We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scotgold Resources Limited | LSE:SGZ | London | Ordinary Share | AU000XINEAK5 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 13.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
05/7/2020 16:14 | Tsk, tsk, spamming again, wee Graham. GAL volumes have been similar to SGZ…higher highs in fact. | pr100 | |
05/7/2020 13:58 | Did you miss your chance, wee Graham? GAL share price has doubled since April so plenty of Bentleys for those in the know. | pr100 | |
05/7/2020 09:53 | Scottish government guidance on development on peatland. Advice from civil engineers is always to avoid peatland, eg. "Road construction within a peatland constitutes a major challenge to the designer and contractor. As the characteristics of peat can differ enormously across a deposit, and even within a few metres, few definitive rules exist to assist the engineer. This variability makes the construction of a risk free, low volume/low cost road within a peatland, unrealistic. All involved with the construction of roads over peat must be aware that failure is to be expected and a process must be in place to minimise and manage the impact of any such failure." Structurally, peat is classed as a geohazard by the BGS, simply because it will always sink under load, and the healthier the peatland, the more it will sink. But the reason it is protected is environmental. It can take 10,000 years to form, it locks in vast amounts of carbon and it supports a unique ecology. Any form of man-made drainage damages it. And of course, it is extremely difficult and expensive to build on. Foundations sink; heavy machinery sinks; and it freezes solid in Scottish winters. It has been a nightmare for major infrastructure projects such as Scottish wind farms to circumvent, even with their vast financial resources; so the challenges facing Scotgold and the hapless Grey should not be underestimated. | pr100 | |
04/7/2020 13:09 | Goldman Sachs - Berenberg - Peel Hunt - Liberum - Cannaccord give the top fund managers picks | jimsyone | |
04/7/2020 12:14 | Hi Shylock , thanks but no thanks ! lol As per usual you are using out of date information , there is far better and more useful information out there but that would not fit with your agenda . Bye for now LIAR | vfb1888 | |
04/7/2020 11:54 | Here you go, wee Graham: read all about it. | pr100 | |
03/7/2020 18:13 | mineng, for reasons I won't bore you with, I know a great deal about peat and the environmentalists/pr They don't have cash to spare and the cost of this project is escalating, notwithstanding their trumpeted Covid-19 cost savings. And don't forget that their cost projections were based on the assumption that they would already have generated six months of revenue by now. And the longer the delay to first gold, the worse state their finances will be in. If they don't start producing gold until Q4 2021, as is distinctly possible, they will have 'lost' two years of revenues - and even if their touted £1m per month from gold sales was always wishful thinking they will still have a huge cash shortfall before this mine does eventually start producing. So the last thing they need is to spend £1m or more on preserving peat when it wasn't budgeted for by the hapless Grey. | pr100 | |
03/7/2020 17:24 | pr100 Having had a look at the planning authority website, it does look to me as though you may be making a mountain out of a peat hill. The consultees appear in favour in principle. There are some i's to dot and t's to cross but I got the impression that permission will be granted. I'm sure they have lots to get on with meanwhile. Why the depth of peat wasn't adequately assessed via site investigation remains a question. | mineng | |
03/7/2020 10:01 | Wee Graham, you should stop wasting your time (and other people's) on diversionary nonsense and focus on the things that matter, such as the peat/planning problem. | pr100 | |
02/7/2020 16:24 | meneng, no - the planning application for the formation of an access track and containment cells for the temporary storage of peat is still not approved after many months of consultation - and numerous raps on Scotgold's knuckles by the Scottish Environment Agency (SEPA) for poor working practices which harm the environment. It would appear that there is no easy solution - and may not be any affordable solution - to the peat problem. Hence, Scotgold have not yet been able to issue an RNS to tell shareholders that the peat problem is resolved. Galantas share price has been holding steady at 18/20p so you may be right. Scotgold knows all too well that small UK gold mines are difficult/impossible to raise external cash for on acceptable terms so it will be interesting to see where the legendary Phelps turns for mine funding. | pr100 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions