited information, why buy now and not wait until they announce H1 results?


Q2 should be significantly stronger compared to Q1, given Q1 is traditionally very quiet, but is it?

How much have they been impacted by the loss of Alphonso, the data provider?

Shares on Loan trebling since Dec when the CEO sold 1/3 of his holding and Tosca selling DAYS before the IPO are red flags.




sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Final-Results-100321.pdf

Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:
hxxps://www.tremorinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/TRMR-Submission-of-Confidential-Draft-Registration-Statement-for-Proposed-Offering-160321.pdf

That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[midasx] 21/6/2021 16:45

The share price is tracking the US Dual listing.
Vicious circle until the cycle breaks.

The placing was at a discount, why? Why do they need a huge placing if they have $130m in the bank?
The trebling of Shares on Loan since Dec.

Tosca selling just DAYS before the IPO.



More importantly what impact will losing Alphonso, data provider, have on them..



sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."


Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:


That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.

[midasx] 21/6/2021 16:45

The share price is tracking the US Dual listing.
Vicious circle until the cycle breaks.

The placing was at a discount, why? Why do they need a huge placing if they have $130m in the bank?
The trebling of Shares on Loan since Dec.

Tosca selling just DAYS before the IPO.



More importantly what impact will losing Alphonso, data provider, have on them..



sikhthetech - 26 May 2021 - 21:31:23 - 8332 of 9259 Tremor : Shaking Up Video A
Alphonso court case/US Listing...

The need for a US listing became urgent around March time... The Alphonso court case filing was last week.
Therefore, they would have known many weeks ago, maybe March, of the dispute with Alphonso. Companies try and resolve the differences before taking court action.


So I think once the dispute with Alphonso was known they felt the need to US list (with the placing) asap. I think because the process to list was the reason behind the early Q1 TU (10 days before Q1 end).

On 10th March, they published the fy account, without firm mention of US listing, they simply said:
"The Company continues to explore, from time to time, the possibility of transactions in the capital markets, including the potential for a dual-listing of shares in the United States. No assurance can be made that any such transaction will be completed in the near term or at all."


Yet ONLY 6 days later on 16th March , they published their draft registration for a US listing:


That tells me there was a sudden need to list with days of the fy results being published, timing which coincides with the alphonso dispute.