Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[oldnotwise] 25/4/2019 11:56

Hi rHatton, 11.5p? Clever lad!!
OK long term a punt from here has to be so much better than even 11.5p!
MY view?
Well put in a proportion of the intended whole now and wait... if you invest about half of the sale proceeds you get your original holding, with cash left to think about later (or somewhere else)!
If a cash raiser from existing holders happens then more money can go in at that level. If not catch the share price as it gets upward movement from wherever it finds a base.
Nice to have a choice like that.... hats off to you!
AIMO
This all depends on your view of success for the various platforms..... obviously.
DYOR
ATB

[rhatton] 25/4/2019 11:48

What are people’s thought on this? It’s tempting to come back for a few...funding required still or do you think they can get the data over line without?

[tosh123] 25/4/2019 11:41

You have to laugh.... the village idiot has posted ..." studied the science of Scancell for 7 years .. and posted in excess of 30,000 times on the subject .. "the Thesis".

He now appears to believe that a history of over 30'000 posts of utter rubbish, filled with lies and 100% inaccuracies, equates to a PHD !

Righto... and the moon is made out of cheese.

[oldnotwise] 25/4/2019 10:14

I'm a bit surprised to see comment on the other BB which suggests that people have been selling on a miniscule riseare somehow not very bright.
I'm not sure anyone who thinks (rightly or wrongly) that there's a large supply of SCLP shares freely available to MMs would want to chase the share price up on what is good (but not conclusive) information.
If there's no supply why is the share price not running at around 7 or 8p after some good news?
It could be Oversupply or it could be little demand.
Or it could just be that those already in are simply not motivated to put more cash to the risk of negative return, or it could simply be that many think they'll have to stump up for another call, before the DATA that's been required by significant IIs available.
When looked at like this there's no great incentive ATM to commit more funds (for existing holders) and any new money that's maybe coming along from the Proactive chat will be absorbed by the paper already (or available) to MMs.
This may not be correct but without good positive Trial data there's not a great deal of incentive to commit more money ATM ..... Is there?
AIMO
ATB

[tosh123] 25/4/2019 10:03

Well that was short and sweet.
No real conviction behind the rise by the looks of it, it all petered out quite quickly.
As ONW says, the company probably need to have a concerted flow of positive news to convince investors, we have all heard the wolf cry far too often.

At least there has been something coming out of HQ.

[oldnotwise] 25/4/2019 09:36

It looks to me that (quite apart from the now apparent share overhang), the investing followers of scancell are no longer giving the BOD the sort of support and belief that used to be available in spades.
It also appears that the Honeymoon (which amazingly lasted for several years) has now been well and truly converted to a rather tired (if not suspicious) marriage which only very few LTH can get out of without some expense.
Beware low flying rolling pins for anyone getting in "late from the office" tomorrow morning after the "promise" of drinks (and more)out in the city for a "lucky" few.
Looking forward to seeing the next moves.
AIMO
ATB

[terror] 25/4/2019 09:08

And down she goes.

[terror] 25/4/2019 08:46

Overhang still there. You can’t have 1m bought and only a 0.5p tick up.

Might help to clear the books though

[the real lozan] 25/4/2019 08:45

Morning Tosh, O N W et al -
My 'observations / opinions' are NOT anti SCLP
They ARE 'anti trHYPE' and as such 'Alternative Views' to the 'overstated'
I urge folks to 'keep their feet on the ground'
Rather than the "Double figures in S P" being bandied about, in my opinion - I AM even more convinced that a FUNDING excersise is NEEDED' and 'IMMINENT'... Certainly =
"On the CARDS"
Question is = At what price ???
.
Is it WISE to "GO ALL IN" at this moment in time ??? .
.
I DO understand, this is not what people WANT to hear - BUT, if people only hear what they WANT to hear =
They maybe shouldn't be 'surprised' if what they DON'T WANT to hear becomes REALITY

[oldnotwise] 25/4/2019 08:28

I'll be interested to see whether the CF share overhang's disappeared or whether the MM are rather happy to be going short as anything into the first bit of demand for a long time.
Sorry not to have become completely convinced as yet, but I do wonder about the supply side here...
AIMO
ATB

[tosh123] 25/4/2019 08:27

Loz,
i agree, however, i think this " news " will provide the launchpad for a share price recovery, even if its only a couple of pence, in percentage terms it could be significant.

Its all about timing now.

[tosh123] 25/4/2019 07:50

Still need funding but hopefully, and depending on results, we may be able to raise at a more acceptable level.... timing is key.

[tosh123] 25/4/2019 07:47

Great news !
Maybe this one bit of news will help the share price recover ?

[torquayfan] 25/4/2019 02:50

Gazza - groan . . . . .

[gazza] 24/4/2019 23:30

TF, we need to work on the sequel now!

[torquayfan] 24/4/2019 22:24

Gazza. Contrary to Inan's comment, 'that' discussion was not 'petty' at all and actually, I thought we worked our way through it politely enough. Yep - The End. Thanks.

[tosh123] 24/4/2019 16:34

ineptico..... i quote " even a chimp lover can work that out "... You didn't ... and with that revelation, i rest my case.

[inanaco] 24/4/2019 16:17

if Ruck is copy pasting every post bermuda makes with the early stuff not even identified as such

you have Bermuda posting effectively his text twice ... as Ruck and bermuda

even a chimp lover can work that out ..

[tosh123] 24/4/2019 16:12

Oh the irony.... the uneducated idiot claims that other people cant read, yet in the same breath claims that ... " 'Bermuda is Mr Ruck .. who knows "... is not a suggestion of dual ID.... This is brilliant stuff !


I make that about 20 - 0 here, and the same 20 - 0 on the other BB.
When will the idiot learn.

[inanaco] 24/4/2019 15:46

Bermuda

hey ... read the post it was not a claim of Dual ID

[gazza] 24/4/2019 15:45

"Petty squabble" - abridged.

Ruck: TF, you should have posted the entire g(o*3)sed post.
TF: Really? I don't think so, I'll check with goosed.
Goosed: That's fine TF.
TF: Ruck, told you didn't I.
Ruck: Fair enough!

The End.

Or should have been!!!!!

[inanaco] 24/4/2019 15:44

look Tf ... bermuda can argue his own position with ease

he does not need your help or Ruckrover ..

that just creates more of a tangled web that nobody can follow

you seem to want to project everybody else post from here to the other BB .. the problem with that is, who can debate the post ? as the author is not on the other BB
and you provide no explanation as to why the link or post is important

so the issue is your lack of authority on the subject ... not mine, to be able to determine why a post is useful or not ..

so when i asked what was Useful in the post from Goosed that was Novel .. you and Ruck could not identify ..

yet you both argued over it ... !!