We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harbour Energy Plc | LSE:PMO | London | Ordinary Share | Ordinary Shares |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 22.40 | 22.50 | 22.60 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
30/12/2017 15:11 | emilia, go get a job | marvin9 | |
30/12/2017 09:23 | be better to do any equity raise with the share price much higher, no?....over £2 at least | deanroberthunt | |
29/12/2017 16:14 | I'd rather them do an equity raise and see the CBH off! | bakedbean57 | |
29/12/2017 15:11 | at one point in time TLW was valued over $14bn...given a certain backdrop...with less production and higher opex costs than PMO now.... | deanroberthunt | |
29/12/2017 15:09 | try and be positive, you could have been in Enquest..... we know the reason it's not higher, but that reason won't exist forever.... | deanroberthunt | |
29/12/2017 14:54 | Higher PoO and Foil and basically same share price level as pre wonder what excuses IR have lined up.... | bakedbean57 | |
29/12/2017 14:17 | The dodgy trades to influence the trading bands need an investigation as being used to mask some of the activity at face value. | bakedbean57 | |
29/12/2017 14:04 | Well my share price prediction of between 73 - 75p was more or less bang on, compared to ramper boasts. TLW = £2.06 Great CEO PMO = £0.76 dodgy car dealer, Village idiot CEO Hows the break out charts holding up? Pathetic | marvin9 | |
29/12/2017 13:32 | ? Shouldn't the usual rampy brigade be out by now hailing TD as the new messiah, great buying opportunity, hasn't PMO boomed in the last 6 months, there is no CB iussue, not here for a return just for the good of the company etc etc? | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 13:10 | Might we be heading for another weak update with debt not dented as 'funds not yet paid to debt' etc and more 'jam tomorrow' 'shareholder value' tosh? Maybe that was what the last half hour was about - whether the Wytch farm proceeds etc went off the debt? It might be that we need a bad news update so that TD can be removed and some fresh blood brought in. As I said before - if it wasn't for the PI's in PMO the share price would be getting smashed by the hedgies because the II's do not want to know although Deutsche & BOA may have to up their stakes as I'm sure the hedgies have already used all the stock they could lend them to short already. They'll be asking for more to short it further knowing the CEO is in their pocket | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 12:38 | In the hedgies offices they'll be some glasses being raised now, and probably a toast to Tony Durrant [that's if he's not at the hedgies office]. ....and no reason to expect any change of direction anytime soon, looks as though they have dismissed Foil and rising POO with absolute ease. TD - what did you agree with them? | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 12:35 | So, share price gone absolutely nowhere in 18 months whilst POO has risen 37% | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 12:35 | Bang on beg just tried to sell my holding negotiated trade,when does that fat basted return to work his head needs going on a spike | asa8 | |
29/12/2017 12:29 | Maybe 76p is the year end figure they've got written in. POO rising $1.75 and FOIL had no bearing whatsoever then! | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 12:25 | Lol u couldn't make it up, gone red. ;-( | withoutt | |
29/12/2017 12:01 | Must have been on the spreadsheet for the bid to not end the year above 77p? | begorrah88 | |
29/12/2017 11:20 | What date should we use Begorrah for start date? As I posted before you used that same date in one of your posts when you mirrored my analysis. I think it makes sense as the re-fi (a big drag (no pun intended Begorrah!) on the SP) was fully clarified. To go much further back makes no sense surely? Ha ha very funny, like it. | prewar |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions