We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Redt Energy Plc | LSE:RED | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B11FB960 | ORD EUR0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 52.50 | 50.00 | 55.00 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
16/10/2018 12:13 | I think a few people really need to red this report and understand the implications for RedT. Centrica are nearly 12 months into Timeshifting of offerring and if they are happy to put Battery Storeage as a pillar of their business in a proposal to the Industry and Hostiptals then it is a massive reassurance that the trila has gone well How you can use distributed technologies to reduce your company’s carbon emissions? | zero the hero | |
16/10/2018 12:04 | It is my view that there is a real possibility of another open offer and placing in the wings before year end.If there are people that also think this then that may contribute to the low price of the shares at the moment.Edited for clarity | greenmachine2 | |
16/10/2018 11:58 | Anyone saying that owenski has described the situation well loses every ounce of credibility. Not a shred of research because if you did you will know the extent of sales now exceeding £57 million (declared sales) | zero the hero | |
16/10/2018 11:48 | What???... | chicken01 | |
16/10/2018 11:27 | I didn't know UBER were in the energy storage business. What is the sales cycle on UBER (15 minutes?)? Drawing such parallels is disruptive and misleading. | ts0mev | |
16/10/2018 11:07 | It is true that owenski has described the situation well, I am grateful for his analysis, I agree with him about the potential for the technology and the company. A disrupter company? Well yes but RED is addressing specific problems on a customer by customer basis,site by site. Whilst true disrupters such as UBER had to launch from zero to city wide and in several cities almost simultaneously. It should be within the capability of a specialised sales engineer to identify and convince likely users. As had been said it is low key technology. We need pressure from our large shareholders to enforce change. The team we have may well have worked very hard, but we and they need to admit that they have NOT sold our products. Resignations please. | johnweaver | |
16/10/2018 10:52 | We simply need confirmation on the German utility deal. The price to buy is tempting now. Thank goodness the placing took place when it did. | crystball | |
16/10/2018 10:50 | There are no short positions I believe there is only the option to short via a spread bet which is high risk and only for those that are absolutely certain of a direction - never done it so only what I have read. I'd be happy to be educated otherwise. | zero the hero | |
16/10/2018 10:47 | Yup - if it's any comfort, this never ceases to be a learning game for me. I had great opportunities recently to take some good profit on RED and FTC, just to insure against the retraces. Got complacent; didn't do it. Even if you're a long term holder of a share, it can be a good idea to cover yourself. And of course, on a spike, is generally worth waiting to see what support is offered. At end of the day, CEOs are not running their businesses for our benefit; and on AIM, they are in a real sense trying to tempt peeps into the market, in order to take their money on a fundraise. I don't see this as dishonest, simply, as the way AIM is used, and it's a cat and mouse game. With recent fundraising, Scott is now in position to go quiet for a while, and I'm very much hoping this will last no longer than Christmas when we are to get further confirmation on the German utility deal, as I said. But there is also much more that is likely to come out given the speed at which the green energy market is going to start moving. | brucie5 | |
16/10/2018 10:37 | NAI taken and non given. I am simply perplexed as to this shares obvious potential to the share price performance.We can get 10 buys on the trot, no upward movement, 1 sell and down it goes, spooking the fence sitters.This, I presume is because there are millions of shares waiting to be sold. I believe the last tranche did not meet expectations and was undersold, that would explain this position.I still hold, bit in the red, not serious...but feel really sorry for those that bought in a long time ago when the price peaked above 18... not much of a winner for them.Steve. | chicken01 | |
16/10/2018 10:26 | I'd be interested to know the short interest here esp from SB sites such as IG Group ect. It appears relatively easily manipulated atm on small volumes, which indicates to me that there is still a sell/buy imbalance favouring the former. Either way it's just navel gazing and I'm more than happy to continue to accumulate 100k blocks at strategic price points.spud | spud | |
16/10/2018 10:23 | chicken01 I agree with the tech, see no problems there, except pricing???...so why aren't large investors climbing in at these low levels?. -------------------- 1. Because it's just had a fundraise, which not only makes dilution, but re-emphasises the fact that RED is not yet earnings positive and may well be seeking to raise further six months down the line. (This , to my mind, is why they are to seeking 'strategic partners', to avoid further dilution on greater headcount) Peeps who got in at 7+ on the good news are naturally peed off by this and many sell. Others with larger positions also seek to derisk. I have done so myself, also to take advantage of wider opportunities. 2. It's a small company on AIM addressing a huge market, and will be constantly vulnerable to scares and conspiracies. Is there actually a business model that makes sense? Does Jimflint know something that we don't? 3. It's not yet making money and to that extent is a story-stock. The AIM cemetery is littered with them. In conclusion, this carries risks. In a risk off market, it won't meet everyone's investment criteria. The positive news is, however, that it occupies, as we all keep saying, the centre ground of a massively hot sector, with good technology, and at a very advanced stage. By Christmas we should have confirmation of the German deal, on which I would expect a decent re-rating, if we're not all living underneath our tables on account of whatever stupidity is happening in the world. Good luck on whatever you decide! NAI, obviously. | brucie5 | |
16/10/2018 10:12 | Hi Bruce...VSA Capitol has had a 22p price target on this since the dinosaurs went extinct, now at 6.5p. RNS, good news goes in, moderate improvement for 3 days then back we go. Fine, so if the whole planet is hooked on storage, which is what a few people are alluding to, then why are we where we are...I just don't get this shares performance at all.I agree with the tech, see no problems there, except pricing???...so why aren't large investors climbing in at these low levels?. | chicken01 | |
16/10/2018 09:58 | Chicken, there is no such thing as a slam dunk investment, least of all on AIM. In the short term, this could go anywhere, so it should be a basic rule to set your sizing to restrict or maximise your risk, according to you folio. Not wishing to be rude, but complaint may be more a function of your own risk management. I'm sure you're also aware that the wider market in tech stocks has been badly hit recently, so there is the additional factor, no doubt, making investors additionally risk averse. As to why we are not presently much higher, I would refer you to Owenski's postings. I think he has had this spot on for some time now. Alternatively I could refer you to a number of other high promise AIM stocks I keep my eyes on, each posing similar questions for investors. EG: 1. Can this disruptive business make money? 2. If so, when? 3. If so, when's the right time to get on board? 4, If so, what sort of weighting should I attach to it? | brucie5 | |
16/10/2018 09:57 | looks like crypto currencies could be the place to invest before the next meltdown... | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:43 | Even if the product is made in the EU and the accouts will be in Euro,s but the Sp is not in Euro,s it is in £,s | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:41 | I have to agree, I've held here for way too long. If this is such a slam dunk investment, then why are we sitting g at 6.6 and hoping for another positive RNS...surely by now everyone and their dog should be buying.Quit the constant ramping, tedious...where are the buys?. | chicken01 | |
16/10/2018 09:40 | better to do the deal in your own currency rather than gamble in other coutry,s currencys .... Remember when the $ was $3 to the £ ???? | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:38 | so lets say the first stage is worth 50 million Euro @ 1.12 Euro to the £ = £44.64 ....@ 1.34 a 20% increase the contract would be worth £37 million, that is all the profit gone... | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:32 | Italin banks need proping up to stop the Euro slide Italy, not Turkey, is the biggest threat to European banks right now, strategist says Italy's economy is the third largest in the European Union and the country's new coalition government is currently working on next year's budget. Investors are wary of rises in pensions and state benefits, given that Italy already has a significantly high public debt pile — the second largest in the euro zone, at about 130 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:29 | ts0mev, the more you look around the more you see potential partners making the right noises. Industry, commerce and Government are seriously looking at energy sustainability and CO2 reductions. Its almost like a crusade. Talk about being in the right place at the right time. Centrica certainly fits the bill. | mikemine | |
16/10/2018 09:28 | For how long can we continue to believe our directors or the cheerleader Andrew Monk at VSA? Unfortunately this company compares with MOIL, the Madagascan oil company promoted by the same firm. That price declined from 90p to about 2p then nothing. In between times there were 'good stories' that gave us rises of 20 or 30% peaks of 45, 37,30p and falls of 50% You all can see the prices easily, The company was at £9 per share. Now we can't hold 7p and we are told that we have: loads of cash Good technology Good contacts But still cannot hold 7p per share. The boss and VSA need to go. They have had long enough, we have given them every chance to work with and therefore s p e n d our money. Time to find people more competent than this crowd. I commend this to the investors at large and look for your support. | johnweaver | |
16/10/2018 09:25 | Anybody thought about if the Euro takes a dive, if it goes down 20% then that means the German order is at a loss before it sets off... | dlg3 | |
16/10/2018 09:22 | 2315 would that make Centrica a strategic partner? | ts0mev |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions