We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tadpole Tech. | LSE:TAD | London | Ordinary Share | GB0008705930 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.70 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/10/2008 14:39 | my taddie, oh no, not taddie, boohoo, gasp, croak, agghh!!!! Keef RIP | winter_days | |
02/10/2008 08:06 | LOLOL LofL You jest of course. Pass on my best to AZ Keith (not keef/sadsahara) Beau | monty333 | |
02/10/2008 06:24 | Tad was a company which always looked more likely than not to fail. There was a small possibility that it would succeed and it was on that basis that people gambled on it over the last few years. The outcome is sad, but not unexpected. | indieman | |
01/10/2008 18:07 | Shadu, the full facts surrounding the forced sale will never be known nor do the powers that be ever want them to be. The reality is, shareholders are the lowest form of amoebae when it comes to protection, value or indeed dishing out any spoils that may be left over however unlikely that would be anyway. The stock market over the years is littered with companies that have been prized out of the hands of shareholders where the only beneficiaries are usually directors or vultures who play to their strengths whilst all the excuses as to why a company failed are dished out like confetti and the value disappears into their hands. Only time will tell here whether the new owners will make ago of it. Obviously, the reason why it was rescued in this way can only be because of the strength of the IP (certainly not the quality of the management), and if that is going to be big, the little ol' shareholder can feel very aggrieved, albeit totally powerless now anyway, should the millions spouted as the true value of the IP ever gets handed over in those numbers. Tadpole had a history so clouded with failure, incompetence and disaster that it became, for me personally, compulsive viewing, with hopes and then hopes dashed on pretty much every occasion. Many friends, who I got to know purely through Tad, have lost significant sums of money and that is very sad and I feel for them, my losses peter into insignificance. It is just such a shame that the regulators and legislators are not able to come up with more plausible and effective corporate governance guidelines that protect shareholders more. I'm not convinced that even with the current financial woes plaguing the markets, things will not change and the actions, decisions, management quality and activities of listed companies will be monitored, controlled and regulated more effectively. End of sermon. Probably my last ever post re Tadpole. AIMHO Beau | monty333 | |
01/10/2008 15:19 | I am sure they can find outwho the directors are as if you put the company in google search it does come up. Its frightening that the tadpole could just be sold with nothing to the share holders. | shadu | |
01/10/2008 08:18 | and who are the directors of Acresail?wouldnt the FSA like to know???? | mr.elbee | |
01/10/2008 07:57 | Shadu The company failed to complete a fund raising and was insolvent. Administrators were appointed who sold the business and the assets to pay off the Company's debts. The RNS dated 08/08/08 states "There is no prospect of the Company's shareholders receiving a dividend from the administration." I'm afraid the shareholders have no rights or recourse in such situations. Regards UK | uknighted | |
01/10/2008 01:57 | The company they sold to..Acresail ltd. Also can the company sell it off and the share holders left with nothing? | shadu | |
30/9/2008 14:47 | Shadu. To which "new company" do you refer? Regards UK | uknighted | |
30/9/2008 14:47 | TAD BUST MY GOD? Keef! | winter_days | |
30/9/2008 14:44 | dont the new company give you some shares in their company? And also would the barclays stock brokers send me something to say this has happened, as they hold my certificates. Thanks for the reply. | shadu | |
29/9/2008 22:18 | The company ceases to exist and your shares are worthless. End of story. Regards UK | uknighted | |
31/8/2008 08:13 | TAD has a piece in the Mail On Sunday about shareholder revolt. 30,000 small holder me included are angry. Off Topic Could you please rate my daughters Walkers Crisp flavour. Thanks in advance BargainBob. | bargainbob | |
28/8/2008 02:18 | KDC Sorry to hear of your loss. ROTFLMFAO | thetatrader | |
28/8/2008 01:57 | That doesn't sound right to me. Before a certain date there was taper relief so you could increase the cost against gains, but after a certain date taper relief was abolished anyway. Also, you cannot use taper relief to increase a loss. Also, as time goes on your loss in relative terms is depreciating anyway so why would you have to take a further hit over and above inflation. That just does not make sense. Did you meet this tax expert down the pub ? | yf23_1 | |
27/8/2008 20:54 | I was told by a tax expert....that you can claim 100% against ctg in the first year..it then goes onto a taper relief based on a percentage reduction each year thereafter....the longer you leave it, ie, interms of years, the less you get....the above list gives the official start dates. | htrocka | |
24/8/2008 18:57 | What a fiasco, what a loss, ta ta all | the bull | |
24/8/2008 18:56 | Rodspotty, best trade ever, good on you, the only one to make money out of Tad | the bull | |
24/8/2008 13:41 | When appears on above list eligble for CGT purposes. Thanks yf23.... | eithin | |
24/8/2008 13:34 | Thanks. Carry my losses on a runing list so understand has to be on the HMRC neglible value list before loss eligible to be entered for CGT purposes. | eithin | |
24/8/2008 13:18 | I think you are allowed to claim the losses at your convenience up to a number of years back. e.g If you had gains in 2010-11 you could claim the TAD loss in that year rather than declare TAD loss in 08-09 when you weren't liable for tax. At any rate you will have to wait till they appear in the negligible value list from HMRC. | yf23_1 | |
24/8/2008 09:14 | Any tax experts out there. With tad now in admin are losses now counted this Tax Year as a loss for CGT purposes.Thanks..... | eithin |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions