We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 10.25 | 10.00 | 10.50 | 10.25 | 10.25 | 10.25 | 239,636 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.95 | 95.1M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/2/2018 19:32 | Yes good we can all enjoy polite and informed comment whilst t’other place is in meltdown. The dim witted one has been quiet of late but perhaps his slow thought process is ready to concede that even with the recent validations of the science and the departure of the ineffective previous CEO the ASTUTE have been proved right again. Until the FUNDING on SCIB 1 is SORTED by RNS and NOT falsely linked to a Cancer Charity then this share price will move down and not up to £6 a share. Perhaps I am be8 g unkind to the idiot as he still has 6 months to get to his target.Guffaw | drdobson1 | |
21/2/2018 16:17 | Unless its just my laptop, the other place is experiencing problems with connectivity. Lets be thankful for small mercies, we have a spell of relative calm. | tosh 123 | |
21/2/2018 14:34 | Tosh { et al} - The only element that may cause ANYONE to sport a "surprised face" is the fact that inane'n'co PERSISTS in showing HIMSELF-UP, by CON stantly making 'WILD, FALSE CLAIMS', that- it comes as NO SURPRISE...that NO ONE { with an iota of common sense} takes any notice of...any more Other than HIS....LOSS making,*MINTED*, co CON spiritors that is... | the real lozan | |
21/2/2018 14:12 | please tell me that you didn't have your " surprised " face on, when you posted that Lozan. | tosh 123 | |
21/2/2018 12:07 | Tempus fugit - Tonight, Mrs Lozan and I will attend the annual 'soirée / dinner-do' which our local bank invite us to. Is it REALLY a whole year since the last one ??? It must be, so =??? Is it REALLY about a year, since inane'n'co CLAIMED = "This will be £6 a share in 18 months" ??? Some things happen...Some things NEVER happen. | the real lozan | |
21/2/2018 09:44 | Seems CRUK/Scancell are not the only ones looking for alternative delivery systems : | gooosed | |
20/2/2018 14:46 | The more one reads the 'offerings' from the "Bunch of schoolgirls" on M F F F, especially Elsie, the more one CAN see- Where Steve Coogan {might have} got the 'idea' for his 'Manic Character' = Alan Partridge. Mind you, Mr Coogan, was WISE enough to *Tone Down / Add some intelligence* to his *Alan Partridge character* in order to make him ....More Credible / Believable | the real lozan | |
20/2/2018 14:19 | So nothing has changed, this isn't a new thing, they've done this from day 1, I find C7 more revolting and devious than Inanaco personally | wanderer1210_0 | |
20/2/2018 13:36 | It would seem that a certain poster over on the other place has ruffled a few feathers, so much so in fact , that the usual cowards have decided to gang up and get perfectly rational posts removed. It really is pathetic... What a bunch of schoolgirls... The guy ( but I think maybe a female ) has made a few very relevant points, and proved that the word " very " was NOT used in the recent interview, contrary to C7's continued posts on the matter, only to have the post removed, as it proves the poetic license employed by the blinkered mob, to mislead the gullable. Are they really that scared of things that they still feel the need to get any mildly contentious posts removed ???? Really ?? It would seem that they are all now suffering from the village idiot disease, and will just lie their way out of things. Truly pathetic... they should be ashamed of themselves. | tosh 123 | |
20/2/2018 10:21 | Tosh, that's because Holloway didn't say anything that Goodfellow hasn't said on many occasions. As for near to short term that could mean anything. | panama7 | |
19/2/2018 16:36 | Terror... the much published " herd arriving ", has not materialised. | tosh 123 | |
19/2/2018 16:18 | The MFF are dismayed to find out that the Proactive interview was................. Rats was up all weekend checking the view counter, what a sad PC Plod he is. He should stick to putting the boot in. | terror | |
19/2/2018 11:09 | ONW, Just let the idiot bang on with his RUBBISH. My post was VERY clear... the £20 mill IS NOT Scancells, it WILL NOT appear on the balance sheet. FACT. The guy is a loser... simple as that. | tosh 123 | |
17/2/2018 21:05 | BS - I'm reminded that timbo had previously raised the Ichor Electroporation delivery method as a point of interest some time back. A potentially significant development. | gooosed | |
17/2/2018 20:31 | Thanks gooosed and as you say, it'll be interesting to see whether any further details are given in the presentation. | bermudashorts | |
17/2/2018 18:16 | The Calculus Investor Forum presentation pdf. document (below) mentions the evaluation of Nano-vesicle delivery in relation to SCIB2 on slide 26 & is again mentioned on slide 31. Interesting to see if Dr. Peter Brown elaborated (presentation recording to follow) on Nano-vesicle delivery & 1. Whether CRUK decide to employ this method on the SCIB2 trial. 2. The reason for a possible departure from Ichor TriGrid Gun. 3. Whether this is an off the shelf, in-house or again, a potentially licensed tech. Scancell always exploring/pushing the science. | gooosed | |
16/2/2018 16:04 | Exactly ONW . you agree with Tosh because you can .... you can agree with Loz as well however it does not make you interesting .... or correct how could it .... """ the £20 mill has nothing to do with Scancell.""" completely Factually incorrect when the RNS stated ""Scancell a member of high profile team shortlisted for Cancer Research UK's prestigious Grand Challenge award """ hence its not a debate or anything ... its just you being pedantic .. | inanaco | |
16/2/2018 15:17 | Inanaco You say, " ....hence i ignore your pedantic posts" You seem not to, but I wish you would... :-) I think that if you read my recent posts carefully you'd realise that I've become more positive towards the share price over the last few weeks. Since you're still banging on about "negative perception" you're clearly unable to read what I've written and your head simply says, "ONW... MUST BE A NEGATIVE POST" and then off you go! Anyway from someone you ignore but seem to reply to (??????) thanks for your comments (but sadly I continue to disagree with them). I'm sure that one day we'll find something to agree on, but until then, ATB | oldnotwise | |
16/2/2018 15:00 | you would, hence i ignore your pedantic posts, When you finally get off your negative perception and your inherent desire to try and push the commercial aspects as more important than the science, when only the science can be commercial and you try and present that in a way that appears to be approved by the Dim Wits but still posted like a politician as you actually don't say anything, same as tosh ... dress it up ... then it looks plausible ... | inanaco | |
16/2/2018 14:51 | Inanaco, I agree in principle with Tosh, so feel free to disagree, but there's no point in going further. ATB | oldnotwise |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions