We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serica Energy Plc | LSE:SQZ | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0CY5V57 | ORD USD0.10 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.90 | 2.11% | 188.50 | 187.80 | 188.00 | 190.20 | 184.00 | 187.00 | 4,948,209 | 16:35:29 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 812.42M | 177.8M | 0.4578 | 4.11 | 730.09M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
10/4/2018 11:49 | 6511 Chesty, Hot stacked, part running not completely cold. More expensive for rig supplier but significantly preferable for us!! Any idea when last operational? Either way BP will have npt related to such issues well recorded and contracted I am sure!! | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 11:45 | ...a boat was used to do some anchor work with the Blackford Dolphin recently which suggests to me that she might be getting "surveyed up" in readiness... | sawney | |
10/4/2018 11:37 | Dunderheed Hot stacked , ? do they keep it in the oven | chestnuts | |
10/4/2018 11:32 | Is the rig cold? Perhaps I'm mis remembering but I thought I'd seen somewhere it was stacked? In which case do we know if hot stacked? | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 11:26 | We should be able to track the rigs progress to BKR via its AIS transponder. ...and the anchorhandlers/suppl | sawney | |
10/4/2018 10:32 | It should all become clear before the fdp gets submitted why they've got a get out clause. I guess they won't need it.... | oilretire | |
10/4/2018 10:16 | It doesn't seem to have introduced a spate of mad buying. | fardels bear | |
10/4/2018 10:03 | By the way obviously didn't have time to organise listening in on the analysts call. That would require some organisation lol! Any titbits on there? | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 09:14 | Just as long as Trump looks elsewhere than the Eyeranians to divert US public opinion from some of his other peccadilloes. | fardels bear | |
10/4/2018 09:10 | Dunderheed And with the middleeast smouldering the oil price is going to rise. | chestnuts | |
10/4/2018 09:07 | We should be able to track the rigs progress to BKR via its AIS transponder. | captainfatcat | |
10/4/2018 09:02 | Exactly chesty on the same timelines as previously guided. How many smaller o&g companies perform in that manner (admittedly still BP but I draw confidence that they are equally committed to getting this onstream quickly then likely hand over to sqz). | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 08:55 | Goodmorning all I like that we that RHUM 3 is going to get a rework in May this will add around 6/7kboepd that is like an ERSKIN to the share price | chestnuts | |
10/4/2018 08:53 | What do you guys make of Sericas comment about the Erskine pipeline bypass cost "comparable to 40 days production" This sort of statement really annoys me just give me the numbers then I don't have to guess on what production figure to use 1500-2000-3000-4000 bopd? Hopefully we will get some feed back from the conference call that's due to start in a few minuets. Edit probably see some early feed back on twitter. | captainfatcat | |
10/4/2018 08:53 | I agree cfc and will refrain. Back to sqz. From my perspective, I am very pleased with Columbus decision and possible short term (hopefully upward) share price catalyst of r3 drilling commencing in May?! Best of luck all. | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 08:18 | 6494 so what. Why make the point in the first place? What relevance does that have at all to the results issued today? Have you never been wrong before Nige 'nice but dim'? | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 08:08 | The commercial arrangements re Columbus announcement is a bit ambiguous and could be read a couple of ways. I take it as the decision is made and they are angling for reductions in cost or pipeline tariffs if construction targets are not met which push production further back. Maybe there is some key commercial criteria proposed pipeline between the nearby Arran field and the Shearwater platform that has to be met before its fully sanctioned. Still T's to cross and I's to dot... Regardless the decision has been made due to the OGA 31 March deadline a condition of the Columbus licence extension. They must also submit an FDP by 30 June 2018. So I read this as by the end of June Once the FDP is submitted the 6.7 mmboe of net 2C contingent resources Columbus resources will be redefined as bankable reserves. | captainfatcat | |
10/4/2018 08:06 | Not going to get into a debate about who said what and trawl through a load of posts but needless to say they were and have been proved hopelessly wrong. | nigelpm | |
10/4/2018 07:44 | 6492, No I think it's been 'settled' the fdp will be nade with this potential back out to allow sqz to revert back to Lomond? That's how I read it. Decision made but with agreement with relevant teams but contingent upon future scenarios? I'm happy with this, it's cheaper but worse case if it doesn't progress as expected, there is a fall back. | dunderheed | |
10/4/2018 07:39 | If the Arran development does not proceed as planned, Columbus cannot be developed through Shearwater on a stand-alone basis. The selection of this route has been made conditional on that decision being made to the satisfaction of Serica. Therefore, discussions on commercial arrangements will continue with the Lomond field operator, in the event that the Shearwater option does not mature in the requisite time frame. Columbus plan not entirely settled then. | rogerlin | |
10/4/2018 07:32 | I saw it but took no real notice who posted it as it was clearly nonsense. | farmscan | |
10/4/2018 07:28 | I saw the post from Nigel today but i have to say that i remember no poster previously stating what was suggested by Nigelpm. Who he is refering to i have no idea. imho | pineapple1 | |
10/4/2018 07:20 | The post has been deleted or edited from earlier this morning. | farmscan |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions