We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purplebricks Group Plc | LSE:PURP | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYV2MV74 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.34 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
20/7/2017 14:06 | Rightmove is a very different business and model they are doing great what they are doing why would they want to become an estate agent? it would be like Saatchi deciding to sell soap powder | rogthepodge | |
20/7/2017 13:57 | give it a rest andy ffs i believe im right , you believe youre right move the fk on ps - hows the short coming along ;-) | rackers1 | |
20/7/2017 09:30 | bookbroker, Well their MO is to market the properties of other estate agents, and take a fee for doing so, which is risk free. If they started to sell in competition to those that are using RM to sell properties, then I would doubt those estate agents using RM would continue to do so, and in fact that may spawn a competitor to RM. If I were RM I would certainly be considering how I could expand my services, but without alienating existing customers. | andy | |
20/7/2017 09:23 | Still cannot figure out why Rightmove not exploiting their position in the housing market, as regards marketing properties, not encroaching here, it seems a slam dunk! | bookbroker | |
20/7/2017 09:19 | rog, I know you haven't, maybe you should try and discuss the merits of the company? STILL waiting for rackers to show me even one "deramp" I guess I won't be holding m=y breath, but at least the good people here can see those that are making allegations cannot back them up, when called to do so, and form their won opinon of why they can't! Come on Rog, the share price is up this morning. why not discuss PURP instead of all the personal attacks, eh Rog? | andy | |
19/7/2017 23:46 | Andy nothing better to do mate? | rogthepodge | |
19/7/2017 23:38 | Rog, No, rackers has made unfounded accusations, and when called out to prove them, is "agreeing to differ"! Again he fails to answer the question, is anyone allowed to post honest opinion here? If anyone posts a slight negative, he calls them derampers! Even when commenting on the chart, which is technical analysis! Come on, if you guys cannot have a discussion without personally attacking people that don't hold the same opinion as yourself, why not filter all those whose opinion you disagree with? That way those of us who come here to discuss the company can do so without all the sniping and personal attacks. Do you really think the share price responds to our musings here, I mean, really, do you? | andy | |
19/7/2017 23:18 | rackers has agreed to differ give it a rest mate | rogthepodge | |
19/7/2017 22:58 | rackers, You can't "stand by your accusations" because you cannot substantiate them! And the reason is because your allegation is not true! I have asked you many times to show me where I have deramped this share, and you are unable to post anything of substance. If you think "the chart looks a bit toppy" is deramping, you need a reality check! I take exception to people lying, so I suggest you give it up, I will always respond to lies. This is a discussion board! | andy | |
19/7/2017 15:11 | you're like the wife andy - must have the last word i stand by my accusations - and you stay by your defence. you also missed my balanced view that i agree that this looks overvalued - but its a market disrupter so who knows where this can go . there u go you see - a balanced view. you can do it - go on. good luck on your short but lets agree to differ | rackers1 | |
19/7/2017 15:02 | prewar, Yes they did, (me included at the time), but the difference is here that the barriers to entry are not as great as they are to oppose Amazon or Google, who have become totally dominant. The power of Amazon is starting to cause concern in the retail sector now, but hard to see what can be done about it, they are taking a wrecking ball to the high street. | andy | |
19/7/2017 14:58 | rackers, you STILL haven't found a "deramp", you are confusing honest opinions for "deramping", when they are in fact totally the opposite of each other! Or are you saying only positive views are allowed to be posted here? And if not, how can anyone express a concern or doubt without being labelled a "deramper" by you? Why do you come to a discussion board if you are not prepared to listen to the opinions of others? | andy | |
19/7/2017 14:18 | Post your shorts up oh wise one.... Luddites would have being saying that about Amazon, Google etc etc for many years previously. | prewar | |
19/7/2017 14:09 | Let's face it fellas this has to be the most overrated stock in the market followed by Fevertree. | wiseacre | |
19/7/2017 13:16 | please only post when you have something to say lots of tiresome bickering going on here very tiresome | rogthepodge | |
19/7/2017 12:03 | Andy19 Jul '17 - 11:28 - 1194 of 1196 0 0 ddav, Are you still trying to find a post of mine to back up your allegation by the way? How many days is it now? It can't be that hard surely? It wasn't for me :-) | rackers1 | |
19/7/2017 11:53 | Other posts talk of a bubble......putting in bearish news links which would see the share price here go lower.....anything you post here is to the detriment of the share price now I don't care where this goes as I have no position but your insistence of innocence of dersmping is simply laughable. Andy - 13 Jul 2017 - 15:19:21 - 1122 of 1196 Purplebricks changing the experience of property transacting - PURP Rog, I don;t necessarily see a dearth pf properties on the market as a positive, because there are less transactions to go around...... I know of a couple of sellers withdrawing their properties due to a lack of interest, top of the market maybe? | rackers1 | |
19/7/2017 11:28 | ddav, Are you still trying to find a post of mine to back up your allegation by the way? How many days is it now? It can't be that hard surely? | andy | |
19/7/2017 11:27 | rackers, Yet you STILL cannot post an example! And the reason you can't is because you're just making baseless allegations in the hope that the mud you're slinging sticks. You yourself don't seem interested in discussing PURP, the business model, nor the housing market, all relevant here, just attacking other posts with unfounded personal attacks. Why is that exactly? | andy | |
19/7/2017 11:22 | Andy get real ffs each post you put up here is talking down the share price of PURP . if you cant see that is subtley deramping then you need help. I very much stand by my accusations. | rackers1 | |
19/7/2017 11:13 | DDAV, Several days ago you accused me of deramping PURP, yet to date, despite many requests to do so, you cannot provide one single example of me doing so, why is that exactly? Surely you can find just one example? If you are making the accusation, you must be basing it on something surely? Or are you just hoping to denigrate and alienate a poster in the hope of damaging their credibility in the eyes of other posters? Come on, post your proof........... | andy | |
19/7/2017 11:08 | rackers, Where is exactly is the "deramp" in that post? I have commented on the technical aspect of the chart as I see it, is there anything wrong with what I have said there? If so, please feel free to point it out. I think the stock is fully valued, at £1.25 billion, if you don;t please feel free to point out where you think I am mistaken, given the current known financials. As I see the stocks as overvalued, IF (Note the word "IF") we have reached buying exhaustion (and it happens to all stocks sooner or later!) I would expect shorters to attack this stock due to what I perceive as the high valuation against current earnings. So where exactly is the "DERAMP" there? Come on, please feel free to point out you state where I have lied in my post. --- EDITED TYPOS. | andy | |
19/7/2017 11:02 | Seconded !!!! | ddav |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions