We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totally Plc | TLY | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 4.60 | 08:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.60 | 4.60 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 22/1/2024 10:38 by jugears Oh dear it couldn't get much worse, once investors confidence goes it can take years or never recover for an share price to recover, LLoyds is a classic example! |
Posted at 03/1/2024 16:11 by sikhthetech bmcollins,I haven't seen any bear points which prove that TLY is not very cheap at £10m. The fact is around 40% of institutions hold and some were increasing recently. New Chair, Simon Stilwell, is co-founder of Liberum and director of Gresham, so I'm expecting further interest from institution and other investors. Nothing 1gw and his mates said pre-H1 have come true. If bull points can be countered then it makes the bear case stronger. If bear points can be countered then it makes the bull case stronger. |
Posted at 01/1/2024 10:19 by pierre oreilly But you have a very strange way of analyzing, and describing on bbs, companies.T/O 100m eh? Well the last interims, which plunged the price obviously, showed a 20% decrease in turnover. And as if 't/o is vanity profits are sanity' isn't bad enough, the company reported a 1.9m loss on the plummeting turnover. Not quite what you have reported to readers here is it? It's no surprise to anyone you are down 80/90% here. Your analysis is just weird, and really nothing more than ramping. Over at hvivo, where you have ignored all the positive factors which have doubled the price in 23, you have, all the time, deramped , again with weird views unrelated to pertain factors of the company. Unfortunately for you, I think 24 will be a repeat of 23 for both companies, and for your ramping of tly and idiotic and totally counterproductive deramping of hvo. Why? Do you like losing your own money as much as you try your hardest to lose everyone else's money? Here's a salient tip. The director buy you ramp was small, and often directors make a small buy in an attempt to get the price up ready for a big sell. That's the type of info which help investors, not your rabid ramps and deramps. Parob, soz you're involved here. Perhaps escape while you can still get 4 or 5p? I have concerns about the cash position and the eventual sole choice the directors may have in the near future, but I'll save that for a following post. |
Posted at 12/10/2023 17:32 by sikhthetech 1gw"So the question now is" What about all the previous suggestions and questions you've made? You've been proven wrong all along, haven't you? What's the next story? Significant selling by investors. NO. No evidence of significant selling by investors, especially major holders, 91m shares or around 46% held by major holders. AGM resolutions. All AGM resolutions won't be passed, vast majority unanimously(around 91m shares, so major holders voted in favour) BoD need replacing for major shareholders to retain confidence. No evidence of BoD resigning or being forced out. Dividend won't be paid as they've got cash problems - won't go ex-divi. The shares went ex-divi. Dividend won't be paid due to impairment tests and they haven't got any cash. Dividend received and banked. They won't win any more contracts due to NW London contract ending. They've won contracts, starting after NW London contract ended. etc etc etc Significant increase in Share on Loan as well deramping as same time, pretty much explains it. Tell a story and manipulate the share price to fit that story. Whatever next? |
Posted at 25/9/2023 22:48 by sikhthetech Quazzie,"Give me a quick pitch as to why I should reinvest" YOU shouldn't. Why would you, 1gw, brucegoldfish etc want to invest in a company which you and 1gw claim auditor/company is committing fraud???? Back your conviction and short it at 7p. All genuine investors and potential investors can read the company/sector newsflow and see the facts as previously posted. I'm still adding as and when, great to be able to do so. |
Posted at 12/9/2023 20:35 by paul planet earth1 Still trying to ban me Sikhthetech for speaking the truth it won't work!You've upset so many investors with your nasty little innuendos and assertions! How's it feel siky Totally Healthcare going off a cliff! Mind those 'Red Flags' I've been warning investors here for months now! No Cash! Wafer thin margins! One Customer! Spiralling Wage Inflation! Loss making contracts! Under bidding on new contracts a ticking Carilion time bomb! The list goes on.... |
Posted at 03/9/2023 18:29 by sikhthetech Facts rather than the speculative nonsense by some.Holders and trades From AR. As per 27th July 2023, there are around 91m shares held by larger investors, with > 3%. They hold around 47% of the shares issued. There were 170 trades yesterday with around 3.7 shares traded. Shares on Loan Aug 638423 0.35% Dec 297157 0.16% 2023 Jan 4650990 2.54% Feb 5528394 3% Mar 6471111 3.53% Apr 6570025 3.57% May 6560025 3.56% Jun 6557206 3.56% Jul 6775862 3.68% Aug figure due with next few days. (Free to register or login as guest.) There aren't hundreds of PIs so why hundreds of trades? There's no evidence of significant selling by larger investors and so it comes down to PIs. The are a significant number of Shares on Loan and small trades. A 10k trade is only around £1k. TLY is illiquid and so hundreds of small trades would move the share price We'll soon see if there's significant selling by larger investors, ie > 3% I'll be taking advantage of the fall in share price |
Posted at 02/9/2023 15:36 by sikhthetech Facts rather than the speculative nonsense by some.Holders and trades From AR. As per 27th July 2023, there are around 91m shares held by larger investors, with > 3%. They hold around 47% of the shares issued. There were 170 trades yesterday with around 3.7 shares traded. Shares on Loan Aug 638423 0.35% Dec 297157 0.16% 2023 Jan 4650990 2.54% Feb 5528394 3% Mar 6471111 3.53% Apr 6570025 3.57% May 6560025 3.56% Jun 6557206 3.56% Jul 6775862 3.68% Aug figure due with next few days. (Free to register or login as guest.) There aren't hundreds of PIs so why hundreds of trades? There's no evidence of significant selling by larger investors and so it comes down to PIs. The are a significant number of Shares on Loan and small trades. A 10k trade is only around £1k. TLY is illiquid and so hundreds of small trades would move the share price We'll soon see if there's significant selling by larger investors, ie > 3% |
Posted at 31/8/2023 13:22 by savagedstock In the interests of a sensible debate, a few quick points1 There is no issue with having the AGM in Derby - it is the head office of the company, and covid restrictions no longer apply. It would have shown more concern for investors if it was streamed so people could at least watch remotely (if not participate)..... 2 the macro argument that the govt is spending much more on outsourcing is well known and often repeated - it gets to a stage where even gargantuan numbers have little impact. So the long-term bull story is there, which presumably is why investors are, or have been, drawn to TLY 3 The micro story is as important if not more so. If the company cannot make money against this bullish backdrop, then it implies essentially two things a) the management needs to be changed b) the ability to make money despite government policy is challenging. The latter is more common than people realise - environmental policy for example is, and has been, supportive for innovation etc, but really no company is making the money. Or take KOOTH plc for example - the spend to support mental health issues in the UK is ever growing, yet they have gone to USA... My caution on public healthcare spend is to look very carefully through the headlines and understand where the real priority areas are, how much is being allocated, and what returns a private sector organisation can realistically expect to earn....There is so much smoke in public sector figures that at times they are really unhelpful... So as an investor, you have to decide: if there is real 'jam' being thrown by the UK govt, why is the TLY share price where it is. A positive macro backdrop is necessary, but is not sufficient, for share price performance. I am sure there will be new contract wins etc, but a 100% move up in the share price takes it to 20p, still down 55% from its recent high.....The real question is what will get the share price back to its highs - and underpinning that is what changes does the company have to make to get there..... |
Posted at 31/1/2023 14:36 by replicas1967 Radium1Posts: 699 Price: 24.75 No Opinion RE: You couldn’t make it up!31 Jan 2023 14:23 Moniman….As previously stated, I have stt1 filtered so I don’t see or read any of his clap anymore. You are correct though in stating that this man has spent 10 years+ on the Tremor International, advfm and lse bulletin boards placing content that is designed to damage the investment case for those invested there and followed it through with his version of pleasure posting, detailing how correct his forecasts have been and implying how silly we all were and if only everyone had listened to him, we wouldn’t be where we are, we wouldn’t have lost our money, would we, type innuendo. It’s quite incredible that I can state here that stt has posted a total of thirty four thousand and fifty two posts on the Tremor International advfm bulletin board alone, to date, all of it with a negative slant and (I’m not prepared to waste time checking for correctness) but it’s somewhere in the region of another 11,000+ similar posts on Tremor's lse bulletin board as well. And recent reports indicate that this guy has now migrated to bulletin boards where those same Tremor investors have other interests. It's a well-deserved irony then, for those same investors, knowing that stt is so heavily invested here in Totally PLC at prices dating back to 95p+ days, (I mean, seriously invested). Filled his ISA with Totally on one occasion that I know of; is now suffering the same fate that he tried so hard to bring upon others. He’s not looking so bright right now, is he? What Totally Plc investors are receiving here at this time is, quite simply, Schadenfreude, from those long-suffering Tremor guys. Irrespective of all this, I personally, have never been able to make an investment case for Totally Plc. and right now, without doubt, it is a worrying time for Totally Plc investors. As I see it, the situation is precarious. There is nothing personnel, on my part, to the ordinary Joe here but as I see it, one more RNS carrying bad news and this one is going down hard. On top of that you’ll likely suffer further collateral damage from angry Tremor investors because of the above. For me, I’ll try to restrain myself but there is a debt yet to be paid to Tremor investors (and others) for a decade of misery from this man. Would appreciate it if someone would post this onto the Totally advfm bulletin board. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
