Quantum Blockchain Techn... Dividends QBT

Dividends

No Dividend Data for QBT

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 24/4/2024 09:48 by ellipses FG being FG Dear Jonathon good morning Thank you for your email. The Intel chip was the best at the time, with an unprecedented level of functionalities. The article is unclear, about the real reason for the lower overall hashing rate. The new Bitmain chip used by the S21 miners series has definitely a better Joule per TH/s performance than BlockScale. In your email, you are missing in the BlockScale equation, a major player which has bought the entire Intel inventory. Unfortunately I cannot disclose neither the number chips, nor who they are, due to the various confidentialities signed. We are very close to all theses situations, as you would expect, including the data about the real performance of the above mining rig. I am sorry I cannot share more information. Kind regards Francesco "Unfortunately I cannot disclose neither the number chips, nor who they are, due to the various confidentialities signed." Kind of begs the question as to who those confidentialities are between. No doubt the desired implication is that they are between QBT and Intel/BlockScale. What if they are in fact between Intel and Blockscale and as such QBT, at least at that time, did not have a clue as to what was going on. Dear Intel, How many did you sell and who did you sell them to? We want to tell them they are doing it wrong and how to do it the correct way using our new technology. Best QBT Dear QBT Sorry. The information you have requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement. Best Intel Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 20/4/2024 21:20 by 1knocker Personally. I feel totally certain that QBT will 1000 bag, at least, within the next eight months. I am totally mystified that there are people who doubt this. Have they not seen the QBT videos and the valuations TS and Co have posted? I am totally unable to understand why anyone would not spend all his money buying QBT shares, and then mortgage his house and sell his car, his wife, children and dog, and use the proceeds to buy more QBT shares. I hope that helps the followers of Cap'n Sharetalk's board to enjoy their weekend. No need to keep checking QBT's progress, Campers. I'll post to let you know when you multi billionaires. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 20/4/2024 06:52 by broomrigg Great news for QBT: the miners are now earning HALF the bitcoin that they were yesterday. This puts them under massively increased financial pressure to improve their efficiency. Interesting times ahead. We could see a bloodbath over the next few months if bitcoin doesn't rally above 100,000 usd, especially for the likes of ARB who are at death's door. QBT already have NDAs signed with 2 of the largest bitcoin miners and also with US and Chinese chip makers, so they are well-placed to take advantage of the halving event. The miners need QBTs technology. KEEP ADDING. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 15/4/2024 15:29 by 1knocker With commercial roll out and revenue supposedly a maximum of 8 months away, QBT is down 32.5% YTD. Are you still sure QBT will fund your dreamed of Jag, Private Pike? Maybe it would be best just to get hold of a catalogue, cut out some pictures, overwrite the number plates 'QBT 24', and stick them on your wall. They will serve as a useful reminder that not all that glisters, let alone all that is claimed to glister, is gold. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 10/4/2024 13:45 by zydecoco Private ace ventura 11 "Spiv, Walker" 's most recent QBTpost (before his reappearance today) was post no. 7329 (on the QBT exploitation thread run by sharetalk) on 13th March 2024:"And BTC going Vertical. Perfect Storm. For The Biggest Multi Bagger in AIM History.MASSIVE DAY inbound 500% plus Up tick by 1630. Easy"QBT's share price actually fell and flatlined. He is a pump and dump merchant aka a con artist and exploiter of people.Now you know why he usually deletes all his old posts. He's got lax though, and not yet covered his tracks since 5th March, so the above is there for all to read right now. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 10/4/2024 12:52 by idriveajag That's just a small part of a growing awareness of QBT's potential. Think what could happen to the share price if they are tipped in IC, announce a deal, or there is a takeover.20p would be peanuts for a takeover, on the extra revenues QBT Methods could generate to an exclusive user or mining pool. QBT fair value 100p+. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 07/4/2024 09:24 by anddownitgoes Method B works? Why has QBT never confirmed that Method B works on current difficulty? Quite telling that a dev of CGMiner took one look at QBT and called it bogus. I would trust the opinion of one of these software dudes over an over-invested dim-witted ramper like yourself. You cannot even do basic research on QBT as there is no research to be done, as the CGMiner dev quickly found out. Scam company, should see a good rerate downwards over the next few weeks as the reality hits QBT have vapourware Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 06/4/2024 22:58 by tell sid As far as I can see, Con's expertise/experience is in contributing some patches to the Linux kernel for its desktop, and some programming for CGMiner software. I don't see any reference to him having expertise in AI or machine learning, which is what QBT are all about and in which QBT do have expertise/experience (including the three expert professors and their respective teams, and Dr Grover, on the QBT team). I thus question Con's comments (if they were referring to QBT). Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 06/4/2024 14:32 by anddownitgoes 'The fact that four large bitcoin miners and two large mining machine manufacturers have NDA's with QBT and have remained engaged, must count for something. As would the fact that three separate teams led by three different professors have apparently each produced improved mining or energy saving results using QBT's IP.' We have no proof the miners/manufacturers are engaged aside from QBT approaching them with the claims and the miners/manufacturers asking QBT to prove it. We are still in the 'prove it' stage as the CEO said only when they were able to prove their claims would discussions advance. Very little for the miners/manufacturers to lose in this scenario. As for ckpooldev's Tweets. We don't know the details of what info he was given when approached so hard to determine exactly what he knew about the Methods. He seemingly was put off by the QBT website and lack of technical documentation available and as an open source advocate this was presumably anathema to him hence his response. He was able to come to the conclusion QBTs claims were bogus due to lack of any proof whatsoever. Maybe he is wrong but as an core dev for CGMiner his judgement does count for a lot I think. Read Full Thread Reply
Posted at 06/4/2024 13:59 by tewkesbury That is interesting but not in itself conclusive regarding the efficacy of QBT's three Methods, as they may apply to GPU's, ASIC's or quantum computers. Could it just indicate a gap in CK's knowledge about QBT, or some personal prejudices against commercial companies? One might think, for example, that someone approached privately by a company for programming advice (if that is what happened) would do better due diligence before firing off a dismissive public tweet, and have the professionalism to keep their opinion private. The fact (QBT, 13/3/2024) that two large bitcoin miners and two large mining machine manufacturers have NDA's with QBT and have remained engaged, must count for something. As does the fact that three separate teams led by three different professors have apparently each produced improved mining or energy saving results using QBT's IP: Read Full Thread Reply