We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Estate Credit Investments Limited | LSE:RECI | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0HW5366 | ORD NPV |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-0.50 | -0.43% | 115.50 | 115.00 | 116.00 | 118.00 | 115.00 | 118.00 | 465,479 | 12:38:31 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt | 30.67M | 20.55M | 0.0896 | 12.83 | 263.73M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/9/2016 08:12 | Looks like Friday's volume was nothing more than some large purchases. Perhaps an income fund looking for yield. | kenny | |
18/9/2016 20:53 | Kenny, I have thought the same about Cheyne's stance towards RECI; I did look at RECI's fiancials and I saw in the year to 3.16 they paid Cheyne £2.2m in management and performance fees combined and in the year before when the performance fees were £1.4m the total was £3.4m ie even assuming modest performance fees going forward and reduction in the portfolio post RECP maturity there is enough fee income...and they can always do a new equity raise or borrowing. | cerrito | |
18/9/2016 16:25 | Hope so. Someone suggested options expiring but I would be surprised if there were many options being traded on such a small company. | kenny | |
18/9/2016 15:53 | PROBABLY A FAT FINGER AS ITS KNOWN HAS CAUSED THE SPIKE IT DID A FEW IN FRIDAY AUCTION | ntv | |
16/9/2016 23:08 | Cleary someone knows something and we private shareholders are left wondering what is going on whilst others are obviously dealing on inside information. Here is my guess: Strangely enough, exactly one year from today the preference class redeem at par. My guess is that the company is about to announce that they will wind up on or shortly after the 16.09.17 when the pref's redeem. It could be that Cheyne feel that RECI is just too small for them to bother about after the £40m of pref's redeem in a year's time - I think Cheyne have over $8bn under management so RECI really is tiny in comparison and probably involves more management time than is worthwhile to Cheyne in terms of their fees from RECI. If that is the case, the question is what might ordinary shareholders expect to receive in the next 18-24 months or so. Current NAV is 161.8p and there are unrealised potential gains of 12.9p per share on the bond portfolio albeit I do not know how many of those bonds will redeem at par within the next 18-24 months. So those two items total 174.7p. Turning to the loan portfolio, that has a weighted average life of 1.7 years and I do not know if there are any back-end fees upon redemption of some of the loans. Of course, leading up to the windup and over the life of the windup, ordinary shareholders can expect to continue to receive dividends – currently running at 2.7p per quarter. Also, once they announce a windup, the position for ordinary holders could be improved if they can buy-in some of the pref class at today's sort of prices (RECI currently has over £35m in cash because a number of loans/bonds have recently matured). They could also use some of the cash to buy in ordinary shares, if they slip back, as the company has authority to buy-in up to 14.99% of each class of shares. The above is pure speculation because, unfortunately, I have no inside information! However, it does seem to rationalise why some people were willing to today pay 174p to buy the ordinary class. Personally, I hope I am wrong because I would rather have the income for the next 10 plus years than a capital gain. A capital gain is nice but trying to re-invest to replace this level of income is currently near impossible. | kenny | |
16/9/2016 21:03 | Change in legal structure anything to do with it at the agm? 16:44 - 16/09 Buy 11005 174.00p £19,148.70 16:35 - 16/09 Buy 27456 174.00p £47,773.44 not sure what to make of these last trades.... | mozy123 | |
16/9/2016 17:19 | Could be options change over date | my retirement fund | |
16/9/2016 17:11 | Surely a pricing error | jerseymike | |
07/9/2016 07:12 | EventRECI generated a NAV total return of 0.8% in August 2016 after adjusting for dividends. NAV per share at 31 August 2016 was 161.8p. The company's largest loan position (a whole loan secured against German multi-family properties) substantially repaid in August with 21.3m received by RECI. This loan returned a yield in excess of 15%. Furthermore, two bond positions repaid during the month which resulted in receipts of 9.6m. These bonds generated gains of 4.1% and 4.6%. Cash as a percentage of NAV was 33% of NAV at the end of the month (after adjusting for the upcoming dividend payment). RECI invested £1m in a bond secured by a portfolio of 13 loans in Germany and Sweden post month-end. The bond has an unlevered yield to worst of 6.4% with a 1.5 year duration. A number of other bond opportunities are under consideration following re-pricing post-Brexit. Liberum viewRECI's has generated a NAV return of 1.8% in the three months since 31 May 2016 highlighting the robust nature of the portfolio cash flows during a volatile period for the underlying real estate market. There is now a significant level of cash to invest and we expect the majority will be deployed into loan opportunities alongside opportunistic investments in the bond market. The high level of repayments had been anticipated as the company's recent results statement indicated that potential inflows of £25m from loan repayments were expected in the near-term. Re-pricing in the bond market should offer potential for accretive investments as the manager has a proven track record of outperforming during periods of market weakness. RECI is now trading on a -3.0% discount to NAV compared to an average 2.3% premium for peers and pays a sector-leading 6.9% dividend yield (vs. 6.1% for peers). | davebowler | |
05/9/2016 21:06 | Gents can anyone tell me when this goes XD for the 30/09 payment? TIA | yieldhunter | |
24/8/2016 19:27 | Just having a gander at that myself | badtime | |
24/8/2016 18:40 | Some changes ahead. Namely for RECI holders removal of the cell entity which amalgamates all investments, authorisation for expanding the companies equity value up to 15% including and removing the cover tests on the preference shares. So effectively a closed-ended investment fund adding some fire power. I suspect this move will be followed by more ambitious proposals next year since there will be a range of options open to them for cheaper funding when the preference share are up for redemption. Prefs holders not allowed to vote in this. As ord hold looks ok to me hxxp://www.recrediti | my retirement fund | |
11/8/2016 01:03 | Wow 6% for BBB 3 year paper. Meanwhile another tasty (licks lips), dividend confirmed for this qtr | my retirement fund | |
10/8/2016 16:29 | DB - THNX FOR THAT - AN INTERESTING READ... | skyship | |
10/8/2016 14:28 | Viewpoint today from TwentyFour Asset Management on MBS value Good Afternoon, The most interesting discussions we have on the desks normally revolve around where we think the best value is, with the different strategies backing their favourite picks and trying to make each other understand the hidden value that the market isn’t appreciating. Yields, and the corresponding value, are “not door numbers” as Gary is fond of reminding us, and have been driven by sentiment, fundamentals and direct central bank intervention amongst others. The last of these – central bank action – took an interesting turn yesterday as the Bank of England, on the second day of buying more gilts, failed to buy their target amount in their reverse auction. Another sign of the technical squeeze in £ fixed income that we are experiencing at the moment. Already since the announcement of the intention to buy £10bn of corporate bonds, spreads on eligible bonds have tightened significantly, and even ineligible bonds – banks and insurers – have seen the “portfolio effect” push prices up and yields down. Has this value shift happened across the entire market? Definitely not, and a deal last week in the UK RMBS market emphasizes this. Hawksmoor 2016-1 is a £2.25bn deal backed by vintage (2007) mortgages originated by GE Money. I’m not going to go into the detail of the trade, or our credit view, rather more interesting is the levels the deal priced at and the demand. Rather unusually there were a couple of tranches issued with split ratings. The Class D bonds are A-/Baa2 and the Class Es are BBB/Ba2. Investors’ interest for these two tranches were between 2 and 5 times the amount of bonds issued, and they priced tighter than initially expected. Even with that in mind, the yields these bonds were issued at were sterling LIBOR plus 4.75% and 6% respectively. That’s an incredible yield for 3yr bonds, when compared to the yield on BBB sterling corporate bonds which is currently 1.85% over the same index. Asset backed securities markets are not as mainstream as corporate bonds and prices do tend to lag, but I challenge any of my colleagues in our other strategies to find something more compelling. Ben Hayward Partner, Portfolio Manager | davebowler | |
09/8/2016 08:29 | Liberum; NAV per share at 31 July was 163.2p which equates to a 0.4% NAV return in the month as the loan portfolio continues to drive returns. Portfolio activity was relatively low although the company did receive £1.6m of partial repayments on its loan secured against retirement villages in London and the South East. Cash on the balance sheet at the month-end was equivalent to 11% of NAV. In terms of market outlook, assets demonstrating a stable cash flow profile are outperforming after Brexit in comparison to more cyclical asset classes such as London offices. RECI has no exposure to the City of London office market in its portfolio. In the MBS market, volatility is expected to continue but higher-grade CMBS should see some spread tightening following the reduced interest rates in the UK and the new corporate bond purchase programme. Liberum view RECI's has maintained a steady NAV performance during a volatile period for the underlying real estate market, with NAV return of 1% in the two months since the end of May. The manager has a proven track record of outperforming during periods of market distress. RECI is now trading on a small (-0.7%) discount to NAV compared to an average 3.6% premium for peers and pays a sector-leading 6.7% dividend yield (vs. 6.0% for peers) excluding any special dividends. | davebowler | |
12/7/2016 13:29 | Nice to see a director buy | badtime | |
08/7/2016 09:50 | Thnx also to erstwhile for posting a contrarian view...all helps in the decision making | badtime | |
08/7/2016 09:48 | Is anyone besides me having problems with the Thread title list, or advfn in general?? | grannyboy | |
08/7/2016 09:45 | Thanks DB & Skyship - reassuring update from RECI. | wirralowl | |
08/7/2016 07:28 | LiberumStable performance in June EventNAV per share at 30 June was 162.5p which equates to a 0.6% NAV return in the month after adjusting for dividends. During the month, RECI received a £0.9m partial repayment on its loan secured against retirement villages in London and the South-East. RECI has a cash balance of £13.7m (12% of NAV) and expects further repayments on a number of loans this year. RECI has provided additional market commentary following the referendum and expects the London City office market to be most affected given its exposure to the financial market. RECI has no exposure to the City office market and the portfolio does not contain any loans secured on assets held by open-ended retail funds. The largest loan in the portfolio is a senior mortgage loan secured on German multi-family assets (19% of NAV) and the largest MBS in the portfolio is a Class B bond secured by homes leased to the UK Ministry of Defence with a 45% LTV. Liberum viewRECI is now trading on a 9% discount to NAV (7.3% dividend yield) following a significant de-rating in recent weeks. The manager has a proven track record of outperforming during periods of market distress and recent volatility should present an opportunity to acquire assets at very attractive yields. We believe the 13% discount to the peer group is unwarranted and reiterate our BUY recommendation. | davebowler | |
07/7/2016 13:23 | Erswhile I disagree regards to pref holders. When 2017 comes theres a lot they could do. What ever happens they will be unlikely to be offered 8% again. However they could be offered a rollover into a fesh issue at say 6.5% with those in issue left over offered to in the open market at 6.2% etc.At the end of the day what happens to any pref restructuring largely depends on the largest holders of both the ords and the prefs who will clearly have a vested interest in both issues. | my retirement fund |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions