We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scancell Holdings Plc | LSE:SCLP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63D3314 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.60 | 9.40 | 9.80 | 9.60 | 9.60 | 9.60 | 2,096 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceutical Preparations | 5.27M | -11.94M | -0.0129 | -7.44 | 89.07M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
18/9/2017 09:30 | C7 In fairness I think it would be wise to sit down and work out what sort of strategy you want to apply to your funds in the future. In essence are you an investor/Trader/Gamb Once you know that then you're in a position to think what to do next. There's no right and wrong answers to this, and things can change, but the main consideration is what you want to achieve with your available "pot". There's only one person who can answer that , and that's you! ATB | oldnotwise | |
18/9/2017 09:08 | ""straightforward""! | chelsea35 | |
18/9/2017 09:06 | ONW Nicely balanced post.Wish I had enough money to spread the risk but you give wise words. | drdobson | |
18/9/2017 08:23 | C7 Apols The answer I would give to your question is quite straightforward. The notoriety of AIM Baby Bios should IMO set off warning bells when an investor decides to BUY. Why? Because the failure rate for such companies is high, the journey to commercialisation can be erratic to say the least. An investor in revenue positive companies is looking for the dividends (Income) payable to shareholders to begin to flow and increase over time as the company's profits grow. This is why any investor in even a company like Scancell is in it for .... ie they're looking for PROFITS to be derived from the successful development of the IP. As the business that Scancell is in is high risk most INVESTORS (rather than speculative traders) would expect to have as many failures in their portfolios as winners (and that's an optimistic way of putting it), and so anyone who is an investor (rather than an out and out gambler) would want to have a spread of such stocks forming part of a larger portfolio, and even the sector involvement in Biotechnology would only form a (relatively) small proportion of the overall portfolio's value. The idea being simply that many baby bios will fail so hopefully with good research and a bit of luck some will blossom and produce that dividend income that gives the shares real value. So for an INVESTOR a "Buy and Hold" policy makes sense, but that buy and hold requires time and other investments to spread the risk. This is the reason that I've always been wary of the "all in" and other "Gambler" mentality approaches that have been propagated in SCLP as The share is high risk and by definition not suitable for anyone who has a limited investment pot who wishes to INVEST rather than GAMBLE. If "Buy and Hold" doesn't suit the means/investment strategy of an INDIVIDUAL I'd like to suggest saying that it's stupid isn't necessarily correct, it certainly isn't stupid for my approach. Hope this clarifies my position. AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
18/9/2017 07:50 | ONW, you never actually replied to my 11743. | chelsea35 | |
18/9/2017 07:40 | oldnotwise, you engaged me yesterday, felt i wanted to end that rift as i have tried to do before. I sincerely hope that was your intention to, lets see. | chelsea35 | |
17/9/2017 19:57 | Wig .. understands you better now Loz | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:50 | ONW At any point after the events you can point fingers .. because its all down to what Scancell do and what the market does ... which we have no control over, Now, you claim that folks listened .... so why did the market fall ?? I have never posted a negative ... BB has very little impact ... indeed pretty well non at all on the share price .. cannot imagine Helium or calculus reading it .. and the majority don't want to wade through the majority of posts that are just not relevant. After all they can read RNS and listen and watch Scancell Vids. So lets not hype the Value of the BB to suit your games .......... | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:49 | O N W et al - Good move NOT to enter into a 'spat / argument' with der TEA LEAF As everyone knows ='It always ends up in tears' HIS | the real lozan | |
17/9/2017 19:27 | Rat a Tat Tat ... Not mine Puritas Free money .. it was 8p to 60p .. LOL all in at 8p to 15p ... went well chap ... You seem to forget after your 27p sell it went to 38p ... That's trading .... if i remember you didn't buy the 00 at 22p ...then what happened ? | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:24 | Strange Loz ........... I cannot remember how many times i have said its a game of poker, ... maybe you missed that ref 11747 .... | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:23 | Inanaco I won't start a spat about your personal situation. What I will say is is that things seem to have changed from some sources and there's a rather distasteful attempt to "Rewrite History" here. Remember all the posters who extolled the " go all in" "free money" and "Rat Tat Tat" nonsense? Then have a think about some others who mentioned the potential problems of such a "Risk" strategy. THEN think of some who've switched alliances and now say that the original Gung Ho stuff was bad... Stated investment policies have changed radically from some posters, but some have stayed true to their originally stated views. Those who have attempted to change what actually unfolded need to look inward and maybe sit around and quieten down a bit. AIMO ATB | oldnotwise | |
17/9/2017 19:15 | Wig ... no idea .. you can never take the Moral High Road ... when talking about buying and selling, in shares as The last in, will always lose in a falling market. | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:11 | ONW ... I started at 8p .. problem that consumes Loz, he conveniently forgets i hold a commercial property estate, which every body knew about back in 2013, thus i may have moved all funds into Scancell from my share account, but that's only 5% of investment assets, his problem is being selective in what he posts. Which is way i always try and find the posts concerned, Loz has only ever averaged down....... or traded out at a loss | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:04 | Bit of maths ... and risk Averaging down is plausible, actually you can use Ivy's post .. £10,000 at .3 share price profit thus his first buy at approx .75 (2 year sp) and his buying at the lows at .0975 to achieve an average of .2 indicates approx 5.35 ratio ... thus he must have bought £3750 first time, on the second buy, £16250 to take his capital cost to £20,000 to profit £10,000 (.2p to .3p rise) When its laid out like that .. it gets interesting as you can see the huge disparity in risk in trying to save £3750 initial investment .. | inanaco | |
17/9/2017 19:01 | "but he didn't he had to trade down from a high average.."Interestin | wigwammer | |
17/9/2017 18:57 | Well... remember all the taunts about my sale at 27p (which was an inaccurate level but for this purpose I'll accept that price)? That approach cost me CGT but that's one of the few taxes I'm happy to pay if it's unavoidable. My original strategy was to hold my original investment..... but when it's possible to sell and retain a holding subsidised by profit (the illusive "free shares" strategy) then I took it and have the option to rebuild if I wish, or trade if the options present themselves. The core holding I had after the "27p sale" is what I will retain as my "in to the end" so that adjusted my "buy and hold" because (as I posted on many occasions) I had invested above my theoretical self imposed limit in the first place. I really shouldn't have bought more than my original value limit, but I did (and posted that I had) but with hindsight I'm pleased I did. However, even if I don't agree with an "all in" approach it's not for me to decide whether it's stupid or not for other people. All in my opinion ATB | oldnotwise | |
17/9/2017 18:54 | The DIFFERENCE is TEA LEAF I wasn't deliberately DECIEVING anyone = YOU = were / are | the real lozan | |
17/9/2017 18:36 | Looking back i am sure that occurred. Mind it wont be just inanaco that has ever done that. | chelsea35 | |
17/9/2017 18:09 | I can understand that, and worked up to the point where it momentarily hit 64p. But without trading it, and sinking back to 10p, how can that be a good stratagy?? Sure it is one of those we have discussed many times, buy many of us who bought in late 30s early 40s could only really take a loss, or average down as we continued to hit new lows. | chelsea35 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions