Serica Energy Share Discussion Threads

[spandy83] 12/3/2020 13:44

I'm so pleased someone on here understands me. It's been like talking to a brick wall

[upomega] 12/3/2020 11:04

I'm sure serica will be locking in more hedges. Gas trading 35 per therm winter 2020.
Also net production to serica will be double what it is today in a little over 18 month's. Starting with an increase from rhum 3 and Columbus next year

[rathean] 12/3/2020 10:54

Face the other way...?What chance of the 40p gap getting closed at the height of panic in 4-6 weeks when large parts of the US are locked down?

[chestnuts] 12/3/2020 10:30

I see theres a brokers note out by Peel Hunt bless them they have been miles off the value, we are in a market crash and value goes out the window, Gas is cheap and it will get cheaper, 30p is my target as crashes skew every value as the inverse pyramid unravels , lots of companies will go to the wall with big debts which will effect the banks and so on,

[swanvesta] 12/3/2020 09:08

Which agenda FB? They want to create FUD? I might buy that one. I just don't understand why they'd want to protect coastal real estate from a threat they believe doesn't exist.

[fardels bear] 12/3/2020 08:37

No mate. I don't believe it at all. Have you never heard of agendas? They are all around you.

[spandy83] 12/3/2020 06:35

It doesn't matter who you're talking about. Your point makes no sense regardless. These investors / owners want to save their property value - not needlessly back a false science of man-made climate change. Any investment they (theoretically) have put into this research is aimed at finding the actual answers so it will actually help them... they have no vested interest in getting it wrong. So your argument actually backs me up - IF all this research is backed by these property owners; then it's likely the derived outcomes aren't at all biased towards an outcome of man-made climate change. They're biased towards finding the actual problem and have all concluded independently that it's frickin man-made. Comprende?

[fardels bear] 12/3/2020 01:09

I'm not actually talking about nice beachfront properties. Instead I'm referring to the people who own places like London and New York, Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul, the list is endless.

[fardels bear] 12/3/2020 00:20

Well, I'm retired now but I do like geraniums, as I expect you know. You can't be a gardener these days without liking mud. Foot in mouth , perhaps.

[nicnic1953] 12/3/2020 00:14

fb,...I thought u were a gardener ,or is that the weekend job!

[spandy83] 11/3/2020 20:46

Then I'm amazed you don't respect scientific method & evidence more.

[fardels bear] 11/3/2020 20:28

I'm an anthropologist.

[fardels bear] 11/3/2020 20:27

Academic forums. I'm off out now.

[spandy83] 11/3/2020 20:19

Ohh... stuff you've read over the years... why didn't you say sooner. I'm convinced!

[fardels bear] 11/3/2020 20:17

Look I'm going to the pub now so don't take my silence as acquiescence.

[fardels bear] 11/3/2020 20:16

Stuff I've read over the years.

[spandy83] 11/3/2020 20:14

It's not what I'm told FB; it's what I've researched and what I've read, what I've applied my own critical thinking skills to - in light of scientific evidence. Try it.You didn't understand my point about your coastal argument did you? Your argument doesn't hold water (pardon the pun) at all; it's self contradictory.

[fardels bear] 11/3/2020 20:08

I think the difference is that you believe what you are told and I never have.

[spandy83] 11/3/2020 20:06

hTTps://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus.amp

[spandy83] 11/3/2020 20:05

Give me a scientific dispute, rather than a baseless, subjective one stemmed in conspiracy FB and we can happily debate it. Until then I'll consider your views to be completely and comprehensively uninformed on the entire matter. Climate change deniers are up there with flat-earthers these days; there's really no excuse.