We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.55 | 9.30 | 9.80 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.40 | 88.61M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
11/7/2018 13:38 | Whopper sell GooFy123 getting out perhaps | drdobson1 | |
11/7/2018 12:41 | Lozan, For the record, I have to say your last post had plenty of content, merit and facts. The above view supercedes, replaces and makes defunct any previous views I may have had and posted several years ago. | gazza | |
11/7/2018 12:39 | Always nice to see that kind of volume.Heralds a rise. | j777j | |
11/7/2018 12:29 | GUFFAW ...The 'science anorak' leader of trHYPE,,,,utters = "however i do support his comments," YOU also 'SPPORTED' = " £1 a share 'On the CARDS' years ago" " £6 a share here almost 18 months ago" " £8+ a share here"... maybe, perhaps, before or after man collonises Mars " NO RISK here" "FUNDING is NOT an ISSUE here" "BUY,BUY,BUY and HOLD" "55,500 CLUB shares at 44.6p " At 13.25p = "We have 'hit the bottom here" . DO *WE ALL* { US SHREWDIES} NEED to go on ??? OR Should *WE ALL* just allow YOU to CONtinue to make a FOOL of YOURSELF on YOUR own ??? | the real lozan | |
11/7/2018 12:29 | 0.9% of the total shares have just been traded 3.5mil !! | morgank | |
11/7/2018 12:10 | is your post aimed at Gazza Lozan ? after all it is his description not mine ... Gazza's description of Lozans Posts """"""Posts devoid of content, merit, thought, intelligence or facts."""" however i do support his comments, | inanaco | |
11/7/2018 11:31 | Ineptico, thats not obscenity, its FACT. | tosh123 | |
11/7/2018 11:24 | Tosh's last resort .... Gazza - 12 Apr 2018 - 20:27:26 - 14918 of 16596 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP If you can't construct a reasoned argument there is always obscenities - the last resort of the intellectually challenged. | inanaco | |
11/7/2018 11:08 | ineptico, as has been proven, AGAIN, they are accurate. So far from being devoid of content, they are informative and will be of use to anyone reading this BB, unlike your Contentless, meritless, thoughtless, factless drivel. £8 hahaha Moron. | tosh123 | |
11/7/2018 10:53 | Lozan is doing so well at proving up .. Gazza's description of Lozans Posts """"""Posts devoid of content, merit, thought, intelligence or facts."""" | inanaco | |
11/7/2018 10:19 | Except we are not developing inhibitors ... thus the link is a "worthless" discussion in relation to Scancell Science and the risk is non transferable However any inhibitors that are found to work are a possible "synergy" with scancell so not sure exactly what you so called "experts" are discussing ... I would also point out these results have already being discussed on the LSE BB . | inanaco | |
11/7/2018 09:31 | Re. Goosed article - A perfect example of GOOD posting / research / BALANCE A GOOD example of WHY investors / potential investors here NEED to have access to, and BENEFIT from ALL available info / 'Alternative Views'....NOT = Just the trHYPE. . It should be noted, that - whereas goosed 'presented' the 16604 for ALL to observe on this 'open forum'.... it is questionable whether a certain 'science anorak gang' would have posted this article ... had they 'found it'. Less questionable is the notion that- Had the 'science anorak trHYPE gang' 'presented' the 16604 info, *WE ALL* would , no doubt, have been TOLD to IGNORE it. | the real lozan | |
11/7/2018 07:45 | Yes Goosey, Helps explain in UNbiased way WHY there is RISK here SOOO Unlike Failed Professor PLUM is a CONplete NANA who Insists NO RISK. Plus these are REAL scIENTIsts not NOB the Builder waanabees | drdobson1 | |
11/7/2018 07:31 | Great article goosed, thanks for posting the link. Plenty of scientific reasons why biotech investment is fraught with risk. | gazza | |
10/7/2018 22:20 | Evening Lozan Was there not a famous Detective called Slipper of the Yard. Well baNANA is a infamous DEFective called SLIPPER of the SCAM GANG. Like the THAI CONnrction after the great news from there today.NO Doubt PLUM will make a Terrible comment like he did with GRENFELL. HIS political party is UP the SPRout and his views are Irrelevant as they are hear | drdobson1 | |
10/7/2018 14:41 | Well Plum.You are intellectually challenged.Bet you never reached the hights of imbecility. You were NOT missed on here at all so LEAVE and let US post full of informed content and facts with intelligence NIT the CINsiderable amount if trHYOE you SProut. As goosey says Timbo you may want to ask the following. When is IND submission going in and presume it is with Trigid 2. We don’t want any more delays with trials on either SCIB Combo or Moditope. Us long suffering genuine SH NOT the PLANKtin like baNABA deserve much better. Also ASK what are Odds on winning BIg Challenge and what happens with MONEY. PLUM thinks it is a dead cert and Money GETs trousered by SCLP. Want to make sure before I BUY more SO want an informed opinion on likelihood of winning NOT more of £8 a share trHYPE from a Proven Liar. Bet he got a lot more than a Slipperung in the BIG HOuse.The inmates are a bit less gentle than the Headmaster | drdobson1 | |
10/7/2018 11:58 | Timbo - not convinced that it's a sensible question but perhaps they might be persuaded to provide an update on the Nano-Vesicle delivery tech ? | gooosed | |
10/7/2018 11:31 | Gazza ... refined ........ ? that would be a hand braked turn ? are you now saying that Loz's ... """Posts are full of content, merit, thought, intelligence and facts."""" FFS ... don't go to over board | inanaco | |
10/7/2018 11:28 | Gazza - 12 Apr 2018 - 20:27:26 - 14918 of 16596 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP If you can't construct a reasoned argument there is always obscenities - the last resort of the intellectually challenged. -------------------- """ history has shown tosh ... you must be intellectually challenged """" not my words ... Gazza - 25 Apr 2017 - 19:34:15 - 9069 of 16598 Using immunology to fight cancer. - SCLP Tosh, ok. I can't quite reconcile your stance of holding tight whilst calling others doing the same "cretins". Anyone with a holding, large or small, hold in expectation of improving their situation from hereonin. The potential for gain or loss from this point is the same whether you are sitting on a profit or a loss don't you think? you did not gain from 10p tosh you just held .... clearly gazza agree's with me ... your stance all the way through has been to hold for a deal .. not here to argue with you tosh, don't need to .. but history of your idiotic behaviour falls into """Posts devoid of content, merit, thought, intelligence or facts."""" due to """" you must be intellectually challenged"""" | inanaco | |
10/7/2018 11:22 | Or did a "good slippering" hit a nerve? | gazza |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions