We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rm2 International S.a. | RM2 | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 8.50 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.50 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 05/2/2022 20:53 by mikecook I believe they have been withdrawn from CREST and are held directly with the Registrar - see hxxps://rm2.com/inveI suggest getting in touch with the Registrar or the Company and making sure that your name is on the shareholders Register. Or you might miss out on whatever you are getting in exchange for your shares. |
Posted at 27/6/2019 08:27 by masurenguy From todays issue of The Times.I've never invested here either. "RM2 has proved an object lesson in how to turn a smart idea into a rotten business. Despite the business-savvy board, RM2 made two basic errors. It failed to find a cost-efficient way to make its pallet. Losing $77m on just $104,204 sales might be understandable in 2013’s start-up phase. Yet even by 2017, the latest full-year figures, RM2 still only had $6.6m sales — but $44m losses. In fact, in five years, losses total $280m. John Walsh left in June 2017, with RM2 now on to its third chief executive, though Mr Molson, Lord Rose and Paul Walsh are still aboard. And one investor has kept the faith, upping his stake from an initial 9% to 40%: yes, Mr Woodford. Still, no escaping the unpalletable truth: even good ideas like Blockpal can leave you looking a bit of a blockhead." hxxps://www.thetimes |
Posted at 26/6/2019 10:52 by zen12 Not end of world, maybe investors have missed this trading update hidden behind the announcement '.. Trading updateRamp-up of pallet deployment in the pharmaceutical sector continues and the Company has recently signed further contracts in the food preparation sector, based on recommendations from a Fortune 100 company which prescribes the use of RM2 pallets by its suppliers. Discussions for a large contract with a well-known multinational are promising and the Company hopes to be in a position to announce the signature of that contract in the near future.The Company's cash balance at the end of May 2019 was US$3.3 million. The Company's expected monthly cash burn including cash being invested in the production of pallets to meet demand, is approximately US$2.3 million, prior to any deferral of scheduled payments. |
Posted at 18/3/2019 09:33 by ltcm1 "I don't think the market understands the opportunity here. It seems RM2 would be better off being taken private so it's full potential can be unleashed.I blame the investors for selling out far too early, you need to have patience when investing. It is everone else's fault but mine." NW. |
Posted at 15/6/2018 14:01 by rm2investor Anyone have opinions on the result of the Open Offer? Looks like only £1.4M take up of the available £4M offered - seems a poor result but the tone of the RNS is positive and says it shows 'investor confidence'. Not sure about that, any thoughts? |
Posted at 14/6/2018 10:12 by hpcg Who is that? I am being facetious, but even the very best and most credible investors make mistakes and errors of judgement. Woodford's recent record is appalling and his inability to simply write off investments which haven't worked is risible and what one would expect from the most callow investor. |
Posted at 30/3/2018 21:42 by my retirement fund When they came to market the very clever business model was all geared to build reusable pallets which you would lease to companies rather than sell. After their first year this business model tested and found to be unviable. In short the market for such a service was simply not there. At this stage they should have held and EGM to see if investors wanted to embark upon another plan or wind the business up. Had the business been wound up they would easily have got 80% of there money back.Instead after numerous disasters and further injections its all gone down the toilet.The blame needs to be shared amongst incompetent fund managers like woodford as well as the board.None of wish share any basic business or entrepreneurial acumen between them. |
Posted at 23/3/2018 10:25 by jimmyloser JakYou are on the money buddy. This has been almost criminal for those investors who went in heavy. But Hey Ho! that was yesterday and yesterday as the song goes, is gone! |
Posted at 22/3/2018 06:50 by jimmyloser As I have posted before, just how loud do people want the board here to shout at investors that they are over the worst?impo, A bombed out no hoper of a company does not fight to stay alive like this team have done unless there was bright lights at the end of the tunnel. You do not make legal statements as they have done without being confident. impo/dyor LAZARUS? |
Posted at 20/2/2018 12:58 by snake oil MRF. They know and believe in what they want to do. What I discovered when consulting with them was they were totally lacking in composites manufacturing experience. The current CEO continues as an inexperienced executive.The Walsh brothers also had the fundraising connections from Woodford to Molson and de Mevius. It was a "set up" in the classic sense for investors. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
