We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thalassa Holdings Limited | LSE:THAL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG878801114 | ORD SHS USD0.01 (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 24.50 | 23.00 | 26.00 | 24.50 | 24.50 | 24.50 | 5,000 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oil & Gas Field Services,nec | 296k | -1.45M | -0.1825 | -1.34 | 1.95M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
30/8/2016 16:37 | Results will be before the end of September and Imo will report trading is still tough. | catswhiskas | |
30/8/2016 14:53 | Still no announcement of when the results will be | jmf69 | |
30/8/2016 13:48 | This level of discount just cannot be ignored. Methinks buyback suspended because now in closed period before results which are due soon. Expect buyback to resume after the results are out........ regards Gary | gbill11 | |
15/8/2016 07:09 | Not much stock around at all. | basem1 | |
12/8/2016 16:39 | The fact the shares that have been bought back by the company have not been cancelled has been a point of discussion on this thread on numerous occasions.I'm starting to think they are being held in Trust is for a very specific reason I don't know what that is but I'm suspicious that the reason might not be in the interest of all shareholders imho. | catswhiskas | |
12/8/2016 15:24 | Does he control the voting rights on the Thal trust? | hammers976 | |
12/8/2016 15:19 | I think Soukup might struggle. His holding is only 15.8%. I don't think there is any real doubt over the existence of the cash although, if you deduct the negative working capital from the cash, it's only about 1.3 x market cap. | stemis | |
12/8/2016 11:30 | The market doesn't think so with a market cap of 9.8 million against a cash pile of nearly double this it just doesn't add up.Soukups been a buyer of the shares he's now the major shareholder could he call a delisting and get one through ?There's a good old saying if it looks too good to be true then it probably is. | catswhiskas | |
12/8/2016 10:40 | Is it real? | hammers976 | |
12/8/2016 10:37 | Is the cash on hand at the bank ? | catswhiskas | |
12/8/2016 10:16 | I also see it as Soukup being out of pocket. But, why did he advance the money in the first place when thalassa have so much cash? And why are they looking to continue trading with these Russians? | hammers976 | |
12/8/2016 10:05 | Stemis,On past performance a big contract with the Russians is far from positive :-) | cockerhoop | |
12/8/2016 09:51 | Edit $750k not million | basem1 | |
12/8/2016 09:50 | Soukup will probably be purchasing more shares with his $750m | basem1 | |
12/8/2016 09:19 | Yes that's my take in our new Brexit world | jbarcroftr | |
12/8/2016 09:16 | varies - yes, my reading is that Soukup is $350k out of pocket. If I was being negative, I'd say that Thalassa have just given up their claim over the debt to get Soukup $750k back of the $1.1m he bizarrely advanced to the Russians. If I was being positive then I'd predict that some time soon Thalassa will announce a big contract with the Russians. I've actually done business with the Russians in the distant past. It's not like normal business.... | stemis | |
12/8/2016 08:55 | Nothing is ever straight forward anymore with this Company and I will probably remove it from my W/L Why on earth does a cash rich Company need to effectively borrow from its Exec Chairman? Is the cash there or not? Maybe Soukup Manor needed an extension in part repayment ? | pj 1 | |
12/8/2016 08:47 | Clearly there is something very wrong and shareholders are not being told what that is. Commercially why allow another company to blatantly rip you off. Why was the arbitration for 4.4 million dropped? Our management have just allowed 4.4 million to disappear. Surely they ow us an explanation? | mypension | |
12/8/2016 08:47 | Further insight into this strange transaction might be provided by a close examination of the notes referred to in the accounts.I will look at these when I have time. My impression from this statement is that Mr Soukup advanced $1,100,000 for the discount and that, having received $750,000 back, he remains $350,000 out of pocket. Does the phrase "without recourse" mean he has no claim against THAL for this ? | varies | |
12/8/2016 08:44 | Down it goes again something not right here sellers know something they've been all over it like a rash all week . | catswhiskas | |
12/8/2016 08:43 | I totally agree SteMis. It seems to be an utterly absurd transaction and it starts to make me wonder whether something not quite kosher was involved here. | masurenguy | |
12/8/2016 08:33 | So let me get this. The Russians (SMG) owed us a load of money ($4.4m) for work we'd done for them. To get them to agree to payment, we offered them a $1.1m discount. For completely inexplicable reasons, rather than offset that discount again payments, we (rather Soukup) paid it to them!!. They then banked the cash (thank you very much) but failed to honour any of the payments. Now we've agreed that, as long as they return $0.75m of that discount (effectively to Soukup) we'll let them off the debt. Effectively meaning we've paid them for the privilege of doing work with them. Amazingly we are now exploring new opportunities with the Russians. I can only hope there is something about this that isn't clear because at the moment it looks like utter madness... | stemis | |
12/8/2016 08:19 | They were owed money for a job/equipment etc, but weren't paid, Soukup plugs the short fall to THAL with a loan, they take the company to court, THAL wins, company agrees to cough up part of the money owed, THAL then pays that back to Soukup. And they still look to do business with Sevmorgeo after being stuffed by them, such is the nature of business when pickings are a bit thin. | owenski | |
12/8/2016 08:13 | Can anyone explain today's statement please | jbarcroftr | |
01/8/2016 16:26 | Hopefully not a director purchase otherwise that will mean another decade of no news ! | catswhiskas |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions