ADVFN Logo

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

PROX Proxama

0.0235
0.00 (0.00%)
28 Mar 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Proxama LSE:PROX London Ordinary Share GB00B2PKZ581 ORD 0.01P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 0.0235 0.022 0.025 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Proxama Share Discussion Threads

Showing 7726 to 7748 of 7775 messages
Chat Pages: 311  310  309  308  307  306  305  304  303  302  301  300  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
12/2/2018
09:11
Cash situation even worse than my first prediction of £1.3m. Won't be expecting an apology from Plunge, Ochs, Boffster though.

An awful set of figures and where is the contract news? Nice to see JK got a £55k bonus for the 60%+share price drop in 2017. However, costs are coming down but still looking like a fundraise is likely later this year. I will revise my forecasts on the other thread later.

barvin
12/2/2018
08:05
Going Concern issues
Placing very likely

the stigologist
12/2/2018
08:02
Can't find the words 'our product is selling like hot cakes', or similar, or even, sales are gaining momentum...... I'm a holder, but on the basis, if you've lost 97% might as well hold and see..................
chrisgail
11/2/2018
20:01
I'm guessing Plunge has averaged down a few times over the years and probably also took part in the recent placing - he's not been happy with management and wasn't keen on Kennedy (to say the least), but he's currently willing to give the new guy a chance. However this investment must be hurting by now!
ochs
11/2/2018
19:20
Stig are you having some issues with self-esteem?
canarris
11/2/2018
16:47
ttarrageel - 02 Oct 2014 - 08:03:45 - 2095 of 6920 PROX: NFC Mobile Wallets & Marketing - PROX

Stig is posting his rubbish = time to buy


Big7ime - 30 Sep 2014 - 17:26:56 - 2083 of 6920 PROX: NFC Mobile Wallets & Marketing - PROX

Stig, don't waste your time shorting Prox, they are cheap. there are so many overpriced shares going to slide. Start with WRN


euclid5 - 24 Sep 2014 - 11:14:30 - 2059 of 6920 PROX: NFC Mobile Wallets & Marketing - PROX

but that's your job Stig to constantly deramp as you are short & make your money like that - create negative sentiment

the stigologist
11/2/2018
16:45
I was warning at 8p and warning at 0.8p...
the stigologist
11/2/2018
15:26
There was another figure that pushed it down to £1.3m but being a few days since I was deep in the numbers I cannot recall what it was, so due to board pressure and for clarity, I have amended this to £1.9m whilst keeping my initial estimate in place too.


I do actually have a small holding now not worth selling in this, looking at Plunge I see he has been in this since 2014 so likely a member of the PROX 99% loss club. Which makes his blind positivity towards this company even more bizarre.

Let's see what the final figures reveal and whether there are any decent contracts with substance, or whether it will be all hyperbole speak like last year.

barvin
11/2/2018
12:43
Interesting to see what the figures reveal, as you two look worlds apart with the numbes. Looks like lots of stuff going on in the past year so tricky to work out I suppose. Just wait for the numbers before speculating.
zitec
11/2/2018
10:51
I don't think Barvin is a holder - please correct me if I'm wrong.
ochs
11/2/2018
10:26
Thanks Boffster

A far more plausible assessment of the year end cash position. Whether or not Barvin chooses to justify his evaluation remains to be seen.

But judging from his posting record here, most remarks seem to be an attempt at fostering doubt and discord in the minds of readers. Obviously it is up to others to formulate their own opinions of him and, until he convinces me otherwise, I am certainly suspicious of his motivations.

plunge
11/2/2018
00:53
Barvin

I've crunched my own numbers regards estimated cash position @ 31 Dec.

Cash @ 30 Jun 0.4m
Placing proceeds (after expenses) 2.7m
DPD sale (after expenses) 0.7m

less Barclays payment £0.375m
Less estimated cash burn (~£1m)

= £2.425m

Even if I apply cash burn of £1.6m, which is the approximate figure of the preceding half, which would assume that there has been no increase in location data sales and all the company's cost saving initiatives have amounted to naught, its still more than £1.3m. So no idea how you've arrived at that figure.

boffster
10/2/2018
19:58
Thanks Plunge Very good piece. Can't disagree with article statements but what made me more confident now is how quickly company responded to so called speculations.In my eyes Slade can distinguish white from black , handled all very well and wants to build company on rock solid base without insinuations.Congratulations Mr Slade, some people are made to be leaders.
canarris
10/2/2018
14:01
Both Mark Slade and Ciro Montagano have liked the following article on their respective LinkedIn pages.



This implies that Location Sciences is already meeting GDPR requirements. In fact, Dan Francis explicitly stated in the 2017 half year trading presentation that the Company only collects permissioned, anonymised and non-personal data which is stored in a secure and compliant manner.

plunge
09/2/2018
16:39
Quoted by Mark Slade in the RNS dated 30 October 2017.

“I am delighted to be taking the lead as the Company launches into the location intelligence market with a range of products that have HUGE demand from marketing agencies and brands as well as other sectors......"

The question is has the business converted that HUGE demand into meaningful sales?

plunge
09/2/2018
16:08
I certainly agree with you that there should be some 'green shoots' showing by now, and I will be disappointed if there isn't. But, I will be more interested in forward looking statements, than revenue generated (or lack of) thus far
boffster
09/2/2018
15:34
In my experience the secondary payments are never usually received in these sort of deals, they are usually tough targets to meet and the purchaser will not be busting a gut to meet them that's for sure. Hopefully, those details will be in the Finals. But for the moment I have left those out, in which case I can amend the projections if needed. But I have put a note in the figures to reflect this in the figures. Thanks for your suggestion there.

We will see how close I am when the results are published and I will amend accordingly. But I will be VERY surprised if a 2018 fundraising is not required.

barvin
09/2/2018
15:25
Barvin, I do think that you are being pessimistic regards to cash position, by all accounts Slade has a tight control of costs, plus there's additional money to (hopefully) come from the sale of the digital payments, but we shall see.

Apparently Kennedy was 'glad to be out' of Proxama. I didn't miss the opportunity to express that the feeling was mutual...

boffster
09/2/2018
14:05
Crunched some figures at


I estimate cash will be £1.3m(as of Dec 2017) when we see the results this month. With that cash running out in June 2018 on estimated current cash burn.

So I'd say give it another 2-3 months and if nothing is showing, get out. As that is when another large dilutive placing could be commencing and Barclays get hold of those warrants (just looking when these should be issued, I recall mid-2018) Any contract announcements between these results and May time could be a primed for a placing and a perfect chance to get out on a spike.

barvin
08/2/2018
20:46
Good to get a clarification RNS from the Company. The Board obviously realises how toxic JK's legacy is to investors.

Hopefully the long awaited annual update will also help qwell the recent spate of negative posts.

plunge
08/2/2018
19:21
Very sloppy mistake and embarrassing. Surely they need signatures and stuff to add directors? Anyway, JK not involved which will be a relief for many. Let's hope those results hold something positive.
barvin
08/2/2018
17:35
Clarification RNS issued
tmmalik
08/2/2018
10:15
A good article from one of the location technology companies that Location Sciences works with.
plunge
Chat Pages: 311  310  309  308  307  306  305  304  303  302  301  300  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock