Sabien Technology Share Discussion Threads

[roleybirkin] 03/6/2019 21:54

I cannot disagree jambam - all about selling and winning new contracts - something they have failed to achieve prior to the recent contract win.

If they can start selling then the valuation has to rise as it is negligible - almost worth the company cancelling the listing at this point.

[jambam] 03/6/2019 19:49

market cap < 1mn so only need to secure a fraction of their sales pipeline to see a decent rise. Another 800K order from government would do nicely. At current price, not much being negative.

[roleybirkin] 03/6/2019 16:45

I think they may be worth holding.....
Technology is good but historically they have failed wo sell.
The contract won in April is why they managed to get the placing away successfully.
Revenues likely to be through £1.4m which is a big jump from last year.
I would suggest the true valuation should be at least 1x revenue.
There is light at the end of the tunnel (maybe....)

[geoffcapes] 03/6/2019 11:48

Drip drip, almost back to where they were before their order.

That'll be the dilution for you.

Is it worth actually holding these? There will be so many shares in circulation they'll need an order of about a billion quid to make these worth anything.

[geoffcapes] 13/5/2019 09:53

Hands up who was foolish enough to think that this company can survive with a huge placing?

Again!

How many placings have taken place in the last 2 years. Is it 4 or 5?

[alexios1201] 13/5/2019 09:22

They managed 0.1p due to the shorts from ~0.14pOtherwise they would have never got 0.1pNear £1M McapNot worth it

[jungmana] 13/5/2019 08:15

Will get opportunity to buy under placing price in a few days imo.Gla

[global nomad] 13/5/2019 07:57

huge dilution...not a good start to the week....now have to decide whether to buy on the expected drop...

[jungmana] 13/5/2019 07:42

Placing there at 0.1p as predicted by some.

[geoffcapes] 02/5/2019 15:48

Still not enough decimal places.

[alexios1201] 02/5/2019 14:46

Mcap here is £708k at 0.12p590m shares in issue

[geoffcapes] 02/5/2019 14:03

Behave. They have moved up 0.02 of a penny.

With 590,000,000 shares in circulation and a market cap of £250,000 I haven't got enough decimal places on my calculator to work out how much the rise of 0.02p works out to an increase in the value of the company.

As you were.

[jambam] 02/5/2019 13:36

word is another contract win

[stallone10] 02/5/2019 12:06

Some trade coming through now somethings brewing

[stallone10] 02/5/2019 10:53

This should be much higher 800000 dealonly 200000 market cap

[jimmy2011] 22/4/2019 11:05

They landed one. Fair play. Must have a good salesman selling to someone who hasn’t a clue what they’re buying.Also do you honestly think that just one person has the power to sign of a deal within the UK government with out it going through may different departments .Are you for real.

[jimmy2011] 22/4/2019 10:40

Haha haha, yes I am for real,giving a opinion to a individual/ company in a private descision / email is allowed.BUT, to deliberately, slander a individual/company via chat forum/ news paper/tv/radio,ECT ECT, is not.I am not that bitter regarding this issue, but someone with a big paper lose may be.If I buy a tv with no insides and does not work, I get money back or take them to court, Of course it is viable and does as it says on the tin.We have loft insulation granted by the gov, we have cavity wall insulation granted by gov, wind farms, solar power, ECT ECT.The full picture is , the English gov, on paper are reducing co2 and working to hit targets, so if all n h s / gov buildings across the UK on paper is reducing co2 emission it all adds up and will help to reduce the fines empoised on us.So, if one government building has it the rest will follow.So turned on or not, IT'S TICKING THE BOXES.

[geoffcapes] 22/4/2019 10:04

Hahahahaha! Are you for real?

So you’re telling me tax payers money has never been mis-used?

Feel free to copy and paste and send it to SNT. It wouldn’t be any different to what I have told them myself already!

As for slander. SNT have already done that to far superior products which are on the market.

[jimmy2011] 22/4/2019 09:20

You want to be carefully with your slandering comments, as you are insinuating a misuse of taxpayers money. If copied and pasted to snt I would think a good lawer would make a claim for damages, slander. You are deramping for a lower entering I suspect.If I was you I would remove it quick.

[discodave4] 16/4/2019 22:56

Nortic 007 is a troll, beware.Oops wrong board

[geoffcapes] 16/4/2019 10:29

They landed one. Fair play. Must have a good salesman selling to someone who hasn’t a clue what they’re buying.

[jungmana] 16/4/2019 10:02

Despite your negative views the company is landing good contracts. The local authorities and organisations they sign deals with have no experts to look at the product?

[geoffcapes] 16/4/2019 09:52

Pretty much. Yes. Ask the Scottish NHS what they think of the product.
Ask Marriott hotels what they think of the product.
Ask BT what they think of the product.
Ask BUPA what they think of it.

And they’re just for starters.
I work in this industry and come across M2G units often. They are 99.9% switched off or have been uninstalled.

I don’t know anyone who has anything good to say about them.

Then of course you could ask Boiler manufactures what they think of them. Especially how they invalidate warranties.
I’ve asked Hoval, Weissman, Remeha, Ideal, Andrews and a number of others and they all say the same thing.

“Boilers have to dry cycle to eliminate condensation in the fire box”.
Failure to eliminate moisture results in rust build up. In a boiler this affect is accelerated due to the heating and cooling of a boiler in its normal cycle.

Still think you’re an expert?