Buy
Sell
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Sunrise Resources Plc LSE:SRES London Ordinary Share GB00B075Z681 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 0.24 0.23 0.28 - 0.00 07:30:31
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 0.0 -0.3 -0.0 - 9

Sunrise Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 7301 to 7324 of 7950 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  294  293  292  291  290  289  288  287  286  285  284  283  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
28/1/2021
23:55
You like to pick someone up on v small things like Lord B then twist eh then insinuate I haven't been clear. Okay to be crystal for you as you don't seem to be too good at comprehension??...It's V bad business practice imho when samples always free. Standard industey practice to supply free samples! I've done my research! It also screams desperation in acceptance to the buyer but let's be honest any potential buyer knows Sres skint!!I can't believe you couldn't figure that out.Secondly making the actually point of stating it via RNS to "spin" out is typical. That's why I outlined a former Barite Capex RNS from back in the day because everything has been about "supposed" low Capex here. It's NOT low. Profits are low! I've provided exact model figures in the past. It's anything but low believe me!It's not gold it's bloody pozzolan cement. Not uncommon or rare!To build a business needs big spend. Why? BECAUSE volumes have to be HUGE!!! HUGE!!Now you can easily find out current demand in USA. It's low at present but who know demand may creep up a few years down the line.Popped Perlite is in demand!!! BUT it's expensive outlay.All outlined in presentation Sir!
theaviator
28/1/2021
23:44
You haven't answered. Simple question. Why is the sharing of costs a bad thing in your view? I have asked a direct question and you haven't given a direct answer to it, I'd I have missed it somewhere please point me to it?
dandandan4
28/1/2021
23:41
I answered perfectly! It's you that can't comprehend it. V v odd. Am just going over the boom from .12 days (yes I save all) Can't see your 50mil shares that's you've tripled??? lol
theaviator
28/1/2021
23:35
So you won't answer? Smoke and mirrors indeed.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
23:26
Smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors....All wil soon become clear am sure and possibly a few heads scratching sooner than later.
theaviator
28/1/2021
23:23
Time to work some things out a little deeper Sir....profound?Am leaving it there.
theaviator
28/1/2021
23:15
I am not touchy, just I intrigued. You seem unable to answer a simple question with a straightforward answer. Why would the sharing of costs be a bad thing in your view?
dandandan4
28/1/2021
23:07
You are getting a little touchy Dan.No emotions with shares! I made my view perfectly clear.
theaviator
28/1/2021
22:57
You are perfectly entitled to make your own business decisions but I have also noticed that you seem very keen to influence the decisions of others on a stock that you don't hold. I have asked you to explain the rationale behind your view that a large company being willing to share the expenses for a trial of a product is a bad sign and you haven't done that. I am totally open to different opinions but you haven't really shared yours in that particular area and you seem unwilling to do so.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
22:28
It's very easy to ramp, not that am putting you in that bracket at all, Dan, as you give good gentlemanly reasoned debate, but it's much more difficult to try to break down a business and forsee the exact financial journey.I personally can't let my view of the statement of phase one not providing enough profit go, in addition to the current raw pozz demand in USA. This may change down the line of course but my current stance is that it will be chicken feed u til such times as they do either sell the project OR continue to phase 2.Many may call me a cynic, and you certainly aren't going to change me now, but until clarification and less "secrecy" I'm not willing to part with any hard earned at this price.
theaviator
28/1/2021
21:56
Dan, there are different views and opinions on business practices. That's fine. That's not mine! Deflection - no. The fact it was mentioned via rns is "desperate".I wish you the very best and look forward to watching what may unfold.
theaviator
28/1/2021
21:02
Just saying smoke and mirrors and DYOR is just deflection.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
20:57
You haven't made your opinion clear on the 50/50 other than implying you think it's a bad thing. You said yourself tonight that samples would normally be free. I spent my career in industry and a customer sharing the costs of samples is a huge buying signal, especially I'd that buyer is much larger and would normally be able to dictate terms at th early stages of negotiation. I think anyone who has ever sold anything in their life would agree the 50/50 is a very good sign, no guarantee of a deal, but a good early sign. You have implied totally the opposite and I am just interested as to whether that is your opinion and if so why?
dandandan4
28/1/2021
20:52
I made my views perfectly clear in that.Disgraceful imho if you know how this business works. The very mention of it was smoke and mirrors within itself.....I'll let you figure the rest out. ;)
theaviator
28/1/2021
20:49
And the 50/50? Good sign or bad sign?
dandandan4
28/1/2021
20:48
Worry about who you give credibility to yourself not others Sir....Am not explaining myself three times.ATB
theaviator
28/1/2021
20:35
And honestly if you knew anything about Lord B's posting history on LSE you would stop making the point. Its nonsense, he is a fantasist. Placings may well be in the future here but placings aren't all that bad. We simply don't know yet and I accept that you don't like not knowing because you want to move in and out of stocks but I don't agree that the future here doesn't look good. I don't think we will see the 2-3p that you were predicting a few months back but I can see .7 to 1p in the medium term and beyond that will depend on a lot of things.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
20:32
I didn't buy in one go, I have held some here for a very long time. I take it you agree that the 50/50 is a very positive sign indeed?
dandandan4
28/1/2021
20:07
Ps I sold at .36 as posted at the time btw Decent amount too. Transparent! :)
theaviator
28/1/2021
20:02
And I think it's going lower. Why? Not just techs but dilution, more smoke and mirrors and alot of time until any decent news.
theaviator
28/1/2021
19:53
Yes samples in mining would usually be free, as with most of business when one party is trying to court a bigger one. Hence the fact the CRMC were willing to pay half is a massive plus point. I really can't emphasise enough what a buying signal that is, it's a very good sign indeed.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
19:52
I have a similar number of shares to what you used to have, a bit less, and I have tripled my money in a year. I don't think investors here have much to complain about and I think the future here is brighter than you make out, if you don't think so then that's fine but I am not quite sure why you feel the need to constantly talk it down if you aren't invested or have any other reason to? I mean backing Lord B seemed like you were just looking for a reason to talk it down, it does you no favours.
dandandan4
28/1/2021
19:51
Samples in mining usually free I'm told.
theaviator
28/1/2021
19:48
And my question about the 50/50 on the trial?
dandandan4
Chat Pages: Latest  294  293  292  291  290  289  288  287  286  285  284  283  Older
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
LSE
SRES
Sunrise Re..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20210616 06:52:47