We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saga Plc | LSE:SAGA | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BMX64W89 | ORD 15P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.40 | 2.00% | 122.40 | 121.20 | 122.60 | 123.60 | 118.20 | 118.20 | 707,017 | 16:35:19 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Misc Retail Stores, Nec | 581.1M | -259.2M | -1.8401 | -0.66 | 172.13M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
07/2/2019 08:21 | I have been with Saga for several years for both of our cars and House/Contents Insurance. Last year my car was £420, this year it jumped to £480. Checked around and got back to them and they reduced it to £445. As you say I renewed it for just a £25.00 increase but why didn't they offer that price without prompting. Guess many people just accept the first offering. | billy5 | |
06/2/2019 16:47 | I've been with Saga motor insurance for around 10 years. They're great. Of course their renewal price is ridiculous as they hope you simply renew without checking around. All insurers do this and it's annoying. Just haggle! | griffinred | |
06/2/2019 15:32 | They are all doing it, but I'm surprised none of them ever give you a renewal that's say £30 more (or 5-10%). For that amount I wouldn't bother changing (and haven't in the past). You'd think that one of them would do themselves a survey and find out what £ increase would typically still retain the customer. In these days of data-driven decisions, that doesn't look like a big task. A-level chart of % increase vs. % customer loss, with total revenue/profit on the same chart on a different scale. I think. | yump | |
06/2/2019 13:11 | Optomistic - I was with Saga a few years ago, then moved to Aviva on cost grounds and have just moved back to Saga for the same reason. Brand loyalty doesn't work anymore sadly. | skinny | |
06/2/2019 13:07 | FYI Buy (Dev) Clever! Target up to 50p! Good article from Gary Mac! Have a read. Dan x | daniel levi bmd | |
06/2/2019 13:05 | No Skinny...SAGA | optomistic | |
06/2/2019 11:54 | Are you talking about Aviva? | skinny | |
06/2/2019 11:46 | Skinny, I had been with them a couple of years but this year they increased it too much..went with the RAC and saved £100. It's what they seem to do now, get you on the books then try to fleece you in the subsequent years...seems like you have to keep changing which is something I really don't want to do each year. I wish they would realise that loyal customers would stay with them for ever if treat right. | optomistic | |
06/2/2019 10:03 | I've just moved my car insurance back here from Aviva - time to have another look at the shares. | skinny | |
26/1/2019 19:01 | Saga plc (LON:SAGA) Is Undervalued By 25.26% https://finance.yaho | mwaters74 | |
17/1/2019 12:08 | FYI 'Seeking Alpha' (Growth) I Accuse! Dan x | daniel levi bmd | |
17/1/2019 11:48 | 'AT' Trades with somebody using a bot? | jonwig | |
17/1/2019 11:33 | Very odd pattern of reported trades | tonybaloni | |
17/1/2019 11:32 | Very odd parters if reported trades. Multiple duplications and too many trades per second for this kind of share. Must be a glitch in system of some sort | tonybaloni | |
16/1/2019 07:37 | Trading statement seems average. I guess it depends on what the market is expecting, given the recent weakness, average may be above expectations. Or not. | dr biotech | |
10/1/2019 16:24 | https://uk.finance.y | mwaters74 | |
13/12/2018 15:25 | I've taken up one of their quotes and not another one, but wouldn't like to judge whether the overall level is more or less expensive than other insurers. They all seem to have quite unpredictable quotes that can be low one month and high the next or vice-versa. I think its a dividend share and maybe undervalued at this level looking 6 months - year ahead, but as for being a growth share I doubt it, as you say its usp may well have passed, although I think its the only one solely targeting the sector. Maybe that's a risk, or maybe it means they can still sort out a set of values that gives it a brand identity that will endure. | yump | |
12/12/2018 12:06 | Just hope nobody got stitched up buying at 200p and above...buying here is like supporting the insiders luxurious lifestyle going... | diku | |
12/12/2018 12:01 | I think looking at Thomas Cooks profits warning, or the 30-50% drop in the larger UK insurers (AV/SLA etc) then its not surprising to see sentiment poor for this one. I guess the older demographic is less likely to be affected by a downturn given the larger proportion of retired or part time workers. There seem to be a lot of options available for those of us chasing income - 6-7% seem s to be quite easy to obtain, compared to 4-5% a few months back. They can't all be hiding skeletons | dr biotech | |
12/12/2018 11:25 | I also bailed out a while ago-taken to market at 185 with huge debt its just an insurance company, or is it a cruise company, very confusing but share price performance awful | gutterhead | |
12/12/2018 10:09 | Bailed out of these at a loss a while back, but I would still be curious to know what effect (if any) that extensive list of equity swaps held by JP Morgan have had on the price. By far the biggest, 22 million odd shares remains outstanding for settlement on 25.02.19 | nav_mike | |
12/12/2018 09:39 | As I have said before this company is listed in a no mans land sector...either the company is split up or a buyer buys the Insurance and flogs the Leisure or vice versa... | diku | |
12/12/2018 09:35 | Well I don't know the ins and outs of whether they should own their cruise ships or not. I think the key question is whether that profit drop is in the price. Anyone who read the interims in any detail will have picked up that comment on adverse impact in the second half - it appeared a couple of times. It looks very much as if the results themselves looked fine and then the detail was read more carefully which resulted in the selling down from 130p+. Add in a nasty market and hey presto. | yump |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions