ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

THR Thor Energy Plc

1.25
0.07 (5.93%)
Last Updated: 08:00:07
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Thor Energy Plc LSE:THR London Ordinary Share GB00BRJ52319 ORD GBP0.001
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.07 5.93% 1.25 1.20 1.30 1.25 1.19 1.25 692 08:00:07
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Misc Nonmtl Minrls, Ex Fuels 0 -520k -0.0019 -6.21 3.29M

Thor Mining PLC TUNGSTEN & COPPER INTERCEPTS AT DESERT SCHEELITE (2171P)

30/08/2017 7:00am

UK Regulatory


Thor Energy (LSE:THR)
Historical Stock Chart


From Apr 2019 to Apr 2024

Click Here for more Thor Energy Charts.

TIDMTHR

RNS Number : 2171P

Thor Mining PLC

30 August 2017

30 August 2017

THOR MINING PLC

TUNGSTEN & COPPER INTERCEPTS AT DESERT SCHEELITE

PILOT MOUNTAIN - NEVADA

The Board of Thor Mining Plc ("Thor" or the "Company") (AIM, ASX: THR), is pleased to report positive outcomes from a diamond drill hole at the Desert Scheelite deposit at the Company's wholly owned Pilot Mountain tungsten project in Nevada, USA (Figure 1).

Highlights:

-- Several scheelite (tungsten trioxide) mineralised intervals were identified by blue fluorescence under ultra violet "UV" light

   --   Intercepts of sulphide mineralisation including copper bearing chalcopyrite 

Significant Intercepts:

   --   15 metres (m) of scheelite mineralisation from 198 metres. 
   --   4m of scheelite mineralisation from 217m. 

-- 18m of scheelite mineralisation from 256m, including sub massive sulphide mineralisation, including chalcopyrite, for 5m from 256m and for a further 4m from 266m.

Detailed logging of the core samples is complete and samples submitted for laboratory assay.

Mr Mick Billing, Executive Chairman of Thor:

"Very encouraging looking core samples from Desert Scheelite, and hopefully the assays, expected in several weeks, will confirm this.

"Desert Scheelite continues to shape as a very exciting deposit, amongst the suite of deposits at Pilot Mountain with extremely promising growth potential."

Table 1: Drill hole orientation summary

 
 Hole ID    Easting    Northing     Hole       Hole      Final 
              NAD83      NAD83      collar     collar     Depth 
             zone 11      zone       dip*     Azimuth*     (m) 
                           11 
---------  ---------  ----------  --------  ----------  ------- 
 17DS - 
  DD01      424,452    4,248,399     -69        195       313 
---------  ---------  ----------  --------  ----------  ------- 
 * Down hole gyro survey shows dip increased 
  to 70 deg and azimuth increased to 199 degrees 
  by the end of hole. 
--------------------------------------------------------------- 
 

The Desert Scheelite diamond drilling program was designed as to test for high grade extensions to previous mineralisation with a best result in 2012 of 17.5m @ 1.80% copper plus 2.2% zinc and 32 g/t silver, along with 13.5m of 0.89% scheelite.

Hole 17DS-DD01 was designed to test a zone approximately 50m below these historic intersections

**Link to Desert Scheelite east - west longitudinal projection showing approximate intercept location for drill hole 17DS-DD01. Other 2017 holes noted are from the reverse circulation drill program earlier in 2017.

http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/2171P_-2017-8-29.pdf

In response to challenging drilling conditions through the volcanic cover to the north of Desert Scheelite, the Company has elected to sight the next hole to the south of the deposit and drill through more competent quartz monzonite. Regulatory permitting to drill from this new site is in process, and subsequent drilling at Desert Scheelite will be deferred until this permitting is in place.

The drill rig has now moved to the Good Hope site and has commenced re-drilling hole 17GH-RC01 which terminated prior to target depth. Preliminary XRF analyses on 17GH-RC01 reported on 18(th) August 2017 comprised 27.4m @ 1.1% copper, 1.3% zinc and 0.19% tungsten trioxide (WO(3) ) including 10.0m (true width estimate of 6.5m) from 17.5m depth at 0.32% WO(3)

On completion of the drill programme and the receipt of all final assay data the Company will issue an updated report with the full results. XRF analyses are considered indicative, preliminary data and are only undertaken on small subsamples of the RC drill cuttings. XRF analyses is not suited for core or whole rock. Follow up laboratory analyses are more definitive than XRF results.

Enquiries:

 
    Mick Billing           +61 (8) 7324         Thor Mining              Executive 
                            1935                 PLC                      Chairman 
    Ray Ridge              +61 (8) 7324         Thor Mining              CFO/Company 
                            1935                 PLC                      Secretary 
    Colin Aaronson/        +44 (0) 207 383      Grant Thornton           Nominated 
     Daniel Bush/           5100                 UK LLP                   Adviser 
     Richard Tonthat 
    Elliot Hance            +44 (0) 207382      Beaufort Securities      Joint Broker 
                             8300                Limited 
    Nick Emerson           +44 (0) 1483         SI Capital Ltd           Joint Broker 
     / Andy Thacker         413 500 
    Tim Blythe/            +44 (0) 207 138      Blytheweigh              Financial 
     Camilla Horsfall       3222                                          PR 
 

Updates on the Company's activities are regularly posted on Thor's website www.thormining.com, which includes a facility to register to receive these updates by email, and on the Company's twitter page @ThorMining.

Competent Person's Report

The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Richard Bradey, who holds a BSc in applied geology and an MSc in natural resource management and who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Bradey is an employee of Thor Mining PLC. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Richard Bradey consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

About Thor Mining PLC

Thor Mining PLC is a resources company quoted on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange and on ASX in Australia.

Thor holds 100% of the advanced Molyhil tungsten project in the Northern Territory of Australia, for which an updated feasibility study in 2015(1) suggested attractive returns. Thor also holds 100% of the Pilot Mountain tungsten project in Nevada USA which has a JORC 2012 Indicated Resources Estimate(2) on 1 of the 4 known deposits.

Thor also holds a production royalty entitlement from the Spring Hill Gold project(3) of:

-- A$6 per ounce of gold produced from the Spring Hill tenements where the gold produced is sold for up to A$1,500 per ounce; and

-- A$14 per ounce of gold produced from the Spring Hill tenements where the gold produced is sold for amounts over A$1,500 per ounce.

Notes

   --     (1) Refer ASX and AIM announcement of 12 January 2015 
   --     (2) Refer AIM announcement of 22 May 2017 and ASX announcement of 23 May 2017 
   --     (3) Refer ASX and AIM announcement of 29 February 2016 
   --     At the date of this announcement gold is trading at approximately A$1,650/oz 

The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.

JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

 
 Criteria            JORC Code explanation                                          Commentary 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Sampling                                                                           Exploration results 
  techniques           *    Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,         are based on HQ sized 
                            random chips, or specific specialised industry           diamond drill core 
                            standard measurement tools appropriate to the            No metal concentration 
                            minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma    data has been reported 
                            sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These         - only visual indications 
                            examples should not be taken as limiting the broad       of the presence of 
                            meaning of sampling.                                     metal bearing minerals 
                                                                                     specifically scheelite 
                                                                                     and chalcopyrite. 
                       *    Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample 
                            representivity and the appropriate calibration of any 
                            measurement tools or systems used. 
 
 
                       *    Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that 
                            are Material to the Public Report. 
 
 
                       *    In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done 
                            this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse 
                            circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples 
                            from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g 
                            charge for fire assay'). In other cases more 
                            explanation may be required, such as where there is 
                            coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. 
                            Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg 
                            submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed 
                            information. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Drilling                                                                           Diamond drilling for 
  techniques           *    Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole      continuous core sample. 
                            hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) 
                            and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard 
                            tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or 
                            other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by 
                            what method, etc). 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Drill                                                                              Core recoveries exceed 
  sample               *    Method of recording and assessing core and chip          95% 
  recovery                  sample recoveries and results assessed. 
 
 
                       *    Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure 
                            representative nature of the samples. 
 
 
                       *    Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery 
                            and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred 
                            due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse 
                            material. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Logging                                                                            Drill core was logged 
                       *    Whether core and chip samples have been geologically     geologically and photographed 
                            and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to        for the entire length 
                            support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,         of the hole. 
                            mining studies and metallurgical studies. 
 
 
                       *    Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in 
                            nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. 
 
 
                       *    The total length and percentage of the relevant 
                            intersections logged. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Sub-sampling                                                                       No assay data is reported. 
  techniques           *    If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, 
  and sample                half or all core taken.                                  Mineralised intervals 
  preparation                                                                        of core were cut and 
                                                                                     half core sent for 
                       *    If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary       assay. Sample intervals 
                            split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.               were based on geological 
                                                                                     boundaries or a maximum 
                                                                                     of five feet. 
                       *    For all sample types, the nature, quality and 
                            appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.     Industry standard 
                                                                                     QAQC protocol was 
                                                                                     adopted. Field duplicates 
                       *    Quality control procedures adopted for all               make up 30% of the 
                            sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of        quality control samples. 
                            samples. 
 
 
                       *    Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is 
                            representative of the in situ material collected, 
                            including for instance results for field 
                            duplicate/second-half sampling. 
 
 
                       *    Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain 
                            size of the material being sampled. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Quality                                                                            No assay data is available 
  of assay             *    The nature, quality and appropriateness of the           or reported 
  data                      assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether 
  and laboratory            the technique is considered partial or total. 
  tests 
 
                       *    For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF 
                            instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining 
                            the analysis including instrument make and model, 
                            reading times, calibrations factors applied and their 
                            derivation, etc. 
 
 
                       *    Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg 
                            standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory 
                            checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie 
                            lack of bias) and precision have been established. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Verification                                                                       No significant intersections 
  of sampling          *    The verification of significant intersections by         are reported only 
  and assaying              either independent or alternative company personnel.     visual indications 
                                                                                     of the presence of 
                                                                                     metal bearing minerals 
                       *    The use of twinned holes.                                - specifically scheelite 
                                                                                     and chalcopyrite. 
 
                       *    Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, 
                            data verification, data storage (physical and 
                            electronic) protocols. 
 
 
                       *    Discuss any adjustment to assay data. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Location                                                                           Hand held GPS 
  of data              *    Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill 
  points                    holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine 
                            workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource 
                            estimation. 
 
 
                       *    Specification of the grid system used. 
 
 
                       *    Quality and adequacy of topographic control. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Data                                                                               Results from only 
  spacing              *    Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.       one hole is being 
  and distribution                                                                   reported. No resource 
                                                                                     estimation is implied 
                       *    Whether the data spacing and distribution is             or inferred. 
                            sufficient to establish the degree of geological and 
                            grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource 
                            and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and 
                            classifications applied. 
 
 
                       *    Whether sample compositing has been applied. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Orientation                                                                        The hole is inclined 
  of data              *    Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased    appropriately for 
  in relation               sampling of possible structures and the extent to        the orientation of 
  to geological             which this is known, considering the deposit type.       the mineralised zone. 
  structure 
 
                       *    If the relationship between the drilling orientation 
                            and the orientation of key mineralised structures is 
                            considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this 
                            should be assessed and reported if material. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Sample                                                                             No assay data is reported. 
  security             *    The measures taken to ensure sample security.            Core remains in the 
                                                                                     custody of the supervising 
                                                                                     geologist and stored 
                                                                                     in a locked building. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 Audits                                                                             None 
  or reviews           *    The results of any audits or reviews of sampling 
                            techniques and data. 
------------------  -------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------------- 
 

This information is provided by RNS

The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

END

DRLSEWFLUFWSEDA

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

August 30, 2017 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)

1 Year Thor Energy Chart

1 Year Thor Energy Chart

1 Month Thor Energy Chart

1 Month Thor Energy Chart

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock