We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range Resources Limited | LSE:RRL | London | Ordinary Share | AU0000065989 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.035 | 0.03 | 0.04 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
01/2/2019 19:36 | Love this on WS from a poster who knows what the Ego is about"Celtic - Remember your maths from decades ago - 10 times zero is still zero!!!!!!!!!" | rangenoresources | |
01/2/2019 19:14 | Rnr I think Titasiini summed up the welsh windbags perfectly Utter lowlife pond scum 👍🏻 | nas_daq | |
01/2/2019 18:27 | Aka the AGM liar | rangenoresources | |
01/2/2019 17:44 | Titasiini The troll who posted after your last post is right up there with the welsh windbag 🤣🤣 | nas_daq | |
01/2/2019 17:26 | I thought they would have consolidated long before now, CH. 10 for one sounds ok - 1.2bn at .3p sounds less ridiculous than 12bn at .03p. I would change name from Range Resources - with all its Landau connotations. Lenigas changed to CERP, and Columbus sounds to me a lot better a name. And I would have 100/1 consolidation - 120m shares at about 3p a share currently. And round the shares up and down to nearest hundred for each investor. Doesn't change fundamentals. But may be good psychology coupled with a new name, logo is ok but name needs to reflect its power and drive. Staff involvement (quality circles) and a marketing drive with shareholders - and a return of Q&A. | lewisyfawr | |
01/2/2019 16:19 | nas, I couldn't care less whether he lies to his partner or even whether he has a partner. I couldn't care less whether or not he loses all of his money. (but it would be just deserts if he does; everyone likes to see a bully get a metaphorical smack in the mouth). I couldn't even care less that he for years has been trying to convince others that Range is a good place to invest. But what I do find offensive about the slimeball is the way he actively goes about trying to discredit and stop people posting anything negative about Range, and even more so now that all of those posting negatively have been proved correct. Idiots like him and pretty much the whole of ws still call people like us trolls, even though the 0.03p price tag is staring them in the face and proves who the real trolls are. Utter low life pond scum the lot of them, and rightfully ridiculed for what they are. | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 15:59 | Titasiini Couldn’t agree more with your last post. The welsh windbag has gone out of his way, ever since his original purchase, to get negative posters removed from financial forums, which kind of highlights what a low life he is. Luckily some posters refuse to be bullied by all the threats and continuous reporting to admin and the end result is he looks like the clown 🤡 he has become, the fact that he has lied 🤥 to his partner is The cherry 🍒 on the cake If ever spineless keyboard coward was a justified label, Celticheart07 has earned that label and some 🤣🤣 | nas_daq | |
01/2/2019 15:42 | Nas, good point re failure already being priced in which might dampen any further drop in share price on the share issue. Different perspective and worth thinking about. | aseyho | |
01/2/2019 15:22 | nas, do you really expect that the blinkered ramper who has always seen and reported everything negative as a positive to suddenly wake up and realise that he has been consistently wrong for 8 years? We are talking 8 years of blinkered non stop ramping and posting excuses for the constant failings and share price demise. 8 years of calling everyone who saw the negativity a troll. He has spent 8 years trying to discredit posters on all BB's. Remember, he bought in at 13p and after losing 99% of his money he is still apparently oblivious to his situation and he gives everyone the impression that there are blue skies ahead. With his characteristics of being ever so dim and also unscrupulous in trying to stop people posting anything negative about Range, what makes you think he has the ability to be realistic now, and more to the point, who cares anyway. | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 14:31 | Doesn't really matter that this is going sub 0.02 The main thing is that wti thingy is hammering up.... no | 1manos | |
01/2/2019 14:10 | "celticheart07 "I fully expect to see some form of consolidation once the LO share allocation" I fully agree, however is make no difference to the small shareholder, you will just hold the same share value as you did before the consolidation, its neither here nor there although adds a tad credibility to the company. 12 billion shares in issue is nonsense. | aseyho | |
01/2/2019 14:04 | I can't as yet see an argument to hold. Unless you think the share issue will get voted down, but I can't see that happening and even if it did they do not have to get shareholder permission for a 1b ish share issue. I'd love some comments about why it's good to hold when almost certainly the price will fall. There are 6 months accounts issued in march, but we know these are poor based on the last two quarters so we can't get a boost there even. Love to hear the other side of the coin, albiet one that isn't just based on pure optimism, hope and reteric. | aseyho | |
01/2/2019 14:01 | "ASEYHO - ego’s won’t allow this sensible suggestion" My point was not aimed at our Welsh holders, more just a general point. If we know that share price will fall, which is almost a certainly, and the fall has to be material as they have published a share issue of 50% shares currently in the market to 13b. If we know this, which we do, and we know that must decrease the share price, then what benefit is there to hold, rather than sell now, possibly crystallise a loss and buy back in at a lower price, increasing your holding. | aseyho | |
01/2/2019 13:54 | freaking great entertainment reading his posts though. ha ha ha | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 13:53 | He is way beyond clueless. It does make you wonder how brain dead a person can be and not be 6 feet under. chop his legs off and he will be grateful that he wont have to wash his socks any more. | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 13:48 | And by the way, when has anything that you "fully expect" ever came to fruition. No really, can you recount just one single prediction that you have ever made that came to be. Seriously, out of the 1000's of posts from you, name just one that came true. I fully expect that you have never ever been correct with your idiotic expectations. | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 13:48 | Aseyho I think he is hoping the tooth fairy will magically bring a gusher to range’s portfolio in the intervening period....he thinks by talking consolidation the market cap will mysteriously increase and he won’t have to admit the gambling and 98% losses.... Has any investor ever been so clueless...... | nas_daq | |
01/2/2019 13:42 | celticheart07 "I fully expect to see some form of consolidation once the LO share allocation is approved. A 10:1 consolidation would give us just 1.2 Billion shares in issue with a value 10 x what they are now. Our holding value would remain unchanged." And what difference will a consolidation make. You have lost 99% of your money here and still are in cloud CuckooCocoland. Consolidation wont help you when you need a rise of over 43,000% to just break even. Do a 1000:1 consolidation and you are still clueless of your situation here. I suspect you are oblivious to being diluted by 30% too. Again. Just 1.2 billion shares after a 10x consolidation ha ha ha ha ha what a plonker. | titasiinitramho | |
01/2/2019 13:40 | ASEYHO - ego's won't allow this sensible suggestionToo much emotional attachment by some holders | rangenoresources | |
01/2/2019 13:35 | Even if you believe in range, I don't really understand why you wouldn't sell up and then buy back in at the dilluted price. Does holding from now until the shares are dilluted by a third offer any advantages? | aseyho | |
01/2/2019 13:17 | No mention from Malcy about RangeIn denial like the ego | rangenoresources | |
01/2/2019 12:54 | Cocoheart07 It’s great to see your losses back to 98% after 7 years of averaging down..... Congratulations 🤣🤣 | nas_daq |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions