We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sylvania Platinum Limited | LSE:SLP | London | Ordinary Share | BMG864081044 | CMN SHS USD0.01 (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-2.00 | -2.99% | 65.00 | 64.00 | 66.00 | 67.00 | 65.00 | 67.00 | 1,243,928 | 10:44:44 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Miscellaneous Metal Ores,nec | 127.04M | 45.35M | 0.1720 | 3.78 | 171.35M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/3/2020 11:37 | In general. I'm a fan of SLP, however nothing is safe atm with all the uncertainty. | johndoe23 | |
16/3/2020 11:32 | What generally or SLO It’s profits this year are going to be between 60 and 79m It’s market cap is around 90m Why is it being hammered so much? It’s way below the general market reaction | mr stephens | |
16/3/2020 11:00 | My guess is a long time. More downside to come yet imho | johndoe23 | |
16/3/2020 08:21 | Update 16 March 2020 With reference to the proposed buyback of 4,875,000 ordinary shares of USD0.01 ("Ordinary Shares") in the market, announced in the Company's interim financial results on 17 February 2020, the Company announces that, on 13 March 2020, it acquired 4,125,331 Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 1.42% of the Company's issued share capital, at 47.36p per Ordinary Share. Following the above transaction, the Company's issued share capital is 289,724,772 Ordinary Shares, of which a total of 11,435,814 Ordinary Shares are held in Treasury. Therefore, the total number of Ordinary Shares with voting rights in Sylvania is 278,288,958 Ordinary Shares. | mr stephens | |
16/3/2020 08:20 | Update RNS 16 March 2020 With reference to the proposed buyback of 4,875,000 ordinary shares of USD0.01 ("Ordinary Shares") in the market, announced in the Company's interim financial results on 17 February 2020, the Company announces that, on 13 March 2020, it acquired 4,125,331 Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 1.42% of the Company's issued share capital, at 47.36p per Ordinary Share. Following the above transaction, the Company's issued share capital is 289,724,772 Ordinary Shares, of which a total of 11,435,814 Ordinary Shares are held in Treasury. Therefore, the total number of Ordinary Shares with voting rights in Sylvania is 278,288,958 Ordinary Shares. | mr stephens | |
15/3/2020 15:43 | re Platinum use in Hydrogen fuel cells. I see Ian Cowie writes in today's Sunday Times re ITM Power referenced above in my last post. "The chancellors emphasis on green power could be good for ITM Power". "These green shares are amongst my few recent purchases that aren't deep in the red." May be of interest to those following the usage of Platinum. ITM up 11% and Ceres (CWS) 19% on Friday after earlier falls. | nimrod22 | |
14/3/2020 17:33 | for those in to the Hydrogen fuel cells: a small punt in to Ceres(CWR),ITM Power (ITM) are probably worth it whilst the latest market drop is in progress. Some others Ballard Power in Canada, Power Cell in Sweden, and Plug Power (Plug:NAQ)on the Nasdaq. Maybe drip feed in over the next month if there's further falls. | nimrod22 | |
14/3/2020 14:16 | Hybrid fuel cell/plug in, is already here but Mercedes claims to have reduced platinum use in fuel cells by 90%. 2020 Mercedes GLC F-Cell Review: Best Hybrid Alternative In addition to its fully electric range, the Stuttgart manufacturer is also preparing for the launch – on a small scale and in specific regions – of the 2020 Mercedes GLC F-Cell. This ‘environmental In contrast to this Asian three, the German manufacturer does just a little more than just assemble a fuel cell in his SUV. 2020 Mercedes GLC F-Cell – What changes the 2020 Mercedes GLC F-Cell combines its fuel cell with a large lithium-ion battery with a capacity of 13.5 kWh gross (and 9.3 kWh net ). Thanks to this extra energy source, the SUV can travel fifty kilometers (51 according to the new mixed European cycle) without consuming one gram of hydrogen. The battery is under the trunk floor. With the 7.2 kW (integrated) charger, the SUV can be charged to a normal wall socket, wall box or ordinary public charging station. The process takes one and a half hour when the battery is completely empty. Most fuel cells are quite bulky, which limits the functionality of the car. The unit developed by Mercedes (and Ford, see frame), however, is so compact that it fits easily under the hood of the GLC. The new fuel cell would even be more than 30 percent more compact than the one in the B-Class F-Cell (the prototype that was launched in 2010) and also uses the same anchor points as the combustion engine is the ‘normal’ GLC. Mercedes also claims that the amount of platinum used for the production of the fuel cell was even reduced by 90 percent. With a double advantage: not only is the planet’s raw material supply so spared, but the production costs of the system are also limited. | risa5 | |
13/3/2020 21:25 | John Rosier writes in the printed Investors Chronicle today. "Two of my holdings recorded positive returns in February; Sylvania Platinum (SLP) and Syncona (SYNC). Sylvania was up 20.3 per cent following excellent results for its half-year ended 31 December 2019. This led to significant upgrades, leaving the shares valued at just 3.5 times June 2020 earnings and on a prospective dividend yield of 8.6 per cent, at 56p. Moreover, current forecasts are for a dividend in the year to June 2021 of 15¢, leading to a yield of 21 per cent. Something is wrong here; either the share price is far too low, or the price of platinum group metals is about to collapse." | nimrod22 | |
13/3/2020 16:38 | Pd has been the trade of the century, up, down, and it will go up again . As I said before, in Spain Car industry is badly affected | book5 | |
12/3/2020 18:08 | I should probably know the answer but how many times a quarter do they sell the concentrate? Also it’s on a spot price of that day I would guess so daily movements don’t effect the price Unless SLP were to make a delivery. Happy to hold here and will continue to do so. | koolio | |
12/3/2020 16:57 | Bounced pretty fast, now only 15% down! Still making plenty of cash at these prices | barnaberible | |
12/3/2020 16:02 | Palladium 25% down FFS | cambourne | |
11/3/2020 14:28 | Melton, You are completely correct, I had a mental math meltdown. You can get economy 7 ~ 9p which equates to about £8. But general tariffs are about 13 - 15p ~= £12 Apologies for my mistake. | sdmbot | |
11/3/2020 14:19 | Fair point Melton, does work out at 5p, but you need to check your deal, I got 11p/kwh on a dual tarrif, did take a bit of finding though!!!!!! Have checked with a friend about charging costs, he says a fiver is about right but that is for a range of about 180 miles which skews things, still very considerably cheaper than petrol. The other cost is batteries, they are very expensive and need changing at around £100k. Flip side, you don't have to worry about your head gasket, swings and roundabouts. | devonlad | |
11/3/2020 14:18 | I have a 62kw car and pay 15p per kw on public rapid chargers..Real world range on a full charge 200 miles, you don't want to run them empty. 30 mins for 80% or an hour for full charge.I'll typically achieve 4 miles per kw, so that's £6 of fuel for every 100 miles | plat hunter | |
11/3/2020 13:57 | SDMBOT I don't know where your figures are from but 80 KWH and £4 means 5p a unit (1KWH) I thought I had a good deal at 13p. Please tell me where I can go for 5p. | melton john | |
11/3/2020 13:49 | Apart from larger vehicles like vans lorries and busses that need more power for bigger loads and longer range where FC may be the basic solution. There is also the option of a hybrid FCEV + BEV (although I am not sure if this option as yet available). A FC car can also have a big enough battery pack to allow charging at home for daily commute of 20-40 miles and only needing hydrogen for longer trips. so you can have BEV efficiency and still have the advantage of FCEV fast fill up for longer range. | risa5 | |
11/3/2020 13:28 | Risa The intel supporting hydrogen vehicles is wrong Read the Johnson Matthey PGM report It’s free to download from their website Irrespective diesel and petrol are here for a while yet China will get back on its feet and India is also in the process of upgrading its considerable fleet of diesel transport trucks to the new E6 regulations SLP is trading on a p/e on forward earnings of 2.0 so something has to give | mr stephens | |
11/3/2020 11:30 | sdmbot, I think hydrogen will be a significant part of the mix. Where I live we have hydrogen fuel buses running on quite a few routes. The hybrid diesel/electric buses are being phased out. I imagine you'll see the same technology switch for LDVs. The councils will really struggle to install sufficient pavement recharging points, especially where people live in flats. It's just not going to happen. Don't even mention the load on the grid. Pure electric vehicles will always suffer from long charge cycles while we're using NiMH battery technology. Trickle charging takes a long time, but is kind to the battery. Flash charging compromises battery life significantly (take a BMW i3 - 200,000 mile battery life with trickle charging, down to 80,000 with flash charging). I don't hold SLP or any hydrogen stock. I'm just interested vehicle technologies. | drradcliffe | |
11/3/2020 11:01 | Risa5, Forgive me if you're joking, it's difficult to tell these days whether people are being ironic on the internet, but even though the big Japanese manufacturers are behind the hydrogen car technology, it's looking increasingly like they are on the wrong side of the betamax / vhs tech bet, and are just going through the motions due to the massive sunk costs of their R&D in Hydrogen tech. Most of the "salient" points in that video are looking increasingly precarious, range for bevs is increasing, charging times will improve, infrastructure for recharging evs is improve, battery costs are coming down, the battery companies are already looking at increasing energy density to about 300wh/kg in the near term (end of 2020 beginning of 2021). On top of that many (although not all) can simply recharge their cars at home costing (£4 for a full tank / 80kwh, £4 FFS!), and councils are rolling out tech to recharge in the streets. I hold SLP and would love for you to be right but I just can't see it. I'm not trying to be combative if you think I'm factually wrong please tell me preferrably with DOI, but not a promo video by Business Insider. Good Luck! | sdmbot | |
11/3/2020 08:56 | Nice wedge forming here. May even buy back in shortly | deme1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions