Scancell Share Discussion Threads

[torquayfan] 08/4/2018 16:24

Inan. Coming from you 'that's rich', as my Dad would have said. I can't speak for anyone else but for me - I don't like to see self immolation. And I thought the desperate effort by Lozenge to find a negative was funny. That's all. Goodnight.

[inanaco] 08/4/2018 13:12

C7 and Tf leave him mumbling to himself .... Lozan has no shares and no money, why get involved ?

[chelsea35] 08/4/2018 11:24

Lozan..............""".As *WE ALL* CAN clearly see, the recent discussions 'tween BoB and myself were -AS ALWAYS, carried out in a POLITE manner. By BOTH posters."""

Back on Planet Earth, it is noted that ALL discussions CONducted by BoB are always polite!!! Any discussions between you both, noted by an observer, are always prompted by some fictitious ramblings by your good self which need correcting so as NOT to taint the share further, despite you being CONvinced of your own false CONtributions to this excuse for a BB.

CONdescendingly you refer to him as BoB, just another disciple of your fallen EMPIRE.

It would make a change for you to post something CONstructive here .

"""Thus, resulting in 'constructive contribution' to forming a BALANCED VIEW on the subject of SUCCESSFUL *INVESTING in SCLP*"""" GUFFAW!!!.

[gooosed] 08/4/2018 11:15

While it's quiet . . . . .

[torquayfan] 08/4/2018 11:10

This rambling stuff with CAPITALS just looks loony M8.

You were so desperate to build up a negative about a few thousand Euro of Patent expenses, I had to chuckle. But a nice day to you.

[the real lozan] 08/4/2018 10:25

"CONstructive CONtribution" V REALITY
As *WE ALL* CAN clearly see, the recent discussions 'tween BoB and myself were -AS ALWAYS, carried out in a POLITE manner. By BOTH posters.
In FACT, most exchanges 'tween ANY and ALL posters -Re, *INVESTING in SCLP*... Are usually carried out in an ADULT / BALANCED manner.
Thus, resulting in 'constructive contribution' to forming a BALANCED VIEW on the subject of SUCCESSFUL *INVESTING in SCLP*.
.
However - As *WE ALL* CAN clearly see, from the 'Weak-ender trHYPE flock'... Who CLAIM *WE ALL* "never discuss SCLP matters on this forum"... The opposite IS the REALITY.
.
Yet AGAIN, This 'weak-ender' trHYPERs and SCAMMERS... is *NOT* to 'offer input'to the *BALANCED VIEW on the subject of SUCCESSFUL *INVESTING in SCLP*.
BUT... To 'urge focus' NOT on the "constructive contribution " of ANY posts
JUST ..To 'urge derogatory focus' towards the POSTER
ANY POSTER, Who 'highlights' the REALITY... and 'highlights' JUST how 'disastrous' the FAILED trHYPE driven BUY,BUY, BUY SCAM... HAS PROVEN ...for anyone INTERESTED in the subject of SUCCESSFUL *INVESTING in SCLP*.

[torquayfan] 08/4/2018 02:36

Lozan - sheer desperation to find something amiss or negative about SCLP, is evident in your ridiculous 14848 and 14850, so politely answered by Bermudashorts. Just occasionally, at the core of your comments there is a grain of reality but that will invariably be lost in the hyper snide style of your posting.

Why not change that and make a constructive contribution ? Nice day to you . . .

[chelsea35] 07/4/2018 23:56

10acious..........No need to worry, i understand Lozans "points" very well. They are the same points regurgitad over five years and we now have the added bonus of "monkeys". As i said brilliant!!! Sad really.

[10acious] 07/4/2018 23:13

I would suggest that if you cannot understand the point being made that you should not be investing at all, let alone be encouraging others to!

[chelsea35] 07/4/2018 17:13

Lozan................so everyone should have sold between 10/12p, and missed the rise to 19.25!!! Brilliant.......

[agema] 07/4/2018 15:07

Fragma,

A placing could well be in the works. My guess is in May. But we could expect it any time now really.

Bet its a big one too.

[the real lozan] 07/4/2018 11:08

From a BBC article - "What monkeys can teach us about money"
"Most people will gamble and go for the riskier choice. Surprisingly, so do the monkeys. The thought of losing out is so painful that they will risk a bigger loss just for a chance of no loss.

When stocks and shares crash or house prices collapse, you might expect people to become more cautious. In fact, they take more risks. People will hold onto stock that is losing value, speculating the price will rise again, because we can’t bear the thought of having less than we have now. This is loss aversion."

[fragma] 06/4/2018 13:46

Every buy now seems to be pushing the price lower for the next buy, as has been for 3 days now. can now buy at 14.38.

From my experience they are either working a very large sell order or their is a placing in the works (which would explain the 5% gap up the other day on no volume to allow the forward selling of shares)

[bermudashorts] 06/4/2018 12:51

Lozan

That is the EPO fee. As for the translation costs, only the Claims require translation. There are just 17 claims which in total will probably cover 2 to 3 A4 pages and most of them are just one sentence. It won't be a significant cost.

[the real lozan] 06/4/2018 12:27

BoB -
Have you ever had to pay for a 'listed French translator' to translate a 'document' from Enlish into French ???
... 0 / - ...
You reckon - 925 euros.. will cover it ???

[bermudashorts] 06/4/2018 11:54

Lozan,

The fee is modest - 925 euros.

[gooosed] 05/4/2018 10:59

Nugget hunting time . . . . . . .

[chelsea35] 05/4/2018 06:02

"""Just post after post of false information and lies. All very pointless!!"
SO.. Why do you post them Elsie ???.
And from the 'inferior forum' Elsie posts ="Of course ADVFN reckon two straight sells lol, what a waste of a BB."
SO... Why do you post here at all Elsie ???"""

Lozan, very simple. As a shareholder in Scancell, and considering it is your posts i am discussing, it is about time more us challenged the nonsense and lies that you post. Really is as simple as that.

[the real lozan] 04/4/2018 21:16

"Just post after post of false information and lies. All very pointless!!"
SO.. Why do you post them Elsie ???.
And from the 'inferior forum' Elsie posts ="Of course ADVFN reckon two straight sells lol, what a waste of a BB."
SO... Why do you post here at all Elsie ???

[chelsea35] 04/4/2018 17:46

Tosh, correct i haven"t called many things that right in the first few years, but i have always honestly declared that, have others here been honest over their holdings??

Just so tedious that in any given day SCLP is not discussed, just constant talk of inanaco. Would be good to get over that after six years??

The two 245k trades are probbly rollovers, like the many we have seen before. Whats the big deal or the difference now??

Just post after post of false information and lies. All very pointless!!

[bermudashorts] 04/4/2018 14:41

fragma - that's not my understanding.

They could have been anything, buys, sells, transfers, rollovers but as rHatton says share price hasn't dropped and second trade was for a higher price so not sure why anyone would jump to the conclusion that they were sells. Similarly the share price hasn't risen which suggests they probably weren't buys either.

Either way, it doesn't matter whatever the trades were, they've washed through now.

[rhatton] 04/4/2018 13:52

Doubt very much 600ks worth of shares would be sold without the share price cratering.