We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rolls-royce Holdings Plc | LSE:RR. | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B63H8491 | ORD SHS 20P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.40 | 1.75% | 429.40 | 429.30 | 429.50 | 429.40 | 411.40 | 421.10 | 6,701,393 | 13:39:29 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aircraft Engine,engine Parts | 16.49B | 2.41B | 0.2884 | 14.75 | 35.57B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
17/9/2018 06:59 | Minerve I agree that the reason for the engine shutdown is the critical factor. By describing the the landing as an emergency when it clearly wasn't augmented the sell off in the market. As Rolls have not issued an RNS relating to the incident suggests to me that there is no reason to suspect a fundamental flaw in the XWB version of the Trent. The engine which was shutdown had only been on the wing for a few months whereas many XWBs have been in service for up to 3 years without incident. | standish11 | |
17/9/2018 06:47 | Minerva I agree that the reason for the engine shutdown is the critical factor. By describing the the landing as an emergency when it clearly wasn't augmented the sell off in the market. As Rolls have not issued an RNS relating to the incident suggests to me that there is no reason to suspect a fundamental flaw in the XWB version of the Trent. The engine which was shutdown had only been on the wing for a few months whereas many XWBs have been in service for up to 3 years without incident. | standish11 | |
16/9/2018 20:39 | standish11 What provoked the sharp drop in the share price was concern that reliability issues maybe extending to other engine models. An engine shut-down or an emergency landing may both signal that this _maybe_ the case. Therefore it is irrelevant whether it was an emergency landing or not. What matters is what causes the emergency landing or the engine shutdown. It is also irrelevant whether the A350 can fly on one engine or not. Rolls-Royce investors want Rolls to sell engines, be reliable and have low cost service, maintenance and repair. | minerve | |
15/9/2018 21:18 | Minerva The reference to an emergency landing is what provoked the sharp drop in the share price Engines are shut down for various reasons which are nor necessarily due to a technical problem e.g. bird strike. The captain did not even declare PAN PAN which is less serious than declaring an emergency.It is also worth bearing in mind that the A350xwb is certified to fly up to 370mins on one engine. | standish11 | |
15/9/2018 20:22 | Standish The FT article did state that it was unlikely to be similar to the Trent 1000 issues. Whether the flight made an emergency landing or not is irrelevant. If the engine had to be shut down mid-flight that is enough. | minerve | |
14/9/2018 08:32 | Fake news from the FT. The Iberia A350 did not make an emergency landing. The share price reaction over the last couple of days suggests that the engine problem is unlikely to be similar to the Trent 1000 issues. | standish11 | |
12/9/2018 16:55 | A technical failure in a Rolls-Royce engine forced an Iberia flight bound for New York from Madrid to make an emergency landing at Boston’s Logan airport on Wednesday. Pilots made an in-flight shutdown of one of the Trent XWB engines with engineers due to examine it later in the day, Rolls-Royce said. - FT Explains today's share price action. | minerve | |
10/9/2018 14:19 | hxxps://ukdefencejou | dafrog | |
10/9/2018 13:55 | Actually, the MQ-25 order is for only 4 aircraft each powered by a RR AE3007N turbofan. Not exactly a big contribution to Rolls' bottom line. Boeing has 6 years to supply the four with deliveries due by 2024. And the prototype hasn't even flown yet. | heorot1 | |
06/9/2018 19:25 | hxxps://www.rolls-ro | dafrog | |
02/9/2018 20:59 | Yes, but they need new orders, GE and Prat seem to be taking them. There’s been some lax engineering on their engines sad to say. Can they get it right from here? Got too! The Obama US isn’t the same as a Trump US..They’ll do anything to push their own! | rayrac | |
31/8/2018 11:50 | They do much more than manufacture commercial aircraft engines. Expect USA operations have sold quite a few to military. The Osprey has RR company engines. | dafrog | |
31/8/2018 11:41 | I suppose they will eventually sell an engine? It's been months! | rayrac | |
28/8/2018 09:19 | Rolls-Royce offers data analytic expertise to nuclear reactors - FT | minerve | |
27/8/2018 17:14 | Check nuog ,well worth a look if you're looking for growth short term ,deal expected to send it sky ward | thecashmoney | |
27/8/2018 17:13 | Just do your own research and ignore the noise is my advice,it's quite obvious that NUOG /MFDEVCO is on the cusp of transformational news .Comms from the company via tweets says negotiations are drawing to a conclusion,last rns from chairman states it's progressing .Recent podcast designed to be non promotional imvho .Think of it like buying a car ,you don't tell the other parties how much you love it ,you say it needs new tyres , exhaust is on its way out etc ,you want the best deal possible . According to my research it's a win win win for all involved. OSX-3 owners want more from their asset , dommo current operators need cash revenue to raise to develop other assets.Mfdevco obviously will be truly transformational as the podcast states it will put mfdevco in a very forward position,with most of the steps allready completed,alot of money has already been spent and will put this company in a very advanced state compared to its current market capitalisation.CM | thecashmoney | |
09/8/2018 21:58 | If Warren East keeps fixing things, this will continue to go up in fits and starts. The coming recession will help oil prices down and air cost and profits disproportionately.. Maybe it will slip before it goes back up, for those who want to gamble on news flow. | sbs | |
03/8/2018 18:49 | "a period of outperformance vs market for next few years". Absolutely agree. I will probably buy back in at some point. | robs12 | |
03/8/2018 18:39 | True, but then he wouldn't have been able to make a purchase over the past few weeks. | grahamburn | |
03/8/2018 17:16 | One director just bought 8k; he presumably does not see a current peak. | wad collector | |
03/8/2018 12:54 | Good market and press reaction to the numbersI am holding all of mine, think we could be into a period of outperformance vs market for next few years. Warren proving to be class ace in my view | ayl30 | |
03/8/2018 12:34 | I just offloaded at £11, having bought in early June. Suspect it will slip back a little now...but who knows! | robs12 | |
02/8/2018 16:43 | 4 year closing high. Is this the beginning of the next step or another transient peak? Tempted to unload some , but made some badly timed deals recently.I will await a flurry of broker upgrades and see what happens. | wad collector |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions