Rhythmone Share Discussion Threads

[gowlane] 15/2/2018 11:20

JWoolley to answer your question, just once though.

Of course I was invested here for many years, exited completely just a few months ago and know this company well. Including the long term track record, management integrity and credibility or lack of it, organisation culture, all the soft issues that are so important.

Why are we still posting here? The answer is purely out of the goodness of our hearts. I am sure we have all benefited from the kindness of strangers from time to time, what would the world be like without that?

Now if you saw someone driving down a road where a bridge had collapsed, you would probably wave them down frantically and advise them of the imminent danger to life and limb. Whether it was a young person starting out in life or a mature person coming up to retirement.

Take for example, when Barky was encouraging newbies to invest at 40p-50p last year, lying though his teeth as usual, claiming that he had inside information that 1R was in profit and the share price would quadruple when the results were out.

Many of us were alarmed and ensured that the counter argument was placed out there, spelling out the risks and likely consequences of buying this share, sticking to facts and reasoned argument.

Guess what? We have been proven to be 100% right. Now if the facts ever change I will certainly be open to changing my mind and I daresay Sikh will be the same

[sikhthetech] 15/2/2018 11:14

Jw,
really?? you sure I haven't held 1R for several years!!!

Ad Tech is a fast moving industry.. you need to keep up...
What do you think of ITP, GDPR, move to Fee transparency, ads.txt..google's ad blocker.. which companies will benefit and which will suffer...
Do you know what ITP is?

Have a search on Football's thread for ads.txt.. It's only mentioned after 1R mentioned it...
Anything 1R do is right, according to the gang....
Hang on, Blinkx had a great model so why completely change the model..
RTHM were so growing so well, without jam tomorrow, then why change of management...

We're back to asking will the new management have any success in turning around 1R.. Maybe they will, maybe they won't but we won't know for a while... this year's fy results won't help because of new management and new strategy..

I've said my interest here is 'Tosca and cash' (not the jam tomorrow business)....

Oh, it seems like Tosca and cash have been key recently... strange that, isn't it it????

[gowlane] 15/2/2018 11:08

JonC, you have my sympathies in trying to make any sense out of Barky!

Barky is arguing that the addendum to the F-4 document that was filed with the SEC and which contained a lot of illustrative projections from 2017-2021 are the unpublished "accounts"!

Of course they came with about 20 health warnings and anything from 2018-2021 is jam tomorrow and strictly for the birds.

Perhaps the only part that could be taken seriously was the projection for 2017, as a proxy for FY 2017-18, with some adjustments.

But this looked more like a profit warning to me.

[jonc] 15/2/2018 10:58

The US have a rules based system while we have had less so now a principles based system.

The US based system is the reason why even a two line announcement by a Company is accompanied by five pages of legal waffle designed to prevent the issuer from being sued by the owner of a dog whose dog was traumatised by the use of the split infinitive in the Company announcement.

Why compare the two they are chalk and cheese.

It still does not mean that the SEC have scrutinised R1s accounts.

[barkboo] 15/2/2018 10:54

JohnnyC - care to compare our regulators? lol They are busy on the cheese and wine circuit!

[jonc] 15/2/2018 10:44

So what?

It does not mean that the SEC scrutinised R1s accounts.

edit

Certainly not in the sense that you imply.

UK Companies House review all accounts submitted for accuracy of presentation and will sometimes reject the accounts on that basis. It doesn't mean that they have scrutinised the underlying transactions or accounting policies.

[barkboo] 15/2/2018 10:40

"Total Number of SEC Enforcement Actions Filed
Despite the uncertainty introduced by changes in SEC leadership and the new administration, enforcement activity continued at a strong pace during the first half of FY 2017 (October 1, 2016–March 31, 2017).

The SEC filed 334 total enforcement actions during the first half of FY 2017, compared to 372 during the same period in the previous fiscal year.
Excluding actions against delinquent filers, the number of enforcement actions in the first half of FY 2017 was 299—virtually unchanged from the same period in the prior fiscal year"

[digitalis] 15/2/2018 10:22

Yep.....I’m sure when SC set out it was in the best interest of investors but yrs later the playground of the bots.....a system to suck money from the unwary,as a few traders on here testify daily.....

[alex1621] 15/2/2018 10:12

Hi Kendo ... look, the turnaround has begun, just as predicted!

[jarvis4] 15/2/2018 10:06

Hi digi, yes I remember the (short) period when Aim was driven by buys and sells. Then the computing criminals took over and the FCA went AWOL. Hey ho, on we go.

[jonc] 15/2/2018 09:54

16p emergency fund raising is more likely than £16.

Hope that helps.

Just saying###

[jonc] 15/2/2018 09:53

BARKBOO15 Feb '18 - 09:16 - 12395 of 12397

That is not the same as "The SEC have closely scrutinised R1s accounts" Don't be silly.

[football] 15/2/2018 09:41

Top post Jwoolley life is to short to spend it on things you no longer have a interest in, people should move on and in joy life and the future and not look back at the past 24/7.

[precinct14] 15/2/2018 09:34

Berky, this company is going to have to raise capital on a very low sp, from now on. That's thanks to SC and his gang of self-serving thieves, who managed to con lenders on a high share price for several years, then flushed their ill-gotten gains down the toilet on loss-making companies.

And sorry to disappoint you, but I'm rather distanced from being skint, and that distance will increase considerably over the course of the year. You held here from 12p to 234p and back to 15p, plus bought all of gowlane's offloaded stock in November 2011. No wonder you're so bitter!

[barkboo] 15/2/2018 09:16

JohnnyC - you don't tell the SEC false information!

"Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) US Government agency, with the purpose of protecting investors from dangerous or illegal financial practices or fraud, by requiring full and accurate financial disclosure by companies offering stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and other securities to the public."

You get banged up over in Yankee land!

[jonc] 15/2/2018 09:14

This could break the £2 mark today as the momentum builds.

Short to zero.

[barkboo] 15/2/2018 09:06

JohnnyC - do you always change the subject when you lose? - already in real profit here in our opinion.

Those SEC figures seems to back up the fact they are doing rather better than most think.

[barkboo] 15/2/2018 08:54

Hi Digi - yes, would make for good business....they have mentioned $30m adj. Ebitda plus the Yume injection ...we could be talking serious money in a very short period of time.

[digitalis] 15/2/2018 08:46

I would be happy for another placement at £16.....

[precinct14] 15/2/2018 08:24

Repeat post. Take two times daily.

[precinct14] 15/2/2018 08:24

Berky's web of lies: 'you say the bod's look like a bunch of cowboys or crooks. They always raised dough cheap, therefore making acquisitions cheap.'

Yes, exactly as cowboys and crooks would. They conned the institutional lenders then flushed the 'dough' (expressed like the cowboy he is) down the toilet on loss-making entities. And as the cash pile dwindles to nothing, they're still at it. Anyone that swallows Berky's dishonest guff should seek professional help.