Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Tandem Group Plc LSE:TND London Ordinary Share GB00B460T373 ORD 25P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 240.00 230.00 250.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 5,193 08:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Leisure Goods 32.5 1.9 32.3 7.4 11

Tandem Share Discussion Threads

Showing 3576 to 3596 of 4750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  154  153  152  151  150  149  148  147  146  145  144  143  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
11/10/2011
14:20
neverforget...What do you propose shareholders do ? When greengiant bought all the loose stock last year he passed it to the company and the directors. When you say shareholders are toothless one could argue that greengiant sharpened his to great effect ! I am a long term holder and there are quite a few of us. However those who play this short term do us no favours !
davidosh
11/10/2011
14:10
i will explain myself here not going to bother going ff line. here is the bear case for this share. * declining revenues you can only continue to cut costs so far after that level has been reached you begin to die * terrible management no revenue growth no profit growth failed strategies and acquisitions yet high salaries * uses company cash to buy shares back have no better of cash? * rising freight costs to come through * weak high street * stronger $ * rising steel costs up $100 per tonne this year * management team has no regard for shareholders and current shareholders toothless no forecasts no investor presentation nothing care to put the bull case
neverforget
11/10/2011
07:12
neverforget.....Can you not see why long termers here like Graham1TY and I would see you as a hypocrite and troll ? You do not have a holding in Tandem and claim you are not interested in the company but for some reason you come here having sold no doubt at a much higher level than the current share price to annoy long term holders with comments about their holdings ?? Makes no sense and if you want to explain yourself then just email me.
davidosh
11/10/2011
06:21
not interested in tandem had 25/ shares at one point but sold out and judging the graph glad i did very poor management who hare here for there salaries and that is it what valuehave they added
neverforget
10/10/2011
07:13
neverforget....You are being rather selective with your reporting. I had already stated that my family holdings were in more than one nominee account and you have only identified my personal holding at 81,000 shares. I am not going to spend time going through a 1000 posts but there is nothing I am aware of to suggest our family holdings are any different to those recorded. We still have over 2% as stipulated here last night. Maybe you should tell us exactly what shareholdings you have had in Tandem at various points over the last three years and why we should be interested anyway ? Did you record your holding on that poll for example ?
davidosh
10/10/2011
07:01
My shareholding still the same as for the shareholder poll: 0.22% of current share cap.
18bt
10/10/2011
06:29
nobody needs to keep me informed I seem to be using the same math principles that you apply davidosh - 10 Nov'09 - 10:47 - 1572 of 2548 supreme mo.....Excellent do you have an email ? Just to keep a running tally... CWA1....1% treatmelike...1.5% ish davidosh....2.2% supreme mo...2% Any more ? then you posted this on the link 81/ shares alunmorris - 18 Feb'10 - 11:43 - 1685 of 2548 Poll: To express your opinion (anonymously if you wish) on Tandem's having one non-exec (the Chairman) who is also the remuneration committee: http://www.freesharedata.com/tandem in that time you posted that you were a net buyer yet 81/ was just 1.25% at the time. enough of this these are just examles of why you will never do anything here not a holder never plan to be a holder the company will get crucified with a falling £
neverforget
09/10/2011
21:18
And to be clear, my current holding is 100,000 which is over 2%
graham1ty
09/10/2011
21:17
never, I did not say that I do not trade in and out. I did sell some when I wanted to. I bought it back when I wanted to. I hold more shares than I did a year ago, so over that period have been a net buyer. I am not quite sure what yr point is anyway ?
graham1ty
09/10/2011
16:08
Not over here much i am a iii man. I have 105,000 share in two accounts. That may well be more tomorrow because at 90p i am having a few more. The company has said it will make approx 580k (results out later this month). So thats 10or 11p eps in the bag. I think a 2p int dividend as well. The NAV Is double share price........... Going back to non-exc role. i have 30 plus years in retail/importing/distribution. i am Chair of a food comapany and one of 2 shareholders in a private company. This has been built from 2.5 million t/o to 50 in 10 years. No debt just good solid growth. We buy in China and the far east i have many contact in Indonesia, and other far east countries. i understand importing/stock and forward sales. I understand getting the product right at that end. I think this BOD needs support and help because we have a small company that has flat/falling sales. best tiger
castleford tiger
07/10/2011
18:20
never, who was post 2540 aimed at ? If you look at the register, you can see my holding quite clearly: it is in my name, not a nominee. And, yes it remains above 2% where it has been all along
graham1ty
07/10/2011
17:55
saw the register splitting out top 80% of nominee accounts. now did you say 2% or was it closer to 3%?
neverforget
07/10/2011
17:45
neverforget.....there are over 1000 entries on the shareholder register and many are in nominee accounts. You are still not making any sense. What is the vote or backing that did not come forward in support of gg that you refer to ? I doubt you even have a copy of the register and as you claimed you sold out on the same day as gg did then I am even more uncertain why you are seeking to cause a problem here ? I do not know you so certainly have no intention to discuss my family shareholdings with you but the Board are certainly well aware of my holding and that of a number of us who attended the Agm. As you can imagine the Board watch the register like a hawk after gg built his stake so profitably ! Why not email me if you have genuine concerns or thoughts that can help shareholders here ?
davidosh
07/10/2011
17:29
how to explain that? let me ask you what your shareholding is and i will be able to check it to the shareholder register i have seen. what was it 2%? Thought not.
neverforget
07/10/2011
16:39
PS, the 80p was a pretty rubbish price: there was no bid. I hope that the Company might have been alerted and picked them up.......to avoid this apparent collapse
graham1ty
07/10/2011
16:38
I agree with much of above. We all loved it when gg pushed the price far too far. We all got greedy. It never should have got up to 170p. This Company is sound, profitable, cash generative, but like everyone else, in a pretty rubbish market place. They will survive, they will be fine, but no great prospects for the moment. And few prospects as a private company of this size, for private investors. I think they probably should be a private company now. I hope they might start buying back more shares in the market. Then one day, a backer will give them enough cash ( or debt) to buy out the rest of us. PS what I would not forgive is a delisting......I know it is costly being listed, but I have yet to see one of the ( many) Companies withdrawing doing a decent deal for private shareholders. So, let us encourage them, encourage discourse, keep fingers crossed for some kind of Olympic dividend, and curse our greed for not selling to Andrew above 150p. I'd be buying back twice my original stake now......
graham1ty
07/10/2011
15:56
I think GG saw a good company with cr*p management and tried to change it around but then was bought off because the BoD didn't want their party spoilt. I think he tried to spin it by saying the management are really passionate about the business to make shareholders feel he had had an affect. Unfortunately passion doesn't equal profit.
whoppy
07/10/2011
15:50
wont happen this could have been so different but people here bullshi@@ed about the level of their holdings when gg was trying to instigate change and now they are left with a company that is run for management not knowing where to grow and a failed strategy. (Neverforget) neverforget...Maybe you could explain that one in more detail ! At what point did gg need a company vote on anything ? Who exactly gave a false level of holding ? I am fairly certain that gg knew exactly what he was doing and made sure he had an exit plan A and then plan B if that was not able to work. The rest of us were in his hands to a certain extent and carried along for the cycle ride ! I am a long term investor and do not have a private equity background. There are a few questions to be asked though but not sure what you are suggesting with yours ?
davidosh
07/10/2011
15:43
Management told GG if I remember correctly that he spoiled their little party because he kept sending the share price up eveytime he bought. Shows you they prefer to have a low share price Kinda makes you think. A non committed management whose only passion is to stick their noses in the trough while shareholders who own the company are treated with contempt. They have lost us so much money with all their buy backs which shows up there limited ambition in trying to create shareholder value. What's the point of them even being listed on the market and how do they get away with it. I think they need investigating.
whoppy
07/10/2011
15:38
There we go, 80p, halved in a year. Annoyingly Andrew was right. And they paid him 140p for 821,000 shares, so at 80p, they have overpaid by £492,000. Add in another 80,000 shares at 111p, another c £25,000. Ouch. Steve, encouraged to get more involved, told by us ( well actually, me) that he needed to be tied in by an equity exposure, that could make or break him, has lost nearly half his 140p. Hey ho. Wait for the interims. I really should get into greenmail.
graham1ty
07/10/2011
15:36
wont happen this could have been so different but people here bullshi@@ed about the level of their holdings when gg was trying to instigate change and now they are left with a company that is run for management not knowing where to grow and a failed strategy. yes it has cash at the moment but can only see margins being decimated as the £ drops versus the $. yes they hedge but that has to be negotiated again at the end of november. too many people here looking after their own interests one which is likely to continue to to the illiquidity. if you want to seell you cant because any volume will have the effect like today 10k at 80p and the shareprice is decimated. daviddosh what about strategy presentations and broker forecasts? silence from the company.
neverforget
Chat Pages: Latest  154  153  152  151  150  149  148  147  146  145  144  143  Older
Your Recent History
LSE
TND
Tandem
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200117 12:41:06