We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Snoozebox | LSE:ZZZ | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B7D66J40 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.3575 | 0.35 | 0.365 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
17/8/2015 07:09 | Snoozebox hotel plan. | yupawiese2010 | |
10/8/2015 23:11 | That's interesting, perhaps they are managing to establish a brand? Franchising the next step? At an event it would all be about the quality of the execution, creating a clean restful haven to step into to get away from the hubbub. That's at the top end. The other end is the workforce accommodation, which is a corporate customer trying to reduce overheads, quite different markets for a single operator. I could imagine the business getting taken out by two different buyers, one who wants the high end trade, and another who is in the bulk service market. How long do we have to wait to find out who is mopping these up? | lefrene | |
10/8/2015 18:53 | Thanks for explaining, I hear people at events talking about Snoozebox by name now and are familiar with choices available. Sounds very promising. Rich | richharris1 | |
10/8/2015 14:17 | It will be down to the change of management and the need to sort out and re-direct the business. It's in the past, the business appears busier than ever with a wider range of income sources. I notice that relentless sells just get mopped up, somebody must be patiently accumulating on a steady basis. Perhaps they want to get the business as cheaply as possible? | lefrene | |
07/8/2015 15:01 | Apologies if I'm being lazy, but can anyone shed any light on the drop in turnover from 2013 to 2014. Seems dramatic and not really mentioned in the Annual Report. Cheers Rich | rich_harris | |
06/8/2015 11:37 | It's pretty much a contract hire business, and made more so as they move into other areas that are not containers. The long term sites will be pretty much just about hire of the units, while the events side must need a lot more staff, especially if mini hotels are being set up with service staff. But I don't see any of it as difficult to account for, so indeed why not a proper statement? It occurs to me that if the Gov is clamping down on private landlords renting to undocumented refugees, then those people will have to go somewhere, and there must be a lot of them. This could be a slot for zzz to fill via councils who presumably will be the only legal authority these hapless persons can turn to? | lefrene | |
06/8/2015 10:10 | Hi Lefrene My gut feel is that they have no idea how much they are making or losing. The long term rentals should be easy enough to account for but NOT SO SURE ABOUT THE EVENT side. I get the impression there are only a few of the new units available and therefore they sell out quickly but probably don't earn an awful lot either. as for the Snug things then how much these cost and their life span etc etc is all an unknown. The analysts at the moment can not really understand this business any better than we do. If the company was up to speed then A proper trading statement would have been released. | angus17 | |
06/8/2015 09:21 | angus17, one does get the impression that it is run more like a family business and that the shareholders should keep their noses out. At least turnover will be up, but how much are they making? Certainly not giving anything away with those few words. | lefrene | |
06/8/2015 06:12 | Are these guys for real Something just isn't right here, I have never seen such a ridiculous statement. I just wonder if there are accounting issues with the increase in activities and they simply haven't been able to put a finger on where they actually stand, hence no real data until the actual interim results. Who knows but this is no way of running a plc. | angus17 | |
06/8/2015 06:06 | The silence is broken at last... "Snoozebox Holdings plc (AIM: ZZZ), ("Snoozebox") is having a busy event season with a substantial increase in the number of events compared to last year. Results for the 6 months ended 30 June will be published on the morning of Tuesday, 1 September 2015." | goodapple | |
05/8/2015 15:23 | Looks like a few more tucked away today. Just wear down the bulls until they throw in the towel with boredom. | lefrene | |
04/8/2015 11:43 | Well somebody must like them, as all I seem to see are sells which get mopped up. Perhaps this mooted deal with Mears and providing homes to councils will be the game changer? As for the rest, the country seems to be on events steroids, with outdoor shows absolutely everywhere, so I would think there is good demand for comfortable temporary accommodation. Lack of news would suggest an agenda, and others here have speculated an mbo being worked. | lefrene | |
04/8/2015 11:06 | The number you need is 0207 3534200 but there is nobody there at the moment representing Snoozebox. Its the London PR firm that issues the RNS info. etc etc and not Snoozebox itself. the email is snoozebox@tulchangro can't be bothered to send an email as I fear any response will be negative and the trading update when we eventually get one even worse. Hope not but I fear that if there were good news it would have been issued by now. | angus17 | |
03/8/2015 08:57 | Observer - I assume you have discussed your ongoing concerns with Lorcan O Murchu - what was his response? If you haven't I suggest that you do. 0207 457 2020 | norbert colon | |
03/8/2015 08:34 | I see the BOD continue to starve the market with news, no trading update in July like last year. No surprise there. In the meantime someone is happy to gobble up any loose private investor stock that hits the market. With the majority of stock held by a small number of institutional investors (some friendly to the company) it can only be a matter of time before we see either a bid or MBO in my view. Minorities would probably be offered a fair premium on the prevailing market price in such circumstances. Holding and waiting, could be worth a buy for a corporate move also IMO. | observer007 | |
31/7/2015 09:36 | No July update for us this year then! | goodapple | |
29/7/2015 09:02 | actually a buy. It was mine. | angus17 | |
29/7/2015 09:00 | I agree Ob007, and I suspect that trade this morning was also a sell, even though it's marked as a buy. | lefrene | |
29/7/2015 08:17 | goodapple I have been watching daily the trading in ZZZ for nearly 2 years - I have held for that time. Basically there has hardly been any retail buying for quite a while but there has been retail selling, all absorbed. The clue to some form of corporate action comes in the form of Kestral or BNY Mellon who have been building their position and are now up to 15%. The RNS suggests 'various other clients of Kestrel Partners LLP (through State Street Nominees Ltd)' The majority of ZZZ is held by a handful of major investors. It strikes me someone is taking out the free float which is now probably below 60m shares. All the makings of some corporate action here in my view. | observer007 | |
29/7/2015 07:36 | might buy a few before close today. gamble on tomorrow. | angus17 | |
29/7/2015 07:26 | How do you know that small sales are being "absorbed by some entity" as opposed to just some new small PI's? | goodapple | |
29/7/2015 06:39 | If there is no trading update this week then it adds weight to the Management Buyout (MBO) theory in my view. Snoozebox has starved the market of news for months on end, a classic MBO tactic. It seems demand for the company's products is increasing strongly across a plethora of new arenas. ZZZ is expecting to enter a strong growth phase in 2016, now is an ideal time for a MBO therefore. The free float is so small and anything that comes on the market via bored retail selling is absorbed by some entity. If a MBO is planned they will not want minority investors so will probably buy them out at a premium. My guess is to get shot of the remaining retail punters they would need to pay 15p+ | observer007 | |
28/7/2015 07:08 | trading update last July on the 28th Maybe tomorrow then re-reading last years it was all very positive. We shall soon see. | angus17 | |
23/7/2015 12:33 | I would expect them to leave the temporary housing negotiations to Mears group who have a long and successful relationship with councils. One wonders when the various entities that are accumulating here, will reveal their hand. Obviously if an MBO, then they want to get what they have built up on the cheap. | lefrene |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions