React Share Discussion Threads

[nithbank] 16/2/2016 09:48

Share price on the slide. Needs an update fast.

[loftus16] 12/2/2016 17:34

Agreed yump - they are simply getting on with running a small established business. There is a lot of cash available, for a company of this size, which will be deployed when the time is deemed right and when the right opportunity is identified - in the light of the recent board appointment possibly sooner rather than later. Not long to wait in any case at least for a statement of current trading.

[yump] 12/2/2016 17:06

I think its a bit early to expect any real evidence one way or another re: the strategy. Give it 6 months or so - its not a quick buck share.

[andyview] 12/2/2016 16:26

good volume again with some chunky buys. heres to some positive news in the near future.

gla

[andyview] 09/2/2016 11:56

Volume has been a little stronger over the past few days, I've added a few more...

Gla

[blueblood] 08/2/2016 16:42

Is the companies financial year still to end Sept15? If so results next month but could of released trading update in meantime.

[loftus16] 05/2/2016 12:29

Likewise and so must the Reynolds/vendor group be which has 37% between them including the board.

Not to forget Helium RSF which holds 23% after more than doubling its initial financial investment.

The above 60% were content to be locked in for twelve months leaving 40% a number of which are in EIS schemes so it was reported some time ago.

Let's hope for an upbeat statement in March.

[andyview] 05/2/2016 10:29

Added to my holding post Vmp conversion, very positive about future prospects here !gla

[blueblood] 03/2/2016 08:36

Non exec board change looking towards future M&A imo.

[yump] 02/2/2016 14:30

It appears they got React for about 6x profits, 1x turnover, which isn't bad. So if they start delivering some growth and it gets rerated a bit, that should provide a fair bit of upside.

The rationale for the reverse takeover does make sense. A group that's only 5% of a larger group (Autoclenz), is not going to get much investment, as its probably being treated as an easy cash generator.

Looks like React had flat turnover last two years.

So either its a stable business bought cheaply, or its an expandable business, with some investment and initiatives thrown in. In which case the valuation could be transformed.

Depends how much growth there is in the market if you get a bit more aggressive with the selling.

[loftus16] 01/2/2016 16:05

A logical and welcome development following November's rns. Looking forward to the results statement as the figures will only show two months worth of React.

[partner] 01/2/2016 15:49

should help , licence to print money .

[blueblood] 28/1/2016 14:04

You can change the name but not the lack of communication it seems. It really is unacceptable not to have had some sort of trading update since we relisted!

[loftus16] 20/1/2016 13:36

Relatively fortunate here in that, while there is widespread market turmoil, roughly half the market capitalisation is accounted for by cash in the bank.

[nithbank] 13/1/2016 12:48

Something happening...results imminent?

[jack ladd] 12/1/2016 14:37

tick up....Pat, see post 51.

[yump] 08/1/2016 12:02

Came across this by accident, from September, at Hydrodec:

The Company also announces today that Gillian Leates, Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit Committee, has retired from the Board and as Chair of the Audit Committee with effect from the close of yesterday's Board meeting, in order to focus on her other business interests, including as Non-Executive Chairman of React Group.

[patio58] 06/1/2016 08:43

Any deals yet?

[blueblood] 04/1/2016 19:41

Reynolds isn't normally shy with his news flow so this is unusual.

[nithbank] 21/12/2015 14:31

Nice to be tipped!

[jack ladd] 20/12/2015 01:02

A bit of cough tip / press...

[jack ladd] 04/12/2015 19:10

Patio, see post 51...

[snape] 04/12/2015 18:53

Adam Reynolds seemed quite positive about then at the Gold, Bears conference at the weekend. Said that Reat had looked at buying the two 'acquisitions' before subsequently picking them up from the administrators. Sounds like they should be a good fit and overall a prudent approach to me.